logo
UN Peacekeeping Ministerial in Berlin a crucial call for reform amid global uncertainties

UN Peacekeeping Ministerial in Berlin a crucial call for reform amid global uncertainties

Daily Maverick22-05-2025

Despite significant headwinds, a recent UN Ministerial meeting reflected broad backing for reformed peacekeeping.
With the future of multilateralism hanging in the balance, the United Nations (UN) used this month's Peacekeeping Ministerial in Berlin to mobilise political support for peacekeeping while reinforcing the need for deep systemic reform.
The meeting was attended by representatives from about 130 UN member states — 60 at ministerial level. Seventy-four countries pledged financial and other support to strengthen military and police units and other peacekeeping capabilities.
Compared with past events, Berlin saw a substantial increase in participating countries and pledges made. At the 2023 Ministerial in Ghana, 91 member states participated, with 33 pledging contributions.
While this year's pledges will help make UN peacekeeping more effective, their main importance is symbolic — confirming high-level political support for peacekeeping. Member states' broad backing for UN peacekeeping in the context of rising global threats sent a strong signal that peacekeeping is still relevant.
Since 2016, the Peacekeeping Ministerial has been held roughly every two years. UN member states typically use the opportunity to commit to enhancing peacekeeping and the safety of mission personnel.
This year's gathering attracted considerable public and media attention. Analysts characterised the mood at the UN as turning from bleak to catastrophic — mainly due to insecurity caused by a lack of political consensus and immense financial challenges for multilateral crisis management.
Some of the UN's peacekeeping missions such as those in Sudan, Mali, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Lebanon have struggled to end conflicts and address the shifting demands of host nations and local populations. Support for missions from the UN Security Council (UNSC), host nations and regional actors has also been inconsistent, making operations difficult.
The most recent United States (US) plan to reduce funding, if not entirely defund, peacekeeping exacerbates the UN's pre-existing funding crunch. This challenge stems from an overreliance on US funding, although delayed disbursements and accumulated arrears also play a role.
While several conflict situations warranted deployments, notably in Sudan, the UN Security Council has not authorised a new peacekeeping mission since 2014. According to a recent report from the Center for International Peace Operations, the number of UN peacekeeping personnel worldwide had dropped to 67,715 in 2024, compared with its peak of 111,900 in 2015. The UN currently has 11 active peacekeeping missions, three fewer than in 2015.
Demonstrating political support is critical, considering the uncertainties about the UN's future role in addressing conflicts. US President Donald Trump's second term ushered in an era of ambivalent US engagement in peacekeeping. The country has been signalling that it may not fund UN peacekeeping, but 'at the same time, US officials have pushed for reform', points out Daniel Forti, Senior UN Analyst for the International Crisis Group.
Forti told ISS Today that US officials emphasise 'longstanding priorities for peacekeeping reform, such as performance, efficiency, and accountability, while their diplomats at the UN partake in discussions about mission mandate renewals and budget negotiations'.
Washington's dissonance on the issue was evident in Berlin.
'The US did not issue any pledges at the Berlin summit,' Forti said. 'This was an unusual, but perhaps not unexpected, decision.'
He said the US, which 'convened the original Leaders' Summit on Peacekeeping in 2014 and is still one of the co-chairs of the current Ministerial format, has made pledges at all previous conferences (including two convened during Trump's first term)'. But now, 'parts of the current administration appear to dismiss UN peacekeeping in its entirety'.
Besides making the political case for peacekeeping, the Berlin meeting reinforced that reform is vital. This has been an ongoing theme in discussions on addressing peacekeeping's political, operational and financial challenges. The 2024 Pact for the Future reinforced the need for reform, and member states have requested a review of all forms of UN peace operations.
A recent Global Alliance for Peace Operations report underlines that member states and partners should seize this moment to reform peacekeeping without losing the essential features that ensured its past effectiveness.
Germany's Foreign Affairs Minister Johann Wadephul affirmed this at the Ministerial, saying peacekeeping should 'adapt to a changing international environment'. He said several changes should be considered, including realistic and flexible mandates, a modular approach, clear transition and exit strategies, local ownership and the implications of diminishing resources.
As UN Secretary-General António Guterres underlined, all these suggestions must be buttressed by political support as 'Peace operations cannot succeed (without) a political solution.' This includes investments in securing peace processes and agreements, and using existing conflict prevention and mediation mechanisms.
The outcomes of the Ministerial will feed into the review of UN peace operations planned for 2025 and 2026. However, the main challenge is converting broad political support for peacekeeping into tangible diplomatic actions and policies. As International Crisis Group head Comfort Ero recently wrote, it is unclear whether member states have 'figured out how the UN can adapt its peacekeeping and peacemaking efforts to address today's unsettled political and security environment'.
These challenges must be taken up in the Security Council, where firm commitments from member states to implement reform are needed. Expanding the debate to other platforms, such as the UN General Assembly, would coalesce support, especially around political solutions as part of peacekeeping. Ultimately, the reform of peace operations requires a broad coalition involving UN member states, regional actors and civil society. DM

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We must all reclaim our information space
We must all reclaim our information space

Mail & Guardian

timean hour ago

  • Mail & Guardian

We must all reclaim our information space

Elon Musk. (File photo) More South Africans arrived in the United States this week. But it is an old resident who made the most headlines. Elon has left the Doge office. He did so in bizarre pomp and ceremony, with Donald Trump looking to save both their faces with a predictably awkward golden key award ceremony. Musk and his Javier Milei-inspired chainsaw are no longer a factor in Washington. The same cannot be said for public life. Musk owns X/Twitter, one of the biggest social media platforms on the planet. He's had a huge following on it long before he took control in 2022. He relishes using that influence to peddle all manner of absurdity and falsity. Musk has been the figurehead of the open conspiracy of tech oligarchs that reign in the White House. They have made no secret of their willingness to do whatever is asked of them, knowing that the reciprocation will be ample (or indeed, the punitive repercussions for a failure to toe the line would be grave.) Meta owner Mark Zuckerberg's sycophantic about-turn on moderation was a perfect example of that reality playing out in real time. In that now infamous announcement video, he waxed lyrical about how he created Facebook to be a democratic marketplace of free ideas. That is a lie, of course. He created Facebook so college boys could rate women on the internet. Regardless, with other media and search engine owners included in the cohort, the fact remains that a few powerful men control the dominant means of creating and sharing information in 2025. Those white South Africans arriving as refugees in the US should be all the reminder we need of how pernicious a narrative can be; and that real-world consequences need not be grounded in truth or rational reasoning. It bears repeating: there is no white genocide in South Africa. It is imperative that we, as individual news consumers and practitioners, reclaim our information space. For as much as the oligarchs strut with the swagger of impunity, that is far from the case. While this would be an obvious segue into launching into a pitch to get you to subscribe, the struggle we face goes beyond promoting ideas of established media. There's a war going on for our attention. The mistake would be in thinking we have to take sides. We have to respect each other and the process of sharing ideas civilly, with a respect for the truth. If our engagement begins and ends with a retweet, our society will begin to look even bleaker. The algorithm only wins if you surrender to it.

EXPLAINER-What is the International Criminal Court?
EXPLAINER-What is the International Criminal Court?

Daily Maverick

timean hour ago

  • Daily Maverick

EXPLAINER-What is the International Criminal Court?

THE HAGUE, June 5 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump's administration on Thursday imposed sanctions on four judges at the International Criminal Court, an unprecedented retaliation over the tribunal's work on issuing an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Here are some facts about the court: WHEN WAS THE ICC SET UP AND WHY? The court was established in 2002 to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and the crime of aggression when member states are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. It can prosecute crimes committed by nationals of member states or on the territory of member states by other actors. It has 125 member states. The court's budget for 2025 is about 195 million euros ($202 million). WHAT IS THE ICC INVESTIGATING? The ICC is conducting investigations from the Palestinian territories to Ukraine and African states such as Uganda, Democratic Republic of Congo and Kenya, to Venezuela in Latin America and Myanmar and the Philippines in Asia. It says there have been 32 cases before the court, with some having more than one suspect. ICC judges have issued at least 60 arrest warrants. HOW MANY PEOPLE HAS THE COURT CONVICTED? ICC judges have issued 11 convictions and four acquittals. Twenty-one people have been held in the ICC detention centre in The Hague and have appeared before the court, and 31 people remain at large. Charges have been dropped against seven people due to their deaths. Of the 11 convictions, only six have been for the court's core crimes of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The others were for crimes such as witness tampering. The six convicted men were all African militia leaders from Democratic Republic of Congo, Mali and Uganda. Terms ranged from nine to 30 years in prison. The maximum possible term is life imprisonment. WHO IS ON THE COURT'S ARREST WARRANT LIST? Former Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte was arrested on March 11 on a warrant from the ICC. Prosecutors accuse him of forming and arming death squads held responsible for the killing of thousands of perceived drug users and dealers during his rule. Duterte has said he takes full responsibility for the 'war on drugs' as he braces for the legal battle. Other notable ICC suspects are Netanyahu, who is accused of being criminally responsible for acts including murder, persecution and using starvation as a weapon of war in the Gaza conflict, and Russian President Vladimir Putin, accused of the war crime of illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Both Israel and Russia have repeatedly denied that their forces have committed atrocities in Gaza and Ukraine respectively and have argued the ICC has no jurisdiction over them. When it issued the warrant for Netanyahu, the ICC also issued a warrant for the arrest of Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif, whose death was confirmed after the warrant was issued. The ICC prosecutor has also requested arrest warrants for senior Afghan and Myanmar leaders, but those have not been officially approved by judges. WHICH COUNTRIES ARE NOT MEMBERS OF THE ICC? Although the court is supported by many United Nations members and the European Union, other countries such as the United States, China and Russia are not members, arguing the ICC could be used for politically motivated prosecutions. Myanmar is not a member of the court, but in 2018 and 2019 judges ruled the court had jurisdiction over alleged cross-border crimes that partially took place in neighbouring ICC member Bangladesh, such as deportation and persecution, and said prosecutors could open a formal investigation. Israel is not a member and does not recognise its jurisdiction, but the Palestinian territories were admitted as an ICC member state in 2015. This, together with a ruling by judges, means the court can look at potential war crimes carried out by Hamas fighters in Israel and by Israelis in the Gaza Strip. The Philippines is not currently a member of the ICC but was between 2011 and 2019, when the unilateral withdrawal by Duterte became final. Under the court's founding 1998 Rome Statute, even if a state withdraws as a member it retains jurisdiction over crimes within its jurisdiction committed during the membership period. In February 2025, Trump authorised economic and travel sanctions targeting people who work on International Criminal Court investigations of U.S. citizens or U.S. allies such as Israel. Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan has so far been the only ICC staff member targeted by sanctions, which are set to go into force on April 7.

Donald Trump vs Elon Musk
Donald Trump vs Elon Musk

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Donald Trump vs Elon Musk

President Donald Trump said on June 5, 2025, that he asked "crazy" Elon Musk to leave his administration and threatened to take away the tech tycoon's government contracts, as a growing row over the US president's budget bill triggered a bitter public divorce with his top donor. Image: AFP / IOL Graphics By Danny KEMP Donald Trump and Elon Musk's unlikely political marriage exploded in a fiery public divorce Thursday, with the US president threatening to strip the billionaire of his huge government contracts in revenge. Trump said in a televised Oval Office diatribe that he was "very disappointed" after his former aide and top donor criticised his "big, beautiful" spending bill before Congress. The pair then hurled insults at each other on social media -- with Musk even posting, without proof, that Trump was referenced in government documents on disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The row could have major political and economic fallout, as shares in Musk's Tesla car company plunged and the South African-born tech tycoon vowed that he would end a critical US spaceship program. Speculation had long swirled that a relationship between the world's richest person and its most powerful could not last long -- but the speed of the meltdown took Washington by surprise. "I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office as visiting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz looked on silently. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ "Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore." A hurt-sounding Trump, 78, noted in a 10-minute diatribe that it had been only a week since he hosted a grand farewell for Musk as he left the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Trump later called Musk "crazy" and insisted he had asked the tycoon to leave because he was "wearing thin." 'Ingratitude' Musk hit back in real time on his X social media platform, saying the Republican would not have won the 2024 election without him and slamming Trump for "ingratitude." As the spat got increasingly vindictive, Musk also posted that Trump "is in the Epstein files," referring to US government documents on Epstein, whose 2019 jail cell suicide, while awaiting trial, sparked a major conspiracy theory. "Have a nice day, DJT!" added Musk. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told AFP that Musk's Epstein tweet "is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted." Musk, who was Trump's biggest campaign donor to the tune of $300 million, separately claimed the Republican would not have won the 2024 election without his support and accused him of "such ingratitude." He replied "yes" to a post suggesting Trump should be impeached, and blasted Trump's global tariffs for risking a recession. Trump finally suggested hitting the "crazy" entrepreneur where it hurts, threatening Musk's multibillion-dollar government contracts including for launching rockets and for the use of the Starlink satellite service. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump said on Truth Social. Again Musk fired back, with the SpaceX chief saying he would begin "decommissioning" his company's Dragon spacecraft -- vital for ferrying NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station -- in response. In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 He later appeared to walk that back, replying to a user on Twitter: "OK, we won't decommission Dragon," though his tone was unclear. 'Abomination' When the crossfire finally relented after several astonishing hours, Tesla had seen more than $100 billion wiped off the company's value. Trump and Musk's whirlwind relationship had initially blossomed, with the president backing DOGE's cost-cutting rampage through the US government and the tycoon sleeping over at the White House and traveling on Air Force One. But the 53-year-old ultimately lasted just four months on the job, becoming increasingly disillusioned with the slow pace of change and clashing with some of Trump's cabinet members. The two men had however kept tensions over Trump's tax and spending mega-bill relatively civil -- until Musk described the plan, the centerpiece of Trump's domestic policy agenda for his second term, as an "abomination" because he says it will increase the US deficit. Washington will now intently watch the fallout from the row. Musk posted a poll on whether he should form a new political party -- a seismic threat from a man who has signaled he is ready to use his wealth to unseat Republican lawmakers who disagree with him. Trump ally Steve Bannon -- a vocal opponent of Musk -- meanwhile called for the tycoon to be deported, the New York Times reported. AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store