Alameda County jurors' compensation cut back to $15 a day
(KRON) — A pilot program providing Alameda County Superior Court jurors with $100 per day in compensation is being paused indefinitely. Any juror selected to serve for a trial after June 4 will only receive $15 daily, court officials said.
The goal for paying jurors $100, instead of a meager $15, was to diversify jury pools. Alameda County Superior Court Judge Thomas Nixon said, 'Jurors are an essential part of our judicial system, and we need to do all we can to increase participation.'
During jury selection, prospective jurors can request to be dismissed by a judge for a wide range of reasons. Financial hardships are common reasons for dismissal requests.
Man who allegedly gunned down 2 people at Vallejo encampment captured: VPD
The Jury Pilot Program was created as part of AB1981, which was signed by Newsom in 2022. In a notice sent this week to seven superior courts participating in the $100 per day pilot program, the Judicial Council of California requested that each court suspend the program because Gov. Gavin Newsom's revised budget cut funding.
The National Center for State Courts, which was tracking juror demographics and diversity in all seven counties, was scheduled to release a report at the conclusion of the pilot program. The status of that report is currently unknown given the program is ending less than halfway through its designed length of time, court officials said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Vancouver man arrested after driving into Pacific Coliseum entrance during Cirque du Soleil show, police say
A 30-year-old man has been arrested after driving a vehicle into the Pacific Coliseum on Thursday night, say Vancouver police. The Vancouver Police Department (VPD) said on X, formerly Twitter, that the suspect drove a vehicle into the front entrance of the arena, located at East Vancouver's Hastings Park, during a Cirque du Soleil performance. Arena security detained the man and police officers took him into custody. Police said that while it is still early in the investigation, the incident "does not appear to be an act of terrorism." The suspect, a Vancouver resident, was apprehended under the Mental Health Act, police said. At a Thursday night press conference outside the arena, VPD Sgt. Steve Addison said police believe the driver was "experiencing some sort of mental health psychosis." Police said there are no reported injuries. B.C. Emergency Health Services said it received a call at 8:02 p.m. regarding a single-vehicle collision at Pacific Coliseum. Three units responded to the scene and paramedics transported one patient. "There were lots of people here, thousands of people inside and outside of the venue," Addison said Thursday night. "We're relieved. It's a miracle that nobody was killed."

Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom is trying to rescue Hollywood. It may be too late.
LOS ANGELES — Gavin Newsom wants to claim the role of Hollywood's superhero. But California's iconic industry is so battered that even its governor may not be able to save it. Newsom has made doubling the state's film tax credit his No. 1 budget priority as he tries to lure back show business production that has fled in droves to other states and countries, even while he proposes slashing other pet causes such as expanded health care benefits. It's a clear bid to rewrite the 'California crack-up' script that has transfixed conservative media — and President Donald Trump — and play the leading man role that woos production back to its homeland. But Newsom's effort also calls attention to the yawning gulf between what the industry wants and what Sacramento can deliver. Already, there are fears that Newsom's best efforts could amount to too little, too late. Newsom has doggedly pursued support from the Los Angeles-based power players and their lavish political donations as he has climbed the ranks of California politics. But now, as his term's expiration date approaches and he eyes a potential 2028 White House bid, the industry exodus has opened a window for Trump to claim the title of industry savior for himself. The president, Newsom's frequent archnemesis, has disparaged the governor's stewardship of his state's signature industry as 'grossly incompetent.' California's film tax credit, which has languished for years behind more lucrative offers from states like Georgia or overseas options like the U.K., could be a place for Newsom to cement his bonafides as Hollywood's champion. The most active players lobbying for its expansion — a coalition of labor unions, studios and industry execs — feel 'an enormous sense of gratitude' toward Newsom, said Scott Budnick, the film producer behind 'The Hangover' and other blockbusters. But there's no guarantee that the heftier tax credit will make it through this fraught budget season unscathed. And even staunch supporters like Budnick acknowledge the effort, if successful, is only an initial step to a Hollywood course correction. 'My hope is we blow through this money, and we're gonna have to go back to the governor for even more next year, and we can show that it's an economic engine for the state as well,' he said. Complicating Newsom's Hollywood courtship is the pronounced funk that has pervaded the industry, which has been pummeled by a series of crises. The pandemic, the dual writers' and actors' strikes in 2023 and the historic Los Angeles wildfires in January have convulsed a town already rocked by changing business models. The industry-wide malaise has led some insiders to greet Newsom's tax credit push with a weary shrug or a sense this is a fruitless endeavor. 'The time for this discussion was 10, 15, 20 years ago,' said Richard Rushfield, editorial director and columnist with The Ankler, an industry newsletter. And even if he does notch a win with a doubled tax credit, it far from guarantees loyalty from a Hollywood political class that tends to prioritize other causes, such as LGBTQ+ issues or abortion rights, when backing a candidate. 'The overwhelming majority of Hollywood dollars that go into politics is not based on industry needs or priorities, but rather based on personal policy beliefs [and] values – often to the dismay of industry lobbyists,' said Donna Bojarsky, a longtime Democratic consultant and Hollywood fundraiser. In other words, Newsom's controversial podcast interview with conservative influencer Charlie Kirk may end up being more influential to Hollywood donor checkbooks than any budgetary mountains he moves for the film tax credit. 'Depression-era level' unemployment As a Northern Californian, Newsom was never one of Hollywood's own. But over the course of his governorship, he has diligently built bonds with industry heavy-hitters such as Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos, whom he frequently texts. Newsom met privately on Thursday with Jon Voight, the actor whom Trump named a 'special ambassador' to Hollywood. 'He has real relationships with Hollywood and that makes a substantial difference, as opposed to the way [previous governor] Jerry Brown was a bit more of an outsider,' said Jay Sures, vice chair of United Talent Agency who was appointed by Newsom to the University of California Board of Regents. 'He can pick up the phone and call just about any CEO and knows them on a first-name basis.' Among the Hollywood donor crowd, Newsom has mostly been regarded as a strong standout among national Democrats considered potential 2028 contenders — though many in the industry, burned by Trump's win in 2024, say they're still shopping around for the next fresh face. Newsom's vocal advocacy on national issues like abortion rights has won plaudits; his comments questioning the fairness of transgender athletes in girls' sports have been less warmly received. 'Gavin has very solid support, but of course, he has his detractors too. And his more recent actions have mystified some,' Bojarsky said. 'But generally people feel positively that he's a sophisticated, charismatic politician that is willing to be out there and take risks.' Lately, the wobbly state of the industry has become a major tentpole in Newsom's Hollywood outreach. FilmLA, which tracks the number of days movies, television shows and reality programs are shot in Los Angeles city and county, found that 2024 was the second-least productive year it had ever observed since its formation 30 years ago — only 2020, the height of the coronavirus pandemic, was worse. 'The levels of unemployment in this industry in Los Angeles are at Depression-era levels,' said Assemblymember Rick Chavez Zbur, one of the primary lawmakers championing the new film tax credit in the Legislature. 'In some of the unions, they have had unemployment levels of 40 and 50 percent.' Tax incentives are seen by the industry as a way to stop the bleeding — even if some economists say such credits can be revenue-losers for states. Proponents argue that in-state production has wide-reaching economic ripple effects that bolster not just the camera grips and makeup artists working on set, but dry cleaners, caterers and other small businesses that benefit from a local film shoot. The projects approved for the tax credit in California from 2020 to mid-2023 generated $7.3 billion in in-state economic activity, according to the California Film Commission. In recent weeks, awareness of the crisis crossed into the broader zeitgeist. Even a recent episode of HBO's acclaimed comedy 'Hacks' included a joke about the film tax credit, complete with a Newsom name drop. A Newsom aide said he was amused by the shoutout and happy the issue had 'broken through' — glossing over the fact that the industry's clear frustration with state government was manifest as a punchline on a hit television show. But it was a surprise social media missive from Trump that catapulted the issue to international attention, as the president touted his favorite policy tool, tariffs, as the solution to stanch the overseas production bleeding. Caught off guard by Trump's post, Newsom challenged the president on X to back a $7.5 billion federal tax incentive. Newsom, using the shorthand of finance and Silicon Valley, came up with the figure as a way to '10x' the $750 million tax break he was championing in California, according to the aide, who was granted anonymity to describe internal discussions. After proposing that enormous sum, however, Newsom has not been deeply involved in the Washington efforts that have stirred to life now that Trump has shown at least some awareness of runaway production. The governor has had some conversations with figures in Washington who are working on a federal proposal, such as Rep. Laura Friedman, a Democrat from Los Angeles and a former film producer. But, Friedman said, the push to craft a new federal incentive and for California to expand its existing tax credits are 'completely separate efforts.' 'His job is to get a budget allocation through the California Legislature … and it's not a slam dunk that they're going to get the money that he asked for,' said Friedman, who served eight years in the statehouse. 'If my experience in the Legislature is any indication, he's going to have a lot of work to do to make that happen. So he should be focusing there.' 'Help is on the way' Sacramento has always been a source of frustration for Hollywood, dating far earlier than Newsom's tenure. There was a sense that California leaders did little to boost their crown-jewel industry, giving other states and countries a prime opportunity to poach the business by offering lavish incentives. 'We, for so many years, have sat on our laurels, assumed dominance in this area because of the history of Hollywood and expected that we didn't need to do very much to retain this iconic industry,' said state Sen. Ben Allen, a Los Angeles Democrat who is one of the lead legislators involved in negotiations. 'Unfortunately, dollars speak louder than tradition.' One hurdle for advocates of a film tax credit is the perception that the program is a subsidy for glitzy Los Angeles studio execs and celebrities, a view that stoked regional rivalries with representatives from other parts of the state. This time, Newsom put a marker down in October — days before he knew the outcome of the presidential election and months before the typical budget negotiating season — about his intention to more than double the tax incentive, which currently sits at $330 million. 'We made a decision … to put a stake in the ground and go,' said DeeDee Myers, Newsom's chief economic adviser. 'That will give us time to make the case, to educate people, and it's also a signal to the industry: 'Hey, we've got your back, and help is on the way.'' The goal of $750 million has remained unchanged, even as the state's budget outlook darkened dramatically in recent months, setting off fierce battles for funding among competing Democratic interest groups. Newsom and his legislative partners have tried to avoid the usual political tripwires. To entice lawmakers far from Hollywood's center, they proposed a bonus for productions filmed outside of the 30-mile zone encircling Los Angeles. They made union entertainment workers, not studio bosses or celebrities, the face of their campaign. By portraying the incentive as a middle-class jobs program, they've largely neutralized objections from elsewhere in organized labor, which would otherwise target the tax credit as a corporate giveaway. 'This was the story of hundreds of union workers who have had to mortgage homes and foreclose on their homes and move to different states because of just how slow the business is,' said Budnick, an advocate for getting formerly incarcerated people into the pipeline for industry jobs. Hollywood hopes collide with Sacramento reality As budget negotiations careen toward a June 15 spending plan deadline, Newsom is trying to assure the anxious industry he'll be able to deliver. His office reiterated on Thursday he is 'fully committed' to securing a revamped $750 millon credit. Even if Newsom is able to claim victory in the final gauntlet of budget negotiations, it's far from assured that the effort will break through Hollywood's current malaise. A panel of top studio executives at the ritzy Milken Global Issues conference last month offered a stark illustration of the gap between Hollywood's expectations and the realities in Sacramento. Casey Bloys, who runs HBO, lamented how California's tax credits — which are capped and distributed via lottery — compared to Georgia's uncapped incentive program. 'Because it's capped, you can't plan,' Bloys said. 'You have to get into a lottery, and you're not sure if your show is going to get the tax break or not.' But an uncapped tax credit was never in the cards in California, especially in this fraught budget year. Newsom is betting that he can make at least some headway in pulling Hollywood out of its doldrums. But that success depends on the studios actually being open to returning to California — or if the enticements from outside its borders prove too tempting to pass up. 'My sense is that people throughout the industry — from the folks building sets to studio execs — recognize that Newsom is doing more than any governor in memory to try and save California's entertainment industry,' said Brian Brokaw, a Newsom adviser who sits on the California Film Commission. 'Ultimately what this will come down to is whether those who actually make the decisions about where to shoot share the governor's commitment to California.' The exodus of production from the state may be so long gone that nothing Newsom does now will substantially reverse the tide. But perhaps the governor's film tax flex could at least quell some uncomfortable questions about Hollywood flight under his watch — particularly if he wants to tout his record in a 2028 White House run. 'If he's going to run for president, this is gonna come up,' said Rushfield, the longtime industry watcher. 'And he's got to be able to say that he tried.'


Politico
9 hours ago
- Politico
Gavin Newsom is trying to rescue Hollywood. It may be too late.
LOS ANGELES — Gavin Newsom wants to claim the role of Hollywood's superhero. But California's iconic industry is so battered that even its governor may not be able to save it. Newsom has made doubling the state's film tax credit his No. 1 budget priority as he tries to lure back show business production that has fled in droves to other states and countries, even while he proposes slashing other pet causes such as expanded health care benefits. It's a clear bid to rewrite the 'California crack-up' script that has transfixed conservative media — and President Donald Trump — and play the leading man role that woos production back to its homeland. But Newsom's effort also calls attention to the yawning gulf between what the industry wants and what Sacramento can deliver. Already, there are fears that Newsom's best efforts could amount to too little, too late. Newsom has doggedly pursued support from the Los Angeles-based power players and their lavish political donations as he has climbed the ranks of California politics. But now, as his term's expiration date approaches and he eyes a potential 2028 White House bid, the industry exodus has opened a window for Trump to claim the title of industry savior for himself. The president, Newsom's frequent archnemesis, has disparaged the governor's stewardship of his state's signature industry as 'grossly incompetent.' California's film tax credit, which has languished for years behind more lucrative offers from states like Georgia or overseas options like the U.K., could be a place for Newsom to cement his bonafides as Hollywood's champion. The most active players lobbying for its expansion — a coalition of labor unions, studios and industry execs — feel 'an enormous sense of gratitude' toward Newsom, said Scott Budnick, the film producer behind 'The Hangover' and other blockbusters. But there's no guarantee that the heftier tax credit will make it through this fraught budget season unscathed. And even staunch supporters like Budnick acknowledge the effort, if successful, is only an initial step to a Hollywood course correction. 'My hope is we blow through this money, and we're gonna have to go back to the governor for even more next year, and we can show that it's an economic engine for the state as well,' he said. Complicating Newsom's Hollywood courtship is the pronounced funk that has pervaded the industry, which has been pummeled by a series of crises. The pandemic, the dual writers' and actors' strikes in 2023 and the historic Los Angeles wildfires in January have convulsed a town already rocked by changing business models. The industry-wide malaise has led some insiders to greet Newsom's tax credit push with a weary shrug or a sense this is a fruitless endeavor. 'The time for this discussion was 10, 15, 20 years ago,' said Richard Rushfield, editorial director and columnist with The Ankler, an industry newsletter. And even if he does notch a win with a doubled tax credit, it far from guarantees loyalty from a Hollywood political class that tends to prioritize other causes, such as LGBTQ+ issues or abortion rights, when backing a candidate. 'The overwhelming majority of Hollywood dollars that go into politics is not based on industry needs or priorities, but rather based on personal policy beliefs [and] values – often to the dismay of industry lobbyists,' said Donna Bojarsky, a longtime Democratic consultant and Hollywood fundraiser. In other words, Newsom's controversial podcast interview with conservative influencer Charlie Kirk may end up being more influential to Hollywood donor checkbooks than any budgetary mountains he moves for the film tax credit. 'Depression-era level' unemployment As a Northern Californian, Newsom was never one of Hollywood's own. But over the course of his governorship, he has diligently built bonds with industry heavy-hitters such as Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos, whom he frequently texts. Newsom met privately on Thursday with Jon Voight, the actor whom Trump named a 'special ambassador' to Hollywood. 'He has real relationships with Hollywood and that makes a substantial difference, as opposed to the way [previous governor] Jerry Brown was a bit more of an outsider,' said Jay Sures, vice chair of United Talent Agency who was appointed by Newsom to the University of California Board of Regents. 'He can pick up the phone and call just about any CEO and knows them on a first-name basis.' Among the Hollywood donor crowd, Newsom has mostly been regarded as a strong standout among national Democrats considered potential 2028 contenders — though many in the industry, burned by Trump's win in 2024, say they're still shopping around for the next fresh face. Newsom's vocal advocacy on national issues like abortion rights has won plaudits; his comments questioning the fairness of transgender athletes in girls' sports have been less warmly received. 'Gavin has very solid support, but of course, he has his detractors too. And his more recent actions have mystified some,' Bojarsky said. 'But generally people feel positively that he's a sophisticated, charismatic politician that is willing to be out there and take risks.' Lately, the wobbly state of the industry has become a major tentpole in Newsom's Hollywood outreach. FilmLA, which tracks the number of days movies, television shows and reality programs are shot in Los Angeles city and county, found that 2024 was the second-least productive year it had ever observed since its formation 30 years ago — only 2020, the height of the coronavirus pandemic, was worse. 'The levels of unemployment in this industry in Los Angeles are at Depression-era levels,' said Assemblymember Rick Chavez Zbur, one of the primary lawmakers championing the new film tax credit in the Legislature. 'In some of the unions, they have had unemployment levels of 40 and 50 percent.' Tax incentives are seen by the industry as a way to stop the bleeding — even if some economists say such credits can be revenue-losers for states. Proponents argue that in-state production has wide-reaching economic ripple effects that bolster not just the camera grips and makeup artists working on set, but dry cleaners, caterers and other small businesses that benefit from a local film shoot. The projects approved for the tax credit in California from 2020 to mid-2023 generated $7.3 billion in in-state economic activity, according to the California Film Commission. In recent weeks, awareness of the crisis crossed into the broader zeitgeist. Even a recent episode of HBO's acclaimed comedy 'Hacks' included a joke about the film tax credit, complete with a Newsom name drop. A Newsom aide said he was amused by the shoutout and happy the issue had 'broken through' — glossing over the fact that the industry's clear frustration with state government was manifest as a punchline on a hit television show. But it was a surprise social media missive from Trump that catapulted the issue to international attention, as the president touted his favorite policy tool, tariffs, as the solution to stanch the overseas production bleeding. Caught off guard by Trump's post, Newsom challenged the president on X to back a $7.5 billion federal tax incentive. Newsom, using the shorthand of finance and Silicon Valley, came up with the figure as a way to '10x' the $750 million tax break he was championing in California, according to the aide, who was granted anonymity to describe internal discussions. After proposing that enormous sum, however, Newsom has not been deeply involved in the Washington efforts that have stirred to life now that Trump has shown at least some awareness of runaway production. The governor has had some conversations with figures in Washington who are working on a federal proposal, such as Rep. Laura Friedman, a Democrat from Los Angeles and a former film producer. But, Friedman said, the push to craft a new federal incentive and for California to expand its existing tax credits are 'completely separate efforts.' 'His job is to get a budget allocation through the California Legislature … and it's not a slam dunk that they're going to get the money that he asked for,' said Friedman, who served eight years in the statehouse. 'If my experience in the Legislature is any indication, he's going to have a lot of work to do to make that happen. So he should be focusing there.' 'Help is on the way' Sacramento has always been a source of frustration for Hollywood, dating far earlier than Newsom's tenure. There was a sense that California leaders did little to boost their crown-jewel industry, giving other states and countries a prime opportunity to poach the business by offering lavish incentives. 'We, for so many years, have sat on our laurels, assumed dominance in this area because of the history of Hollywood and expected that we didn't need to do very much to retain this iconic industry,' said state Sen. Ben Allen, a Los Angeles Democrat who is one of the lead legislators involved in negotiations. 'Unfortunately, dollars speak louder than tradition.' One hurdle for advocates of a film tax credit is the perception that the program is a subsidy for glitzy Los Angeles studio execs and celebrities, a view that stoked regional rivalries with representatives from other parts of the state. This time, Newsom put a marker down in October — days before he knew the outcome of the presidential election and months before the typical budget negotiating season — about his intention to more than double the tax incentive, which currently sits at $330 million. 'We made a decision … to put a stake in the ground and go,' said DeeDee Myers, Newsom's chief economic adviser. 'That will give us time to make the case, to educate people, and it's also a signal to the industry: 'Hey, we've got your back, and help is on the way.'' The goal of $750 million has remained unchanged, even as the state's budget outlook darkened dramatically in recent months, setting off fierce battles for funding among competing Democratic interest groups. Newsom and his legislative partners have tried to avoid the usual political tripwires. To entice lawmakers far from Hollywood's center, they proposed a bonus for productions filmed outside of the 30-mile zone encircling Los Angeles. They made union entertainment workers, not studio bosses or celebrities, the face of their campaign. By portraying the incentive as a middle-class jobs program, they've largely neutralized objections from elsewhere in organized labor, which would otherwise target the tax credit as a corporate giveaway. 'This was the story of hundreds of union workers who have had to mortgage homes and foreclose on their homes and move to different states because of just how slow the business is,' said Budnick, an advocate for getting formerly incarcerated people into the pipeline for industry jobs. Hollywood hopes collide with Sacramento reality As budget negotiations careen toward a June 15 spending plan deadline, Newsom is trying to assure the anxious industry he'll be able to deliver. His office reiterated on Thursday he is 'fully committed' to securing a revamped $750 millon credit. Even if Newsom is able to claim victory in the final gauntlet of budget negotiations, it's far from assured that the effort will break through Hollywood's current malaise. A panel of top studio executives at the ritzy Milken Global Issues conference last month offered a stark illustration of the gap between Hollywood's expectations and the realities in Sacramento. Casey Bloys, who runs HBO, lamented how California's tax credits — which are capped and distributed via lottery — compared to Georgia's uncapped incentive program. 'Because it's capped, you can't plan,' Bloys said. 'You have to get into a lottery, and you're not sure if your show is going to get the tax break or not.' But an uncapped tax credit was never in the cards in California, especially in this fraught budget year. Newsom is betting that he can make at least some headway in pulling Hollywood out of its doldrums. But that success depends on the studios actually being open to returning to California — or if the enticements from outside its borders prove too tempting to pass up. 'My sense is that people throughout the industry — from the folks building sets to studio execs — recognize that Newsom is doing more than any governor in memory to try and save California's entertainment industry,' said Brian Brokaw, a Newsom adviser who sits on the California Film Commission. 'Ultimately what this will come down to is whether those who actually make the decisions about where to shoot share the governor's commitment to California.' The exodus of production from the state may be so long gone that nothing Newsom does now will substantially reverse the tide. But perhaps the governor's film tax flex could at least quell some uncomfortable questions about Hollywood flight under his watch — particularly if he wants to tout his record in a 2028 White House run. 'If he's going to run for president, this is gonna come up,' said Rushfield, the longtime industry watcher. 'And he's got to be able to say that he tried.'