logo
Auckland At 15 - Auckland Is United On What Matters Yet Divided On Delivery

Auckland At 15 - Auckland Is United On What Matters Yet Divided On Delivery

Scoop07-05-2025

A landmark digital survey released today reveals that while Aucklanders are strongly united on the city's big priorities — such as long-term infrastructure planning, environmental protection, and becoming a global innovation hub — many remain unconvinced the Super City model has delivered.
The findings come as diverse Auckland's leaders gather for Auckland at 15, an event that examines the region's progress since the creation of the Super City in 2010 and calls for a new agenda to ensure the region is thriving, sustainable and globally competitive by 2040.
The survey, Auckland@15: Shaping the next fifteen years, shows both shared vision and clear tension — particularly on transport and cultural identity — where support for progress exists alongside significant frustration with how change is being delivered. Most Aucklanders (76%) believe the city lacks a cohesive public transport vision – and while just 28% support sticking with private transport and putting up with congestion, that view reflects a deeply held divide.
The University of Auckland's Complex Conversations Lab conducted the research as Auckland approaches 15 years as an amalgamated council. The innovative Pol.is platform was used showing Aucklanders overwhelmingly support a long-term infrastructure plan (94%), and there is near-universal agreement on protecting the natural environment (up to 95%).
However, only 53% of those surveyed believe amalgamation of the eight former councils has succeeded in unifying Auckland's voice, and just 18% feel they have influence over Auckland Council decisions. Cultural identity remains a sharp point of division with 64% of Aucklanders agreeing the region has a recognisable multicultural identity, however 29% are skeptical about further cultural investment.
Hosted by Auckland University of Technology, the Committee for Auckland, Deloitte, and the Helen Clark Foundation, the Auckland at 15 event will feature four expert panels focused on legacy and political progress, global city success, Auckland's future-readiness, and defining the next 15 years.
Minister for Auckland, Simeon Brown, and the Mayor of Auckland, Wayne Brown, will be joined by former prime ministers, Rt Hon Sir John Key and Rt Hon Helen Clark, alongside business and emerging young leaders, iwi, academics, and international experts.
Committee for Auckland Director Mark Thomas said if Auckland does not reset its direction with a new agenda that focuses on bolder action, smarter investment, and much stronger global competitiveness it will continue to fall behind.
"We must learn more effectively from the best globally and have the courage to back bold, transformative ideas locally or risk continuing to lose the economic opportunity, talent, and quality of life we need to thrive.
'The annual State of the City report shows Auckland is already being overtaken by faster-moving global competitor cities. Without much clearer commitment from central and local government and their partners Auckland's standard of living and growth prospects will continue to suffer," he said.
Deloitte New Zealand Chief Executive Mike Horne said change is needed to help Auckland make more meaningful progress.
"Auckland has been incremental in what it has achieved since becoming a Super City 15 years ago. Being incremental isn't going to achieve what the city needs."
"Auckland has a real opportunity to look at itself in a global context — if Auckland isn't competing globally, New Zealand will suffer. Now is the time for the city to look outward, focusing on connections and innovation, instead of looking in the mirror and rehashing its challenges."
Auckland University of Technology Vice-Chancellor Damon Salesa adds, "AUT is acutely aware of the need for Auckland to succeed in the next 15 years and beyond. Our city will be home to the greatest number of international students, Māori and Pacific young people and indeed of all youth. They have enormous potential and deserve a city that provides education, infrastructure, and employment opportunities."
"AUT is focused on partnerships to amplify the impact our university, students and academics can provide for Auckland and beyond so our city's people can thrive. This means focusing on our city's unique combination of talented people with diverse and cosmopolitan experiences and viewpoints.'
Reflecting on the purpose of amalgamation, Helen Clark, Patron of the Helen Clark Foundation, said that there had been concern that Auckland's potential could not be maximised with its governance dispersed across a number of territorial councils. 'The Royal Commission was established to look at better options, and I have no doubt that the single city has been the right outcome,' she said.
Auckland at 15 is being described by organisers as a catalyst for sustained action, partnerships, and dialogue about Auckland's direction.
Key deliverables from the event include an annual legacy youth event hosted by AUT, and a mentoring programme for aspiring youth leaders provided by Committee for Auckland from its Future Auckland Leaders' Alumni. Deloitte will produce a written summary of the event and Auckland Council's Auckland Conversations will make the full recording of the event available.
In April 2025, Aucklanders were invited to share their views and vote on others' ideas in the survey 'Auckland @15: Shaping the next fifteen years'
#It was conducted via Pol.is, a dynamic online platform that reveals areas of common ground as the conversation evolves. This is a type of 'wiki-survey'. It is shaped by the participants themselves. It provides rich knowledge about group support for ideas in a way that helps to identify common ground among diverse.
How it works:
The conversation was initially framed by a set of 25 'seed' statements covering a range of issues relevant to the topic
Participants contribute by voting on statements (agree/disagree/pass) and by adding their own statements for others to vote on. Those who vote similarly on multiple statements are grouped together to form an 'opinion group'
Automated opinion mapping finds areas of common ground while also identifying differences between opinion groups
Pol.is helps identify the different ways people think about issues that affect them and their communities
575 Aucklanders actively participated in the conversation, which generated over 46,000 votes and nearly 1,000 crowd-sourced statements, providing a rich digital snapshot of Aucklanders' sentiments on the state of their city
This is an initial release of the headline survey information. A further full report will be available from University of Auckland in due course.
Survey summary findings:
Cultural Identity and Diversity:
Cultural identity remains a sharp point of division however 64% agree Auckland has a recognisable, multicultural identity.
Around 70% strongly support celebrating Auckland's Māori and Pacific heritage and investing in cultural diversity and the arts.
About 30% expressed caution or scepticism about prioritising further cultural investment.
Environment Protection and Sustainability Action:
Up to 95% support stronger environmental protections, including improved water quality and urban greenery.
87% think Auckland's trees and urban greenery need better protection to stop our suburbs becoming unappealing, hot and sensitive to flooding.
Decision making capacity and engagement:
Only 53% overall felt amalgamation successfully unified Auckland's voice to central government.
Only 18% felt connected to Council decision-making and just 20% felt amalgamation had improved public engagement.
Only 32% think Council is providing more strategic and region-wide responses to problems, with most saying there are more ad hoc responses,
Housing and Urban Development:
91% of those surveyed believe housing intensification must be balanced with green spaces and liveability.
90% Participants expressed support for high-quality, best-practice high density development in appropriate locations with supporting services like public transport.
Infrastructure Planning:
94% support a long-term infrastructure strategy that transcends political cycles.
93% think Auckland needs to consider retreating from flood-prone areas and should prohibit new building in these locations.
92% think infill housing development needs to be balanced with green spaces and community amenities.
Innovation and Economic Development:
77% believe Auckland must position itself as a global innovation city to attract talent and strengthen its economy.
77% also believe Auckland must position itself as a global innovation city to attract talent and strengthen its economy but expressed concern that the city doesn't maximise this advantage compared to overseas cities.'
Transport:
61% think reducing congestion should be Auckland's top transport priority, even if it means introducing charges on some roads at times when they are most congested.
60% think it's easier to get around Auckland on public transport than it used to be.
56% think cycling and pedestrian access need more investment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Foreign student income down on pre-Covid earnings
Foreign student income down on pre-Covid earnings

RNZ News

timea day ago

  • RNZ News

Foreign student income down on pre-Covid earnings

More than half New Zealand's foreign students studied in Auckland last year. Photo: 123RF Foreign students paid $1 billion in fees last year and more than half that money went to universities. The figures were supplied to the Education Ministry by providers, as part of their reporting for the export education levy. They showed 74,990 international students in New Zealand last year, including 18,020 at schools and more than 25,880 at universities. Their fees totalled $1.085b, about $100m less than the pre-pandemic years of 2018 and 2019. However, two sectors achieved their highest fee incomes on record - universities with $580m and government-funded private tertiary institutions with $167m. The fee take at non-government-funded tertiary institutions, schools and polytechnics last year was well below pre-pandemic numbers. The figure for non-government-funded tertiary institutions - a category that covered English language schools - was just $52.8m, down from a 2019 figure of $135m. Schools received $152m, down from $201m in 2019, and polytechnics received $132.8m, down from $178m. More than half the foreign students last year (43,060) studied in Auckland. Most students (61,500) came from Asia, with the next most significant source being Europe with 5345. At universities and polytechnics, management and commerce was the single largest field for foreign enrolments, accounting for 30 percent of polytechnic enrolments and 28 percent of university enrolments. The 74,990 individual students equated to 46,005 full-time equivalents, three-quarters of the 61,530 full-time equivalents in 2019. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

'Kick in the guts': Government knocks back most of Christchurch council's housing plans
'Kick in the guts': Government knocks back most of Christchurch council's housing plans

RNZ News

timea day ago

  • RNZ News

'Kick in the guts': Government knocks back most of Christchurch council's housing plans

Christchurch mayor Phil Mauger says the government's knock-back of the council's housing plans is a "kick in the guts". Photo: RNZ/Nathan Mckinnon The mayor of Christchurch says a government knock-back on it's three year battle to create a custom carve-out of national housing intensification rules feels like a "kick in the guts", but others are welcoming the certainty of the move. On Friday, Minister for Resource Management Act Reform Chris Bishop issued a final decision on 17 of 20 recommendations the city council had referred after rejecting recommendations from an independent panel on the council's plan to shape a bespoke Christchurch response to national housing density policy). Minister Bishop rejected the bulk of the council's proposals. In 2021, the then-government released its National Policy Statement on Urban Development, a plan to ramp up housing intensification across most urban areas but focused on the five high growth centres of Auckland, Hamilton, Tauranga, Wellington and Christchurch, amid bi-partisan support for the Resource Management (Enabling Housing Supply and Other Matters) Amendment Bill, though the National Party would later withdraw its backing . The bill contained Medium Density Residential Standards (MDRS), which detail what development can occur without the need for resource consent, public notification and consultation in the areas identified as most in need of housing intensification. Those rules were intended to apply across all residential zones in those identified cities, unless "qualifying matters" made intensification inappropriate. In 2022, the council voted to reject the standards , despite warnings a commissioner could be appointed . Instead, the council began several years of consultation, submissions and hearings on Plan Change 14 - its proposed changes to the district plan that would give effect to the Medium Density Residential Standards, but in a way it claimed better acknowledged the character and context of the city. The council temporarily halted the process following the last election, and was later granted an extension until the end of this year on some aspescts of the plan change. Minister Bishop declined a further extension request last month. The council's stance culminated in an Independent Hearing Panel (IHP), which reported back in the middle of last year. The council accepted the majority of the IHP's recommendations, which were incorporated into the district plan. But it rejected various aspects of the proposed plan, making twenty counter-recommendations that went to the Minister. The minister announced on Friday he had rejected 14 of the council's recommendations, accepted three and deferred his decision on three more. Minister for Resource Management Act Reform Chris Bishop has rejected the bulk of the council's proposals. Photo: VNP/Louis Collins The decision means some parts of the city will be zoned higher-density housing and taller buildings, while the council will not be allowed to use several different "qualifying matters" to refuse consents even in high density zones - most controversially, one that hinged on the impediment of sunlight and proposed the Garden City should get an exemption because its southern location meant sunlight angles differ. Bishop's announcement locks in changes for areas in and around the CBD, and the "town centres" of Riccarton, Hornby and Linwood, which will be zoned high density residential. Taller buildings will be allowed within 600 metres of shopping areas in some suburbs - 32m (around ten storeys high) for the Hornby shopping area, 14m for high density residential zones surrounding the shopping area, 22m (around six storeys) for Linwood's town centre, and 14m for high density residential zones around it. The council's bids to create qualifying matters on the basis of sunlight access, recession planes (a line or plane which limits how close a building can be to a property boundary), or by location - such as 'the City Spine' (major transport routes) or Riccarton Bush - also failed. Nor did the minster accept areas around Peer Street in Ilam or the Papanui War Memorial Avenues should be excluded from density rules or allowed special consideration. The council proposals the minister did accept were Local Centre Intensification Precinct - intensification around eight of the city's commercial centres, including Barrington, Prestons and Wigram; increasing the building height overlay for the former stock yards site on Deans Avenue (a prime spot adjacent to Hagley Park, currently used as car parking for the Christchurch Hospital shuttle service) to up to 36m; and allowing high density residential zoning for Milton Street (the site of the Milton St substation, which Fletchers plans to build 80 homes on). All other council alternative recommendations were rejected in favour of the hearing panel recommendations. The minister has deferred decision-making for the heritage listing for Daresbury - a historic home in Fendalton; Antonio Hall - a derelict historic home on Riccarton Rd; and Piko Character Area - a Riccarton residential neighbourhood made up of many original state houses from the 1930s - until the council decided on the underlying zoning. "In putting these decisions forward to the government, we obviously wanted to get all of our alternative recommendations approved. So to only have three of them get the tick is a kick in the guts," mayor Phil Mauger said. "This plan change has been a huge undertaking for our city, and we've said right the way through that we want to get the best outcome we possibly can. This doesn't feel like the best outcome. "To that end, we'll keep working hard as a council, and there are still major decisions yet to be made when it comes to housing density and planning across much of Christchurch, so watch this space." The decisions come into effect immediately and cannot be appealed to the Environment Court. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon New Zealand has one of the most unaffordable housing markets in the OECD. Urbanist collective Greater Ōtautahi welcomed the minister's decision. Chairperson M Grace-Stent said the decision finally brought some certainty after years of delays, decision making, submissions and hearing panels. "What we're most excited about is that Ōtautahi Christchurch is set up for the future, it has certainty around where it can grow and where it can continue to develop in the future." The decision will not mean apartment buildings spring up overnight, they said. "It's still going to be a slow developing process, just as our cities always continually change. This is just another step." The city also needed to turn its attention to improving public transport. "Ōtautahi Christchurch definitely needs a reevaluation of its transport system. We've been calling for the introduction of mass rapid transport across the city to support and facilitate the kind of growth and development that needs to happen, and to make sure that everyone has a choice about how they're getting around the city and aren't forced to just pick cars." Grace-Stent said the debate touched on ideas embedded in the national psyche about how and where New Zealanders live. They said the quarter-acre dream of a stand alone house on a large section is unsustainable and doesn't not always produce greater social outcomes. "Not everyone wants to live the exact same lifestyle - allowing more housing to be built allows people to make that choice for themselves. So if people want to be living on 1/4 acre block, they're allowed to, and if people want to be living in an apartment close to their friends and amenities and where they work, they also have that choice." They acknowledged that some medium and high density housing is not built to high standards, but said some of that was due to limitations of the current zoning process, which can mean the lowest bidder builds on these sites. "This is just the first step into assuring that everyone has a home that is liveable and that works for them, and is good quality. There also needs to be changes throughout the way that we are think about housing and building houses across the country," Grace-Stent said. The decisions, which come into effect immediately, are final and cannot be appealed to the Environment Court. The council has until the end of the year to decide on density rules for the rest of the city. It was unable to confirm by deadline how much it had spent fighting the density rules, but had budgeted for $7 million dollars between 2021 and the middle of this year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Foreign exchange fined amid transactions deemed 'objectively suspicious'
Foreign exchange fined amid transactions deemed 'objectively suspicious'

1News

time2 days ago

  • 1News

Foreign exchange fined amid transactions deemed 'objectively suspicious'

An Auckland-based foreign exchange and money remittance company has been convicted and fined $1.125 million for failing to report suspicious activities and to submit prescribed transaction reports. An investigation by the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) found that Qian DuoDuo Limited, which traded under the name Lidong Foreign Exchange, found it failed to report 197 international transactions to China between June 2018 and September 2019. The transactions, which totalled over $19.14 million, included 26 "objectively suspicious" activities with a value of $4.72 million and 171 involved prescribed transactions with a value of $14.42 million. The value of the nearly 200 transactions represented around one fifth of the gross value transactions undertaken by Qian DuoDuo Limited for the 2018/2019 financial year. Two individuals who completed the transactions, Xiaoyu Lu and Musubayoufa Fuati, were convicted of criminal offending. ADVERTISEMENT Fuati was convicted of structuring transactions to avoid anti-money laundering laws, while Lu was convicted of providing unregistered financial services, as well as multiple counts of money laundering. Both pleaded guilty to their charges. In sentencing, the Auckland District Court found the company failed to carry out adequate customer due diligence on the source of Fuati and Lu's funds and relied on questionable verification documents despite recognising a high risk that its operations could be used to launder money. Anti-money laundering and countering financing of terrorism director Serge Sablyak said Internal Affairs took offences under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 "very seriously". "Suspicious transactions have the potential to be linked to money laundering or terrorist financing activities. Prescribed transaction reports are vital in alerting law enforcement to suspected offenders and make money laundering and terrorist financing difficult to hide." Sablyak said Qian DuoDuo Limited had a "history of non-compliance". "In 2017, the Department took civil action against the company following non-compliance with its obligations, and the High Court confirmed multiple breaches of the company's legal obligations. "When financial institutions, including money remitters, continue to fail to meet their obligations under the Act, the Department can and will take action." ADVERTISEMENT Qian DuoDuo Limited appealed the District Court's decision to the High Court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store