AG Pam Bondi has the power to revoke green cards at any time, Justice Department claims
The Justice Department has suggested that Attorney General Pam Bondi has the authority to revoke green cards as she sees fit.
DOJ attorney Lindsay Murphy posited Bondi's alleged power during a Third Circuit hearing in Philadelphia. If the court sides with the Trump administration's position, it could jeopardize the lawful residency status of the U.S.'s estimated 12.8 million green card holders.
Murphy suggested that the attorney general has full discretion to revoke the permits at any time for any reason, even for legal permanent residents who had lived in the U.S. for decades. People with green cards can live and work in the U.S., receive Social Security, Medicare and financial aid for college and serve in the military.
It comes as Donald Trump continues to ramp up his immigration crackdown, pledging to deport millions of migrants who don't have the right documentation and fueling concerns for those who do. The president has ordered DHS Secretary Kristi Noem to add 20,000 officers to enforce his deportation policies, and her agency is reportedly considering a TV show that would see migrants competing for citizenship and offering $1,000 incentives to immigrants who self-deport.
Murphy made her argument during Tuesday's hearing, according to Newsweek, which focused on an ongoing case involving Mohammad Qatanani, the Palestinian-born imam who has lived in New Jersey since 1996.
Qatanani has been seeking permanent residency in the U.S. and fought off deportation for decades amid government accusations that he is linked to the Palestinian terrorist organization, Hamas, which he denies. He was granted permanent residency in 2008 after an immigration judge ruled against his deportation, which the government appealed.
The immigration judge ruled in favor of Qatanani in 2020 but a year later, the Board of Immigration Appeals, which sits within the DOJ's Executive Office for Immigration Review, reversed the ruling through initiating certification, ultimately rescinding the religious leader's green card.
Murphy was pressed on whether there was a timeframe for certification, with U.S. Circuit Judge Arianna Freeman asking: 'Do you mean even 10, 20 years later?'
'The regulation doesn't impose any time limit, so yes,' Murphy added, before adding that it would require 'exceptional circumstances.'
Probed on what qualifies as an exceptional circumstance, Murphy told the panel that the attorney general has full authority to make that determination.
'That's an extraordinary position for the government to be taking, don't you think?,' Freeman added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
DOGE cuts face battle in House
The Big Story Some Republicans are voicing doubts about portions of the White House's request to claw back $9.4 billion in funds for foreign aid and public broadcasting programs, as the party looks to lock in cuts pursued by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). © The Associated Press One House Republican estimated around 10 lawmakers have voiced concerns about the bill, but 'there's more concerns than people who have whipped 'no.'' 'And I think it's a broader concern about the rescissions process itself,' the lawmaker added. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) — under heavy pressure from hardline conservatives eager to codify the DOGE cuts — is aiming to approve the bill in the coming days, setting the stage for another complicated week for GOP leaders. One of the largest concerns Republicans have with the package is the $1.1 billion in rescissions to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps fund NPR and PBS. Republicans have panned the outlets as biased, and President Trump signed an executive order in May to cease federal funding for both companies. But a handful of Republicans are worried about the impact the slashes will have in their districts. Other Republicans are investigating the cuts to USAID, which was one of DOGE's first targets. The Hill's Mychael Schnell has more here. Welcome to The Hill's Business & Economy newsletter, I'm Aris Folley — covering the intersection of Wall Street and Pennsylvania Avenue. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads Key business and economic news with implications this week and beyond: Hawley bill would raise minimum wage to $15 Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) wants to double the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour, with legislation filed Tuesday to increase the rate last bumped up nearly two decades ago. World Bank slashes growth outlook on trade concerns The World Bank on Tuesday reduced its outlook for both global and U.S. economic growth this year, citing disruptions to global trade stemming from President Trump's trade war. Three dozen House Republicans urge Senate GOP against 'budget gimmicks,' deficit increases More than three dozen House Republicans are warning Senate GOP leaders against approving additional deficit increases or using 'budget gimmicks' to count additional savings in the 'one big beautiful bill' of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities. Tax Watch Senate GOP divided over trimming cost of Trump bill Facing a jittery bond market and scathing criticism from Elon Musk, GOP lawmakers have expanded their search for ways to reduce the deficit by cutting Medicare, the Defense Department and the Federal Reserve — areas of the budget that were considered off-limits just a few weeks ago. But each new proposal is creating new divisions. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) is warning colleagues to steer clear of cutting Medicare spending, even though proponents of the idea insist it would be targeted only on 'waste, fraud and abuse.' Other Republicans want to look at Medicare Advantage plans provided by private insurance companies as an alternative to traditional Medicare. They say 'fly-by-night' health care providers are abusing the program and bilking the federal government. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) also said lawmakers are discussing a proposal sponsored by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) that could save up to $275 billion by cracking down on insurance companies that overcharge Medicare Advantage. The Hill's Alex Bolton has more here. DEADLINE SLIPPING?: Former Trump economic adviser Stephen Moore, who served in Trump's first term, told The Hill's Emily Brooks that GOP leaders' goal of advancing the One Big, Beautiful Bill by July 4 is likely too ambitious. 'I'd love to see that, but I think there's too many differences right now to get it done by Fourth of July,' Moore said. Read more here and sign up for Brooks's new newsletter The Movement here. The Ticker Upcoming news themes and events we're watching: In Other News Branch out with more stories from the day: US stocks drift closer to their record as Wall Street waits to see what US-China talks will bear NEW YORK (AP) — U.S. stocks drifted closer to their all-time high on Tuesday as the wait continued … Good to Know Business and economic news we've flagged from other outlets: What Others are Reading Top stories on The Hill right now: Judge declines to block Trump's Corporation for Public Broadcasting firings but allows board members to stay Correction: A previous version of this article gave incorrect names of the fired CPB board members. They are Laura Ross, Diane Kaplan and Thomas Rothman. Read more Stephen Miller wages war on the GOP's libertarians The Movement is a weekly newsletter tracking the influence and debates steering politics on the right. Sign up here or in the box below. Read more What People Think Opinions related to business and economic issues submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here
Gizmodo
25 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk's Moment of Regret
On March 15, 2021, a rather unusual detail emerged in a Tesla filing with the SEC: Elon Musk's official title was listed as 'Technoking of Tesla.' The billionaire later clarified this whimsical change as a humorous jab at corporate formalities. Yet, beyond the jest, it perfectly encapsulated his audacious approach: deeply unconventional, unconcerned with tradition, and utterly dismissive of decorum. His self-assigned mission has always been to farcically upend established norms and forcefully impose his unique vision on the world. This distinctive style manifests as an unapologetic infusion of private-sphere behaviors into the corporate realm. Musk, for instance, has never shied away from engaging in heated arguments on social media, often employing colorful language and pointed insults that would undoubtedly lead to a CEO's swift dismissal or at least a stern warning from their board. He routinely uses X (formerly Twitter), the 'public town square' he acquired in late 2022, to settle scores. 'Gates is a huge liar,' he famously declared on May 8, referring to philanthropist and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. Gates's perceived transgression? Daring to criticize the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a brainchild of the Trump administration. Trump had tasked Musk with streamlining the federal government by slashing spending and reducing costs, and DOGE, the agency specifically created for Musk's oversight, quickly alienated nearly every other government member, becoming a lightning rod for public dissatisfaction with the administration. Musk had previously posted an insulting meme targeting Gates, whose 'great sin,' in Musk's eyes, was allegedly shorting Tesla stock years prior, effectively betting on its decline. Throughout these episodes, Tesla's board of directors, largely composed of loyalists and close associates, remained conspicuously silent. Millions of fans on X, however, cheered him on, further solidifying his image as a 'king' adored by his subjects. He largely ignored the few dissenting voices. As his financial power swelled, Musk's sense of invincibility grew. Donald Trump's return to the White House, a victory to which Musk contributed over $290 million according to filings with the Federal Election Commission, ultimately granted him the political influence he had previously lacked. He found himself wielding a rare trifecta of power: immense wealth, political sway, and control over crucial social media platforms (X and xAI). However, on June 5, the tech mogul discovered that even his immense power had its limits. He escalated his criticism of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' Trump's signature budget bill, which includes cuts to Medicaid and Medicare, increased national debt, and the elimination of subsidies for green cars. This time, he directly and personally attacked Trump, bemoaning the former president's 'ingratitude,' claiming Trump wouldn't have won without his support. He went so far as to express support for Trump's impeachment, controversially linking it to the Epstein Files, a fixation within far-right and MAGA circles. A prevalent conspiracy theory among these groups suggests that Jeffrey Epstein, the sex offender who died by hanging in prison in 2019 while facing charges of sexually abusing underage girls, was allegedly murdered to prevent him from revealing a list of powerful clients, many of whom are believed to be prominent liberals. The fact that Epstein died during Trump's presidency is conveniently disregarded by proponents of this theory. This public showdown between the world's richest man and arguably the most powerful man in the world sent shockwaves through right-wing circles, where the alliance between the two had previously been lauded. Unlike his past skirmishes, Musk did not receive the expected and hoped-for support from his legion of followers. Instead, he faced significant criticism, even from Joe Rogan, a long-time friend who had publicly asserted for months that America owed Musk a great deal. This time, however, Rogan believed Musk had overstepped. 'I understand, he owns Twitter,' Rogan commented on Musk during a June 5 episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, his popular podcast. 'I think it's bad for your mental health. Posting things publicly all day and arguing with people constantly is bad for you.' For many, Rogan's sentiment was simply playing the world's smallest violin for a man whose self-inflicted wounds were becoming increasingly apparent. It is within this unprecedented context that Musk did something entirely uncharacteristic: he issued a mea culpa. In a short, ironic post, he engaged in self-criticism, signaling a surprising moment of personal introspection. 'It's outrageous how much character assassination has been directed at me, especially by me,' he posted on the night of June 8. The post quickly garnered over 44 million views as of the time of writing. Musk's statement seems to suggest that he is the primary architect of the criticism he faces, acknowledging that he is, in essence, his own worst enemy. This reveals a rarely seen, vulnerable side of the billionaire, starkly contrasting with the public image of an untouchable figure who believes he can do no wrong. But is this genuine self-criticism, or a strategic move born out of necessity after burning bridges? Indeed, on June 7, Trump informed NBC that he had no desire to mend his relationship with Musk and threatened the billionaire with 'serious consequences' should he fund Democratic candidates against Republicans who voted for the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' in the upcoming midterms. California Congressman Ro Khanna, who has known Musk for many years, extended an olive branch to the billionaire, calling for his party to embrace him. 'Having Elon speak out against the irrational tariff policy, against the deficit-exploding Trump bill, and the anti-science and anti-immigrant agenda can help check Trump's unconstitutional administration,' Khanna said in an interview with Semafor. 'I look forward to Elon turning his fire against MAGA Republicans instead of Democrats in 2026.' However, it is uncertain whether Democrats will heed Khanna, as Musk has become persona non grata, particularly among the party's left wing. Musk has stated he voted Democratic until Joe Biden's election. Beyond SpaceX, which holds numerous government contracts, Tesla itself is an easy target for Trump, who views the powers of the presidency as inherently personal. Tesla's net profit, in fact, plummeted 71% in the first quarter to $409 million compared to the previous year, primarily due to a sharp decline in vehicle sales. The automaker is also grappling with protests outside its stores globally, with demonstrators denouncing Musk's actions through DOGE in the U.S. and his perceived support for far-right ideologies worldwide. This erosion of goodwill is expected to continue. Initial data for the current second quarter shows a sustained decline in Tesla sales across China and Europe. Sales fell 45% in the UK in May, even as the overall EV market grew by 28%. In Germany, home to Tesla's only European factory, the decline was 36%, contrasting sharply with a 45% jump in the local market. Further demonstrating this trend, Tesla sales are down 67% in France, 54% in Sweden, 20% in Italy, 48% in Denmark, and 29% in Germany. These figures strongly suggest that Musk's reputation has been severely damaged among liberals, who constituted Tesla's core customer base due to their embrace of climate change initiatives and environmental concerns. For them, Tesla once symbolized the quintessential 'green' car. Tesla executives have been working to reassure worried investors since April. Musk himself has indicated a desire to reduce his role within the Trump administration. More significantly, he has promised that in the coming months, self-driving Teslas would be widely available in many cities thanks to advancements in FSD (Full Self-Driving), the software enabling autonomous driving. Unsupervised FSD, he implies, would make people forget this current rough patch and repair his tarnished reputation. 'I'm confident that it will be available in many cities in the US by the end of this year,' he told investors during the quarterly results presentation conference on April 22. However, this ambitious timeline hinges on regulatory approval, particularly from federal agencies. Given the increasingly fractured relationship with Trump, this green light is no longer as guaranteed as it might have seemed just a fortnight ago. The path forward appears considerably less smooth. Whether this mea culpa arrives too late remains uncertain. And Trump is never one to apologize. What is clear, however, is the division among X users. 'To err is human, to forgive is divine,' one user commented on Musk's post. 'The courage to realize that you have erred, apologize, and make amend is protecting the true essence of human to human interaction.' Conversely, another self-proclaimed Trump supporter commented, 'Shouldn't have said the things you did Elon. Burning bridges is something you shouldn't do. and you should know better. everybody took you in and this is how you get back wat everybody when you don't get your way.' For a man who almost never admits he's wrong, the slightest confession that he has painted himself into a corner is significant, though it's just a small blip in the flood of posting he engages in day-to-day. Even his own fans didn't seem to take it as an earth-shattering moment from a man they expect to deliver interplanetary leaps. As it so happens, around the same time last week, physicists at Loughborough University in England were getting their hands dirty with real advancements in nanotechnology and laying the groundwork for the world's tiniest violin. Measuring in at just 35 microns long and 13 microns wide, Musk's haters and boosters picked it up and played a sorrowful tune in his honor.
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
Justice Dept. to Take Narrow Approach to Prosecuting Corporate Bribery Abroad
The Justice Department has closed about half of its open investigations into bribery by U.S. businesses overseas, but plans to initiate prosecutions to more narrowly focus on misconduct that hurts the country's capacity to compete with foreign companies, officials said on Tuesday. President Trump signed an executive order in February pausing all of the department's investigations under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, pending a review of enforcement policies by Todd Blanche, the department's No. 2 official. Good government groups criticized the freeze as the elimination of guardrails needed to prevent corporate abuses. The move coincided with the closing of investigations into the aircraft manufacturer Bombardier and the medical device maker Stryker, among others. But Mr. Blanche, in a statement, said the decision was made to align enforcement of the act with the administration's broader goal of increasing U.S. leverage against foreign businesses and governments, by 'shifting prosecutorial resources to cases that clearly implicate U.S. national security and competitiveness.' Mr. Blanche, a former criminal defense lawyer for Mr. Trump, accused the Biden administration under Attorney General Merrick B. Garland of opening too many cases, 'burdening companies' and damaging national interests. Critics said the new guidelines were a dangerous reversal that abandoned major investigations, including a deal the Justice Department struck in May with Boeing that spared the company from taking criminal responsibility for deadly 737 Max crashes in 2018 and 2019. Many families of the victims vigorously opposed the agreement. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
