logo
Scottish young women divided on Ash Regan's new bill

Scottish young women divided on Ash Regan's new bill

Pioneered in Sweden in 1999, the 'Nordic model' criminalises the act of buying sex while decriminalising its sale. The model was subsequently adopted by Norway, Iceland, Canada, Northern Ireland, France, Ireland and Israel.
Some sex workers have criticised the proposed legislation, saying it could force them underground — and make their lives more dangerous.
Regan, who argues that prostitution is undergirded by 'male violence against women', has said she wants her legislation to become law before the end of the current parliamentary session in 2026.
Ash Regan introduced her 'Unbuyable' bill last week.A number of young Scottish women shared their thoughts on the bill with The Herald.
AJ Whyte, from Stirling, said: 'I'm in two minds about it, honestly.'
'I think decriminalising it is the first step to protecting sex workers who are trapped in the industry. It's the same as abortion, it will always happen but decriminalising it helps with the stigma and allows more people to accept help.'
Emily McKay, who is a fourth year University of Aberdeen student, agrees.
'In my opinion, most women don't turn to sex work unless they really have to', she said.
'It'd be more helpful to offer support to pull people out of poverty. I think it's sort of similar to abortion where criminalising it won't make it disappear. It just makes it harder for folk to find support and makes it more dangerous.'
Beth Templeton, also from Aberdeen, backs the bill.
She said: 'I think that Ash Regan's proposal appears as if it will protect sex workers. By putting the criminality on men who exploit these women, it protects women and targets the structural issue prostitution sits within, rather than further punishing the women.
However, Beth did share one concern about the bill, noting: 'If there isn't increased protections for sex workers alongside this bill, there is the danger of these women being exploited further by men willing to pay a higher price for services.
'If they can pair it with other benefits and programs for work then it may well help.'
Beth Templeton is a student at the University of Aberdeen. (Image: Supplied)
According to the Scottish Government, the legislation would 'create a new offence of paying for sexual acts'.
Currently, it is not illegal to buy sex in Scotland. However, it is illegal to run brothels, solicit or purchase sexual services in public, or cause others to join the sex industry.
The legislation would repeal Section 46 of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982, effectively decriminalising the sale of sex in public.
Historic convictions for prostitution would be quashed, and the Scottish Government would be required to provide 'assistance and support' for sex workers.
Some young women have questioned Alba's role in crafting the legislation.
Kirsten Koss told The Herald: 'Rather than criminalising and stigmatising what is often a symptom of social issues, Regan would do better to challenge the Scottish Government around its approach to resolving the issues that force women into sex work.
'Frankly, Alba is increasingly moving in a troubling direction when it comes to women. Policies such as these amount to misogyny, under the guise of 'protecting women from men'.
'Instead we should tackle the reasons that these men feel this behaviour is acceptable, and the societal issues that cause women to become victims of such treatment.'
Kirsten Koss doesn't trust the motives behind the bill. (Image: Supplied) Arts student Eden Hally says that decriminalising sex work would be a positive for those working in the industry.
They said: 'Sex workers face a working environment that can be extremely dangerous. When someone who does sex work faces abuse and rape and other forms of sexual assault, they may feel unable to disclose the abuse or seek justice due to the status of legality of their work. They are already a highly stigmatized group of people.'
There has been robust debate over the efficacy of the Nordic model. Speaking to Good Morning Scotland, Regan compared Sweden, the first proponent of the approach, to Germany, which decriminalised sex work in 2002.
Regan noted that no sex workers had been killed in Sweden this century, compared to Germany, where 99 have been murdered.
However, a 2022 report by Amnesty International contends that a 2017 law criminalising the purchase of sex in Ireland did not protect sex workers from exploitation, but actually created a 'higher risk of abuse and violence' for sex workers.
The report read: 'Sex workers frequently described being forced to engage in more risky behaviours as a result of client criminalization.
'Sex workers often do not engage with the police for fear of being charged with brothel keeping or other offences under the 2017 Act, despite the government's claims that it 'decriminalized' sex work.'
Sex workers in Ireland say they are not comfortable approaching the police with concerns. (Image: TVP) Scottish Greens activist Iris Duane told The Herald that sex workers must be at the heart of any proposals.
'This bill, and bills like it, have operated in various contexts in other countries and proven it does not work', she said. 'Like many policy areas, this represents another attempt of our political elite to dictate to those living their lives, what does and does not keep them safe.
'Particularly in this case, it represents yet another attempt of wealthy politically privileged 'feminists', dictating to women based on little more than their idea of how the world should work - not how it works in actuality.
'It is incredibly important that policy in this area is led by the safety, dignity and autonomy of sec workers themselves, not on what our political elites think will be 'good for them'.'
READ MORE on the 'Unbuyable' bill
Beth agrees with Regan's view that prostitution is a systemic issue which 'perpetuates male violence'.
She said: 'Regan does seem to recognise this so the protections for women need to be the same protections for women who are sexually assaulted/ abused.
'Although it is 'work' it is often work that has been due to limited choices for women and a lack of support within the system.
'There can't just be a blanket solution of criminalising men, there needs to be real work and effort put in for the protection of women.'
Eden added: 'I don't think sex work should be encouraged, but it is also an inevitability in society. We must protect vulnerable people wherever they're at, and sometimes that means facing a morally grey area.
'When we can reduce the harm done to vulnerable people in society like sex workers through law, it may seem vulgar or like we're making it 'more acceptable', but I believe it prevents unnecessary deaths."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SNP ‘running down the clock' before losing power, claims Anas Sarwar
SNP ‘running down the clock' before losing power, claims Anas Sarwar

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

SNP ‘running down the clock' before losing power, claims Anas Sarwar

The SNP's 'balloon has burst' and John Swinney is 'running down the clock', Anas Sarwar, Scotland's First Minister, has said after Labour won a shock by-election victory. The Scottish Labour leader said his party's knife-edge win in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse contest showed voters wanted to oust the SNP from power in next year's Holyrood election. Labour's Davy Russell won the Scottish Parliament seat by 602 votes from the SNP's Katy Loudon, with Reform's Ross Lambie only 887 votes behind her. The Tories finished a distant fourth, barely saving their deposit, after their support collapsed. Mr Swinney was left humiliated by the loss of the SNP seat after repeatedly claiming the by-election was a straight fight between his party and Reform. Alex Neil, the former SNP minister, said the First Minister should resign. Speaking the morning after the victory, Ms Sarwar accused Mr Swinney of running a 'disgraceful campaign' that 'deliberately' encouraged people to vote for Reform. Mr Sarwar said the result demonstrated that next year's Holyrood election would really be a 'straight choice' between the SNP and Labour, with Reform merely a 'spoiler' who could not win power. But Prof Sir John Curtice, the country's most eminent psephologist, said Reform had achieved a 'highly creditable' third place by attracting a slew of former Labour voters. Writing in the Telegraph, he warned Nigel Farage's party risked 'severely denting' Mr Sarwar's hopes of being First Minister. Sir John also said Labour's performance, its vote share in the constituency declined, was 'well short of what is needed to demonstrate it is currently on course to win next year's Holyrood election.' He said Labour still managed to scrape victory thanks to a 17-point drop in support for the Nationalists, with independence supporters 'less forgiving than they once were of what many perceive as the SNP's poor record in government.' The contest was called following the death of Christina McKelvie, the Scottish Government minister, who won the seat for the SNP with a 4,582 majority in the 2021 Holyrood election. 'An outsider' in the contest Although Labour won the equivalent seat at Westminster by almost 10,000 votes in last year's general election, the party's collapse in support during the early months of Sir Keir Starmer's government meant it was viewed as an outsider in the contest. However, Labour insiders attributed their victory to Mr Russell's popularity locally and a strong get-out-the-vote operation that saw more than 200 activists travel to the constituency on polling day. Speaking at a press call in Hamilton town centre with Mr Russell, Mr Sarwar said he was 'confident' that he could replace Mr Swinney as First Minister in 2025. The Scottish Labour leader said: 'I think what we're seeing now is the running down of the clock. This is an SNP government that's lost its way, the balloon is burst, they are out of ideas, they are out of steam. 'They have no positive offer for the people of Scotland, they've got no positive record to put in front of the people of Scotland and they're running down the clock.' He said there was a 'lesson' for pollsters and commentators who believed Mr Swinney's claim that the by-election was a straight fight between the SNP and Reform, arguing they should stop listening to the First Minister's 'nonsense.' Pressed on Sir John's view that Reform's strong performance would make it difficult for Labour to win power next year at Holyrood, he said the psephologist was only looking at a 'snapshot' of a particular by-election. Mr Sarwar argued this approach ignored 'the general mood music and the general momentum of a campaign going into next year'. He added: 'On the ground, people believe the SNP are done. They are sick to the back teeth of think they're a busted flush. They want them out.' Sir Keir sent his congratulations to Mr Russell on his 'fantastic victory.' In a post on social media, the Prime Minister said: 'People in Scotland have once again voted for change. 'Next year, there is a chance to turbo-charge delivery by putting Labour in power on both sides of the border. I look forward to working with you.' Speaking in Edinburgh, Mr Swinney said: 'Clearly, we're disappointed that we didn't win last night, but we made progress in the election compared to the general election last summer, and we've got to build on that and make sure that we strengthen our support in advance of 2026. 'So the SNP made progress last night, but it's not nearly enough and we've got to build on that.' Asked if it was a mistake to call the by-election a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform, he said: 'I called it the way I saw it.' The First Minister argued the Labour vote had collapsed compared to last year's general election and 'we saw the Reform vote surging, which it has.' But Mr Neil, who served in Alex Salmond's and Nicola Sturgeon's Cabinets, tweeted: 'Poor by-election result for the SNP despite having the best candidate 'It shows that the opinion polls appear wide of the mark. Most importantly, it shows the current SNP leadership needs to be replaced urgently.' The SNP under Mr Swinney was also routed in last year's general election. Labour won the by-election with 8,559 votes (31.6 per cent), despite its vote share declining by two percentage points compared to the 2021 Holyrood election result in the seat. The SNP finished second with 7,957 votes (29.4 per cent), a huge drop in support compared to 2021, when Ms McKelvie won 46.2 per cent of the popular vote. Reform finished third with 7,088 votes (26.1 per cent), which Sir John noted was 'well above' the 19 per cent support recorded in Scotland-wide opinion polls, despite the seat not being 'particularly fertile ground for Nigel Farage's party.' Richard Tice, Reform's deputy leader, attended the count and insisted he was 'delighted' with the result. He said it was 'truly remarkable', adding: 'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal.' But the result was disastrous for the Scottish Tories, who won only 1,621 votes. Their vote share declined from 17.5 per cent in the 2021 election to only six per cent. 'A very competitive political environment' Speaking ahead of next week's Scottish Tory conference in Edinburgh, UK leader Kemi Badenoch said: 'Larkhall is not the place where the Conservative Party fightback starts'. She said it was 'interesting' that Reform was 'causing problems for all parties' and noted that 'we live in a very competitive political environment.' Miles Briggs, the shadow education secretary for the Scottish Tories, said the party knew it would be a 'difficult' by-election and blamed 'protest voting' for Reform and Labour. He told BBC Radio's Good Morning Scotland programme: 'We know what that challenge is and we have no doubt of the fight that we have to take forward into the election next year.'

Liberty loses bid to bring legal action against equalities body
Liberty loses bid to bring legal action against equalities body

Rhyl Journal

timean hour ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Liberty loses bid to bring legal action against equalities body

The UK's highest court ruled in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex, after a challenge against the Scottish Government by campaign group For Women Scotland. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is consulting on proposed amendments to part of its guidance, after interim guidance was published last month related to trans people's use of certain spaces including toilets and participation in sports following the judgment. The commission increased the length of time for feedback from an original proposal of two weeks to six weeks, but campaign group Liberty said that it should be at least 12 weeks, claiming the current period would be 'wholly insufficient' and unlawful. Liberty made a bid to bring a legal challenge over the length of the consultation, but in a decision on Friday afternoon Mr Justice Swift said it was not arguable. In his ruling, Mr Justice Swift said: 'There is no 12-week rule. The requirements of fairness are measured in specifics and context is important.' 'I am not satisfied that it is arguable that the six-week consultation period that the EHRC has chosen to use is unfair,' he added. At the hearing on Friday, Sarah Hannett KC, for Liberty, said in written submissions that the Supreme Court's decision 'has altered the landscape radically and suddenly' and potentially changes the way trans people access single-sex spaces and services. The barrister said this included some businesses preventing trans women from using female toilets and trans men from using male toilets, as well as British Transport Police updating its policy on strip searches, which have caused 'understandable distress to trans people'. Ms Hannett said a six-week consultation period would be unlawful because the EHRC has not given 'sufficient time' for consultees to give 'intelligent consideration and an intelligent response'. She told the London court: 'There is a desire amongst the bigger trans organisations to assist the smaller trans organisations in responding… That is something that is going to take some time.' Later in her written submissions, the barrister described the trans community as 'particularly vulnerable and currently subject to intense scrutiny and frequent harassment'. Ms Hannett added: 'There is evidence of distrust of both consultation processes and the commission within the community.' Lawyers for the EHRC said the legal challenge should not go ahead and that six weeks was 'adequate'. James Goudie KC, for the commission, told the hearing there is 'no magic at all in 12 weeks'. He said in written submissions: 'Guidance consistent with the Supreme Court's decision has become urgently needed. The law as declared by the Supreme Court is not to come in at some future point. 'It applies now, and has been applying for some time.' The barrister later said that misinformation had been spreading about the judgment, adding that it was 'stoking what was already an often heated and divisive debate about gender in society'. He continued: 'The longer it takes for EHRC to issue final guidance in the form of the code, the greater the opportunity for misinformation and disinformation to take hold, to the detriment of persons with different protected characteristics.' Mr Goudie also said that there was a previous 12-week consultation on the guidance at large starting in October 2024. Following the ruling, EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner said the commission's approach 'has been fair and appropriate throughout'. She continued: 'Our six-week consultation period represents a balance between gathering comprehensive stakeholder input and addressing the urgent need for clarity. We're particularly encouraged by the thousands of consultation responses already received and look forward to further meaningful engagement through the rest of the process. 'The current climate of legal uncertainty and widespread misinformation serves nobody – particularly those with protected characteristics who rightly expect clarity about their rights. A swift resolution to this uncertainty will benefit everyone, including trans people.'

Liberty loses bid to bring legal action against equalities body
Liberty loses bid to bring legal action against equalities body

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Liberty loses bid to bring legal action against equalities body

The UK's highest court ruled in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex, after a challenge against the Scottish Government by campaign group For Women Scotland. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is consulting on proposed amendments to part of its guidance, after interim guidance was published last month related to trans people's use of certain spaces including toilets and participation in sports following the judgment. The co-directors of For Women Scotland and campaigners celebrated outside the Supreme Court in London after the ruling in April (Lucy North/PA) The commission increased the length of time for feedback from an original proposal of two weeks to six weeks, but campaign group Liberty said that it should be at least 12 weeks, claiming the current period would be 'wholly insufficient' and unlawful. Liberty made a bid to bring a legal challenge over the length of the consultation, but in a decision on Friday afternoon Mr Justice Swift said it was not arguable. In his ruling, Mr Justice Swift said: 'There is no 12-week rule. The requirements of fairness are measured in specifics and context is important.' 'I am not satisfied that it is arguable that the six-week consultation period that the EHRC has chosen to use is unfair,' he added. At the hearing on Friday, Sarah Hannett KC, for Liberty, said in written submissions that the Supreme Court's decision 'has altered the landscape radically and suddenly' and potentially changes the way trans people access single-sex spaces and services. The barrister said this included some businesses preventing trans women from using female toilets and trans men from using male toilets, as well as British Transport Police updating its policy on strip searches, which have caused 'understandable distress to trans people'. Ms Hannett said a six-week consultation period would be unlawful because the EHRC has not given 'sufficient time' for consultees to give 'intelligent consideration and an intelligent response'. She told the London court: 'There is a desire amongst the bigger trans organisations to assist the smaller trans organisations in responding… That is something that is going to take some time.' Later in her written submissions, the barrister described the trans community as 'particularly vulnerable and currently subject to intense scrutiny and frequent harassment'. Other campaigners have protested since the ruling (Andrew Matthews/PA) Ms Hannett added: 'There is evidence of distrust of both consultation processes and the commission within the community.' Lawyers for the EHRC said the legal challenge should not go ahead and that six weeks was 'adequate'. James Goudie KC, for the commission, told the hearing there is 'no magic at all in 12 weeks'. He said in written submissions: 'Guidance consistent with the Supreme Court's decision has become urgently needed. The law as declared by the Supreme Court is not to come in at some future point. 'It applies now, and has been applying for some time.' The barrister later said that misinformation had been spreading about the judgment, adding that it was 'stoking what was already an often heated and divisive debate about gender in society'. He continued: 'The longer it takes for EHRC to issue final guidance in the form of the code, the greater the opportunity for misinformation and disinformation to take hold, to the detriment of persons with different protected characteristics.' Mr Goudie also said that there was a previous 12-week consultation on the guidance at large starting in October 2024. Following the ruling, EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner said the commission's approach 'has been fair and appropriate throughout'. She continued: 'Our six-week consultation period represents a balance between gathering comprehensive stakeholder input and addressing the urgent need for clarity. We're particularly encouraged by the thousands of consultation responses already received and look forward to further meaningful engagement through the rest of the process. 'The current climate of legal uncertainty and widespread misinformation serves nobody – particularly those with protected characteristics who rightly expect clarity about their rights. A swift resolution to this uncertainty will benefit everyone, including trans people.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store