Mao Saigo fires 66 for US Women's Open lead as she chases second major of year
Mao Saigo already won her first major title this year. She's putting herself in position for another at US Women's Open.
Saigo shot a 6-under 66 on Friday to take second-round lead at Erin Hills. At 8-under 136, the 23-year-old Japanese player had a three-stroke advantage over a group of six led by top-ranked Nelly Korda.
If Saigo maintains this pace, she would finish at 16 under to match the score Brooks Koepka had in winning the US Open at Erin Hills in 2017. Koepka matched a US Open record.
Saigo was asked whether 16 under might be within reach.
'It is very difficult to compare,' she said through an intepretor. 'All I can say is that I will do my best, and as a result, I would like to make a good result.'
Saigo won Chevron Championship in a playoff outside Houston just over a month ago for her first LPGA Tour title.
Korda, who has never finished higher than a tie for eighth in the US Women's Open, had a 67. That's the best round she's had in the event.
'I feel like I've had a very complicated relationship with US Opens,' Korda said, 'but I'm happy to be in the position I am heading into the weekend.'
She was 5 under with Hinako Shibuno (69), Sarah Schmelzel (68), Maja Stark (69), Yealimi Noh (71) and 2020 U.S. Women's Open champion A Lim Kim (71). Jing Yan (69), Lin Grant (69), Chiara Tamburlini (71) and Jinhee Im (72) were 4 under.
After not making a birdie until her 18th hole Thursday, Korda had seven of them Friday thanks to her improved putting.
'Honestly, I was hitting really good putts yesterday,' Korda said. 'I was hitting it exactly where I wanted to and they just weren't falling. It was one of those days. Today I did the same thing.'
Kim was one of 18 competitors still on the course finishing their rounds when weather concerns halted play for about 54 minutes. Kim was alone in second place at 6 under and playing No 17 when the delay happened.
The 29-year-old from South Korea said she waited out the delay in a car. Kim then returned to make par on No 17 before bogeying the par-5 18th to fall back into a tie for second.
Kim said she still likes where she stands midway through the tournament.
'Really good position,' Kim said. 'I love to chase the leader, so let me see.'
Saigo made sure everyone would be chasing her this weekend as she bounced back from some early misfortune.
After starting out at No 10 and getting birdies on No 11 and No 12, Saigo bogeyed the par-5 No 14 when she got a bad break. Her third shot hit the flagstick, bounced backward and rolled all the way to a bunker.
But she recovered by getting four birdies in a five-hole stretch from Nos 16-2.
'I thought that was not my mistake,' Saigo said. 'I just thought to myself that it was just unlucky, and then I just changed my mind.'
Play was suspended due to darkness Friday night with 12 players unable to finish.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
American tennis superstar breaks 22-year-old Andre Agassi record to make history with insane French Open win
Tommy Paul made history on Sunday, becoming the first American man in the French Open quarterfinals since Andre Agassi in 2003. The 28-year-old beat 25th-seeded Alexei Popyrin of Australia 6-3, 6-3, 6-3 in less than two hours to smash the record Agassi has held for the last 22 years. Paul, who is himself seeded 12th at Roland-Garros, was coming off consecutive five-set victories but breezed to this win, helped by saving 9 of 10 break points he faced while converting all but one of the six he accumulated. Both Paul and Popyrin won junior singles titles on the red clay in Paris, with the American's coming a decade ago. Paul, who was a semifinalist at the Australian Open in 2023 on hard courts and a quarterfinalist at Wimbledon last year on grass courts, is now the only active U.S. man to reach the final eight at Grand Slam tournaments on three surfaces. There haven't been multiple U.S. men in the French Open quarterfinals since 1996, when Jim Courier and Pete Sampras both made it that far. Agassi was the last from the country in the men's semifinals at the French Open when he won the championship in 1999 to complete a career Grand Slam. Ben Shelton and Frances Tiafoe are also both still in the men's singles competition, though the former faces a very tough test against No 2 seed Carlos Alcaraz later on Sunday. Tiafoe, meanwhile, faces unseeded German Daniel Altmaier for his chance to join Paul in the quarterfinals, with the US giving themselves a strong chance of having some representation in the semifinals. Five American women reached the fourth round this year, with No. 16 Amanda Anisimova taking on No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka on Sunday. Coco Gauff, Jessica Pegula, Madison Keys and Hailey Baptiste are scheduled to play for quarterfinal berths on Monday, with Gauff seeded No 2 and Pegula No 3.
The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
When are people too old to do their jobs?
Old people are making news. Just this past week in Denmark, the retirement age for collecting a government pension was increased to 70 years old, an issue that has caused much debate in that country. Here in the US, questions have been raised about former president Joe Biden's mental acuity while he was still in office. Warren Buffett announced his retirement at the age of 94 from Berkshire Hathaway. Donald Trump's behavior, at the age of 78, continues to raise concern, if not alarm. When are people too old to do their jobs? Recent regulations are encouraging workers to stay on the job by increasing the age for when people are required to start cashing out their 401(K) plans from 70 1/2 years to 75 years by 2033. However, a recent study found that over half of workers over the age of 50 have been pushed out of jobs before they would have retired willingly. US law prohibits forced retirement, but some well-known companies – like General Electric, Exxon, Intel and Apple – have age-based restrictions for their senior executives and board members. And yet, according to a recent report from the Federal Reserve, more than half of small businesses are owned by people over the age of 55, including 70% of firms with more than 50 employees. Should they still be in charge? It's a growing concern because the population of old people is growing. In the US, the number of people over the age of 65 was about 9% of the total population in 1960. Today it's closer to 18% and by 2054, 84 million adults ages 65 and older will make up an estimated 23% of the population. Life expectancy was less than 70 back in 1960. Now it's closing in on 80. People are living longer and working longer. We all know people in their 80s who are sharper than those who are half their age. How old is too old? Clearly you can't assign an arbitrary number that defines old age. Mick Jagger is 81. Bruce Springsteen is 75. Paul McCartney is 82. They're all still performing in front of countless fans. Tom Cruise – age 62 – is still jumping out of planes. Cher, 78, recently released a holiday album. Richard Branson, 74, continues to command the Virgin empire. Say what you want about Trump, but even at 78, he's running around like someone half his age. But do we really want a 78-year-old running the country? Or piloting a commercial jet? Or performing open heart surgery? Should someone that old be putting out fires, fixing roofs, driving trucks, working in a steel foundry, herding cattle? Probably not. In fact, when someone hits a certain age, everything needs to be re-evaluated. What age? 60. A 2023 study found that almost half of the Fortune 500 were run by people over the age of 60. However, only 28 companies were still being run by a CEO over the age of 70. Something happens during that time and a recent study from Stanford University may provide the clue. According to that research, which tracked thousands of different molecules in people aged 25 to 75, two major waves of age-related changes were detected at around ages 44 and again at 60 which helps explain why spikes in certain health issues including musculoskeletal problems and cardiovascular disease occur. This may account for the 'sudden accumulation of wrinkles, aches and pains or a general sensation of having grown older almost overnight'. It's not gradual. It's a burst. And while the study focused on physical effects, I believe there's something else going on once someone hits the age of 60: a loss of energy. I have a friend in his early 60s who used to run a bar in downtown Philadelphia and now works as a manager at a manufacturing firm. I asked him if he has any interest in running a bar in the future. 'Are you kidding?' he said to me. 'I just don't have the energy. I just want to play a little golf and spend time with my grandkids.' And that sums it up. Most people lose energy when they hit their 60s. Of course, we're still interested in the world. But work has become less of a priority. We prefer to do other, more fun things in the remaining years of our lives. We tire a little quicker. We go to bed earlier. We move a little slower. I was recently offered the opportunity to buy a competitor's business and I declined. Sounded interesting but, like my friend, I just couldn't imagine mustering the energy needed to make such a transaction successful. The thought exhausted me. It still does!
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Expert reveals the 'desperate' text you shouldn't send if you want a second date
Dating in 2025 can be a hugely stressful and complicated affair as most singletons know all too well. Many people go on enjoyable dates, and then are surprised when the person they shared a pleasant evening with just disappear. This can be especially galling when everything seemed to go well, and a second date seemed to be in the bag. Not knowing what went wrong can mean daters are left questioning their behaviour, ruminating on what happened - and why. According to sex and relationship expert Anita Fletcher, many daters are likely jeopardising their chances of securing a second date by sending 'desperate' text messages that can put off a prospective partner. She said: 'We've all been there, but some texts scream desperation louder than others.' Anita has identified six texting mistakes people make that can make them appear desperate and needy, and come across as red flags to potential partners. 1. 'Hey, you there?' (The desperation check-in) This seemingly innocent message is a major red flag, according to Anita. She explained that sending it multiple times throughout the day shows you're constantly checking if they're available – and that you have nothing better to do. 'This text reveals anxiety about being ignored,' she said. 'It puts pressure on the other person to respond immediately, which feels suffocating in early dating.' Better alternative: Wait until you have something specific to say. Try: 'Just saw that new coffee place you mentioned! Have you tried their cold brew?' 2. The triple text trap Message 1: 'Hey! How's your day?' Message 2: 'Hello???' Message 3: 'Guess you're busy…' Nothing says needy like bombarding someone with multiple messages when they don't respond fast enough. This behaviour shows you can't handle even brief periods without validation. 'Triple texting demonstrates poor emotional regulation,' said Anita 'It suggests you'll be high-maintenance in a relationship.' Better alternative: Send one thoughtful message and give them time to respond. If they don't reply within 24 hours, move on gracefully. 3. 'Why aren't you responding?' Asking people why they aren't instantly replying to messages 'reveals deep insecurity and an inability to respect boundaries', according to Anita This confrontational text is relationship kryptonite. Demanding explanations for response times shows controlling behaviour before you've even met in person. Fletcher notes: 'This message reveals deep insecurity and an inability to respect boundaries. It's manipulative and will make anyone run for the hills.' Better alternative: Simply don't send it. People have lives outside their phones. If someone consistently ignores you, take the hint. 4. The Overshare Avalanche 'I had such a terrible day at work and my boss yelled at me and then I got a parking ticket and my mum called about Thanksgiving drama and I'm so stressed I can barely function…' Dumping your emotional baggage via text before establishing a real connection is overwhelming and inappropriate. 'Early dating should be fun and light,' Fletcher advises. 'Save the heavy stuff for when you've built trust and rapport.' Better alternative: Keep early texts upbeat. Try: 'Work was intense today! Looking forward to unwinding. How was your day?' 5. 'I Miss You' (After one date) Texting someone to say 'I miss you' after just one date comes across as needy and suggests unhealthy attachment patterns Declaring intense feelings too soon is a classic needy move. Telling someone you miss them after minimal interaction suggests unhealthy attachment patterns. 'This text implies you're already emotionally dependent on someone you barely know,' Fletcher warns. 'It's too much, too fast.' Better alternative: Express enjoyment without intensity: 'Had a great time last night! Would love to do it again soon.' 6. The Validation Seeker Fishing for compliments or reassurance through text screams insecurity. These messages put the other person in an awkward position of having to boost your ego. Fletcher explains: 'Confidence is attractive. Constantly seeking validation suggests you don't believe in your own worth.' Better alternative: Build confidence through actions, not texts. Focus on sharing interesting thoughts or planning fun activities instead. Discussing why people send needy texts after just meeting someone, sex and relationship expert Anita Fletcher said: 'Most people send needy texts because they're operating from a place of fear – fear of abandonment, fear of rejection, or fear of not being good enough. 'When someone doesn't respond immediately, anxious attachers spiral into worst-case scenarios. They think silence means disinterest, when really the other person might just be in a meeting.' According to Anita, the irony is that in being needy, the texter 'creates exactly what we're trying to avoid – rejection'. She continued: 'When we bombard someone with desperate messages, we're essentially saying "I don't trust you to like me unless I constantly remind you I exist". That's exhausting for the recipient. 'My advice? Put down the phone and work on yourself. The best relationships happen when two complete people choose to share their lives, not when one person desperately clings to another for validation. Remember, the right person won't need constant texts to remember you exist – and you won't need constant reassurance that they care.'
