
Man allegedly murdered boy, 14, with sword in ‘brutal string of attacks'
A man allegedly murdered a 14-year-old boy with a Samurai sword in a 'brutal string of attacks' that were indiscriminate, a court has heard.
Marcus Arduini Monzo, 37, is on trial charged with murdering Daniel Anjorin during a 20-minute spate of attacks in Hainault, north-east London, on April 30 last year.
He denies the charge as well as four counts of attempted murder.
None of the victims were known to Monzo and 'it did not matter who they were or indeed how old they were', prosecutor Tom Little KC told the Old Bailey on Wednesday.
He told jurors that they may conclude 'there can be little doubt that the defendant was intending to kill as many people as he could that day and that he is therefore just as guilty of the four charges of attempted murder as he is the charge of murder'.
Prior to the incident, Monzo had skinned and deboned his own cat, the prosecutor said.
It is alleged that the first attack was when Monzo drove his grey Ford Transit van at speed into Donato Iwule.
The pedestrian was 'catapulted some distance' into a nearby garden on Laing Close and the vehicle smashed a concrete pillar and fence, the court heard.
The defendant then exited his vehicle and struck Mr Iwule in the neck with the sword, jurors were told.
Footage played to the court appeared to feature Mr Iwule wailing and later running away after the alleged murder attempt that started at 6.51am.
Mr Little told jurors: 'If he had not managed to escape it seems inevitable that he too would have been killed.'
The defendant then re-entered the badly damaged van and drove a short distance down Laing Close, the court heard.
Daniel was wearing headphones and school sports clothes when he left home for school at 7am and was 'slain' by Monzo, Mr Little claimed.
The schoolboy sustained a 'devastating and unsurvivable chopping injury to the left hand side of his face and neck' from the sword, the prosecutor added.
Mr Little described the wound as 'essentially a near-decapitation'.
Emergency services were called and police and paramedics arrived 'at the point and just after' the alleged attack.
Pc Yasmin Mechem-Whitfield pursued the armed defendant through a series of alleyways through residential properties, the court heard.
Monzo struck her three times with the sword that had a 60cm blade using 'extreme force', the prosecutor said.
She sustained 'significant injuries' that could have 'easily' killed her, he added.
Monzo is accused of then entering a nearby house through a backdoor and walking upstairs into a sleeping couple's bedroom and attacking them.
Their daughter was sleeping in a bed next to theirs and Mr Little said: 'They were spared only because in fact the four-year-old child woke up and started to cry.'
The defendant shouted to the couple on a number occasions, 'do you believe in god?' before leaving the property through the front door, the court heard.
Police had been following the defendant and he was backed into a nearby garage area near to the other alleged attacks, the court heard.
He is accused of then striking Inspector Moloy Campbell once with the sword before attempting to escape police.
The defendant is said to have climbed on top a garage but he was eventually disarmed and arrested.
During police interview he initially answered 'no comment', but later recalled having a large sword, the court heard.
Monzo claimed his personality had switched and that 'something happened, like a game happening', Mr Little said.
The defendant compared the events to the movie The Hunger Games and said 'part of my lifestyle is to heal… been through traumatic events in childhood'.
He also told police that he had 'many personalities spread out' and that one of them is a 'professional assassin', the prosecution said.
Monzo denies Daniel's murder, and has pleaded not guilty to the attempted murders of Donato Iwule, Sindy Arias, Henry De Los Rios Polania and Pc Yasmin Margaret Mechem-Whitfield, as well as wounding Inspector Moloy Campbell with intent.
He also denies aggravated burglary and possession of a bladed article relating to a kitchen knife.
That weapon was found in his van and had non-human blood on it which was linked to the killing of his cat, the court heard.
Monzo previously admitted two counts of having an offensive weapon, namely two swords.
Jurors were told these were the alleged murder weapon, and a Katana sword with a 22cm blade that was discovered in his van and had no blood on it.
Mr Little argued there is 'no issue in this trial as to who carried out this brutal string of attacks and what the defendant did on that fateful early morning'.
He said Monzo had been under the influence of cannabis, and that: 'We say that the defendant's conduct was brought about by self-induced intoxication in the form of drugs.
'We say this led to a psychotic disorder but not one meeting the requirements to make out the partial defence to murder of manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility.'
Drug-induced psychosis is not a recognised medical condition and cannot alone establish diminished responsibility, he said.
Psychiatrists will discuss whether Monzo met the threshold for a schizotypal disorder diagnosis, he added.
The trial continues.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
9 minutes ago
- The Sun
Brazen owner of Bully which mauled boy, 5, blames child and insists ‘he's harmless…I still let him play with my toddler'
A DAD whose dog 'savaged' a five-year-old boy says it was a "genuine mistake" and claims the child was actually in the wrong - sparking a furious response from his mum. Aaron Eccles' Pocket Bully attacked Antonio Quinn - four at the time - after he unexpectedly came into the house and startled the pet, resulting in injuries to his face and legs. 11 11 The little boy subsequently needed a three-hour operation to stitch his wounds - while police seized the Bully, as well as a Staffordshire Bull Terrier, owned by Aaron's partner, at the scene. Aaron told The Sun: 'It's a genuine mistake and the parents aren't accepting the fact that their child's in the wrong for coming into the house." And says he'd still be happy for the dog to play with his own six-month-old baby son. However, Antonio's flabbergasted mum Amanda Holmes has hit back at the owner's claims, saying her son is "very lucky to be alive" and was certainly not to blame. She said "trying to justify" the dog's behaviour is "sickening". Aaron, who described arriving home on May 26 to see '20 armed officers' outside, believes the incident does not necessarily make his pet Harry - initially reported to be an XL Bully - 'dangerous'. Antonio had followed Aaron's six-year-old stepson into the house in Oswaldtwistle, Lancashire, after they'd been playing outside - with only his older sister, age 12, upstairs. Staffy Bella, who was in season, was in a cage to keep her separate from Harry. Aaron, 34, told The Sun: 'I came back and there's 20 armed police terrorising my dogs, pepper spraying them and winding them up. 'They told me my dog's savaged somebody, a four year old boy.' Mum screamed 'my baby's dead' as girl, 10, killed by XL Bully weeks after excitedly telling friends about her 'new pet' He added: 'He got reported as an XL Bully but it wasn't. He's a Pocket Bully.' Pocket Bully dogs are not part of the XL Bully ban. It's a criminal offence to own or possess an XL Bully dog in England and Wales unless you have a valid Certificate of Exemption. Pocket Bullies are a much smaller, though similar breed. Aaron does not believe there would have been the same police response if they'd known initially Harry was a much smaller dog. And argues, due to most dogs' sense of territory and reaction to an 'intruder', any breed could have reacted in a similar manner. 'The dog's never met the little boy before so he's thought he's an intruder and he's nipped him to warn him to get out,' he said. 'He's not ragged him or savaged him or anything. He has bitten him but it's a warning bite. 'He hasn't grabbed hold of him and shook him about - nothing like how it's been portrayed.' 11 11 Describing Antonio's injuries, Aaron said: 'The marks on his legs are from his (the dog's) paws when he jumped up at him and also where he's caught his neck.' The dad explained that his partner Nikki Morris, 35, had told her son not to go into the house while she went to collect Aaron from the gym, but in the space of 10 minutes from her leaving the incident happened. He said: 'It's a genuine mistake and the parents aren't accepting the fact that their child's in the wrong for coming into the house. 'The worst has happened and now it's my family and dogs that are suffering.' Aaron previously spent time homeless, with two-year-old Harry as his only companion, and said he's extremely loyal to him, but 'like a teddy bear' usually. 'He's never lashed out before,' he explained. 'He was just protecting his home - what he's loyal to. They don't differentiate between an adult and a child when they think it's a burglar. But he certainly hasn't mauled him.' He continued: 'I've got an almost six month old baby, the Pocket Bully lies and sleeps next to him. 'I've got videos and pictures of him lying next to him licking him to death. 'I wouldn't have an aggressive dog next to my baby or my stepson.' 11 11 11 He said he has since had a call from a police officer asking if he would like both dogs euthanised, but told them no. Aaron understands there will now be an assessment process to understand if the dogs are too dangerous to be allowed home, and he could face charges - but hasn't yet been arrested. 'The police aren't responding to me, it's like they don't care,' Aaron continued. 'I'm not 100 percent what's going to happen with the dogs.' He said Staffy Bella had only escaped her cage when police arrived and antagonised Harry. Describing the scene when he arrived home, he said: 'All armed police…they were just pepper spraying them through the door, through the back door and banging on the windows, getting them all aggressive while the other armed response officers were coming through the front door, spraying loads of pepper spray on them. 'It was sickening to watch. You don't do that to someone's pet. They're telling me they're aggressive, and I'm saying if you spray me with pepper spray and wind me up I'll be aggressive as well.' Aaron and Nikki have bought Antonio a present but said they are letting the dust settle a little more before they try to speak to his family. 'We felt bad, but the fact of the matter is they need to accept their little boy was in the wrong, entering the house and they just won't accept that,' Aaron said. 'We're trying to fix things and it's just getting blown out of proportion. It was a tragic accident, there's no point torturing both dogs when one wasn't doing anything and the other isn't aggressive, he was just doing his job. 'He was just protecting his home.' Asked if one of the dogs attacked any of his children he might feel differently, Aaron said: 'If I thought the dogs were capable of doing that [a much worse attack] to the children then I wouldn't think twice, I wouldn't be keeping them. 'I know 100 percent those dogs wouldn't do anything to my kids.' He added: 'My stepson winds them up no end and they still don't do anything to him. They lick him. 'This is why I'm going so ballistic because I know my dogs are not dangerous.' EXPERT COMMENT: 'The law must tread carefully with dog attacks involving children' Rhianna Tsiattalou, Solicitor at criminal defence & civil litigation practice Stokoe Partnership Solicitors, told The Sun: 'Cases involving dangerous dogs - particularly where children are harmed are profoundly tragic, and the law must tread a careful line between protecting the public and ensuring fairness in the application of justice. "This case falls within the remit of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, which makes it a criminal offence to own or be in charge of a dog that is 'dangerously out of control' in any place. This includes private property. "Where such an incident results in serious injury, harsh penalties can be imposed, including jail time. If a child is involved, courts treat the matter with particular gravity. "S3 (1A) and (1B) of the Dangerous Dogs Act provides an exemption from prosecution for householders in instances where their dog has been dangerously out of control with respect to trespassers in their home. "However, this does not apply to dog attacks on trespassers in gardens, driveways or outbuildings. "The Anti-social Behaviour, Crime & Policing Bill, Fact Sheet: Dangerous Dogs (part 7) makes clear that this is intended to differentiate between innocently intentioned trespassers or trespassers in or entering a dwelling that are more likely to have a malign intent. "Often, individuals unaware of legal responsibilities around dog ownership face the full weight of prosecution only after tragedy occurs. "Proactive education and tighter regulation around breeding, containment, and training are therefore essential. "As lawyers, we frequently see cases where non-dangerous breeds become involved in catastrophic events, often due to a momentary lapse in containment or unpredictable behaviour. "In these instances, it is important for cases to be dealt with promptly and without excess delay due to the undesirability of keeping dogs kennelled for long periods of time (as expressed in the Home Office Guidance Circular 29/1998). "Dogs that are seized should be assessed immediately to ascertain whether they truly are a danger to the public.' Antonio's mum Amanda told The Sun: "My son was playing with their son and he went to the door while their son got a drink. "The dog ran out and attacked my son. Aaron and Nikki, the parents, weren't even in the house. They was out so maybe if they was in it could of been prevented. "That dog could have gone for anyone passing by... I'm sick of hearing hearsay." She added: "My lad's a very lucky boy." Amanda called for Aaron to release footage from his home CCTV to show what happened, but Aaron said his cameras were not recording at the time. Asked how Antonio is doing, she said: "He's doing really well - he's not been to school though and it's his birthday today (Friday)." She said doctors have warned the boy's scars will be permanent, but his mum added: "Obviously, they will fade with age and I'm going to be getting him some good oil." 'It was the worst thing ever' Amanda previously said her son had managed to run home, but was left covered in blood following the attack. He was later taken to Royal Manchester Children's Hospital where he underwent surgery. He suffered injuries to his cheeks, underneath his chin and his right thigh. Amanda, 34, said: "It was the worst thing ever, it was horrible. It was so scary. "I couldn't believe my son's face was like that, it was like something out of a horror film." The mum-of-three went on to say: "I heard a scream - you know your child's cry. "Antonio was then at the front door, he had blood all over his face and his cheeks were hanging off his face. "I was screaming, asking what's happened and then I rang the ambulance. "Luckily, the dog didn't remove any skin - they just ripped it. "They've managed to put it all back together, they've done a really good job with him." Despite Antonio's injuries, he seems to be doing well, she'd added. She said: "I thought that bringing him home from the hospital, when we've got a dog, might be an obstacle for him but he's been absolutely fine. "The dog knows that he's been injured so she hasn't left his side. "Antonio is doing okay, you can tell that he's shocked by it. "He's still in a lot of pain but he's doing well." In a Facebook post last week, Amanda said: "My son is 4 years old, he plays with my neighbour's son. "...went in the house for some juice and there dog pounced on my son and attacked him he's lucky to still be comments that are being made on the groups trying to justify the dog are sickening. "If them dogs were brought up right they should never of seen a 4 year old boy as a threat!" A Lancashire Police spokesperson said: "We're appealing for information and footage after a child suffered a dog bite in Oswaldtwistle. "We were called at shortly after 1.30pm on Monday 26th May following reports that a child had been bitten by a dog on Thwaites Road, Oswaldtwistle. "The child, a four-year-old boy, was taken to hospital with injuries to his leg and face. "Thankfully, those injuries are not life threatening. "Two dogs have been seized by police - a Staffordshire Bull Terrier type and a Pocket Bully Type and the dog owner has been identified and will be spoken to in due course." Which dog breeds are banned in the UK? THERE are specific regulations in place that prohibit certain dog breeds from being owned or bred in the UK. So what are the illegal dogs in the UK? Which dog breeds are illegal in the UK? People tend to think of large, vicious dogs when they imagine being bitten by one. But the truth is that many types of dogs are known to bite humans, whether provoked or not. However, it's important to remember that just because a breed tends to bite humans, that doesn't mean that they all do. British law determines five breeds of dog are illegal to own, breed, sell or give away. These are an XL Bully, Pit Bull Terrier, Japanese Tosa, Dogo Argentino and Fila Brasileiro. 11


Sky News
10 minutes ago
- Sky News
Rachel Reeves turning around UK's finances 'like Steve Jobs did for Apple', claims minister
Rachel Reeves will turn around the economy the way Steve Jobs turned around Apple, a cabinet minister has suggested ahead of the upcoming spending review. Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle compared the chancellor to the late Apple co-founder when asked on Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips where the £86bn for his department is coming from. The package, confirmed ahead of the full spending review next week, will see each region in England granted £500m to spend on science projects of their choice, including research into faster drug treatments. Asked by Trevor Phillips how the government is finding the money, Mr Kyle said: "Rachel raised money in taxes in the autumn, we are now allocating it per department. "But the key thing is we are going to be investing record amounts of money into the innovations of the future. "Just bear in mind that how Apple turned itself around when Steve Jobs came back to Apple, they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office. "Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, moving to a series of products like the iPod. "Now we are starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future, some of the high-tech solutions that are going to be high growth. We're investing in our space sector... they will create jobs in the future." The spending review is a process used by governments to set departmental budgets for the years ahead. Asked if it will include more detail on who will receive winter fuel payments, Mr Kyle said that issue will be "dealt with in the run-up to the autumn". "This is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years, so you're sort of talking about two separate issues at the moment," he said. 0:42 Scrapping universal winter fuel payments was one of the first things Labour did in government - despite it not being in their manifesto - with minsters saying it was necessary because of the financial "blackhole" left behind by the Tories. But following a long-drawn out backlash, Sir Keir Starmer said last month that the government would extend eligibility, which is now limited to those on pension credit. It is not clear what the new criteria will be, though Ms Reeves has said the changes will come into place before this winter. Mr Kyle also claimed the spending review will see the government invest "the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system". However, he said the chancellor will stick to her self-imposed fiscal rules - which rule out borrowing for day-to-day spending - meaning that while some departments will get extra money, others are likely to face cuts.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Birmingham landmark building death as man falls from upper levels
The death of a man who fell from the upper floors of a high-rise Birmingham landmark is not being treated as suspicious, police were called to The Cube on Wharfside Street at 18:30 BST on Saturday.A spokesperson for West Midlands Police said the man's family were aware and being supported by in the building's 240 flats have been allowed to go back to their homes and access to commercial venues was fully restored, the force confirmed. Venues in the £100m development were temporarily closed while emergency services carried out investigations.A police spokesperson asked for "privacy and understanding" as inquiries continued. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.