logo
26-Foot-Tall Giant ‘Fungi-Like' Organism Might Be A Lost Form Of Life — A Biologist Explains

26-Foot-Tall Giant ‘Fungi-Like' Organism Might Be A Lost Form Of Life — A Biologist Explains

Forbes07-04-2025

Prototaxites, a towering organism that once dominated the barren landscapes of early terrestrial Earth 440 to 360 million years ago, has long been an enigma among paleobiologists.
For nearly two centuries, its true identity eluded scientists, as fossilized remains revealed a structure that defied classification. Its colossal, branchless trunks were a puzzle, hinting at a lost chapter in the history of life on this planet.
The first fossils of Prototaxites were unearthed in the mid-19th century, sparking debates over whether they were the remnants of ancient conifers or peculiar forms of algae.
As research progressed, the scale and unique anatomy of these fossils gradually steered scientists toward a fungal interpretation. Yet, as new analytical techniques emerged, the simplicity of earlier interpretations was challenged.
Today, fresh evidence suggests that Prototaxites might represent an entirely novel branch of life, one that no longer exists in our modern world.
The story of Prototaxites begins with its discovery in 1843, when paleontologists first stumbled upon giant, cylindrical fossils along the ancient riverbanks of Gaspé Bay in Quebec, Canada.
Early interpretations by scientists such as John William Dawson initially identified these massive trunks as decayed conifer remnants. However, the absence of typical conifer anatomy quickly cast doubt on this idea.
Subsequent studies revealed a complex internal structure — an interwoven network of narrow tubes with diameters as small as 50 micrometers. This internal architecture featured a variety of tube types: some thick and unbranched, others thin with intricate, branching networks, suggesting an alternative origin.
Physiologically, Prototaxites was unlike any organism known today. Its towering form — it could reach heights of up to 26 feet and stretch a meter wide — dwarfed other Devonian flora such as Cooksonia (see image below) and indicates that they likely played a critical ecological role in early terrestrial ecosystems.
Furthermore, the variable carbon isotopic ratios found in its tissues supported the idea that it did not rely on photosynthesis but instead derived carbon from a mix of substrates — a characteristic trait of heterotrophic organisms that cannot produce their own food.
Thus, for much of the 20th century, the prevailing view among scientists was that Prototaxites was a giant fungus. Early microscopic examinations by researchers like Arthur Church in 1919, coupled with subsequent work by Francis Hueber in 2001, solidified the notion that these fossils were the fruiting bodies of an enormous fungal organism.
Chemical analyses in 2007 by teams including C. Kevin Boyce provided further support by revealing carbon isotope ratios characteristic of heterotrophic fungi. However, the classification was never without controversy.
Over the years, debates raged as further evidence complicated the picture. Prototaxites lacked key biochemical markers found in all known fungi, most notably, traces of chitin in their cell walls.
While some researchers attempted to reconcile these differences by suggesting that Prototaxites might be a giant lichen (a symbiotic association between fungi and photosynthetic partners), other studies instead pointed to its entirely distinct molecular fingerprint.
Repeated reclassifications have demonstrated that traditional fungal taxonomy could not fully accommodate the unique features of Prototaxites. In effect, while early work grouped it with Ascomycota, later discoveries forced scientists to consider whether it represented a lost lineage that defies the modern fungal framework altogether.
The most recent breakthrough in our understanding of Prototaxites comes from a yet-to-be peer-reviewed study focused on a species designated as Prototaxites taiti, and investigated by a team from the University of Edinburgh.
These scientists re-examined exquisitely preserved specimens from the famed Rhynie chert — a deposit known for its exceptional fossil quality from the early Devonian period.
Their in-depth analysis combined advanced imaging techniques, such as confocal laser scanning microscopy and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, with machine learning algorithms trained to recognize molecular fingerprints of known organisms.
What emerged was startling: P. taiti exhibited internal tube structures with subtle annular thickenings, along with medullary spots that did not match the reproductive or structural elements found in modern fungi.
The chemical analysis further showed a complete lack of chitin while revealing the presence of unusual lignin-like compounds. These findings led the researchers to conclude that P. taiti could not be comfortably placed within any existing branch of the eukaryotic tree, be it fungi, plants, or animals.
Fungi or animal? Not possible due to the lack of chitin and the structure of the cell walls. A plant or algae? Very unlikely considering what we know about its chemical composition. A lichen? Its anatomy indicates otherwise.
Instead, it appears to represent an entirely novel form of multicellular life — a lineage that evolved complex structures and a unique heterotrophic lifestyle before disappearing without a trace, leaving us to wonder about what now seems like a missing branch of the tree of life.
Does reading about Prototaxites and how scientists continue to discover entirely new forms of life on our incredible planet fill you with wonder? Take this test to find out how deep your sense of belonging is with the natural world: Connectedness To Nature Scale

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scientists Found Footprints That Push Humanity's Timeline Back By 40 Million Years
Scientists Found Footprints That Push Humanity's Timeline Back By 40 Million Years

Yahoo

time19-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Scientists Found Footprints That Push Humanity's Timeline Back By 40 Million Years

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn in this story: The common ancestor of all tetrapods (including humans) was previously thought to have emerged at the dawn of the Carboniferous period. Fossilized tracks from an early reptile are now the oldest known reptilian tracks, meaning the tetrapod ancestor most likely appeared earlier, during the Devonian period. These tracks were made by clawed feet—a characteristic of amniotes. Their appearance pushes back amniotes evolution by 35-40 million years. Between 359 and 350 million years ago, it rained. Lizard-like creatures crawled through the mud in what was once Gondwana (but is now Australia), leaving behind footprints that became frozen in time, fossilizing as mud turned to stone over the aeons. These tracks would later be unearthed in an excavation that questioned how far back in time our tetrapod ancestors walked on land. Tetrapods (meaning 'four legs' in Greek) include all amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals, and are thought to originate from lobe-finned fish that made their way out of primeval seas on fins that functioned as primitive legs. Humans are tetrapods, and like all tetrapods (except amphibians), we are also amniotes, with eggs that protect developing embryos in amniotic sacs. Amniotes are thought to have diverged from amphibians at the dawn of the Carboniferous period, about 355 million years ago. Mammals would diverge from reptiles and birds only 30 million years later. The fossil footprints were discovered at the edge of an paleontological site in eastern Victoria known as Broken River (or Berrepit in Taungurung, the language spoken by local indigenous people). Whatever creature left imprints of its feet on the riverbank provides the first evidence of terrestrial life in this area, and claw marks from the footprints suggest it was an amniote—except that amniotes weren't supposed to have evolved so early in the Carboniferous period. 'This pushes back the likely origin of crown-group amniotes by at least 35-40 million years,' the Australian and Swedish team of researchers who excavated at the Berrepit site said in a study recently published in the journal Nature. '[Amniotes] cannot be much younger than the Devonian/Carboniferous boundary, and [the origin of tetrapods] must be located deep within the Devonian.' Before this find, the oldest known amniote fossils were tracks from Notalacerta and the bones of Hylonomus. Both species were sauropsids—part of a larger group of extant and extinct reptiles and birds that presumably lived during the late Carboniferous. The common ancestor of all tetrapods was thought to have emerged in the earliest years of the Carboniferous, but that changed when this team of experts came upon the mysterious tetrapod footsteps from Berrepit. They now think that the tetrapod ancestor appeared during the Devonian, and that amniotes began to diverge from them about 395 million years ago, 35 to 40 million years earlier than previously thought. It is evident that the footsteps came not just from a tetrapod, but from an amniote because almost all amniotes have claws or nails. Claw marks scratched the wet earth after a short rain shower, and there is no evidence of a body or tail dragged across the ground. While it is impossible to know what this animal actually looked like, the spacing between forefeet and hind feet indicates that it was about 17 cm (about 6.7 inches) from shoulder to hip, with neck, head, and tail lengths unknown. Using a modern water monitor as a proxy, the researchers determined it must have been about 80 cm (about 31.5 inches) total in length. Something else could possibly be demystified by the footprints—the end-Devonian mass extinction was thought to have such a catastrophic impact, it could explain why tetrapods don't appear in the fossil record for another 20 million years. Tetrapods dating to after the gap are much more diverse and advanced than their pre-gap predecessors. Early Carboniferous sauropsid tracks mean that tetrapods must have been branching out from their common ancestor sometime during the Devonian, meaning that the mass extinction had little effect on the evolution of tetrapods. 'The [fossil footprints] have a disproportionate impact on our understanding of early tetrapod evolution because of their combination of diagnostic amniote characteristics and early, securely constrained date,' the researchers said. 'They demonstrate, once more, the extraordinary importance of happenstance and serendipity in the study of severely under-sampled parts of the fossil record.' You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?

Newly Discovered Fossil Tracks May Rewrite Early History of Reptiles
Newly Discovered Fossil Tracks May Rewrite Early History of Reptiles

Yahoo

time15-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Newly Discovered Fossil Tracks May Rewrite Early History of Reptiles

Fossil claw prints found in Australia were probably made by the earliest known members of the group that includes reptiles, birds and mammals, according to a study published in Nature today. The findings suggest that this group — the amniotes — originated at least 35 million years earlier than previously thought. Early amniotes evolved to lay eggs on land, because they were encased in an amniotic membrane that stopped them drying out. Before this study, the earliest known amniote fossils had been found in Nova Scotia, Canada, and were dated to the mid-Carboniferous period, about 319 million years ago. The latest findings suggest that amniotes also existed in the early Carboniferous period, around 355 million years ago. 'This discovery is exciting, and if the tracks have been interpreted the right way, the findings have important implications for our understanding of tetrapod evolution,' says Steven Salisbury, a palaeontologist at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] The claw tracks were found in a sandstone block on the bank of the Broken River at Barjarg in the state of Victoria, by two co-authors of the paper who are not professional scientists. This area of the river is known as Berrepit to the Indigenous Taungurung people who own the land. The sandstone block is part of a larger structure that had already been dated to the early Carboniferous on the basis of radiometric and tectonic evidence. Fossilized tracks of aquatic invertebrates and fish found in the same layer were also dated to this time period. The three sets of tracks in the study have clear footprints with indentations from claws, a feature of reptiles but not of amphibians. 'Having these hooked claws on the trackways indicates they're definitely a reptile-like animal,' says John Long, a palaeontologist at Flinders University in Adelaide, Australia. There are no marks of dragging bellies or tails, and the authors suggest that the amniotes that left the tracks were able to keep their bodies and tails off the ground while they walked on land. But Salisbury questions that interpretation, because it would mean the animals had developed sophisticated structures for complex locomotion, which would be surprising given how early they are. 'It seems more likely that the tracks were made by an animal that was 'punting' in shallow water, rather than walking on land,' he says. Until now, evidence suggested that the last common ancestor of modern amphibians and amniotes lived around 352 million years ago. But if the ancestors of reptiles existed during the early Carboniferous, their split from amphibians must have occurred even earlier, says Long. Dating by the team suggests that the groups diverged in the Devonian period, about 380 million years ago. To estimate the probable time of divergence, Long and his colleagues used several dating methods. One included geological evidence from radioactive decay in volcanic rock layers above and below the fossil tracks. They also used molecular phylogenetics, which compares similarities and differences in the DNA of living species to estimate their evolutionary relationships and how recently their last common ancestor lived. The discovery could also shift the origin of amniotes to the Gondwana landmass. This formed the southern portion of the Pangaea supercontinent and gave rise to multiple current landmasses, including Africa and Australia. Previously, the earliest known amniotes were found in North America, leading palaeontologists to think that the group originated in the Northern Hemisphere. But more evidence from Australian fossils is needed before definitively shifting their origin site, says Long. 'Australia is a vast area with fewer palaeontologists on the ground,' Long says. 'We've got a lot more unexplored fossil sites where new things like this keep turning up.' This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on May 14, 2025.

Ancient reptile tracks rewrite when animals conquered land
Ancient reptile tracks rewrite when animals conquered land

Yahoo

time15-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Ancient reptile tracks rewrite when animals conquered land

After a brief rain in part of the ancient supercontinent of Gondwana 350 million years ago, a reptile pressed its small claws into the still-wet ground. Its tracks, which have been discovered in Australia, mean it is the oldest-known vertebrate animal to have permanently abandoned the oceans for dry land, a study suggested on Wednesday. It also significantly pushes back the date for when these four-limbed pioneers made this important evolutionary step that would eventually lead to humans conquering the globe. The tracks were found by amateur archaeologists on a 30-centimetre-wide sandstone slab in a mountainous area of the southeastern Australian state of Victoria. First there was a single footprint of an unknown animal which has "raindrop pockmarks all over it," Per Ahlberg, a palaeontologist at Sweden's Uppsala University, told AFP. This suggests it was made before the brief shower, said the senior author of a new Nature study describing the discovery. Then there were two sets of tracks from after the rain. The second set of tracks suggest this reptile ancestor "was in more of a hurry", he added. "You see the claws making long scratches on the ground." - 'Keyholes' into 'lost world' - The researchers cannot determine whether both sets of tracks were made by the same individual animal, but Ahlberg thinks this is unlikely. The animal was 60-80 centimetres long and would have looked "quite lizard-like", he added. That the animal had claws is a clear sign it was an amniote, a group of animals which today includes mammals, birds and reptiles. Its ancestor tetrapods -- notable for their four limbs -- split into two groups, amniotes and amphibians. While amphibians had to return to water to lay their eggs, amniotes evolved to have eggs strong enough to survive on land, shedding its last connection to water life. The discovery indicates that amniotes existed 35 to 40 million years earlier than previously thought, during the turn of the Devonian and Carboniferous periods, the study said. This suggests the "water-to-land-dwelling transition" may have taken place in just 50 million years, much quicker than had been believed, Stuart Sumida of California State University commented in Nature. That would be just the latest twist in the tale of how animals rose from the ocean to dominate the land. "The only way to ever understand it is to look through these tiny little keyholes that we find into this strange, dark, lost world," Ahlberg said. pcl-dl/jj

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store