Musk lashes out at Senate's take on ‘beautiful' megabill
Elon Musk has slammed the Senate version of President Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" as support for the motion to proceed with the legislation in the upper chamber comes down to the wire. "The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!" Musk wrote on X on Saturday afternoon. "Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." Senate Republicans dropped the final text of the sprawling 940-page bill late on Friday evening.
Trump has said he wanted the Senate to pass the legislation — which would include sweeping spending cuts to pay for the tax cuts he signed into law in 2017, increased spending for the military, oil exploration, and immigration enforcement —before the July 4th weekend. Republicans, who have 53 seats, plan to pass the bill using the process of budget reconciliation. That would allow them to sidestep a filibuster from the Democrats as long as the legislation relates to the budget. For the past week, the Senate parliamentarian's office has issued advisories about which parts do not comply with the rules of reconciliation. The biggest sticking point was major changes to Medicaid. Specifically, the legislation would require that Medicaid recipients who are able-bodied and without dependent children would have to work or participate in community service or education for 80 hours a month. In addition, the legislation limits the amount of money states can tax health care providers like hospitals and nursing homes to raise money for Medicaid.
But the American Hospital Association said this would devastate rural hospitals that rely on Medicaid dollars. The parliamentarian removed the provider tax provision, but the new version of the bill simply delays when the cap goes into effect. Before the text dropped, Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who hails from a state with a large number of rural hospitals and that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act in 2023, said he was a "no" on the motion to proceed because of Medicaid. "It will cause a lot of people to have to be moved off of Medicaid," he told The Independent on Friday evening. "Is just inescapable. The price tag's too high, and the transition protocol, even if you agree with the ultimate target." In addition, the legislation also rolls back some of the renewable energy tax credits implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act, the legislation former President Joe Biden signed that used the same budget reconciliation process.
If the bill passes the Senate, it will return to the House of Representatives, which passed it last month. But plenty of conservatives have made objections to the Senate's changes. Trump lobbied senators on Saturday while playing golf with Senators Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. Tillis, who's up for re-election in 2028, outlined his opposition to the bill again on Saturday, saying in a statement that "It would result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities. This will force the state to make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands in the expansion population, and even reducing critical services for those in the traditional Medicaid population."
Senator Tim Sheehy of Montana wrote on X ahead of the vote on Saturday, "I have just concluded productive discussions with leadership. I will be leading an amendment to strip the sale of public lands from this bill. I will vote yes on the motion to proceed. We must quickly pass the Big Beautiful Bill to advance President Trump's agenda." While, President Donald Trump threatened Senate Republicans who defy him and his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' as the legislation cleared a key test vote in a dramatic night in the upper chamber of Congress. After negotiations dragged on for hours Saturday evening, the Senate voted 51 to 49 to open a debate on the legislation, moving one step closer to landing the bill on Trump's desk by his self-imposed Fourth of July deadline.
The Independent
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
How US-Israeli strikes on Iran made our world more dangerous
The recent hostilities between Israel and Iran, and the entrance of the US into the conflict at the behest of its regional ally, are once again posing serious questions about diplomacy, international order and nuclear proliferation. Israel's launching of strikes against Iran drew from the same playbook it has employed in its multiple interventions across the region in recent years. This strategy comprises assassinations and the targeting - in addition to military sites - of civilian infrastructure, such as universities and hospitals. Israel's recent strikes killed hundreds of civilians in Iran. One need not be an expert in international affairs to see that this offensive was designed to derail the delicate diplomacy that had been taking place between Iran and the US since President Donald Trump's return to power. Washington's participation in this conflict not only rode roughshod over Trump's promise to end costly American interventions abroad, but it also highlighted the continuing hold that Israel maintains over US policy in the Middle East. Despite Tel Aviv's boasts of air supremacy, and its stated desire to curtail Iran's offensive capabilities, Tehran remained able to launch devastating attacks against military targets in Israel. It also made a performative, symbolic strike against the American al-Udeid airbase in Qatar. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The triumphalist messaging from the US in the wake of its initial hits against Iran's nuclear sites has now been overshadowed by a frenzied debate over the relative success or failure of the strikes, and the whereabouts of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile. Predicting the next moves is beyond the purview of even the most seasoned observer, especially given the continued fragility of the ceasefire. The leadership in Tehran long ago telegraphed what its response would be to direct US attacks on Iranian territory, as evidenced by the carefully calibrated al-Udeid strike. Disrupting shipping through a closure of the Strait of Hormuz was tabled, while a more forceful response might have seen a targeting of Israel's own nuclear sites - facilities that face no international oversight, with Israel remaining the Middle East's only nuclear-armed state. Global insecurity Fanciful notions of an 'unconditional surrender' by Iran were always highly unrealistic. If Trump's attempt to impose a ceasefire on Israel and Iran fails, then the stage could be set for a costly war of attrition, in which Israel and the US can ill afford to get bogged down. By attacking a non-nuclear-armed state, Israel and the US have massively increased incentive for other states to weaponise their own nuclear programmes Iran's nuclear knowledge cannot be bombed away, despite Israel's strategy of scholasticide. A further dangerous aspect is Trump's regular changes of direction, extreme even by his own highly capricious standards - with a seeming desire for negotiations being immediately followed by US attacks against nuclear facilities, before swinging back to diplomacy again. Running in parallel with confused statements about Washington's stance on regime change in Iran, this lack of direction makes it very difficult for Tehran to read the US president's true intentions. This makes calibrating a response even more precarious. Ultimately, two nuclear-armed powers might have violated international law to pre-emptively disable a perceived threat emanating from Iran's nuclear programme, despite intelligence estimates to the contrary. Concurrent hopes of somehow fomenting a viable domestic challenge to the Islamic Republic were also naive, and showed that regime change is not something that can be imposed under aerial bombardment. Domestic political polarisation and questions over the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic still exist within Iran, but expecting change to come through external military force shows a total lack of understanding of Iran's history and its people's response to foreign intervention. By allowing Israel to bomb Iran, Trump is pushing Tehran to go nuclear Read More » The Israeli-US action has created a world that is now far more insecure. These developments will increase calls within Iran to weaponise its nuclear programme as a deterrent against further action. By attacking a non-nuclear-armed state, Israel and the US have massively increased the proliferation risk, giving other states an incentive to weaponise their own nuclear programmes as a means of ensuring their survival. Having a nuclear deterrent has worked for Israel so far, whereas pursuing nuclear diplomacy has thus far not worked for Iran - so other states with nuclear ambitions will look to this moment to help shape their own decision-making. Finally, the weak, copy-pasted response by European states to Washington's entry into the conflict only further undermined the foundations of the 'rules-based order' they hold so dear. With their reputation for upholding this vision already in tatters over the double standards applied in relation to Ukraine and Gaza, their cowardly submission to US and Israeli 'security interests' further underlines both their hypocrisy and ineffectiveness. As the US and Israel pursue a 'might is right' strategy, their impunity trashes any sense of international norms or consensus, resulting in greater insecurity for all. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Tahawul Tech
2 hours ago
- Tahawul Tech
Lebanon 3.0: From Elon Musk's call to a National Reboot powered by Code, Collaboration, and Confidence
A surprise phone call from Elon Musk to Lebanese President Joseph Aoun is sending ripples across the region — and a clear message to global investors: Lebanon is back on the opportunity map. In the call, Musk reportedly expressed interest in doing business in Lebanon, a gesture that senior officials described as a symbol of renewed global confidence in the country's direction. The timing couldn't have been more telling , arriving on the eve of LebTech 2025, Lebanon's leading technology summit, and in the early days of a new reformist cabinet, now widely referred to as Lebanon 3.0. A New Operating System for the State Led by President Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, Lebanon 3.0 signals a departure from the entrenched patterns of crisis management that defined earlier governments. It represents a generational and strategic reboot of the Lebanese state: leaner, more technocratic, and future-facing. The addition of new ministries such as Technology and Artificial Intelligence isn't just a bureaucratic update — it's a structural acknowledgment that digital transformation is now central to national sovereignty and economic recovery. Rather than a set of policies, Lebanon 3.0 is being framed by insiders as a new operating system — designed to prioritize trust, deliver real services, and empower people. At LebTech 2025, that framework was laid out with clarity by Minister of State for Technology & Artificial Intelligence and Minister of Displaced, Kamal Shehadi. A Moment of Alignment Speaking to a packed audience of entrepreneurs, investors, engineers, and students, Shehadi opened by calling the summit a moment, not just a meeting , a convergence of vision and action. He cast the digital transformation as already underway, rooted in infrastructure and ambition, and guided by an urgent national mission. 'The world is watching Lebanon — not with doubt, but with renewed interest,' he said, referencing the Musk call. 'But with that spotlight comes responsibility. If we want to turn interest into impact, we must be ready , with the right foundations, the right tools, and the right mindset.' The conference, which spanned themes from AI in public services to cybersecurity and sustainability, mirrored the country's expanding tech agenda. It also reflected a deliberate shift toward inclusivity and co-creation — with students, public sector innovators, and diaspora voices playing prominent roles. The Loop That Powers Reform Shehadi's address introduced a three-part framework driving Lebanon's digital transformation: trust, services, and talent — not as a checklist, but as a system in motion. The development of ethical AI frameworks, data protection laws, and cybersecurity standards aims to rebuild public trust. That trust, in turn, makes it possible to deliver smarter, faster, more transparent digital services. But the country's greatest long-term asset, he emphasized, is its people. He described this interdependence as a feedback loop: when citizens trust systems, services improve. When services improve, confidence in the state is restored. And when confidence returns, talent — both local and diaspora — stays, contributes, and leads. This loop is now at the heart of what's being called the 'Lebanese Digital Republic' — not just a tech vision, but a reimagined contract between citizen and state. A New Public Spirit One of the most human moments came when Shehadi paused to acknowledge the young, pro bono team working with his ministry. He asked them to stand so the audience could see who was quietly powering much of the behind-the-scenes change. These volunteers, many working without pay or title, have helped shape policy and platforms alike , driven by belief more than mandate. Their presence in the room wasn't symbolic. It was proof of a changing culture within Lebanon's public institutions , one that is younger, faster, more collaborative, and rooted in purpose. Shehadi urged attendees to engage with them, share ideas, and collaborate. 'Let's meet them where they are, work together, and bring our shared vision closer to reality , one collaboration at a time.' From Headline to Horizon As Lebanon embarks on this new phase, the symbolism of Musk's call is already giving way to deeper questions: What comes next? Will the country capitalize on this momentum? Can it deliver results quickly enough to retain the attention of global innovators and the trust of its own people? For Shehadi, the answer lies in turning networks into systems, and energy into structure. He closed not with predictions, but with a challenge: to show the world and one another that Lebanon is still capable of building something that lasts. As headlines swirl around Elon Musk's call, some will focus on the name, the intrigue, the possibility. But for those building Lebanon 3.0 from the ground up — students, coders, policy minds, and public servants , the call is not the story. It's the signal. The real story is what Lebanon chooses to do with that signal: to show not just that it's open for business, but ready to lead , with its people, its ideas, and its code.
Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
Gold gains on dollar weakness, US jobs data awaited
Gold firmed on Monday as the dollar hovered near its lowest level in more than three years, while the market's focus shifted to a slew of U.S. jobs data due later this week that could influence the Federal Reserve's rate cut trajectory. Spot gold was up 0.4% at $3,287.29 per ounce as of 0959 GMT, after hitting its lowest since May 29 earlier in the session. Bullion has risen 5.3% so far this quarter. U.S. gold futures gained 0.4% at $3,298.80. The dollar index hovered near its lowest level since March 2022. A weaker dollar makes greenback-priced bullion less expensive for holders of other currencies. "I see two factors which are interlinked supporting gold. A weaker U.S. dollar and the ongoing pressure of President (Donald) Trump on the U.S. Federal Reserve to cut interest rates," said Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS. Trump said on Friday he would not appoint anyone to head the Federal Reserve who would not support lowering interest rates. On the U.S. data front, investors awaited the ADP employment report due on Wednesday, and non-farm payrolls report on Thursday, which could provide insights into the Fed's future path for interest rate cuts. The focus remains if the data suggests a further slowdown in economic activity, which will allow the U.S. central bank to cut interest rates, Staunovo said. Investors are anticipating 66 basis points of Fed rate cuts by the end of this year, starting in September. Gold tends to gain appeal in a low-interest rate environment, as it offers no yield. On the trade front, Canada scrapped its digital services tax targeting U.S. technology firms late on Sunday, just hours before it was due to take effect, in a bid to advance stalled trade negotiations with the United States. Spot silver rose 0.2% to $36.05 per ounce, platinum firmed 1.6% to $1,361.0, while palladium was up 2.3% at $1,160.09. (Reporting by Anushree Mukherjee in Bengaluru; additional reporting by Ishaan Arora; Editing by Mrigank Dhaniwala Editing by Bernadette Baum)
