
Glossy black cockatoos could be pushed towards extinction in Victoria if burns go ahead, experts warn
Glossy black cockatoos could be pushed towards extinction in Victoria if planned burns of 13,000 hectares of forest go ahead, ecologists and conservationists warn.
The Victorian government is being urged to abandon the burn, which is intended to reduce bushfire risk.
Glossy black cockatoos are listed as vulnerable in Victoria, where they are found only in East Gippsland.
Nearly two-thirds (64%) of their Victorian habitat was burned in the 2019-20 black summer bushfires, leaving the species almost entirely dependent on 48,000 hectares of unburnt coastal forest between Lake Tyers and Orbost, about 350km east of Melbourne.
A peer-reviewed study published in the journal Australian Field Ornithology estimated that the Victorian population had declined by three-quarters since the fires.
Glossy black cockatoos feed almost exclusively on the cones of black sheoak trees.
Peter Menkhorst, a retired ecologist who worked for Victorian government wildlife agencies for 48 years and a co-author of the study, said they probably had the most specialised diet of any Australian bird, and that a fire in black sheoak forests could badly damage their food supply. He said any unburnt stands of black sheoak were 'of critical importance for the species'.
A state government report into biodiversity after the fires agreed that surviving black sheoak stands were of 'great significance for this highly specialised bird species' and advised 'great care' would be needed in managing the forests.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
But conservation groups have expressed concern that the state's forest fire management department plans to burn what they estimate is 13,000 hectares of the bird's remaining habitat over the next three years.
Gippsland Environment Group and the Victorian National Parks Association say the birds may never recover if the burns go ahead.
Louise Crisp, a founding member of the Gippsland organisation, said she was 'horrified' that significant sheoak stands near Lake Tyers and Lakes Entrance were burned.
'What they're doing is burning the glossies' pantry,' she said.
Even a low-intensity fire could cause the cones to open and shed their seed, she said, which was a problem because the birds wouldn't eat seed from the ground.
'My biggest fear is that the population will not have a chance to recover from the incredible effects of the black summer bushfires because Forest Fire Management Victoria are continuing to burn their sole food resource.'
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
A spokesperson for Forest Fire Management Victoria said uncontrollable fire was the greatest threat to cockatoo feeding habitat and low-intensity planned burns helped reduce fuel loads and protect sheoak trees.
'Ensuring the protection of native wildlife and habitat in the short and long term is a key priority when implementing our planned burning program,' they said.
Dr Daniella Teixeira, an ecologist who researches glossy black cockatoos at Queensland University of Technology and is chairing a species recovery team, said fires in sheoaks needed to be planned carefully to avoid areas where the birds were feeding, particularly if there were nest sites nearby. Fire that was too hot could kill the trees.
The birds were 'very fussy' about what they ate, she said, 'even down to the individual trees'.
Teixeira said the species was long-lived and slow to reproduce, laying a single egg every one or two years, and in decline across its range.
BirdLife Australia's president, Mandy Bamford, said Victoria's glossy black cockatoo population was 'tiny', estimated at 250 birds. Those birds needed sheoaks to feed on and safe places to nest, she said, and BirdLife had worked with the department to map priority sites that needed protection.
The department's preferred burn window in autumn posed an additional risk, she said, as it overlapped with the bird's breeding season. 'If there are nestlings in hollows, they can't get away. Also, potentially you're reducing food sources at a critical time when they're feeding chicks.'
Concerns have been raised about Forest Fire Management Victoria activities after an endangered greater glider was found dead next to a tree-felling operation in Yarra Ranges national park in May 2024. A critically endangered orchid received a last-minute reprieve from a planned burn last October after a local environment group threatened legal action to protect its habitat.
Jordan Crook, a nature campaigner at the Victorian National Parks Association, said authorities had a duty to protect threatened species along with houses and infrastructure. He said fire management planning was happening 'behind closed doors' without independent oversight.
'We need to fundamentally change how we use fire in the landscape and manage bushfires,' he said. 'The way we're currently doing it is damaging our biodiversity and our wildlife habitat.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Our NSW council banned street-visible solar panels. What can I do?
Our home is in a heritage conservation area. Council rules prohibit the installation of solar panels that are visible from the street. However, there are dozens of homes with recently installed panels that are very prominent. When I queried council, they explained that I could provide addresses of these 'offenders' and they may be fined and/or forced to remove panels. I want owners who are prepared to invest in solar to be rewarded, not penalised. What can I do? – Scott, New South Wales Kat George says: When the old and new collide it often takes systems and regulations time to catch up. The rules about installing climate-friendly technologies on heritage homes is a prime example of where change is slow. If you want to install solar panels on a heritage home, the general rule across most local councils is that they can't be visible from the street. This generally applies to all modifications including second storeys and extensions. Creative design can assist you in finding workarounds for other modifications to your home, but it's a bit tricker with solar panels. The aspect of your roof will dictate the best place to install solar panels for efficiency – in other words, where they're going to collect the most sun to be effective in powering your home. It's widely considered the best angle for solar panels in Australia is north-facing, so if your street-facing roof happens to be north-aligned, it starts to get tricky. For what it's worth, I live in a heritage terrace with a north-facing facade, so I understand your frustration at a personal level too. That said, it's still possible to install solar panels on a heritage home. If you're happy to install them out of sight of the street, you're free to proceed. But if they're going to be visible to the street, it might take a bit more legwork on your part. It sounds as though some of your neighbours may have taken the 'ask for forgiveness not permission' route to installing solar on their heritage homes. It also sounds like forgiveness won't necessarily be forthcoming if they're caught. As fines and the removal of solar panels are likely to be costly, I wouldn't recommend taking the same pathway. To take legitimate steps towards installing street-visible solar panels to your roof, the first step is to find out if your heritage listing falls under local council or state jurisdiction (in NSW this is the Heritage Council of NSW). You can check this via the State Heritage Register. If your home's heritage listing falls under your local council's jurisdiction, call them back and ask them how to apply for a development application or heritage exemption certificate. You'll need one of these to argue your case to council about why you should be given an exemption to install visible solar panels. It will be at their discretion to approve or deny your request. Some local councils have already taken strides to make it easier for heritage homeowners to install solar panels. The City of Sydney, for instance, has issued a guideline for exemptions to solar panel installation in heritage areas to 'encourage greater uptake of sustainable and energy efficient infrastructure and dwellings', after the local council declared climate change to be a national emergency. If, on the other hand, you have a state heritage listing, it's likely there will be a higher level of scrutiny to your application and you'll need to apply directly to the Heritage Council of NSW. As for the higher-level change you mention – of solar owners being rewarded rather than penalised – it's likely with net zero targets looming, governments and local councils will consider better ways to support heritage homeowners to invest in green technology, as the City of Sydney has. In the meantime, you can write to your local council and local state MPs to air your concerns. Better still, if you have the time and inclination, you can instigate community action. Letterbox your local neighbourhood, encourage others to write to local representatives, and start a petition that you can deliver to decision-makers to support your case for systemic change.


BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
Plans lodged for 35 affordable homes in Cornish hamlet near Hayle
A proposal has been lodged for 35 affordable homes to be built in a Cornish plans have been submitted by Coastline Housing in an area between Camborne and Hayle "that has a housing need of 133 dwellings".The application is for a combination of flats, bungalows, and two to four-bedroom houses off Relistian Park in Reawla. It comes a week after Coastline Housing applied to build 42 affordable homes and a 20-space community car park in Lanner, near Redruth. The site is surrounded by residential development to the west and open fields to the east, the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) plans include a parking space for each one-bed property and two spaces for each home with two bedrooms. Secured and covered cycle storage would be provided within proposed sheds in the private gardens. 'Green corridors' If approved, each home would have a lawn and a 1.8m (5.9ft) paved patio, the LDRS a planning statement, the applicants said: "To further enhance biodiversity, a green space with native planting and a diverse mix of species will be introduced to extend habitat availability throughout the seasons. "New hedgerows along site boundaries will establish green corridors, supporting foraging and movement for a range of species."


Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Captain Cook's lost ship is FOUND after 250 years: Scientists discover the sunken remains of HMS Endeavour in Newport Harbor
The final resting place of Captain Cook's Endeavour, the legendary ship that first brought the British to Australia, has been identified after 250 years. Between 1768 and 1771, the Endeavour became the first European vessel to reach Eastern Australia and circumnavigate New Zealand 's main islands. Yet while James Cook was established as one of history's most famous explorers, his ship faded into obscurity, becoming a troop transport. She was then sold in 1775, renamed the Lord Sandwich, and finally scuttled off the US coast in 1778, during the American War of Independence. Now the sunken remains of the Endeavour have been found in Newport Harbor, Rhode Island, after experts formally identified her with a wreck called RI 2394. The verdict was announced by the Australian National Maritime Museum (ANMM) in a new report, bringing 25 years of study to a close with a 'definitive statement'. Museum director Daryl Karp said: 'This final report is the culmination of 25 years of detailed and meticulous archaeological study on this important vessel. 'It has involved underwater investigation in the US and extensive research in institutions across the globe. Between 1768 and 1771, the Endeavour became the first European vessel to reach Eastern Australia and circumnavigate New Zealand 's main islands 'This final report marks our definitive statement on the project.' Experts reached their conclusion after comparing the sunken ship with historical plans of the Endeavour. They discovered timbers whose placement corresponds exactly with the locations of Endeavour's main and fore masts. Measurements from the wreck also correlated with those taken during a 1768 survey of Cook's ship. Furthermore, analysis of the wood revealed it had European origins, consistent with records of the Endeavour being repaired in 1776, several years after the expedition. Collectively they represented a 'preponderance of evidence' that the Newport wreck was indeed the Endeavour. ANMM archaeologist, Kieran Hosty, said: 'The timbers are British timbers. 'The size of all the timber scantlings are almost identical to Endeavour, and I'm talking within millimetres – not inches, but millimetres. HMS Endeavour The HMS Endeavour was a British research vessel sailed by Captain James Cook. Cook left England in Endeavour in 1768 in search of Australia - the 'unknown Southern Land'. It was a small ship - less than 100ft long - and housed a crew of around 100 sailors. Before coming to Australia, Captain Cook reached New Zealand in 1769. He circumnavigated New Zealand's North and South Islands and drew the first complete chart of the country's coast. Endeavour was the first ship to reach the East Coast of Australia, landing in Botany Bay in 1770. The vessel returned to England in 1771 and was largely forgotten before it was sold in 1775 and renamed The Lord Sandwich. Source: Australian National Maritime Museum 'The stem scarf is identical, absolutely identical. This stem scarf is also a very unique feature – we've gone through a whole bunch of 18th-century ships plans, and we can't find anything else like it.' The findings could prove controversial however; when ANMM released a preliminary report in 2022 identifying RI 2394 as the Endeavour, their research partners at the Rhode Island Marine Archaeology Project (RIMAP) pushed back. In a statement, RIMAP asserted that they were the lead organisation for the study, and that the finding was both 'premature' and a 'breach of contract' – but ANMM experts have seen enough. Archaeologist James Hunter said: 'The Lord Sandwich was intentionally scuttled – it was sunk on purpose as a block ship. 'The chances of finding artifacts that would provide an immediate identification, such as a bell, were very unlikely. And that's because anything that was of value would have been stripped out of that ship before it was sunk. 'But what has been recovered up to this point is indicative of an 18th-century time frame.' Mr Hosty added: 'We'll never find anything on this site that screams Endeavour. You'll never find a sign saying 'Cook was here'. 'We will never see a ship's bell with Endeavour crossed out and Lord Sandwich inscribed on it. 'We've got a whole series of things pointing to RI 2394 as being HMB Endeavour. The Endeavour was a small ship - less than 100ft long - and housed a crew of around 100 sailors 'And so far we found lots of things that tick the box for it to be Endeavour and nothing on the site which says it's not.' Only around 15 per cent of the vessel remains with researchers now focused on what can be done to protect and preserve it. In a statement, ANMM acknowledged RIMAP's 'fine historical analysis and detailed artifact recording'. The statement continued: 'We acknowledge that RIMAP continues to accept that RI 2394 may be Endeavour, but they are not ruling out other candidate shipwreck sites.' Ms Karp also acknowledged the work of the ANMM archaeological team, of Dr Kathy Abass in Rhode Island, and of the Rhode Island authorities. RIMAP has been contacted for comment. How do we know that Endeavour has been found? Historical evidence tells us that five vessels were deliberately sunk by the British in 1778, just north of Goat Island in Newport Harbor. One of them was Lord Sandwich - previously known as James Cook's Endeavour. Four shipwreck sites have been found in this small area, including RI 2394. Therefore, one of these four wrecks is highly likely to be Endeavour. All five ships were deliberately sunk - 'scuttled' - by cutting holes in their hulls. There is clear archaeological evidence of scuttling holes in the surviving hull timbers of RI 2394. This confirms that it was one of the vessels sunk in 1778. We know from archival documents that Lord Sandwich (Endeavour) was the largest of the five ships sunk in this location. Archaeological evidence confirms that RI 2394 is much larger than any of the other eighteenth century shipwrecks in the area. Archaeologists have been able to measure the length of a large section of the shipwreck RI 2394. Its length almost perfectly matches the dimensions shown on historic Royal Navy plans for Endeavour. Many other details of the shipwreck RI 2394, right down to the size of specific pieces of timber used in its construction, closely match historic plans for Endeavour. Known as 'scantlings', these measurements also confirm that RI 2394 was the same size (tonnage) as Endeavour. Endeavour was originally built to carry coal. The shipbuilder used some techniques that were quite uncommon in the eighteenth century. One of these was a form of joint in the bow (front) of the vessel, known as a scarph. Archaeologists have found this very rare scarph joint in the bow of RI 2394. The overall shape and layout of the shipwreck RI 2394 also closely matches historic plans of Endeavour. This includes its very flat bottom and the places where the masts were located. These are important diagnostic clues in confirming the identity of the Endeavour wreck. Finally, while some of the ships sunk in Newport Harbor in 1778 were constructed in America, Endeavour was built in Britain. Timber samples taken with permission from RI 2394 have confirmed that it is made of British or European timbers.