SXSW Doc ‘Take No Prisoner' Follows America's Top Hostage Negotiator in Battle to Free L.A. Public Defender From Venezuelan Prison
In 'Take No Prisoners,' director Adam Ciralsky and Subrata De were given unprecedented access to America's former top hostage negotiator, Roger Carstens, as he battles to free L.A. public defender Eyvin Hernandez from a Venezuelan prison.
The opening sequence of the documentary could be mistaken for a Jason Bourne film. On a tarmac in Miami, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro's nephews — convicted drug traffickers — are loaded onto a U.S. government plane to be exchanged for seven Americans: Matthew Heath, Osman Khan, and the so-called Citgo Five. Ciralsky was the only journalist-filmmaker on the tarmac at Joint Base San Antonio when the newly freed hostages arrived.
More from Variety
'The Studio' Co-Creator Seth Rogen Says Martin Scorsese Told Him 'You Guys Say "F--" Too Much'
'The True Beauty of Being Bitten by a Tick' Review: A DIY Wellness Satire Steeped in Thuddingly Obvious Metaphors
Blake Lively Speaks in Public for First Time Since Justin Baldoni Controversy at 'Another Simple Favor' SXSW Premiere
But Ciralsky and De decided not to focus 'Take No Prisoners' on that 2022 recovery, which was the largest of its kind since Americans were released from Iran in 1981. Instead, the duo follow Carstens as he attempts to free Hernandez, an L.A. County deputy public defender who, in 2022, took a vacation to Colombia. There, he joined a friend on a trip to the Colombian-Venezuelan border to resolve a passport issue. At the border, Hernandez and his friend were intercepted by Venezuelan forces and jailed in a maximum security prison for 'criminal association and conspiracy.'
'While there was plenty of gold in retelling the events leading up to the initial Miami release (of the seven Americans), as filmmakers, Subrata and I felt that the odyssey to rescue Eyvin might make for a compelling vérité documentary,' says Ciralsky. 'We had no idea how difficult that would be, how long it would take, or how much it would cost.'
In 2022, Ciralsky was given unprecedented access by the Biden administration to embed in a hostage negotiation process with Carstens. Remarkably, the White House and Maduro's government allowed Ciralsky to observe, and in some cases, film negotiations that stretched from the tiny island of Canouan in the Grenadines to the Venezulan regime's stronghold in Caracas. Ciralsky ultimately turned his time with Carstens into a doc and a 2024 Vanity Fair article also titled 'Take No Prisoners,' which Lionsgate Television optioned and Hulu is developing into a scripted project titled 'The Envoy' with showrunner Alexi Hawley.
Variety spoke with Ciralsky and De about 'Take No Prisoners' ahead of the film's world premiere at SXSW on March 8.
What drew you to tell the story of Eyvin Hernandez's family's fight to get him back home?
Ciralsky: For all of the celebrity and media attention around Brittney Griner and Evan Gershkovich for good reason, because of their platform, we couldn't believe that an L.A. County public defender was rotting in a Venezuelan prison, and nobody was taking notice. It's necessarily advocacy, but we were the only people continually following Eyvin's story. There would be an occasional news hit in Los Angeles, but nobody was there following the journey of this family who didn't know any senators and were not friends with their congressmen.
De: It's also important to note that Roger treated everybody with the same level of priority. That was really important to illustrate. Roger really prioritized every American and their families in the same way. So, being able to see behind the scenes, which many people don't get to see, was really important to us.
The access that the Biden administration gave you was unbelievable. Why do you think they did that?
Ciralsky: I think they genuinely felt that this was one of their foreign policy achievements – securing the freedom of Americans from China, Iran, Russia, and Venezuela. Also, there wasn't another side, a constituency in Washington that was saying, 'You know what? I'm for keeping Americans in prison (in foreign countries).' So, it was that weird issue where they are like, 'Who is going to criticize us?'
De: Also, I think that because it was a documentary where we were following the story long-term, there just wasn't this kind of frenetic activity over managing stories that might be coming out the day of. So in their day-to-day, it felt far more measured in the sense.
This film transitions between moments of intense governmental and political drama, and moments of sympathetic, emotional anguish with the Hernandez family. How did you find the balance between these two contrasting tones?
De: The people at the center of these hostage situations, both in government and the families, live in a slow – often drawn out – high-wire emotional state. For the families, it's a visceral nightmare. There isn't a moment when they aren't living in this miasma of the unknown. Plagued by constant questions. Could we be doing more? What is happening to our person? And emotionally tortured by glimmers of hope – and then massive let-downs. The intense political and government drama is also an emotional roller coaster for the teams involved. They get so close to getting someone home, as you see in the film, and then, an obstacle or unknown block shuts it all down. It's crushing. So the family and hostage rescue team stories are very much interwoven. It was a shared emotional landscape
How are you feeling about finding distribution for 'Take No Prisoners' out of SXSW?
Ciralsky: We have some interest. It's this weird out-of-order, non-sequential thing that we have going on. There's an article, then the article will become a scripted series, and then the documentary comes out.
Best of Variety
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
Oscars 2026: First Blind Predictions Including Timothée Chalamet, Emma Stone, 'Wicked: For Good' and More
What's Coming to Disney+ in March 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
30 minutes ago
- New York Post
Self-proclaimed Tren de Aragua gangbanger who shot two NYPD cops slapped with 28-year prison sentence
A self-proclaimed Tren de Aragua gang member who shot two NYPD cops in Queens will spend decades behind bars for the shocking attack. Bernardo Raul Castro Mata, 20, learned in Queens Supreme Court that he'll serve a 28-year sentence Tuesday — a little more than a year after police chase in East Elmhurst ended in a close-range shooting. 'It is simply a miracle that Officers Richard Yarusso and Christopher Abreu are alive today,' said Melinda Katz, district attorney for Queens, in a statement. Advertisement 3 Bernardo Raul Castro Mata, 20, will serve nearly three decades behind bars. for New York Daily News 3 NYPD officers Richard Yarusso and Christopher Abreu miraculously survived the close-range shooting. Robert Mecea The hero cops — including NYPD Sgt. Nicholas Condos — had spotted Mata, a Venezuelan migrant, riding am unregistered motorcycle the wrong way on Ditmars Boulevard early June 3, 2024, prosecutors said. Advertisement Mata, who also weaved his motorcycle onto a sidewalk with pedestrians, ran off as cops walked up — sparking a wild chase in which Yarusso pursued on foot, Abreu followed in an unmarked police car and Condos rode on the migrant's ditched motorbike, officials said. When the cops caught up and scuffled with Mata, the crook pulled .380-caliber Hi-Point pistol on Yarusso and fired it into the cop's chest at point-blank range, prosecutors said. He also shot Abreu in his leg, prompting the officer to return fire and hit the migrant in his foot. The case added to growing concerns in New York City over Tren de Aragua, the migrant crisis and then-President Joe Biden's border policies. Advertisement Mata had crossed illegally into the US during 2023, but the case against him was dismissed two weeks before the shooting because he had no known criminal ties at the time, The Post had exclusively reported. The pint-sized shooter, in hospital-bed confessions after his arrest, claimed to be a Tren de Aragua gang member whom two fellow goons tapped to commit robberies. He also said it was common for Tren de Aragua crooks to 'shoot at police' because cops in Venezuela 'shoot gang members for minor infractions.' 3 Mata ditched his motorbike in East Elmhurst before running away from cops. James Messerschmidt Advertisement A judge subsequently placed Mata in protective custody during a dramatic arraignment hearing, in which the shooter was wheeled into the courtroom to find more than 60 uniformed NYPD officers waiting for him. The case wound its way through Queens court until May 20, when Mata pleaded guilty to second-degree attempted murder and assault charges. Judge Kenneth Holder, during Mata's hearing Tuesday, sentenced the migrant to 25 years in prison on the attempted murder charge and three years for assault. The sentences will be served consecutively. Police Benevolent Association President Patrick Hendry praised the sentence. 'This sentence sends the message we desperately need,' the union leader said in a statement. 'Anyone who attacks a New York City police officer should expect swift justice and a very long stay in prison.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hundreds rallying at Supreme Court demand Trump return disappeared gay asylum-seeker Andry Hernández Romero
In front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Friday, about 300 people gathered to demand the return of someone the U.S. government erased. Keep up with the latest in + news and politics. Andry Hernández Romero — a 31-year-old gay Venezuelan asylum-seeker, actor, and makeup artist — fled to the United States legally in 2024 to escape homophobic persecution. He passed a credible fear interview and was preparing for his asylum hearing. But before that hearing could take place, the Trump administration deported him under a 2025 executive order invoking the Alien Enemies Act — a law from 1798 once used to imprison Japanese Americans during WWII. Related: Rachel Maddow sees Americans' active resistance as key to overcoming Donald Trump's strongman game Hernández Romero was sent to CECOT, El Salvador's notorious mega-prison, accused of gang affiliation based on two crown tattoos above the names of his mother and father. His attorneys say he had no criminal history. Immigration authorities never gave him a chance to respond. He was last seen in chains, crying out, 'I'm gay. I'm a stylist.' Since that day, there has been no proof of life. 'Andry is a son, a brother. He's an actor, a makeup artist. He is a gay man who fled Venezuela because it was not safe for him to live as his authentic self,' Lindsay Toczylowski, executive director of the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, which is representing Hernández Romero, told the crowd. 'He's a dedicated member of a theater troupe that he has been in since he was seven years old… someone who put nothing but beauty and light into this world.' Related: 'We believe at this moment that he sits in a torture prison, a gulag in El Salvador,' she continued. 'We say 'believe' because we have not had any proof of life for him since the day he was put on a U.S. government-funded plane, forcibly disappeared.' HRC national press secretary Brandon Wolf, Immigrant Defenders Law Center executive director Lindsay Toczylowski, HRC senior VP Jonathan Lovitz and Crooked Media co-founder Jon Lovett speak at the U.S. Supreme Wiggins for The Advocate 'Andry is not alone,' she added. 'He is one of more than 235 men who were disappeared and rendered to CECOT with no due process… Many of them, like Andry, were in the middle of their asylum cases. They were denied their day in court. In an attempt to erase their very existence, they were sent to suffer in a prison that officials in El Salvador have bragged that people only leave in a coffin.' Jon Lovett, the Crooked Media co-founder and Pod Save America host, warned the crowd that the deportation program isn't over — and its logic is meant to desensitize the public. 'They're going to try to say it proves whatever bullshit they've been saying,' Lovett said, referring to the administration's claim, despite an order from the U.S. Supreme Court to return him, that deportees were out of the federal government reach. On Friday, the administration returned Maryland father Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the U.S. from El Salvador to face criminal charges that his attorney says are dubious. Related: 'What that tells us is two things. One, it means the pressure matters. They can pretend they're immune to politics and democracy — they are not. That's one. And two: they can send people back at any time they want. They can bring Andry back anytime they fucking want," Lovett said. He blasted DHS Secretary Kristi Noem for refusing to confirm whether Hernández Romero is alive. 'Kristi Noem, a mother, is asked to give proof of life. That's it. Proof of life that Andry, this innocent person who'd only touched the immigration system because he followed the rules, is alive — and she wouldn't do it.' Gay California U.S. Rep. Robert Garcia pleaded with Noem during a recent House hearing, during which she refused to acknowledge the concern about Hernández Romero. Sarah Longwell, the lesbian publisher of The Bulwark and a former longtime Republican political strategist, said the outrage many former conservatives feel over Hernández Romero's disappearance is rooted in values their party abandoned. 'The Republican Party that we grew up in understood that immigrants added tremendous value to our country,' she said. 'Ronald Reagan used to say… 'if you had freedom in your heart and you wanted to follow our laws, anybody can come to America from anywhere and become an American.'' Related: Kristi Noem won't say if gay asylum-seeker deported to El Salvador's 'hellhole' prison is still alive 'But the other thing we were raised on as young conservatives was fidelity to the Constitution,' she added. 'It was a belief in the rule of law and due process and equal treatment… And so what I want from us… is to remind Republicans that they're Americans first… and that the values this country was founded on, they still have to abide by.' Supporters gather at the U.S. Supreme Court in suport of the "Free Andry" movmement. Christopher Wiggins for The Advocate 'That's what we do when we don't forget about people like Andry,' Longwell said. 'They know it's wrong. And we should never let them forget what they're doing.' Tim Miller, her colleague at The Bulwark, issued a blunt indictment. 'We did this to Andry — not some crooked cop or some corporation or some foreign country. We did it,' he said. 'And so it is up to us to get him back.' He described scrolling through Hernández Romero's Instagram. 'It's a fucking tough scroll, to be honest, thinking about this nightmare that we put him through. But there's one caption that he wrote on one story. He said this: 'Always give more than what's expected of you because 80 percent of success is simply persistence. So, do not be afraid of failure. Be afraid of not trying.'' 'Donald Trump wants to dehumanize these folks,' Miller said. 'He wants to say that they are vermin, that they're thugs, that they're bringing fentanyl into the country, and he wants people to not care about them… but he's wrong about that.' Related: Longwell, Lovett, and Miller joined forces to host a joint The Bulwark and Crooked Media fundraising event and podcast taping on Friday evening at the Lincoln Theatre in D.C. to support the Immigrant Defenders Law Center in its fight for the rights of wrongfully deported Venezuelans, such as Hernández Romero. Rep. Mark Takano, a California Democrat who was the first gay person of color elected to Congress, invoked his family's own forced removal. 'The Alien Enemies Act was once used, along with other evil laws, to imprison my own parents and grandparents during World War II,' he said. 'Their only crime being Japanese American. No charges, no trial, just locked up and stripped of their dignity. And the trauma didn't end when the war did. It echoed through my family for generations.' Related: 'Now we see it happening again,' Takano said. 'The same fear, the same injustice, repackaged and rebranded, but just as cruel.' The Bulwark's Tim Miller and Sarah Longwell speak at the U.S. Supreme Court rally for Andry Wiggins for The Advocate He called Hernández Romero's deportation 'scapegoating,' not safety. 'Let's be crystal clear,' he said. 'We must repeal the Alien Enemies Act… because none of us gets to sit this out.' Jonathan Lovitz, the Human Rights Campaign's new senior vice president for campaigns and communications, delivered one of the rally's most impassioned speeches — honoring Hernández Romero while indicting the system that disappeared him. 'He's a vibrant soul who made the world beautiful just by being in it,' Lovitz said. 'You heard that in 2024, he fled Venezuela — not for opportunity, not for handouts — for survival. He was beaten, he was abused, and he was targeted for being an outspoken gay man. That was his crime.' Related: Lovitz condemned the weaponization of bureaucracy: 'No hearing, no justice — just vanished. That is cruelty. That is cowardice. And it is the product of a broken and weaponized system, one that treats human dignity like a paperwork error.' 'Our Constitution does not say due process only for citizens,' he added. 'It does not say only for the lucky. And it certainly does not say only for the white, the straight, and the tattoo-free. It says that all people — all people — deserve justice.' But in front of the Court, the message was simpler: Bring Andry home. 'If Andry isn't safe,' Lovitz said, 'none of us are. Not immigrants, not asylum-seekers, not gay or trans people, not any of us.' And as the chants of 'Free Andry' swept through the crowd, Lovitz's final words rang out: 'These colors don't run.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge restricts DOGE access to federal databases, finding 'breach of law and trust'
A federal judge has restricted the Department of Government Efficiency's access to federal databases, citing a "breach of law and trust." Led by the American Federation of Government Employees, a group of current and former federal government employees and their unions in February sued the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and DOGE for alleged "breach of privacy." U.S. District Judge Denise Cote of the Southern District of New York granted the plaintiffs' April 25 motion for a preliminary injunction Monday, but said the scope of the injunction would be addressed in a separate order. "Following President Trump's inauguration, OPM granted broad access to many of those systems to a group of individuals associated with the Department of Government Efficiency ('DOGE'), even though no credible need for this access had been demonstrated. In doing so, OPM violated the law and bypassed its established cybersecurity practices," Cote wrote in a 99-page opinion on Monday. Supreme Court Rules Doge Can Access Social Security Information "In brief, the OPM records at issue concern the plaintiffs' most sensitive private affairs," the opinion says. "They include social security numbers, health care information, banking information, and information about family members. For some people, disclosure of information in OPM systems could subject them to danger." Read On The Fox News App An appointee of President Bill Clinton, Cotes said plaintiffs "have shown they are entitled to" a preliminary injunction, which "would stop disclosure of OPM records to individuals associated with DOGE and require the destruction of any copies of personal information that have been obtained through such disclosure." "The plaintiffs have shown that the defendants disclosed OPM records to individuals who had no legal right of access to those records," Cotes wrote. "In doing so, the defendants violated the Privacy Act and departed from cybersecurity standards that they are obligated to follow. This was a breach of law and of trust. Tens of millions of Americans depend on the Government to safeguard records that reveal their most private and sensitive affairs." The judge further criticized the Trump administration's handling of OPM records. "The Government could have acknowledged that in its rush to accomplish a new President's agenda mistakes were made and established, important protocols were overlooked. It has not," Cote wrote. "The Government has defended this lawsuit by repeatedly invoking a mantra that it adhered to all established procedures and safeguards. It did not. Without a full-throated recognition that the law and established cybersecurity procedures must be followed, the risk of irreparable harm will continue to exist." In a May hearing, Justice Department lawyers reportedly argued that any preliminary injunction granted should include exceptions for high-level OPM officials and cited how a separate judge had walked back initial restrictions placed on DOGE access to Treasury Department records in February so long as DOGE staffers have the appropriate training and vetting, according to the Federal News Network. Justice Department lawyers filed a separate motion in the case on Friday, citing the Supreme Court's latest decision related to DOGE access to Social Security Administration (SSA) records. DOGE's future remains uncertain amid a rocky public fallout between its former leader, tech billionaire Elon Musk, and President Donald Trump, though both men previously said they want the waste-cutting entity's work to continue. The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration two victories on Friday in cases involving DOGE, including giving it access to Social Security systems containing personal data on millions of Americans. The three liberal justices dissented in both cases. Federal Judge Dismisses California's Lawsuit Over Trump Tariffs, Citing Jurisdiction Issue The justices also separately reined in orders seeking transparency at DOGE. In one case, the high court halted an order from a judge in Maryland that had restricted the team's access to the SSA under federal privacy laws. The Trump administration says DOGE needs access to carry out its mission of targeting waste in the federal government. Musk had been focused on Social Security as an alleged hotbed of fraud. The entrepreneur has described it as a "Ponzi scheme" and insisted that reducing waste in the program is an important way to cut government spending. But U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland found that DOGE's efforts at Social Security amounted to a "fishing expedition" based on "little more than suspicion" of fraud, and allowing unfettered access puts Americans' private information at risk. Her ruling did allow access to anonymous data for staffers who have undergone training and background checks, or wider access for those who have detailed a specific need. The Trump administration has said DOGE cannot work effectively with those restrictions. U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer also argued that the ruling is an example of federal judges overstepping their authority and trying to micromanage executive branch agencies. The Associated Press contributed to this article source: Judge restricts DOGE access to federal databases, finding 'breach of law and trust'
