GMB star Kate Garraway reveals she had bailiffs at her door while late Derek Draper was in a coma in hospital
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
KATE Garraway today revealed how she had bailiffs at her door while her late husband Derek Draper was in a coma.
The Good Morning Britain presenter, 58, opened up about a tough time she faced while her husband was stricken in hospital with a Covid-related illness.
Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter
Sign up
4
Kate Garraway revealed a shocking story on Good Morning Britain today
Credit: ITV
4
Kate revealed that she was faced with bailiffs as Derek was stricken in hospital
Credit: PA
4
Kate with her beloved late husband before he was taken ill
Credit: Shutterstock
Kate - who's husband Derek sadly passed away last year - revealed her shocking story during today's GMB.
Her revelation came during a chat with money expert Martin Lewis who is campaigning to change the way councils call in debts of unpaid council tax.
Kate - who has been faced with a stressful £800,000 debt battle following the death of her beloved husband - then revealed how whilst her husband Derek was in a coma after being stricken by Covid, bailiffs turned up at her house.
She revealed it was after she had unknowingly not paid her council tax for six weeks.
More on Kate Garraway
FINANCE FIGHT Kate Garraway update on her stressful £800k debt battle and £288k tax bill
Kate explained the reason for the bill going unpaid, was because her husband was responsible for paying the council tax.
She said she had "no idea" it was going unpaid - otherwise she would've paid it.
Kate revealed how "awful" it had been for her family when bailiffs suddenly turned up at her door, especially during such a tough time.
FINANCIAL NIGHTMARE
This latest revelation comes after The Sun revealed how Kate had received a much-needed financial boost in her struggle to pay back huge debts.
The cost of caring for Derek during his four-year health nightmare ran into hundreds of thousands of pounds.
At the same time, Derek's psychotherapy firm Astra Aspera Ltd - which was jointly controlled by Kate - went bust owing hundreds of thousands to creditors, including a huge sum to HMRC.
GMB's Kate Garraway reveals she still can't pay 'excessive debt' for late husband Derek Draper's care - on anniversary of his death
A liquidator's report revealed how Kate has been trying to repay debts as well as a more palatable revised total.
HMRC has submitted a preferential claim of £288,054, a third of its previous submission of £716,822. It's not known why the HMRC have dramatically dropped their demand.
There are also creditor claims of and £196,548 from four other firms including a £50,000 bank loan.
However, at this stage, there will be no pay out for any creditor after liquidator fees of £32k and 40 per cent of assets have been realised.
A representative for Kate said: "Kate has met all that the liquidators of Derek's company have asked for and more over the past four years.
'She doesn't recognise these figures and is shocked that it's being presented in this way by them.
"Caring for Derek and supporting her family when Derek could no longer run his own businesses has taken a huge financial toll on her but she's determined to put things right.'
4
Kate has opened up about the financial nightmare she has faced following Derek's death
Credit: Shutterstock
MORE MONEY WOES
Meanwhile, earlier this week, Kate revealed she had been hit by another financial blow.
The popular presenter told fans she's been frozen out of her bank accounts after changing her phone.
Taking to social media to beg the bank for help, she wrote: 'Please please get in touch with me.
'I have not been able to access any of my Barclays accounts current or savings since Friday due to changing my phone handset and can't get through to anyone on customer service - please dm me.'
Luckily Kate's plea was answered and the bank replied, telling her to send more information via direct message.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Hundreds of jobs at risk as River Island plans store closures
The retailer has unveiled a radical restructuring plan in a bid to reverse recent heavy losses due to a slump in trading. Bosses blamed the closures on the 'migration of shoppers from the high street to online' and higher costs to run stores. The retailer has 230 shops across the UK (Ian West/PA) The family-owned retailer confirmed it is proposing to close 33 of its 230 stores by January next year as a result. A further 71 stores are also at risk depending on talks with landlords in order to secure improved rental deals. The retailer, which employs around 5,500 people, was founded in 1948 under the Lewis and Chelsea Girl brand before being renamed in the 1980s. It has reportedly hired advisers from PwC in order to oversee the restructuring process. The proposals are set to go to a vote by the firm's creditors – companies or individuals owed money by the retailer – in August. The deal will result in fresh funding being invested into the business in order to help fuel its turnaround. Ben Lewis, chief executive of River Island, said: 'River Island is a much-loved retailer, with a decades-long history on the British high street. 'However, the well-documented migration of shoppers from the high street to online has left the business with a large portfolio of stores that is no longer aligned to our customers' needs. 'The sharp rise in the cost of doing business over the last few years has only added to the financial burden. 'We have a clear strategy to transform the business to ensure its long-term viability. 'Recent improvements in our fashion offer and in-store shopping experience are already showing very positive results, but it is only with a restructuring plan that we will be able to see this strategy through and secure River Island's future as a profitable retail business. 'We regret any job losses as a result of store closures, and we will try to keep these to a minimum.' The retailer is among high street fashion chains to have been impacted by weaker consumer spending and competition from cheaper online rivals, such as Shein. River Island fell to a £33.2 million loss in 2023 after sales slid by 19%, according to its most recent set of accounts.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Inheritance tax is heinous, but avoiding it could be a bigger disaster
They say nothing in life is certain but death and taxes, but I propose to add a third to the list: investors doing everything imaginable to avoid taxes. The bigger the bite HMRC wants, the heavier the hustle to shield hard-earned assets. Thanks to Labour dragging pensions into the inheritance tax net, it is now a stampede. Yet the avoidance path conceals huge pits I've watched investors fall into throughout my 50 years managing money. Estate planning is wonderful, but too often, sensible planning leads to tax considerations dictating investment decisions. This raises risk, reduces returns and can hit your planned inheritance much harder than any tax rise. Consider popular ways people now seek to shield pensions from inheritance tax: investing in Aim shares is one, with the double benefit of stamp duty exemption and business property relief. Enterprise Investing Schemes (EIS) are another, and business property relief schemes letting you access unlisted companies is a third. All these sprang from past governments' investment incentives, hoping to spur entrepreneurship and startups. A fine aim. But pursuing a strategy aimed at these incentives solely for tax benefits aren't the sunlit uplands some promise. You don't need me to tell you Aim has a long history of scandals and failures alongside those select success stories that graduated to the main market. Or that its stocks are Britain's tiniest, with a median market capitalisation of £15m. Or that FTSE's Aim All Share is down nearly -30pc since 2000, while the FTSE All Share has soared over 275pc. Astronomical missed returns are a dear price to pay for tax relief, particularly one whose relief is rapidly diminishing – Aim stocks' BPR relief drops from 100pc to 50pc next year. EIS and BPR schemes carry another risk: overloading on unlisted companies. These sport the veneer of stability and, in EIS's case, supposedly high growth potential. They are billed as a way for normal folks to invest in venture capital and reap big rewards when a startup hits it big, but the reality is those are needles in a haystack of hard-to-value, illiquid investments. Winners aren't guaranteed – untraded doesn't mean stable. It just means fewer pricing points, hiding the inherent behind-the-scenes volatility. That is illiquidity – a bug, not a feature. You risk being unable to sell when you really need to without suffering a steep discount. Aim companies aren't categorically horrid. Some are fine, even great. EIS and BPR can also be fine tools, in certain situations. But it all depends on your broader goals and time horizon, which gets us to the root of the problem. Your fixation on tax steers you away from why you invested in the first place. Done right, long-term investing is about picking the correct asset allocation – the blend of stocks, bonds and other securities – for reaching your goals over your investment time horizon. Your goals are the primary purpose for your money, usually growth, cash flow or some combination of the two. Your time horizon is how long your money must last, usually your lifetime – clearly longer if inheritance tax is a concern. Throughout history, stocks and bonds have done a marvellous job of delivering the growth and cash flow people need, given a sufficiently long-term horizon and reasonable withdrawals. Stocks deliver abundant long-term growth, despite bear markets and volatility along the way, while bonds cushion expected short-term volatility and support cash flow with interest. British and global listed stocks and bonds are liquid – easy to sell in a pinch to cover expenses both expected and sudden. When tax avoidance takes supremacy, will you let it steer you from whichever liquid asset allocation aligned with your goals and needs? If your pension is loaded with Aim shares, EIS or BPR schemes to reduce inheritance tax, it risks not delivering the returns needed to support your cash flow later on. Aged poverty is a real pain. Or maybe your pension ends up worth vastly less for your heirs, after tax, than if you had opted for a simple blend of stocks and bonds. If you have a sudden expense, your pension may not be liquid enough to cover it. Then what do you do? Borrow? Don't forget, tax policy is a whack-a-mole game. Pensions were exempt from inheritance tax until they weren't. After halving Aim relief in 2024's Budget, Labour capped BPR last year. Some ministers floated scrapping Aim relief altogether. What then? If you focus on tax optimisation, you may find yourself needing to make big changes again. And again. And again. Changes cost money. Taxes are certain in general, but the specifics are shape-shifting. When your goals and time horizon determine your strategy, there are fewer moving parts. You can build a diversified strategy with a long history of delivering what you need, while taking sensible steps to reduce tax exposure where available. Tax avoidance is nice. Liquidity, predictability and reaching your goals? Nicer.
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Tax hike fears mount after government borrowing jumps in May
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said borrowing surged to £17.7 billion last month, the second highest figure on record for May, surpassed only at the height of Covid. May borrowing was £700 million higher than a year earlier, though it was slightly less than the £18 billion most economists had been expecting. The higher borrowing came in spite of a surge in the tax take from national insurance after Chancellor Rachel Reeves increased employer contributions in April. The decision, which was announced in last autumn's budget, has seen wage costs soar for firms across the UK as they also faced a minimum wage rise in the same month. Experts warned the higher borrowing figures raised the chances of tax hikes to come in the budget later this year, with Ms Reeves under pressure to balance the books amid rising borrowing and her spending commitments. Thomas Pugh, economist at audit and consulting firm RSM UK, said he is pencilling in tax increases of between £10 billion and £20 billion. He said: 'The under-performance of the economy and higher borrowing costs mean the Chancellor may already have lost the £9.9 billion of fiscal headroom that she clawed back in March. 'Throw in the tough outlook for many Government departments announced in the spending review and U-turns on welfare spending and the Chancellor will probably have to announce some top-up tax increases after the summer.' Danni Hewson, AJ Bell head of financial analysis, said the borrowing figures 'will only add to speculation that the Chancellor will have to announce more spending cuts or further tax increases at the next budget if she wants to meet her fiscal rules and pay for her spending plans'. 'One big shock could wipe out any headroom Rachel Reeves might have, and there are still question marks about how much of GDP (gross domestic product) should be spent on defence and where the money is going to come from,' she added. Borrowing for the first two months of the financial year to date was £37.7 billion, £1.6 billion more than the same two-month period in 2024, according to the ONS. The data showed so-called compulsory social contributions, largely made up of national insurance contributions (NICs), jumped by £3.9 billion or 14.7% to a record £30.2 billion in April and May combined. Rob Doody, deputy director for public sector finances, said: 'While receipts were up, thanks partly to higher income tax revenue and national insurance contributions, spending was up more, affected by increased running costs and inflation-linked uplifts to many benefits.' While May's borrowing out-turn was lower than economists were expecting, it was more than the £17.1 billion pencilled in by the UK's independent fiscal watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), in March. The figures showed that central government tax receipts in May increased by £3.5 billion to £61.7 billion, while higher NICs saw social contributions rise by £1.8 billion to £15.1 billion last month alone. Public sector net debt, excluding public sector banks, stood at £2.87 trillion at the end of May and was estimated at 96.4% of GDP, which was 0.5 percentage points higher than a year earlier and remains at levels last seen in the early 1960s. The ONS said the sale of the final tranche of taxpayer shares in NatWest, formerly Royal Bank of Scotland, cut net debt by £800 million last month, but did not have an impact on borrowing in the month. Interest payments on debt, which are linked to inflation, fell £700 million to £7.6 million due to previous falls in the Retail Prices Index (RPI). But recent rises in RPI are expected to see debt interest payments race higher in June. Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones insisted the Government had 'stabilised the economy and the public finances'. 'Since taking office, we have taken the right decisions to protect working people, begin repairing the NHS, and fix the foundations to rebuild Britain,' he said.
