DR Congo and Rwanda sign draft peace agreement
The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Rwanda have signed a provisional agreement aimed at stopping the conflict in eastern DRC, according to a joint statement from the two countries and the United States Department of State.
The development late on Wednesday in Washington, DC, came after 'three days of constructive dialogue regarding political, security, and economic interests', the statement said.
The draft agreement contains provisions on issues including disarmament, the integration of non-state armed groups and the return of refugees and internally displaced people.
Eastern DRC has been riven by conflict for decades, with armed groups competing for access to natural resources. Fighting in the region escalated in January when the Rwanda-backed M23 rebel group captured Goma, the mineral-rich area's largest city. A few weeks later, the group seized the strategic town of Bukavu. Rwanda denies supporting the rebels.
Thousands of people have been killed in the region and hundreds of thousands of others displaced since the conflict intensified earlier this year.
Several of the parties to the conflict have been accused of carrying out human rights abuses.
In a report published in May, Amnesty International accused M23 of torturing and killing civilians.
'These acts violate international humanitarian law and may amount to war crimes,' Amnesty said at the time.
On Monday, Volker Turk, the UN high commissioner for human rights, said that the rebels, DRC troops and allied armed groups had all carried out human rights abuses.Turk called on all sides 'to commit immediately to a ceasefire and resume negotiations, and to respect international humanitarian and human rights law'.
The US hopes to bring an end to the fighting and to unlock billions of dollars of Western investment in the eastern DRC, which has large mineral reserves including cobalt, copper, gold and lithium.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has described the twin aims of peace and investment as a 'win-win'.
As part of the diplomatic efforts, Massad Boulos, the US envoy to Africa, travelled to the DRC and Rwanda in April. During his visit, he urged Kigali to end its support for the M23 rebels.
Although the African countries have agreed to at least six truces since 2021, none has lasted.
Angola stepped down in March from its role as mediator, with the US and Qatar currently leading efforts to secure peace in the eastern DRC.
The draft agreement is due to be formally signed on June 27 by ministers from the DRC and Rwanda in the presence of Rubio.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Iran Threatens To Close Strait of Hormuz: What Would Happen?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iran has warned that it could shut the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most critical oil transit chokepoints, in retaliation for U.S. involvement in its conflict with Israel. "If the United States officially and operationally enters the war in support of the Zionists (Israel), it is the legitimate right of Iran in view of pressuring the U.S. and Western countries to disrupt their oil trade's ease of transit," Ali Yazdikhah, a senior Iranian lawmaker, was quoted as saying by the semi-official Mehr news agency on Thursday. "Iran has numerous options to respond to its enemies," Behnam Saeedi, a member of the parliament's National Security Committee presidium was quoted as saying. "Closing the Strait of Hormuz is one of the potential options." The officials spoke amid heightened tensions as President Donald Trump is reported to be inching closer to ordering military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment by email. Why the Strait of Hormuz Matters The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway connecting the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. At its narrowest point, the strait is about 21 miles wide, with two shipping lanes two miles wide in each direction. The strait handles around 26 percent of global oil trade, making it one of the most strategically important maritime passages in the world. The International Energy Agency notes that any disruption to flows through the strait would have significant consequences for world oil markets. Can Iran Close the Strait? Iran has long asserted that it can shut down the Strait of Hormuz. While the strait can't be "closed" in the traditional sense - like shutting a road - Iran could attempt to make the waterway too dangerous for commercial passage, effectively disrupting global shipping. During the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, Iran targeted oil tankers and oil loading facilities with mines and missiles, including Chinese-made Silkworm cruise missiles, and used speedboats to harass tankers. These actions did not fully block the strait but caused sharp increases in shipping insurance premiums and delayed maritime traffic. According to a 2012 report by the U.S. Congressional Research Service (CRS), Iran could try to obstruct the strait in phases. "Iran might begin with a less violent option and progress over time to more violent ones, or implement a combination of highly violent options from the outset," it said. Possible measures cited in the report included: Declaring the strait closed to shipping without without stating explicitly what the consequences might be for ships that attempt to transit those waters Declaring more explicitly that ships transiting the strait or other parts of the Persian Gulf are subject to being intercepted and detained, or attacked Firing warning shots at ships transiting the strait or other parts of the Gulf Deploying sea mines in the strait and other parts of the Gulf Using submarines, surface ships, shore-based cruise missiles, and aircraft to attack foreign naval ships operating in waters outside the Strait What Would Happen? Iran moving to shut the Strait of Hormuz would likely invite a strong international military response. "An outright closure of the Strait of Hormuz... at present, this appears to be a low probability event. Were this to occur, it is not likely to be prolonged," said the CRS. "It would likely trigger a military response from the United States and others, which could reach beyond simply re-establishing strait transit," it added. "Iran would also alienate countries that currently oppose broader oil sanctions. Iran could become more likely to actually pursue this if few or no countries were willing to import its oil." What People Are Saying President Donald Trump told reporters on Wednesday: "I'm not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between fighting and [Iran] having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do, and maybe we won't have to fight." Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran, said in a public address: "The Americans should know that any U.S. military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage. The U.S. entering in this matter is 100 percent to its own detriment. The damage it will suffer will be far greater than any harm that Iran may encounter." What Happens Next? The foreign ministers of Germany, France and Britain have scheduled nuclear talks in Geneva on Friday with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, according to Reuters.
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
U.S. brokers deal between Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda to end war over mineral wealth
Johannesburg, South Africa — At the invitation of Democratic Republic of Congo President Felix Tshekedi, the Trump administration was brought in to lead negotiations to end the war raging in the east of the country between DRC forces and rebels believed to be backed by Rwanda. A peace deal was initialed Wednesday evening by officials from the neighboring nations, and it's set to be signed formally late next week in Washington by their leaders, and witnessed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the State Department said. While many in the region will welcome an end to the long-running and deadly conflict, Daniel Van Dalen, a senior analyst at the Africa-focused intelligence firm Signal Risk, says the way the agreement was hashed out signals a major change in geopolitical efforts to end crises on the continent. The days of diplomatic soft power, he says, are over. Officials have said the agreement is part of the U.S.' new bid under President Trump to build relationships in Africa that are more transactional and less focused on exerting soft power through diplomacy and investment. The deal came after three days of talks in Washington between DRC and Rwandan delegations — and after many previous failed attempts to secure an agreement between the two countries. Members of the M23 rebel group are seem after the opening ceremony in Goma, North Kivu province, in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, April 7, 2025. Arlette Bashizi/REUTERS If implemented, the agreement will end the fighting in eastern DRC. It could also bring billions of dollars of American investment into the region, which is rich in the minerals coltan, cobalt, lithium, copper and gold, all of which are critical in the manufacture of electric vehicles, smartphones, computers and a wide range of other high-tech goods, from satellites to military weapons systems. The curse of Congo's mineral wealth The DRC is a country roughly the size of Alaska and Texas combined, but its vast mineral reserves sit largely in the far east, near the border with Rwanda. Many locals call it a curse, as fighting over control of the resources has led to three decades of fighting in the region, killing some six million people, according to a 2022 analysis by the Foreign Policy Research Institute. More than 125 different armed groups have fought over access to the mineral reserves, but the largest, the M23 militia, is the only one thought to be backed by a neighboring country — Rwanda. The U.S. government and the United Nations officials believe Rwanda backs M23 militarily, though Rwandan officials have repeatedly denied that. Van Dalen says M23 is different to the other armed groups in the region as it has sought territorial control and expansion. The group's estimated 5,000 foot soldiers have taken two provinces in the eastern DRC over the last few months. In short order, he said, M23 has set up parallel government structures, with tax systems, in those areas, and will be very difficult to remove. Critics of the U.S.-brokered peace deal are skeptical that it will work, as M23 is not a signatory to the agreement and has not been involved directly in the negotiations, and the Rwandan government denies formal links with the group. Van Dalen said the deal will only succeed if M23 abides by the terms. Rwanda walked from previous peace talks, while M23 surged into new territory in the DRC. "That remains true today, as the M23 are still pushing, in spite of peace negotiations, for territorial gains," Van Dalen told CBS News on Thursday. Since M23's seizure of the two provinces in DRC, Van Dalen said there's been a surge in Rwandan mineral exports — a surge representing more than the country could account for from its own, limited reserves. CBS News understands from sources in the region that Rwanda has indicated a willingness to withdraw its troops, who are believed to back M23 fighters in the region, while the DRC might be amenable to the idea of some minerals, mined locally and on a small scale from its territory, being sold through Rwanda. Trump administration looking for deals: "High risk, with vast rewards" Amid the peace negotiations in Washington, President Trump's daughter Tiffany's father-in-law, Massad Boulous, was brought in as a senior adviser to the White House on Africa. He was quickly dispatched to the DRC, Rwanda and neighboring nations, to "meet with Heads of State and business leaders to advance efforts for durable peace in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo and to promote U.S. private sector investment in the region." That work was focused, Van Dalen said, on brokering separate deals with the DRC, to grant access to its mineral reserves, and with Rwanda, on a potential deportee program. A previous agreement between Britain and Rwanda, for the U.K. to deport migrants to the African nation, fell apart before it even got underway — as a result of British court decisions and then a change in government in the U.K. Striking deals like this can give the White House the ability to tout peace-making efforts while securing access to critical resources for the U.S., but it can also help counter China's dominance in Africa's mineral sector, Van Dalen said. It is a tactic China and Russia have used for many years. Chinese companies currently control over 80% of the cobalt reserves in DRC, according to U.S. government estimates. Secretary of State Rubio will witness the signing of the DRC-Rwanda deal in Washington on June 27, the State Department said in its Wednesday night statement, which provided only vague details. It said the parties had agreed to "provisions on respect for territorial integrity and a prohibition of hostilities; disengagement, disarmament, and conditional integration of non-state armed groups," as well as establishing "a Joint Security Coordination Mechanism," facilitating the return of refugees and internally displaced persons, facilitating humanitarian access, "and a regional economic integration framework." U.S. companies had mining operations in the region several decades ago, but they left when the armed conflict and corruption in regional governments made those operations too risky. DRC President Tshekedi has recently revisited legislation that could reform the country's tax code in ways that make its mining sector more appealing to Western business interests. Those proposed changes had already sparked new interest, with U.S. funding committed to develop the Lobito Corridor — a rail line to connect the DRC's land-locked "copper belt" with an Angolan Atlantic Ocean port. In November, then-President Joe Biden visited Angola and saw the Lobito Corridor port operations first-hand. The following month, the Biden administration announced an additional $560 million in U.S. funding for the project. Van Dalen said if the U.S. is able to manage the regional tension and keep a peace agreement in place, it would be "high risk, with vast rewards, both for the region and the U.S. itself," adding that, in his view, it would also fit right in with "Trump's transactional nature."
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Burkina Faso and Russia sign the final document of their electronuclear program
Burkina Faso has officially signed the final administrative document of a historic intergovernmental nuclear deal with Russia, taking a significant step forward in its quest for nuclear energy. Burkina Faso finalized a significant intergovernmental nuclear agreement with Russia. The deal involves collaboration with Russia's Rosatom to develop nuclear infrastructure for peaceful purposes. Burkina Faso seeks to enhance energy capacity and security through nuclear technology. The agreement, managed by Russia's state-owned atomic energy business Rosatom, paves the way for broad collaboration between the two nations in the construction of nuclear infrastructure for peaceful reasons. Burkina Faso's Minister of Energy, Yacouba Zabré Gouba, made the news during an interview with the Russian media source Sputnik. "Many steps have already been taken, not only through the signing of a roadmap with Rosatom, but also through the conclusion of the four memoranda of understanding that we were able to finalize in 2024," the minister stated. SEE ALSO: Despite Burkina Faso's headstrong stance, some African countries still want to remain friends The agreement underscores Burkina Faso's wider objective of diversifying its energy sources and meeting the country's rising electricity demand. Burkina Faso, one of the world's least electrified countries, sees nuclear energy as a revolutionary chance to increase energy capacity and improve energy security. 'The signing opens new prospects for Burkina Faso and marks the end of several steps that had to be followed,' Gouba stated. 'So from now on, the way is open in terms of cooperation and the electronuclear program with the Russian Federation.' This agreement is the final administrative stage in a larger framework of nuclear cooperation between Russia and the West African country. It follows Russia's approval last week of nuclear deals with Burkina Faso and Mali. Burkina Faso and Mali's nuclear deal with Russia According to the provisions of the agreement, Russia authorized on the 12th of June, Rosatom will play an important role in supporting Burkina Faso and Mali with the building of nuclear power plants and research reactors. The Russian nuclear agency will also offer critical services connected to the nuclear fuel cycle, such as nuclear fuel supply and waste management, putting Russia at the forefront of both country's nuclear goals. DON'T MISS THIS: Ukraine's gamble in Africa seems shaky as Mali takes a harsh decision 'As I said earlier, this is a very important step forward, because these two countries have joined forces, and demonstrated their willingness to work together on collaboration, on cooperation, so that the electronuclear program becomes a reality in Burkina Faso,' Gouba said during his interview with Sputnik. 'We are waiting for the technical and financial offer from Rosatom, and this will later allow us to see whether we should continue with the electronuclear program,' he added. For Russia, the agreement strengthens its position in Africa, particularly in francophone countries that are more aligned with Moscow.
