Malaysian man caught trying to smuggling ‘pink cocaine' into Australia
Published: 10:30am, 11 Feb 2025 Police in Australia have charged a 35-year-old Malaysian man over an attempt to import more than half a tonne of illegal drugs into the country.
The Malaysian national was arrested in Coffs Harbour, some 500km (310 miles) north of Sydney, on Monday, the Australian Federal Police said on Tuesday. He is accused of being part of a plot to import 120kg (265lbs) of an illicit substance suspected to be 'pink cocaine', 421kg (928lbs) of MDMA pills and 80kg (176lbs) of methamphetamine in a shipment sent from Italy .
The MDMA pills had an estimated street value of about A$26 million (US$16.3 million), while the methamphetamine had an estimated street value close to A$74 million, the Australian Federal Police said.
02:05
Australia bans recreational vaping to prevent young generation from becoming nicotine addicts Australia bans recreational vaping to prevent young generation from becoming nicotine addicts
Officers said that the Australian market for the drug cocktail known as pink cocaine, or Tusi, was 'not well established', but they estimated that it could be worth up to A$16.8 million.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
a day ago
- RTHK
Thousands march in Rome against security law
Thousands march in Rome against security law People take part in a demonstration against Italian government's DL sicurezza (security law decree) in Rome, Italy. Photo: AFP Thousands of demonstrators marched through Rome on Saturday to protest a new security law passed by prime minister Giorgia Meloni's right-wing government, denouncing its criminal justice reforms as repressive. Under tight police guard and sweltering heat, protesters marched through central Rome past landmarks including the Colosseum, waving trade union and Palestinian flags. The law increases sentences for certain acts including protests and strengthens protections for police officers accused of violence. The decree, passed by the lower house on Thursday after cabinet approval in April, is expected to clear the Senate, where the ruling right has a firm majority, within 10 days. Police facing charges for violence while on duty will be eligible for US$11,350 in legal aid under the new rules. Offences such as taking part in "prison riots" will carry harsher sentences, including cases of passive resistance. Illegal squatters face faster eviction procedures, and pregnant women or mothers of young children will no longer have the chance of avoiding jail when convicted, albeit in less severe detention centres. Traditional union protests such as road blockades during protests, formerly considered only an administrative offence, could now carry jail terms of up to two years. "There is a drastic increase in penalties for occupying buildings to live in," Antetomaso said. "The housing crisis cannot be solved with seven-year prison sentences for those without shelter, but with various social policies." The government insists it has a mandate to pass the law. "Order, security and legality are at the heart of the Meloni government's actions," Carolina Varchi, a deputy in Meloni's far-right Brothers of Italy party, said on Friday. "Challenging this decree means, in effect, turning one's back on the demand for security that comes from citizens." (AFP)
Asia Times
3 days ago
- Asia Times
Anwar's bold and conflicted bid for legal immunity
KUALA LUMPUR – In the corridors of Malaysian power, the language of justice often changes depending on who is speaking — and who is being spoken about. Several years after alleging Anwar Ibrahim sexually assaulted him in a private residence in Segambut, Yusoff Rawther's civil suit has reached a legal crescendo — just as Anwar, now prime minister, seeks to halt the case by invoking what he calls a 'qualified immunity.' But this is no ordinary courtroom drama. It is a test of institutional resolve, of whether Malaysia's judiciary can still call to account the most powerful office in the land. The story began on October 2, 2018. Yusoff, then a young research assistant, claimed he was assaulted by Anwar, the man then touted as Malaysia's next prime minister. In December 2019, he went public, took a polygraph test and filed a police report, but no criminal charges followed. By July 2021, Yusoff took matters into his own hands by launching a civil suit against Anwar. The High Court refused to strike it out, sending the case toward trial. Then came a twist: Yusoff was arrested in September 2024 with imitation firearms and over 300 grams of cannabis. His defense insists he never entered the car where the contraband was found, never had control over it and was immediately handcuffed outside. Three prosecution witnesses appeared to support that view. If he was being framed, as his lawyers claim, the motive was as political as it was personal. On May 27, 2025, Anwar made a move no Malaysian prime minister has made before. He applied to the Federal Court to be granted immunity — not for his actions as a sitting prime minister, but for something alleged before he took office. The timing is curious. The civil suit is scheduled for trial on June 16. The Chief Justice, Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat — known for her judicial independence — retires in June. And Anwar's new legal team, appointed just days before, rushed to file their applications to postpone the trial and elevate the question of immunity to the highest court. Critics note that even Malay royalty do not enjoy such blanket protection — they are answerable in a Special Court. Anwar's attempt to shield himself, they argue, goes beyond what any prime minister before him, not even Najib Razak at the height of the 1MDB scandal, ever dared to seek. And therein lies the rub. Anwar, the man once imprisoned and persecuted by the very system he now leads, is asking that same system to silence a voice calling for justice. The bigger issue is, if we accept this logic, then any citizen can be denied their right to be heard in court, depending on who the defendant is. Indeed, Article 8 of Malaysia's Federal Constitution guarantees equality before the law. Immunity — real or rhetorical — flies in the face of this principle. Anwar frames his application as protection for the Office of the Prime Minister from 'abuse of legal process.' Yet the suit is personal, the alleged incident predates his premiership and the plaintiff is an individual, not a rival party or political movement. This is no frivolous Twitter/X spat. This is about whether the nation's highest office can become a fortress of impunity. On May 29, Perikatan Nasional's whip, Takiyuddin Hassan, urged the Attorney General to intervene — not to side with any party but to protect the Constitution from what he called a 'dangerous judicial precedent.' He noted that Articles 181–183, which govern immunity, were crafted for Malaysia's monarchs, not its ministers. There is speculation, too, about timing and motive. Why is Anwar seeking constitutional cover only now? Is it a strategic bet on the post-Tengku Maimun judiciary? Or a preemptive strike to prevent cross-examination in open court? The deeper paranoia relates to Rafique Rashid, a relatively young legal figure who is central to both Anwar's feud with former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad and this case with Yusoff. What does Rafique know that so rattles the nation's now most powerful man? This saga is not just about legal technicalities or political strategy. It is about the moral soul of a 'reformasi' movement that promised accountability, transparency and the rule of law. Anwar once stood in prison and declared the system broken. Today, seated in Putrajaya, he asks that same system to shield him. In doing so, he risks becoming the very caricature his younger self once fought against. In the coming weeks, Malaysia's judiciary will be called to choose between precedent and power, between access and exclusion, between immunity and accountability. As Malaysia positions itself as a stabilizing force in ASEAN — mediating conflicts in Myanmar, projecting soft power in Palestine and countering great-power rivalry in the South China Sea — its domestic credibility matters more than ever. A nation that cannot resolve its own crises transparently cannot lecture others on justice. A prime minister who claims global moral leadership must not seek local legal exemption. This case, in its quiet courtroom battles and explosive political undertones, will be remembered not just for what was said under oath, but for what it revealed about the state of Malaysia's democracy. Amir Al Fateh is an independent journalist based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, specializing in political analysis, governance and civil liberties. He is a verified contributor to Newswav and his work has been featured in MalaysiaNow and Utusan Malaysia. His professional portfolio is accessible via on his Muck Rack profile .
RTHK
3 days ago
- RTHK
Ex-Goldman Sachs banker gets two years over 1MDB theft
Ex-Goldman Sachs banker gets two years over 1MDB theft Former Goldman Sachs chief of southeast Asia operations, Timothy Leissner, arrives at the US District Court for Eastern District of New York for his sentencing. Photo: AFP A former Goldman Sachs banker has been sentenced to two years in US federal prison for his role in a US$4.5 billion scheme to ransack a Malaysian state investment fund. Tim Leissner, at his sentencing in Brooklyn federal court on Thursday, apologised to the people of Malaysia, who he called the 'real victims' of the scheme. 'The funds raised more than a decade ago could have profoundly benefited the nation and its citizens,' he said in a statement read in court and provided by his lawyers. 'Instead, due to my greed – and the greed of those involved alongside me – they were misappropriated.' Prosecutors said Leissner and other Goldman Sachs bankers helped the Malaysian investment fund known as 1MBD, or the 1Malaysia Development Berhad state fund, raise US$6.5 billion through bond sales. But they say more than US$4.5 billion of the funds were stolen and laundered through bribes and kickbacks. The spoils bankrolled extravagant purchases, from wild parties to lavish spending on jewels, art, a superyacht and luxury real estate, prosecutors have said. They also helped finance the 2013 Martin Scorsese film 'The Wolf of Wall Street' that starred Leonardo DiCaprio. The scandal led to the fall of Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak's government in 2018. Najib was later convicted by a Malaysian court of abuse of power and other crimes related to the scandal and sentenced to 12 years in prison. Leissner had pleaded guilty in 2018 to bribing government officials in Malaysia and Abu Dhabi. He served as a key government witness in the trial of Roger Ng, a fellow former Goldman Sachs banker who was sentenced in 2023 to 10 years in federal prison. (AP)
