
Iran hangs man over 2022 protest deaths, activists say conviction wrongful
Abbas Kurkuri, also known as Mojahed Kurkur, was hanged at dawn in Sheiban prison in the western city of Ahvaz, the Norway-based Iran Human Rights and Hengaw groups said.
His execution was reported by the Iranian judiciary's Mizan Online website which said he had been convicted by a Revolutionary Court of the capital offences of "corruption on earth" and "waging war against God".
He had been arrested more than two years previously over the deaths in November 2022 at the height of the nationwide protests sparked by the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, an Iranian Kurd detained for an alleged breach of Iran's strict dress code for women.
He was accused of opening fire with a military weapon in the town of Izeh northeast of Ahvaz in an attack that left seven people dead, including 10-year-old Kian Pirfalak, whose death sparked outrage at the time.
At his trial, Kurkuri confessed to the charges and said he had been "under the influence of social media", Mizan said.
But human rights groups said his confession, which was broadcast by Iranian state media and re-published by Mizan on Wednesday, had been obtained under duress and accused the authorities of framing him to take the blame away from the security forces.
'Tsunami' of executions
"During his detention, Korkor endured severe torture and was denied access to legal counsel," said Hengaw, adding that Pirfalak's mother had said at her son's funeral that it was security personnel who fired at their vehicle.
It noted that the execution had taken place on what would have been the boy's birthday.
IHR director Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam described the execution as "an extrajudicial killing".
"The Islamic republic authorities attempted to blame him for the murder of 10-year old Kian Pirfalak by forcing confessions under torture," he said.
He said the hanging of Kurkuri, a member of Iran's Bahktiari minority, was the latest in a "tsunami" of executions in Iran, with convicts currently being put to death at a rate of four a day.
According to IHR, at least 569 people have been hanged in Iran so far this year.
Nobel Peace laureate Narges Mohammadi, currently on leave from her own prison sentence, said Kurkuri had been "brutally tortured in solitary confinement (and) falsely accused of Kian's murder based on fabricated claims by interrogators and the regime's judiciary".
Amnesty International said he was convicted after a "grossly unfair sham trial marred by torture-tainted 'confessions' obtained while he was subjected to enforced disappearance".
The London-based group said its investigations had showed "plainclothes security officials used unlawful lethal force during protests in Izeh and fatally fired live ammunition at the child".
"Authorities immediately blamed 'terrorists', but the boy's family repeatedly refuted these claims publicly and attributed the responsibility to the authorities."
Over 550 people were killed in the authorities' crackdown on the protests, according to the IHR's figures. The authorities emphasise that members of the security forces also lost their lives.
Kurkuri's execution comes a day after Iran hanged nine men convicted of plotting to carry out attacks in 2018 on behalf of the Islamic State group.
Iran is the world's second most prolific executioner after China, according to human rights groups including Amnesty International.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
7 hours ago
- Euronews
Strikes against Iran: A political manoeuvre or all-out war?
The US ordered the evacuation of non-essential embassy staff and their families from several countries across the Middle East on Wednesday night as tensions in the region continue to escalate. The decision comes amid an apparent impasse in US-Iran nuclear talks, with US President Donald Trump saying he was "less confident" the two countries would reach a deal to reign in Tehran's nuclear ambitions. The US State Department announced it would be partially evacuating personnel from the US embassy in Baghdad to "keep Americans safe, both home and abroad." That comes after US officials told CBS that they had been told that Israel was ready to launch a military operation in Iran and that US military positions in neighbouring Iraq could be the target of a retaliation by Tehran. But is what is happening now just manoeuvres by Iran to protect its nuclear programme, or is the region really facing a scenario of a surprise military strike that could ignite a comprehensive regional war? Euronews takes a look at the complexity of the situation and the possible repercussions on several different fronts; from Gaza to the Red Sea, from Lebanon to Syria. Israel has long warned that Iran's nuclear programme is not peaceful in nature and that if the country were to develop nuclear weapons, Israel could conceivably be the target of a nuclear strike. However, US President Donald Trump issued a direct warning to Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to strike Iran, saying unilateral military action was off limits and diplomacy needed a chance to succeed. On the other hand, some of Netanyahu's critics see a military escalation in Iran as securing his political future and having similar impact to the fronts he opened up in Lebanon and Syria. Any war with Iran would not come without a substantial cost to the United States. US bases in Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates would all be vulnerable to Iranian missile attacks in the event of a conflict. Commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, Hossein Salami, said bluntly: "We monitor the depth of the enemy's targets and are prepared for any scenario." Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasserzadeh has also warned that any strikes would not go unanswered, vowing to bomb US bases in the region. But is this just rhetoric or would Iran carry out its threats? And it's debatable whether the United States would want to get mired in another long-running conflict in the Middle East so soon after it withdrew its last troops from Iraq after almost eight years in the country. The presence of the US Navy's Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean also raises questions about its role in the event of war. At a time when threats are escalating, the deployment of this fleet seems to enhance Washington's ability to act quickly, but it also makes it a direct target for any Iranian response. Amidst the regional sabre rattling, Palestinians in the Gaza Strip fear that their cause will be relegated to the sidelines. This could turn Gaza into a "forgotten issue" in the outbreak of a major regional confrontation, with all the humanitarian costs that this would imply. The Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, who have supported Gaza since the start of the war in October 2023 by targeting what they believed to be Israel-linked shopping in the Red Sea, recently reached an agreement with Washington to stop attacking freight vessels. But there is a strong possibility that if Iran is attacked and launches counterstrikes, that agreement will be forgotten and the Houthis will rearm and start fighting in support of its main financial backer. Another escalation in and around the key Red Sea shopping lanes threatens again to drive up commodity and oil prices and disrupt the flow of goods between countries. Another issue is Lebanon. Despite Israel reaching a ceasefire deal with the Lebanon-based militant group Hezbollah in November last year, Israeli strikes on Lebanon haven't really stopped, with the IDF allegedly targeting Hezbollah members and facilities. So far, Hezbollah has remained silent on the escalating tensions but, like the Houthis, its main financial backer is Iran. The expectation is Hezbollah will launch solidarity strikes on Israel and while the group was militarily weakened after a year of almost daily cross-border exchanges of fire with Israel, the indications are that Hezbollah maintains a significant offensive capacity which could translate into pressure on Israel's northern front. Iraq stands at a very sensitive point. Armed factions loyal to Tehran, led by the Iraqi Hezbollah Brigades, maintain their readiness in anticipation of any military development against Iran, raising urgent questions about whether these factions will be the spearhead in targeting US bases or interests associated with Israel from within Iraqi territory. However, the biggest challenge facing Baghdad is not only taking a decisive stance on the potential crisis, but how to strike a balance between avoiding a destructive confrontation on the one hand, and maintaining fragile security stability on the other. Security reports indicate serious fears that the so-called Islamic State (IS) terror group could resurface, taking advantage of a regional conflict and the potential security vacuum. In this context, Iraq seems at risk of being drawn into a conflict to which it was not a party, but may suddenly find itself at the centre of a battle that exceeds its ability to endure or control its course. Since the assumption of power by interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa, Syria has been witnessing a gradual shift in its approach to regional and international relations, amid an openness towards the West and hints of an unprecedented rapprochement with Israel. This shift, while still in the process of taking shape, raises a central question: In light of the new understandings, could Syrian territory become a corridor or a platform for any military operations in the event of a conflict? On the other hand, this scenario is not without internal challenges. Remnants of the former regime will seek to exploit the new situation to regain their influence, while the renewed threat of IS poses a real threat to stability. As for al-Sharaa, he faces a fateful test. If regional war breaks out, will he remain on the sidelines or attempt to determine his position in a complex regional equation by picking a side? An alliance with Iran seems unlikely in light of the new political trajectory, as does an alignment against Israel. Between these two "impossibilities," the region is waiting to see how Damascus will position itself in the next phase. Any military strike against Iran would not be a quick or easy operation, but rather a step fraught with enormous strategic and security complications. The outbreak of a confrontation would mean the expansion of its scope to include multiple fronts, widespread disruption of regional balances, and the exposure of vital interests in the Middle East to painful blows. On the Israeli side, Netanyahu may see the battle as an opportunity to escape his internal political and judicial crises - he is facing charges in three separate corruption cases - and achieve personal gains at the expense of the region's stability. As for the US, despite its enormous military power, it is facing a decisive moment, between adopting a deliberate policy of deterrence or being drawn into an open conflict that could cost it dearly, especially in light of the deployment of its military bases in the region surrounding Iran. Iran, already exhausted by Western sanctions and accumulated economic pressures, will be the first to be affected by any war, which threatens to explode the internal situation and widen the circle of popular anger at a time when the country's leadership is facing a double test; maintaining internal cohesion and responding to external threats. A far-right Turkish politician accused of inciting public hatred and hostility went on trial on Wednesday in a case critics view as an effort to suppress opposition to the president. Ümit Özdağ, the leader of the Victory Party, was detained in January over accusations he insulted President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in comments at a party meeting in Antalya. Özdağ was then formally arrested and charged with inciting hatred against migrants. He was blamed for last year's anti-Syrian refugee riots in the central Turkish province of Kayseri, during which hundreds of homes and businesses were attacked. Prosecutors have presented a series of posts from Özdağ's social media as evidence against him. He faces up to four years in prison if found guilty. Meanwhile, the court in Silivri ruled that Özdağ should remain in detention until his next hearing on 17 June. Özdağ, a 64-year-old former academic, is an outspoken critic of Turkey's refugee policies and has previously called for the repatriation of millions of Syrian refugees. Özdağ acknowledged advocating the return of refugees at the opening hearing of his trial at a prison complex on the outskirts of Istanbul. He denied he had incited violence against them and told the court he had worked to calm tensions in Kayseri. In his defence statement, Özdağ maintained that his imprisonment was politically motivated and aimed at silencing him over his criticism of the government's recent effort to end a decades-long conflict with the militant Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). "The reason why I am here ... is because I criticised the talks held with the PKK terrorist organisation's chief," Özdağ said. The Victory Party strongly opposes any concessions to the PKK which Turkey, along with many Western states including the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States, considers a terrorist organisation. The conflict with the PKK has resulted in tens of thousands of deaths since the 1980s. When the trial opened on Wednesday, Özdağ's lawyers requested more time to prepare and the proceedings were adjourned until next Tuesday. The politician's trial comes amid a widespread crackdown on the opposition to Erdoğan's Justice and Development or AK party. Officials from municipalities controlled by the main opposition, the Republican People's Party (CHP), have faced waves of arrests this year. Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu was detained in March over allegations of corruption. İmamoğlu was due in court on Thursday morning to face charges of attempting to influence a witness and attempting to interfere with a trial, but neither he nor his lawyers attended the session. The court rescheduled the trial date for 26 September. Many people in Turkey consider those cases to be politically motivated, according to opinion polls. However, Erdoğan's government insists the courts are impartial and free from political involvement. İmamoğlu is widely viewed as the main challenger to Erdoğan's two-decade rule and is the CHP's candidate for the next presidential election. The election is due in 2028 but could be held earlier.


France 24
11 hours ago
- France 24
In Nigeria, the juntas are history, but street names live forever
To name a few: Sani Abacha Way takes commuters into downtown Abuja. Ibrahim Babangida Way meanwhile cuts through upscale Maitama. Murtala Muhammed Expressway passes next to the presidency and the National Assembly, where Tinubu delivered his Democracy Day speech. All three are named after the heads of military juntas. As other countries in west Africa have gone on a renaming spree -- mostly throwing out roads named for colonial figures -- Nigeria's strongmen have survived this final, symbolic purge. All eight of Nigeria's military leaders have at least one street named after them in the capital -- a fact that's often met with a shrug, even as Thursday's holiday celebrates the transition to civilian rule in 1999 after decades of coups and military rule. "Some leaders, because of their stature, a road can be named after them," said Ibrahim Hassan, 45, an employee at a corner store. "It's not about whether you've done the best for Nigeria." A woman ringing up her groceries, who gave her name only as Adekemi, chimed in with an indifferent laugh: "Right now I'm focusing on how to afford this." 'House the military built' Abuja -- a planned city that became Nigeria's capital in 1991 under Babangida -- "is the house that the military built, so naturally they paid homage to themselves" said Ikemesit Effiong, a partner at SBM Intelligence, a Lagos-based consultancy. While data from pollster Afrobarometer has shown consistent public support for democracy in Nigeria, "the military is still a formidable, well-regarded institution, seen by many as comparatively disciplined and well run" after 26 years of often chaotic civilian rule. Former military chiefs have also entered civilian politics, rehabilitating their image -- including Olusegun Obasanjo and Muhammadu Buhari, both elected president in the democratic era. In the United States and Europe, activists in recent years clamoured to have streets renamed to address colonial or racist legacies -- though those moves weren't always without pushback. In west Africa, including in Senegal and Ivory Coast, governments have ditched boulevards named after French leaders and renamed them after their own countrymen. "We have not fully grasped what democracy is about," lamented Edwin Ajibola, 42, who as an Uber driver, makes his living plying roads named after strongmen. Tinubu too, while praising in his speech "how far we had come as a nation", acknowledged that "we still have so much, and a lot, for that to go." Earlier this week, he found himself directly facing his predecessors' infrastructural legacy when the minister of the Federal Capital Territory renamed Abuja's International Conference Centre after the president. Amid the political squabbling in the aftermath, one former lawmaker suggested the move would unfairly obscure the head of state who oversaw its building: junta head Babangida.


France 24
15 hours ago
- France 24
How would Iran retaliate in event of Israeli strikes?
President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the US was relocating personnel from the potentially "dangerous" Middle East as nuclear talks with Iran stalled, raising conflict fears. He vowed to prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon amid speculation of Israeli strikes. Iran, meanwhile, has been bolstering its military and defence capabilities in recent months, says France 24's correspondent in Tehran Saeed Azimi.