
Can green card, visa holders get Real ID, required to fly in the US?
Many people across the United States are rushing to replace their driver's licenses and state IDs with federally compliant licences, known as Real ID cards, now required to board domestic flights.
As of May 7, all US citizens more than 18 years of age must show proof of identification that meets the 2005 Real ID Act's rules, which set higher federal security standards. But this change in federal travel requirements is creating some confusion about what it means for noncitizens.
Passed two decades ago by Congress in response to the bipartisan 9/11 Commission's recommendations following the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington, DC, the aim of the programme was to raise security standards for domestic travel and federal and nuclear facility access.
But immigration experts say the law's enactment during the second Trump administration has left noncitizens – including some of the 13.5 million people legally in the US on green cards, work and student visas and humanitarian parole – uncertain about what the rule change could mean for their travel.
US President Donald Trump has promised and prioritised mass deportations of criminals and undocumented people in the US. But in practice, his policies have swept up US citizens and people with a legal immigration status. He has also tried to end legal pathways that allowed people to temporarily live and work in the US. Many of these actions are being challenged in court.
Here are some answers to commonly asked questions about Real ID and its effect on citizen versus noncitizen travel.
The Department of Homeland Security says the aim of the Real ID requirements was to bring consistency to the minimum documentation requirements needed for state-issued IDs – driver's license, learner's permits and nondriver IDs.
Now, all states issuing Real ID-compliant cards require people applying for those cards to present certain documentation. The exact requirements vary by state, but in most cases, the minimum documents needed include:
A Real ID card bears a black or gold star or a US flag in its upper right corner. State-issued ID cards that don't have these markers will not be accepted as proof of identity to board domestic flights or enter federal facilities.
Here are some examples of what Real IDs look like:Examples of Real ID-compliant driver's licenses posted on the Department of Homeland Security's website.
No, you can still travel domestically provided you have another form of identification that is Real ID-compliant.
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) lists many other forms of acceptable IDs, including options for people who are not US citizens. Among them:
There's one big caveat: TSA says the list of acceptable IDs is subject to change without notice and advises travellers to check the list before travelling.
Although numerous forms of IDs are accepted for noncitizens, the Real ID policy could have a chilling effect on travelers whose documentation differentiates them from citizens, immigration experts told us.
As one example, immigration attorney Prerna Lal said that, in any interaction with federal authorities, carrying a foreign passport could lead to scrutiny of that person's identity if they lack legal immigration status.
'Even with valid foreign passports, undocumented individuals and mixed-status families may avoid travelling due to concerns about interactions with TSA or law enforcement, despite passports remaining acceptable documentation,' Lal said. 'This fear of enforcement, rather than access to IDs, is the primary chilling effect on the immigrant community.'
A TSA officer may ask a person to complete an identity verification process. If the identity is confirmed, that person will be allowed to enter the screening checkpoint.
Yes, the Real ID regulations define an individual in a 'temporary lawful status' as a person who has a pending application for asylum; has a pending or approved application for temporary protected status; has approved deferred action; or has a pending application for lawful permanent resident or conditional permanent resident status.
The Real ID Act lets states issue temporary, Real ID driver licenses and ID cards to people with temporary status. People with a temporary immigration status are usually granted temporary valid employment authorisation and Social Security numbers, which they can use to apply for Real IDs. Their temporary Real ID will remain valid until their lawful status expires. Florida is one exception: The Sunshine State requires almost all immigrants with lawful status to renew their IDs annually. Green card holders in Florida don't have to renew a REAL ID every year; their Real ID is valid until their green card expires. Most green cards are valid for 10 years, but people can apply for a renewal.
Also, people with valid student or work visas can present their unexpired passports, visas and I-94 forms – documents that show a person's authorised period of stay in the US – for proof of identity and legal status and get a Real ID.
States that provide non-Real ID compliant ID cards to people without legal immigration status can still do so, according to DHS, but the cards must clearly state that they are not acceptable for Real ID purposes and must have a unique design or colour to differentiate them from compliant cards. These non-Real ID-compliant ID cards cannot be used as a form of identification for domestic travel.
Lal told PolitiFact that a Real ID alone does not prevent a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement's arrest or confirm a lawful immigration status. Although Real ID-compliant identification requires proof of lawful presence for issuance, it is not proof of current immigration status.
'ICE conducts its own verification, and possessing a Real ID does not grant immunity from enforcement actions,' Prerna said.
Prerna said that people should present to ICE valid, government-issued documentation that shows their current immigration status, such as a green card, employment authorisation card or visa.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
39 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
US transport dept says Biden fuel economy rules exceeded legal authority
The United States Department of Transportation (DoT) has declared that former President Joe Biden's administration exceeded its authority by assuming a high uptake of electric vehicles in calculating fuel economy rules. With that declaration on Friday, the DoT paved the way for looser fuel standards and published the 'Resetting the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Program' (CAFE) rule. A future separate rule from the administration of President Donald Trump will revise the fuel economy requirements. 'We are making vehicles more affordable and easier to manufacture in the United States. The previous administration illegally used CAFE standards as an electric vehicle mandate,' Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement. The department's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), in writing its rule last year under Biden, had 'assumed significant numbers of EVs would continue to be produced regardless of the standards set by the agency, in turn increasing the level of standards that could be considered maximum feasible,' it said Friday. A shift away from Biden policies In January, Duffy signed an order directing NHTSA to rescind fuel economy standards issued under Biden for the 2022-2031 model years that had aimed to drastically reduce fuel use for cars and trucks. In a release last year, the DoT, then led by Pete Buttigieg, put in place a required fuel economy to increase by 2 percent for cars made between 2027 and 2031. At the time, the DoT said it would help save consumers upwards of $600 on gas every year. It was also part of the Biden administration's plan to address climate change. 'These new fuel economy standards will save our nation billions of dollars, help reduce our dependence on fossil fuels, and make our air cleaner for everyone. Americans will enjoy the benefits of this rule for decades to come,' then NHTSA Deputy Administrator Sophie Shulman said at the time. In June 2024, the NHTSA said it would hike CAFE requirements to about 50.4 miles per gallon (4.67 litres per 100km) by 2031 from 39.1mpg currently for light-duty vehicles. The agency last year said the rule for passenger cars and trucks would reduce gasoline consumption by 64 billion gallons and cut emissions by 659 million metric tons, cutting fuel costs with net benefits estimated at $35.2bn. Late on Thursday, Senate Republicans proposed eliminating fines for failures to meet CAFE rules as part of a wide-ranging tax bill, the latest move aimed at making it easier for automakers to build gas-powered vehicles. Last year, Chrysler-parent Stellantis paid $190.7m in civil penalties for failing to meet US fuel economy requirements for 2019 and 2020 after paying nearly $400m for penalties from 2016 through 2019. GM previously paid $128.2m in penalties for 2016 and 2017. Stellantis said it supported the Senate Republican proposal 'to provide relief while DoT develops its proposal to reset the CAFE standards … The standards are out of sync with the current market reality, and immediate relief is necessary to preserve affordability and freedom of choice.' GM declined to comment.


Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
What has Musk accused Trump of in relation to the Epstein files?
The tech billionaire and owner of Tesla and Starlink, Elon Musk, has accused United States President Donald Trump of being one of the names in the still-sealed Epstein files, and claims that this is the real reason key documents are still being withheld from the public. In January 2024, many of the so-called 'Epstein files' compiled by US federal investigators were released to the public. However, some remained sealed. Trump's presidency began with a strong boost from Musk, who donated large sums to Trump's presidential campaign and was appointed to lead a newly formed federal agency aimed at streamlining government operations, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But that relationship fractured after Musk resigned from the role in May 2025, following mounting public backlash over fiscal policies and a sharp decline in Tesla's stock. Since then, Musk has become increasingly vocal in his criticism of Trump, calling his 'One Big Beautiful Bill' a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the national debt and eliminating electric vehicle subsidies, and, now, accusing him of links to Epstein. Here's what we know about the Epstein files and Musk's accusations. The 'Epstein files' are a collection of documents compiled by US federal authorities during investigations into the activities of Jeffrey Epstein, the now-deceased financier and convicted sex offender. These files include flight logs, contact lists, court records and other materials documenting his activities and associations with high-profile individuals. The first major release of the documents took place in January 2024, when a federal judge ordered the unsealing of records from a 2015 defamation lawsuit against Epstein's associate, Ghislaine Maxwell. In February 2025, the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) followed up with an official declassification of additional documents, many of which had already leaked, featuring redacted flight logs and contact books. However, many documents remain sealed or heavily redacted, prompting public calls for full disclosure. US Attorney General Pamela Bondi stated that the FBI is reviewing tens of thousands of documents, with further releases pending necessary redactions to protect victims and ongoing investigations. On Thursday, Musk publicly accused President Donald Trump of being named in the unreleased Epstein files. In a post on his social media platform X, Musk wrote: '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' He did not provide any evidence to support this has not directly addressed Musk's claim regarding the Epstein files. However, during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz at the White House on Thursday, Trump said he was 'very disappointed' by Musk's criticism of the fiscal bill and suggested that Musk's opposition was down to the elimination of electric vehicle subsidies. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote in a social media post on Thursday. Trump also threatened to terminate federal contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies, including Tesla and SpaceX, stating that this would save the US government billions of dollars. Trump and Epstein were acquaintances in the 1980s and 1990s, often seen at social occasions together in New York and Palm Beach, Florida. Their appearances together were documented in news coverage and social pages at the time, while US media reported the two became close during the 1990s when Epstein bought a mansion near Trump's Mar-a-Lago compound in Palm Beach. A 1992 video published by NBC News shows Trump and Epstein socialising and watching dancers at a party hosted at Mar-a-Lago. In a 2002 profile of Epstein by New York Magazine, Trump was quoted describing Epstein as a 'terrific guy' who enjoyed the company of beautiful women 'on the younger side'. 'I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump said. Flight logs released during court proceedings against Maxwell show that Trump flew on Epstein's private jet at least seven times between 1993 and 1997, occasionally with family members. Epstein's 'Black Book' – a contact directory obtained in 2015 by Gawker, a now-defunct US blog that covered celebrities and media – was later submitted as court evidence and listed multiple phone numbers and addresses for Trump, including his office, home and Mar-a-Lago. Once allies, Musk's relationship with Trump has deteriorated significantly since his criticism of Trump's fiscal policy and subsequent allegations about the Epstein files. Trump's threats to cut federal contracts with Musk's companies led to a 14 percent drop in Tesla's stock value. Musk has since called for Trump's impeachment and replacement with US Vice President JD Vance. This public spat has also drawn attention from political figures, with some Democrats demanding the release of the full Epstein files and questioning whether they are being withheld due to potential implications for Trump.


Al Jazeera
7 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
The magician-in-chief: How Trump makes us miss the real story
Donald Trump is the magician-in-chief. Trump understands better, I reckon, than any US president since Ronald Reagan how to bend and manipulate the squirrel-like attention spans of much of the new and 'legacy' media to his will and advantage. Reagan and his adept advisers relied almost exclusively on choreographing flattering set pieces for television to drive his retrograde plans and stick-handle around a prickly scandal or two. Trump, having established his ubiquitous star via 'reality TV' and countless appearances on ephemeral 'chat' shows, knows full well the ways and means to inculcate himself into the American consciousness courtesy of the 'boob tube'. Still, Trump has skillfully used social media – now mostly Truth Social – to hone his trademark trick: Misdirection. Like any seasoned illusionist, he appreciates how to draw the public's eye and ear away from what demands scrutiny. His aim is twofold: To advance his revolutionary agenda and to obscure the damage that agenda inflicts. When, in early 2020, a new, lethal virus emerged and spread rapidly as the death toll mounted, Trump dismissed the COVID-19 threat, peddled unproven cures such as hydroxychloroquine, and even suggested injecting disinfectant as a possible remedy. Trump's bizarre provocations were deliberate and meant, in large measure, to delay and deflect thorough review of his administration's slow, chaotic response. Trump grasps that in the digital age, outrage is oxygen. By provoking conflict and controversy at a relentless pace, he controls the focus and tempo of public discourse. Armed with a cellphone – likely embossed with the presidential seal – and a glint of inspiration, Trump can instantly shape or reshape the dominant 'news' narrative. He does this by flashing shiny, fleeting baubles that further his parochial interests, while more consequential matters drift by like a passing cloud, unnoticed – leaving the hard, complex stuff to fade into neglect. Trump is the human equivalent of a 24/7 cable news outlet pumping out intriguing content that the real cable news channels are happily addicted to – admitted or not. So, in the disconcerting face of the sudden, caustic split with Elon Musk and a festering revolt in the Senate over his signature 'big, beautiful' budget, Trump pulled out of his top hat a fantastical 'channel-changer' that provoked awe and disbelief. According to NBC News, the president of the United States 'reposted a baseless claim on Truth Social that former President Joe Biden was executed in 2020 and replaced with clones or robots'. Given that the president of the United States shared the 'conspiracy theory' with his 10 million followers, and, by extension, the rest of us, an NBC correspondent was required to contact the White House to determine the following: First, whether America's head of state 'believed' that Biden was executed in 2020. Second, why did America's head of state amplify a post claiming an executed Biden had been replaced by a clone? Let me help NBC News and the dozens of reporters who were compelled to ask the White House the same absurd questions in the pursuit of 'clarity'. Despite his, ah, bluster and eccentricities, I can confidently suggest that Trump does not 'believe' that Biden was executed in 2020. Trump trumpeted this nonsense to get NBC News and other scribes fixated on the latest shiny bauble instead of exploring how his 'big, beautiful' bill will strip millions of Americans of their health insurance and dilate the US deficit. To dismiss Trump's expert ability to train the world's gaze where he wants it as a 'distraction' is, I think, too easy and simplistic since, by now, we ought to have become wise to the ruse. What Trump wields is far more practised and pernicious. He doesn't just distract – he rewrites the story in real time, making the serious seem trivial, and the trivial seem epochal. Oh, and he figured out long ago that most political observers are far more captivated by personality than policy. Trump also recognises that the presidency isn't only about power. It's about stagecraft. He is not preoccupied by nuance or accountability. He revels in spectacle. And the spectacle always wins out. As such, Trump continues to beguile and enthral with his studied performances grounded, as they are, in the gravitational pull and intoxicating prestige of occupying the Oval Office. The Beltway press is conditioned to look where the president points – again and again. On reliable cue, Trump announced, by presidential decree, that the White House counsel and attorney general would probe allegations that Biden's aides may have 'covered up' his 'cognitive decline' and used an autopen to sign off on major policies without his knowledge or consent. For his agitated part, Biden issued a statement on Thursday calling Trump's calculated gambit a 'distraction', while insisting that he made the 'decisions during my presidency'. The 'investigation' comes on the convenient heels of a book, co-authored by CNN host Jake Tapper, detailing Biden's alleged waning mental acuity while in office. The book's detractors have accused Tapper of revising the record as a sop to right-wing personalities since, they insist, he and CNN previously poo-pooed reports of Biden's faltering mind and body. Meanwhile, the manufactured brouhaha and deepening, vitriolic rupture of the Trump-Musk bromance, have reduced the resurrection of Trump's racially tinged travel ban to an afterthought. Once the subject of fierce legal and moral opposition, it has returned with barely a whisper of resistance – another example of how Trump's theatrics serve to smother the dangerous intent beneath the enticing din. What to do? A responsible newsroom must avoid as best it can serving as marionettes to Trump's cynical schemes. That translates into ignoring the impulse to treat every incendiary outburst, insult, or incitement as urgent or newsworthy. Editors and producers should ask: Whose interests are being served by this coverage? If the answer is Trump's, pause or take a refreshing pass. Journalists should redirect the lens towards substance, not stunts. That involves patience and the discipline to pose another important question: What is being hidden behind the colourful camouflage? The antidote to manipulation is not detachment – it's sharp, vigilant coverage of the profound, human consequences of the president's actions, not his antics. In its exhausting dance with Donald Trump, the fourth estate can and must stop mistaking the fireworks for the fire. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.