Karen Read judge sued over 'buffer zone' keeping protesters away from courthouse
Four protesters are suing Judge Beverly Cannone over a "buffer zone" that they say unlawfully keeps them too far away from the courthouse where Karen Read's retrial on murder and other charges is underway in Massachusetts.
"Cannone has issued this order primarily to quash criticism directed at her, as…the only protests that have been documented have been the Plaintiffs in this case, who have quietly held signs criticizing Cannone," the lawsuit alleges.
Those plaintiffs are Massachusetts residents Jason Grant, Allyson Taggart, Lisa Peterson and Samantha Lyons. Their lawsuit also names Geoffrey Noble, the state police superintendent, and Michael d'Entremont, the chief of police in Dedham, where the courthouse is located.
In their lawsuit, they are asking a federal court to declare the "buffer zone" an unconstitutional "prior restraint" on free speech and an injunction, plus legal fees.
The court established a 200-foot buffer zone around the courthouse building itself and a parking lot behind the nearby Norfolk County Registry of Deeds building ahead of Read's first trial last year.
The lawsuit takes issue with the expansion of that zone to extend to 200 feet around Bates Court, Bullard Street, Ames Street and Court Street for her second trial.
SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER
"Buffer zones that over-zealously prohibit all First Amendment activity are almost always unconstitutional and this one is no different," said Mark Trammell, a lawyer for the plaintiffs and the executive director of the Center for American Liberty. "The Karen Read trial continues to inspire passionate public debate—and citizens must be allowed to protest peacefully outside their own courthouse."
David Gelman, a Philadelphia-area defense attorney who has been following the case, told Fox News Digital the lawsuit is likely to fail.
"The judge is not saying they can't protest – the judge is saying they just can't protest at the courthouse," he said. "The reasons are legit too. It could sway a jury each day they enter and leave the building."
GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB
Similar orders have been upheld around the country, he added.
"The judge is 100% within her right to do this and will prevail," he said. "It's the most common gripe among protesters. All speech is not free speech."
Protesters both for and against Read have been regularly attending many of her court dates since she was charged in 2022 with the murder of her Boston police officer boyfriend, John O'Keefe, 46.
Read the lawsuit here:
A nor'easter tore through the region on the morning he was found dead – Jan. 29, 2022. An autopsy found he had died from trauma to the head and hypothermia. However, the medical examiner left the manner of death "undetermined."
The 45-year-old Read's first trial over O'Keefe's death ended with a hung jury last year.
Jury selection for the do-over began Tuesday. It is expected to take six to eight weeks after opening statements.
Read is charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and leaving the scene of a deadly accident. She could face up to life in prison if convicted of the top charge.
Read denied the charges, pleaded not guilty and claimed that she is being framed as part of a police cover-up.
Cannone warned potential jurors at the start of jury selection Tuesday not to be influenced by protesters outside.
"John Adams said that we are a government of laws, not of men, and that the law must be deaf to the clamoring of the public," she said, referring to the Founding Father with deep Boston roots.
"He meant that while the public opinion about a given subject may ebb and flow, the law must be steady, reliable, and even-handed."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Jeffries says Trump ‘intentionally' inflaming unrest in Los Angeles
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is hammering President Trump over the clashes in Los Angeles, saying the president is purposefully escalating tensions to distract the country from a volatile economy. Speaking to reporters in the Capitol, Jeffries railed against Trump's aggressive deportation policies and defended the rights of Americans to protest such government actions — if it's done peacefully. He accused Trump of 'fanning flames and inciting things on the ground' to distract from a domestic policy agenda that Jeffries has dubbed 'a failure.' 'Donald Trump is clearly trying to distract from the fact that he has a failed administration,' Jeffries said. The Democratic leader also dismissed Trump's argument that, by intervening in the L.A. immigration protests, he's simply bringing law and order to a city where local officials have failed to do so. Jeffries noted that Trump, for hours, had declined to intervene on Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of his supporters attacked law enforcers at the U.S. Capitol in an effort to block the certification of Trump's election defeat a few months earlier. In January, Trump pardoned roughly 1,500 of the rioters — a move that, according to Jeffries, gives Trump and his supporters 'zero credibility' to claim the mantle of law and order. 'Donald Trump wasn't a leader on Jan. 6. He didn't send the National Guard to stop the violent mob that was brutally beating police officers in plain view for every single American to see,' Jeffries said. 'And this guy, who likely withheld the National Guard — he certainly didn't send them forward — is lecturing the country about law and order?' 'Give me a break. We're not feeling you — particularly as it relates to this issue,' he continued. 'Donald Trump and all of these minions who support him — the sycophants, the extremists — have zero credibility on this issue. Republicans have become the party of lawlessness and disorder.' Amid the unrest in L.A., Trump over the weekend activated members of the National Guard, drawing criticisms from California officials — notably Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) — who said local law enforcement agencies are sufficiently equipped to handle the situation without the involvement of federal troops. Newsom announced Monday that he is suing the administration over the federal intervention. 'This is a manufactured crisis,' Newsom posted on X. 'He is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution.' Jeffries is standing squarely behind Newsom and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass (D), a former member of the House, who have both argued that local and state law enforcers in California have the faculties and manpower to protect both First Amendment rights and public safety. 'The LAPD, the L.A. Sheriff's Department, other local law enforcement, and the California Highway Patrol, seem to have the capacity to make sure that the situation is addressed — that peaceful protests are allowed to occur, and that law-breakers are held accountable,' Jeffries said.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump deploys National Guard troops to Los Angeles. Where were they on Jan. 6?
To quote Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on June 8: "Yes, President Trump is putting the safety of the communities that are being impacted by these riots and by these protests that have turned violent, and he's putting the safety of our law enforcement officers first." Her comments were about Trump deploying National Guard troops in response to immigration protests in Los Angeles. Here's another quote from a protester who I think summed up the Trump administration's hypocrisy quite well: "Where was the National Guard on January 6?" More than 100 law enforcement officers were injured during the violent protest at the U.S. Capitol. By the way, these violent, convicted criminals from Jan. 6 have all been pardoned by Trump. More: These Ohioans received a pardon from Trump for their actions in the January 6 riots How could Noem say with a straight face that the president is putting the safety of our law enforcement officers first? Watch what they do, not what they say. April Brauch, Wyoming We must pay attention to the escalation of power and the inappropriate use of that power by the president. What is happening in Los Angeles, California, must be an alert to what might be in store for the rest of the country if President Donald Trump is not reined in. What are you doing, senators and representatives? Using the National Guard and describing a demonstration against the use of force by Homeland Security is not an insurrection. When a real attempt at insurrection occurred on Jan. 6, 2021, with threats to the life of the vice president and members of Congress, the president said it was a peaceful demonstration of First Amendment rights. I feel helpless, and so I am doing the first thing I can do, which is to speak out and hope others will do the same. Marion DiFalco, Walnut Hills This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Protests in L.A. against ICE raids are not an insurrection | Letter
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Union leader faces federal charge of conspiracy to impede an officer during L.A. ICE raids
Federal authorities on Monday charged David Huerta, president of Service Employees International Union California, in a criminal complaint with conspiracy to impede an officer in connection with his alleged actions during an immigration enforcement raid last week. Huerta, 58, has been held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown L.A. since Friday and is expected to make his initial appearance in federal court on Monday afternoon. He is facing a felony charge that carries up to six years in federal prison, according to the U.S. attorney's office in L.A. His attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Huerta was detained and injured while documenting a workplace immigration raid in downtown L.A. on Friday. He was treated at a hospital and transferred to the Metropolitan Detention Center. Nine people tied to the protests have been charged federally, according to the U.S. attorney's office in L.A. Among them is Russell Gomez-Dzul, a Mexican national, who the White House said was arrested on suspicion of assaulting a federal officer. Rallies are scheduled in more than a dozen cities across the U.S., including in L.A., by union members and other supporters demanding Huerta's release and an end to the workplace immigration raids. California Democratic Sens. Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla sent a letter Monday to the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice demanding a review of Huerta's arrest. The U.S. attorney for Los Angeles, Bill Essayli, a staunch Trump ally and hard-line conservative who was appointed in April, last week posted a photo on X of Huerta, hands behind his back, after the arrest. Essayli accused Huerta of obstructing the access of federal authorities to a facility where they were conducting a search warrant. "Let me be clear: I don't care who you are — if you impede federal agents, you will be arrested and prosecuted," Essayli wrote on X. "No one has the right to assault, obstruct, or interfere with federal authorities carrying out their duties." The labor union said in a statement Friday that Huerta was detained 'while exercising his First Amendment right to observe and document law enforcement activity.' Schiff, who referred to Huerta as "a very prominent union leader in Los Angeles, a very respected voice," was waiting to attend the labor leader's hearing Monday. Schiff spoke with reporters in front of a building graffitied in expletives aimed at Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He said that Huerta was "exercising his lawful right to be present and observe these immigration raids." 'It's obviously a very traumatic thing, and now that it looks like the Justice Department wants to try and make an example out of him, it's all the more traumatic," Schiff said, when asked how Huerta was doing. "But this is part of the Trump playbook. They selectively use the Justice Department to go after their adversaries. It's what they do.' According to the criminal complaint, U.S. Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi authorized search warrants Thursday for four business locations 'suspected of unlawfully employing illegal aliens and falsifying employment records related to the status of its employees.' In an affidavit filed with the federal complaint, a supervisory special agent with Homeland Security Investigations, whose name was redacted, said news quickly spread about 'ICE raids' taking place throughout L.A. According to the complaint, Huerta arrived at Ambiance Apparel in the downtown Los Angeles Fashion District before noon Friday, joining several other protesters. The company was one of the sites of a workplace raid. 'The protesters, including HUERTA appeared to be communicating with each other in a concerted effort to disrupt the law enforcement operations,' the agent wrote. The agent wrote that Huerta was yelling at and taunting officers and later sat cross-legged in front of a vehicle gate to the location where law enforcement authorities were serving a search warrant. 'In addition to sitting in front of the gate, HUERTA at various times stood up and paced in front of the gate, effectively preventing law enforcement vehicles from entering or exiting the premises through the gate to execute the search warrant,' the agent wrote in the affidavit. 'As far as I was aware, this gate was the only location through which vehicles could enter or exit the premises.' The agent wrote that they told Huerta that, if he kept blocking the Ambiance gate, he would be arrested. Huerta responded that he couldn't hear the agent through his mask, according to the affidavit. Huerta used a curse word, the agent wrote. According to the complaint, as a white law enforcement van tried to get through the gate, Huerta stood in its path. Because Huerta 'was being uncooperative, the officer put his hands on HUERTA in an attempt to move him out of the path of the vehicle.' 'I saw HUERTA push back, and in response, the officer pushed HUERTA to the ground,' the agent wrote. 'The officer and I then handcuffed HUERTA and arrested him.' Huerta on Friday released a statement through his union, saying: 'What happened to me is not about me; This is about something much bigger. 'This is about how we as a community stand together and resist the injustice that's happening. Hard-working people, and members of our family and our community, are being treated like criminals. We all collectively have to object to this madness because this is not justice. This is injustice. And we all have to stand on the right side of justice." Ahead of the Monday afternoon hearing, Huerta's cousin, Marta Gonzales, said she was there to represent the family. 'We're all heartbroken. We have family all over the world,' she said. 'Everyone's been watching.' Gonzales called Huerta 'a giant in our family.' 'This is so unjust,' she said. Asked about the protests over the weekend, she said she wondered if Huerta 'was the spark for a lot of it. It just angered so many people." Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
