logo
Chevron ordered to pay more than $740 million to restore Louisiana coast in landmark trial

Chevron ordered to pay more than $740 million to restore Louisiana coast in landmark trial

The Hill04-04-2025

POINTE À LA HACHE, La. (AP) — Oil company Chevron must pay at least $740 million to restore damage it caused to southeast Louisiana's coastal wetlands, a jury ruled on Friday following a landmark trial more than a decade in the making.
The case was the first of dozens of pending lawsuits to reach trial in Louisiana against the world's leading oil companies for their role in accelerating land loss along the state's rapidly disappearing coast. The verdict – likely to be appealed – could set a precedent leaving other oil and gas firms on the hook for billions of dollars in damages tied to land loss and environmental degradation.
What did Chevron do wrong?
Jurors found that energy giant Texaco, acquired by Chevron in 2001, had for decades violated Louisiana regulations governing coastal resources by failing to restore wetlands impacted by dredging canals, drilling wells and billions of gallons of wastewater dumped into the marsh.
The jury awarded $575 million to compensate for land loss, $161 million to compensate for contamination and $8 million for abandoned equipment.
'No company is big enough to ignore the law, no company is big enough to walk away scot-free,' the plaintiff's lead attorney John Carmouche told jurors during closing arguments.
A 1978 Louisiana coastal management law mandated that sites used by oil companies 'be cleared, revegetated, detoxified, and otherwise restored as near as practicable to their original condition' after operations ended. Older operations sites that continued to be used were not exempt and companies were expected to apply for proper permits.
But the oil company did not obtain proper permits and failed to clean up its mess, leading to contamination from wastewater stored unsafely or dumped directly into the marsh, the lawsuit said.
The company also failed to follow known best practices for decades since it began operating in the area in the 1940s, expert witnesses for the plaintiff's testified. The company 'chose profits over the marsh' and allowed the environmental degradation caused by its operations to fester and spread, Carmouche said.
How are oil companies contributing to Louisiana's land loss?
The lawsuit against Chevron was filed in 2013 by Plaquemines Parish, a rural district in Louisiana straddling the final leg of the Mississippi River heading into the Gulf of Mexico, also referred to as the Gulf of America as declared by President Donald Trump.
Louisiana's coastal parishes have lost more than 2,000 square miles (5,180 square kilometers) of land over the past century, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, which has also identified oil and gas infrastructure as a significant cause. The state could lose another 3,000 square miles (7,770 square kilometers) in the coming decades, its coastal protection agency has warned.
Thousands of miles of canals cut through the wetlands by oil companies weakens them and exacerbates the impacts of sea level rise. Industrial wastewater from oil production degrades the surrounding soil and vegetation. The torn up wetlands leave South Louisiana – home to some of the nation's biggest ports and key energy sector infrastructure — more vulnerable to flooding and destruction from extreme weather events like hurricanes.
Chevron's lead attorney, Mike Phillips, said the company had operated lawfully and blamed land loss in Louisiana on other factors, namely the extensive levee system that blocks the Mississippi River from depositing land regenerating sediment — a widely acknowledged cause of coastal erosion.
The way to solve the land loss problem is 'not suing oil companies, it's reconnecting the Mississippi River with the delta,' Phillips said during closing arguments.
Yet the lawsuit held the company responsible for exacerbating and accelerating land loss in Louisiana, rather than being its sole cause.
Chevron also challenged the costly wetlands restoration project proposed by the parish, which involved removing large amounts of contaminated soil and filling in the swaths fragmented wetlands eroded over the past century. The company said the plan was impractical and designed to inflate the damages rather than lead to real world implementation.
Attorney Jimmy Faircloth, Jr., who represented the state of Louisiana, which has backed Plaquemines and other local governments in their lawsuits against oil companies, told jurors from the parish that Chevron was telling them their community was not worth preserving.
'Our communities are built on coast, our families raised on coast, our children go to school on coast,' Faircloth said. 'The state of Louisiana will not surrender the coast, it's for the good of the state that the coast be maintained.'
What does this mean for future litigation against oil companies?
Carmouche, a well-connected attorney, and his firm Talbot, Carmouche & Marcello have been responsible for bringing many of the lawsuits against oil companies in the state.
Louisiana's economy has long been heavily dependent on the oil and gas industry and the industry holds significant political power. Even so, Louisiana's staunchly pro-industry Gov. Jeff Landry has supported the lawsuits, including bringing the state on board during his tenure as Attorney General.
Oil companies have fought tooth and nail to quash the litigation, including unsuccessfully lobbying Louisiana's Legislature to pass a law to invalidate the claims. Chevron and other firms also repeatedly tried to move the lawsuits into federal court where they believed they would find a more sympathetic audience.
But the heavy price Chevron is set to pay could hasten other firms to seek settlements in the dozens of other lawsuits across Louisiana. Plaquemines alone has 20 other cases pending against oil companies.
The state is running out of money to support its ambitious coastal restoration plans, which have been fueled by soon-expiring settlement funds from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, and supporters of the litigation say payouts could provide a much-needed injection of funds.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California woman sues Costco for $14M after display fell on her, causing ‘permanent injuries'
California woman sues Costco for $14M after display fell on her, causing ‘permanent injuries'

New York Post

time14 minutes ago

  • New York Post

California woman sues Costco for $14M after display fell on her, causing ‘permanent injuries'

A California woman is suing Costco for more than $14 million after a cabinet allegedly fell on top of her in a store – claiming the incident caused her a traumatic brain injury. Sadie Novotny was walking down a Costco store aisle on March 22 when a heavy liquor cabinet fell and pinned her to the ground, a complaint filed in April alleged. The Bay Area woman claimed the large cabinet had 'thin legs' and was balanced precariously on a 'worn' and 'inadequate' wooden pallet in a Costco store in Santa Rosa, according to the lawsuit. Costco was sued for over $14 million after the woman's injury. AP The incident allegedly left Novotny with multiple permanent and severe injuries, including traumatic brain injury, the suit said. Novotny is seeking approximately $5 million for pain, suffering and inconvenience; $5 million for emotional distress; $100,000 for medical expenses and loss of earnings; and $4 million for future medical expenses and loss of earnings. The plaintiff, 46, works as a private practice psychotherapist, specializing in marriage and family counseling, according to her LinkedIn and several background check sites. The lawsuit alleges Costco is responsible for negligence in failing to adequately operate its store and manage merchandise, as well as failing to train, manage and supervise employees so the heavy liquor cabinet did not fall on the plaintiff. Lawyers for Novotny and Costco did not immediately respond to The Post's requests for comment. While the suit was originally filed in Alameda County Superior Court, it was moved to the Northern District Court at Costco's request. Both parties are due in court in September for a case management meeting.

North Carolina auto insurance rates are going up 5% on average in settlement
North Carolina auto insurance rates are going up 5% on average in settlement

Associated Press

time19 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

North Carolina auto insurance rates are going up 5% on average in settlement

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina automobile insurance rates are poised to increase statewide by a 5% average this fall as part of an agreement reached between state regulators and the insurance industry. The settlement announced on Monday by Insurance Commissioner Mike Causey is lower than the average 22.6% rate increase for private passenger vehicles that had been requested in February by the North Carolina Rate Bureau, which represents insurance companies. Without a settlement, the industry was headed to a scheduled Sept. 22 rate hearing in which a hearing officer would have considered the bureau's premium rate level request. That hearing is now canceled. The rate changes will take effect on new and renewed policies starting Oct. 1. 'With factors such as distracted driving, excessive speeding and increased automobile repair costs putting upward pressure on insurance rates, I am happy that we were able to hold the average increase to 5%,' Causey said in a news release. The automobile premium rates will remain among the lowest in the nation, the Republican elected commissioner said. The agreement also includes an average statewide 16.3% decrease on motorcycle liability insurance rates. The bureau's previous rate filing in 2023 ultimately resulted in a settlement that led to an overall average 4.5% increase per year for two years.

Pakistan hikes defense budget 20% following conflict with India, but overall spending is cut
Pakistan hikes defense budget 20% following conflict with India, but overall spending is cut

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pakistan hikes defense budget 20% following conflict with India, but overall spending is cut

ISLAMABAD (AP) — Pakistan Tuesday hiked defense spending by 20% following last month's deadly conflict with India. The government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced the increase as part of the budget for the fiscal year 2025-26, in which overall spending will be cut by 7% to 17.57 trillion rupees ($62 billion). Pakistan and India were pushed to the brink of war earlier this year after a gun massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir, marking the biggest breakdown in relations between them since 2019. Weeks of tension followed, culminating in missile and drone strikes that resulted in dozens of fatalities on both sides of the border. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said the government was allocating 2.55 trillion rupees ($9 billion) for defense compared with 2.12 trillion rupees in the previous budget. India in February increased its defense spending by 9.5%. Sharif told the Cabinet: 'All economic indicators are satisfactory. After defeating India in a conventional war, now we have to go beyond it in the economic field as well.' Opposition members of the National Assembly verbally abused Aurangzeb, chanting slogans, throwing scrunched-up copies of the budget at him, whistling, and banging their desks as he gave his address. The coming year's defense allocation is considerably more than the government's expenditure on higher education, agricultural development, and mitigating climate-related risks, to which Pakistan is especially prone. The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store