Why scientists are resistant to prostate cancer screening
If you could choose to never know you had cancer, even if it meant a slightly raised risk of death decades down the line, would you take it? Many may choose to say wilfully ignorant, especially if knowing would lead to a string of invasive procedures that could cause more problems than they solve.
This is the trouble with prostate cancer screening and why, despite ongoing pressure from charities, the National Screening Committee (NSC) and scientists are reluctant to add it to the list of routine NHS checks.
Put simply, it does little good and can cause significant harm.
The current screening tool is the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test which is used in some European countries such as Lithuania.
But a 15-year trial, led by the universities of Bristol, Oxford and Cambridge, estimated one in six cancers found by PSA screenings were over-diagnosed, leading to unnecessary treatment of tumours that would not have caused any harm in someone's lifetime.
For every 1,000 men screened, it is estimated that testing saves just one life.
'It's a very emotional thing,' said Prof Freddie Hamdy of the University of Oxford, who has spent years researching the benefits of prostate cancer screening.
'You have celebrities who come up, and the obvious example is Chris Hoy, who was diagnosed at the early age of 48 with a disease which is seemingly not curable, and that triggers a lot of emotions, 'We must find all these cancers'.
'What people don't realise is all the consequences of trying to find these few cancers on the larger population.'
Men aged 50 or over can request a screening test, but the impact can be profound. What is often mis-sold as a simple blood test can set them on a lifelong path of scans, surgery, side effects and stress.
Arguably, those who are found to have low or intermediate-risk prostate cancer would be better off not knowing. Research shows that they have around a 97 per cent chance of survival for 15 years whether they choose radiotherapy, surgery or simply monitoring the tumour.
Many will be spooked into going ahead with procedures, even if there is little benefit.
'I saw in my clinic yesterday five new patients with prostate cancer,' added Prof Hamdy. 'Four out of five are unlikely to have benefited from knowing they've got cancer. Two chose to have radical treatments.
'It isn't just a blood test. You have essentially a man who is healthy, who has no symptoms, and told him he has cancer.
'Essentially what we've done, irrespective of how serious the disease is, we've given that man a new passport, a new identity, which he is going to have to live for the rest of his life. And that is a huge responsibility.'
Those who opt for treatment face the prospect of being left incontinent and impotent. A study by the University of Bristol found that around half of men experienced urinary leakage and needed to wear pads after surgery to remove all or part of the prostate gland.
Although it improved over time, one in five still experienced incontinence five years after the surgery. Likewise, research found that the number of men with impotency issues rose from around 33 per cent to 80 per cent following treatment.
Jenny Donovan, professor of social medicine at the University of Bristol, said: 'This really affected some men severely. Loss of sex life can be devastating.
'Will we cause more harm than good by screening? We think yes, if we repeat this cycle of over-detection and over-treatment.
'It's an intuitively nice idea. We're not in principle against it, it's just more complicated than it seems.'
Even those who do not choose invasive procedures, face a lifetime of active monitoring and the constant fear that each new appointment could bring bad news.
One man wrote in the study: 'When I first went for the active monitoring, I thought 'well this isn't going to be a problem, I'll be able to sail though this because I know the cancer is being contained and I know I am being monitored'.
'But then it wasn't in reality as simple as that because I knew that I had cancer and it messes things up. You think you can handle it, but it's always there niggling in your mind.'
If all the evidence suggests the benefits of screening does not outweigh the risks, why then do charities like Prostate Cancer UK advocate for a national screening programme?
The answer probably lies in the figures. Prostate cancer deaths are the second-most common cause of cancer death in the UK, killing 12,000 people each year, making it a major public health problem.
Something needs to be done, but screening could bring more challenges than it solves.
When Kazakhstan introduced population screening for prostate cancer in 2013, they were forced to close the program within five years because the health service could not cope the influx of low-risk prostate cancers, which did not need treatment.
Richard Martin, professor of clinical epidemiology at the University of Bristol said: 'What we don't want to do is compound that problem by adding harm and not reducing those 12,000 deaths a year. That would be a disaster.'
This week, Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, declared his support for a national prostate cancer screening programme, adding that he was 'particularly sympathetic' to the idea.
Currently the National Screening Committee, which keeps a rolling review on the issue, is looking into whether certain at-risk groups could be targeted, but is unlikely to recommend a national programme.
Derek Rosario, honorary professor at Sheffield Hallam University and clinical advisor to the NSC, said: 'The NSC is still considering evidence around perhaps identifying high-risk populations, but the real difficulty is reliably identifying high-risk populations for prostate cancer. Lethal prostate cancer is not quite as straightforward as it might seem.
'So there is no formal review of national screening going on, but the space is moving all the time.'
In response to Mr Streeting's intervention, Prof Hamdy said: 'Fund research and we'll give you the evidence.
'There seems to be a lot more attention given to, 'let's find the cancers, and then we'll sort it afterwards'. And what we're saying is, before you put the needle in a man's prostate, just think.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Aggressive Africanized honeybees spread to 13 States, including Alabama
Africanized honeybees, also known as "killer bees," have spread to 13 states, including Alabama, posing threats to people and animals. Here's what to know about Africanized honeybees and their presence in Alabama. Africanized honeybees, a mix of African and European bees, are far more aggressive than honeybees. They attack in large numbers, chase people and animals for up to a mile, even follow cars, and can sting through standard beekeeping gear. Africanized honeybees look almost identical to regular honeybees, so much so that most people can't tell the difference. They're slightly smaller, with golden-yellow coloring and darker brown bands, but only experts can spot the difference by measuring their wings and body size. Killer bees first grabbed headlines in the 1990s after showing up in the U.S. They thrive in warm, tropical climates and struggle to survive cold winters, so they're primarily found in southern states. Africanized honeybees don't pack more venom than regular honeybees but attack in bigger numbers. Each bee can sting only once before it dies, but when the colony feels threatened, hundreds may swarm and sting. If you're getting attacked, experts recommend running away quickly in a zigzag pattern and seeking shelter in a building or car. Jumping into the water is not recommended because the bees will wait for you to resurface. In 2024, the Alabama Department of Agriculture confirmed the invasive bees in Jackson and St. Clair counties after local beekeepers collected wild swarms. Officials euthanized the bees and set traps within a five-mile radius to monitor for more. Africanized honeybees have been reported in at least 13 states, with Florida seeing the highest numbers. Here's where these aggressive bees have been spotted so far: Alabama Arizona Arkansas California Florida Georgia Louisiana Mississippi Nevada New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Utah Jennifer Lindahl is a Breaking and Trending Reporter for the Deep South Connect Team for Gannett/USA Today. Connect with her on X @jenn_lindahl and email at jlindahl@ This article originally appeared on Montgomery Advertiser: Are killer bees a threat in Alabama? Here's what to know
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sir Francis Graham-Smith, radio astronomy pioneer whose work indicated that the universe had a beginning
Sir Francis Graham-Smith, the former Astronomer Royal, who has died aged 102, was a pioneer of radio astronomy, carrying out research which helped to establish our modern picture of the universe. In the 1950s, he was the first astronomer to measure the accurate positions of distant 'radio galaxies', those that have large regions of radio emission that extend well beyond their visible structure. Together with Sir Martin Ryle, his predecessor as Astronomer Royal, he suggested that the speed at which these galaxies are moving away from us indicated that the universe must have had a definitive beginning. These findings helped to demolish the then fashionable steady state theory of Sir Fred Hoyle and others, which held that the universe had always existed. In the 1970s, Graham-Smith did much detective work on pulsars – fast-spinning stars made up of matter so dense that one ton can be contained in a teaspoon. King Charles II established the office of Astronomer Royal in 1674. Appointed in 1982, Graham-Smith was the 13th to hold the office – an unlucky portent as it turned out, for the 1980s saw a series of cuts in funding for astronomical research. The shadow hanging over British astronomy partly stemmed from a public relations disaster on the night of March 13 1986 when, shortly after midnight, the European spacecraft Giotto passed through the tail of Halley's comet, sending back data to earth. The BBC, in a late-night television show, invited several astronomers, including Graham-Smith to comment on the results, forgetting that none of their guests knew much about comets. The show was a shambles: no one could make head or tail of the Giotto data. But the real row began later in No 10 Downing Street, where Margaret Thatcher was watching the programme. She was angry at what she saw and decided that space research was a waste of money. The next year she barred British participation in a European X-ray telescope searching for black holes and rejected plans to boost the budget of the National Space Centre, a move which prompted the resignation of its director Roy Gibson. Caught in the cross-fire, Graham-Smith strove in as civilised a manner as possible to put the case for higher investment in British astronomical research: 'We have no shortage of excellent students,' he observed in 1986, 'but they will probably work abroad. The fact that we will go on populating the world with British astronomers is absolutely splendid, but wouldn't it be nicer to think that just a few would stay at home?' Francis Graham-Smith was born on April 25 1923 to Claud and Cicely and educated at Epsom College and at Rossall School in Lancashire. He began studying natural sciences at Downing College, Cambridge, in 1941 but did not graduate until 1946. Like his colleague Martin Ryle, he spent most of the Second World War working at the Telecommunications Research Establishment at Malvern involved in the development of radar. This experience led him into radio astronomy and he stayed on at Cambridge after graduating to work with Ryle at the Cavendish Laboratory on radio waves from the sun and other stars. By a fortunate coincidence, the largest sunspot for many years occurred at this time – in July 1946 – and Cambridge radio astronomy grew from observations of its very powerful emissions. Soon afterwards the pair were using the same techniques to detect radio waves coming from other parts of the sky. Setting up a simple radio telescope in a field behind the house where they both lived, they left it for 24 hours to scan the sky as the earth rotated recording the radio signal on a paper chart recorder. When they looked at the chart the next morning, they were astonished to see the trace of not one but two powerful radio sources on the recording. The radio source appeared to be coming from the constellation Cassiopeia. A few years later, the radio source was precisely located and identified with the remains of a stellar explosion in the Milky Way. Another target of their research was a radio signal coming from a discrete source in the constellation of Cygnus. In 1952, Graham-Smith located this radio signal known as the galaxy Cygnus A (the 'A' indicating that it is the brightest light in its constellation), sufficiently accurately for a visual search to be made for a visible counterpart. This search turned out to be a turning point in modern astronomy. American researchers using large optical telescopes found that the radio waves were coming from a galaxy of unusual shape and with a large 'redshift' – evidence that it is moving away from earth at a speed which increases with distance. This discovery demonstrated that radio astronomy could be used for penetrating great distances outside our own galaxy. Cygnus A is the first known example of a radio galaxy. In 1952 Graham-Smith went to America to work at the Carnegie Institute in Washington, returning to Cambridge in 1953. He published a paper with Ryle in 1957 suggesting that radio signals from orbiting satellites could be used to aid navigation. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s Graham-Smith worked on radio astronomy at Jodrell Bank, then moved into optical astronomy as director of the Royal Greenwich Observatory, where his main task was to build the new optical telescope at La Palma in the Canary Islands. In 1977 he was part of a team working at the British-American optical telescope in New South Wales which photographed the Vela Pulsar, the brightest pulsar in the sky in terms of radio emissions, no more than 30 miles in diameter yet weighing one and a half times as much as the sun. The star's total explosion or 'supernova' had been recorded in Sumerian inscriptions. In 1981 Graham-Smith moved back to Manchester to become only the second director of Jodrell Bank – where he had a cameo in the series Treasure Hunt, giving Anneka Rice a piggy-back to help her reach a clue. He listed bee-keeping among his recreations in Who's Who, and looked after the hives at Jodrell Bank. In 1982 he was appointed Astronomer Royal, and he was professor of physics at Manchester from 1987 to 1990. After his retirement, Graham-Smith – who was known as Graham to friends and colleagues – became vice-president of the Royal Society and his attention turned increasingly to the future of our own planet. In 1994 he hosted an international population summit which concluded that zero population growth 'within the lifetime of our children' was the only way to save the earth from ecological disaster. He was knighted in 1986 and elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1970. He married, in 1945, Dorothy Palmer, whom he met when they were both working on radio astronomy with Martin Ryle in Cambridge; they had a daughter and three sons. Professor Sir Francis Graham-Smith, born April 25 1923, died June 20 2025 Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Weight loss jabs could be starting to affect shopping habits in UK supermarkets
The growing popularity of weight loss jabs could be starting to affect shopping habits in UK supermarkets, figures suggest. Grocery sales were down by 0.4% in the four weeks to June 15 – the first year-on-year decline this year – in what could partly be down to changing health priorities such as the growing use of weight loss drugs, analysts Kantar said. Fraser McKevitt, Kantar's head of retail and consumer insight, said: 'Supermarkets and grocery brands are entering new territory as weight loss drugs become more popular, with four in 100 households in Great Britain now including at least one GLP-1 user. 'That's almost twice as many as last year so while it's still pretty low, it's definitely a trend that the industry should keep an eye on as these drugs have the potential to steer choices at the till. 'Four in five of the users we surveyed say they plan to eat fewer chocolates and crisps, and nearly three quarters intend to cut back on biscuits.' Earlier this week, GPs across England were given the green light to start prescribing Mounjaro for the first time, opening up the treatment to hundreds of thousands more people. About 220,000 people are expected to receive the jabs through the NHS over the next three years. It has raised the prospect that supermarkets could start to see a more pronounced dip in grocery sales. Those on the treatments consume as much as 30% fewer calories, research has found. According to a report by Morgan Stanley, patients taking the treatments cut back significantly on both alcoholic and sugary non-alcoholic drinks, with consumption falling by 63% and 65% respectively. In 2023, US supermarket giant Walmart said it had seen a 'slight pullback' in how much people were putting in their baskets because of the jabs. Meanwhile, grocery prices are now 4.7% more expensive than a year ago as supermarket inflation hit its highest level since last March. The figure is up from 4.1% last month, which was a rise from 3.8% in April. Price rises did not stop British consumers from making 490 million trips to the supermarket over the last month, averaging almost 17 per household and the highest recorded by Kantar since March 2020. The increase in visits saw take-home grocery sales over the four weeks to June 15 grow by 4.1% compared with the same period last year. However, the rise in the frequency of visits was balanced out by a drop in average amount spent per trip, which fell by 3p to £23.89. As temperatures rose, consumers bought 2,400 packs of strawberries every minute in the last four weeks. Shoppers also traded up to more exotic fruits too, with sales of mangoes and blueberries climbing by 27% and 10% respectively. Consumer concerns over price are continuing, with sales of own label ranges growing 4.2% this month ahead of branded lines as shoppers looked to balance their budgets. Ocado was the fastest growing grocer with sales up 12.2% in the 12 weeks to June 15 to take a 1.9% share of the market. Lidl was the fastest grower among bricks and mortar grocers at 11.2% – its third consecutive month of double-digit growth to reach 8.1% of the market. Fellow discounter Aldi increased its share to 10.9% as sales rose by 6.5%. Tesco saw the highest share gain over the period, at 0.5 percentage points, taking it to 28.1% of the market. Asda's sales fell by 1.7% on a year ago, leaving it with a market share of 11.9%.
