logo
Anthony Albanese knows he isn't invincible and is swiftly addressing his political weaknesses

Anthony Albanese knows he isn't invincible and is swiftly addressing his political weaknesses

Much of the political focus since the election has been on Labor celebrating its mega-win, a brutal factional battle over the spoils of victory, and a divided opposition grappling with which way to turn.
The prime minister, as many have observed, is in a rare position of strength.
Yet at the same time, he's been moving to fix a range of problems before they grow any bigger. A political survivor, Anthony Albanese knows he's not invincible.
Consider some of the steps he's taken this week.
Earlier in the year the prime minister was accused of being left out of the loop on a "caravan bomb plot" that turned out to be a hoax. His opponents argued he was failing to pay sufficient attention to national security.
At the time, Albanese played down any problems with lines of communication. But this week he moved swiftly to shift ASIO and the Australian Federal Police from the Attorney General's portfolio back into Home Affairs. He specifically cited learning lessons from the "caravan incident". Problem solved.
During the campaign, Albanese was accused of taking his eye off the ball with Indonesia over its defence cooperation with Russia. Once again, he denied this charge and made hay when Peter Dutton over-reached on the issue.
But today, the prime minister is in Jakarta meeting President Prabowo Subianto as his first post-election port of call. The two will discuss ramping up military exercises. Albanese doesn't want any lingering suggestion he's ignoring such a vital relationship.
Live results: Find out what's happening in your seat as counting continues
Then there are the frontbench changes. Some of the moves are designed to fix lingering first term headaches, most notably in the environment portfolio.
Fears of a backlash in Western Australia saw Labor shelve its "Nature Positive" laws. Now a Queenslander has been sent in to sort it out. If Murray Watt lands a deal early in the term, the new environment minister will take the mantle of Albanese's "fixer".
The notable exception to the prime minister's mission to clean up messes has been the blood left on the floor from Labor's internal factional fight.
For better or worse, Albanese stayed out of that one, leaving two former ministers aggrieved and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles stuck with the tag of "factional assassin".
When it comes to policy problems, however, the prime minister is trying to remove vulnerabilities. He's demonstrating a keener sense of identifying issues that need to be resolved than he did after his first election win when the euphoria of victory was on show.
Perhaps this is Anthony Albanese learning and growing in the role. The real test will be his willingness to fix the bigger problems of lifting productivity and economic growth, while bringing spending under control.
Want even more? Here's where you can find all our 2025 federal election coverage
Catch the latest interviews and in-depth coverage on ABC iview and ABC Listen
On the Coalition side, the Nationals' decision to stick with David Littleproud and the Liberals' decision to install Sussan Ley as leader also suggest a willingness by the respective parties to fix their electoral problems.
The Coalition needs to win back the centre and the alternative options of Matt Canavan as Nationals leader and Angus Taylor (together with Jacinta Nampijinpa Price) leading the Liberals would have represented a more conservative direction.
The leadership decisions, however, are only a first step.
Over the coming week, Ley and Littleproud will discuss a new Coalition agreement before frontbench positions can be settled. The Nationals have greater clout, given the Liberal rout at the election, and are demanding more spots in the Shadow Ministry.
This doesn't make life easy for Ley and perhaps explains why she's begun with such policy timidity, unable to say where the Liberals went wrong at the election or where they need to go now.
Every Liberal policy is under review, including the commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050. The Morrison government signed Australia up to the target. Dutton remained committed to it. Now the Liberal position is up in the air.
When Ley confirmed in her inaugural press conference as leader that net-zero was under review, even some Nationals were surprised.
Abandoning the target is hardly going to help the Liberals win back the swathe of urban seats lost over successive elections. Nor will prolonged indecision over what to do.
Ley is aware of the need for a credible policy to both reduce emissions and keep industry alive. But she also needs to hold her divided party together and hold the partnership with the Nationals in place.
The prime minister isn't rushing a return to parliament. MPs won't re-assemble in Canberra for at least another two months. Liberals aren't complaining. They need as much time as possible to sort out some basic positions and personnel before even contemplating how to take on a prime minister determined to tidy up outstanding problems.
David Speers is national political lead and host of Insiders, which airs on ABC TV at 9am on Sunday or on iview.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

J.D. Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong
J.D. Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

J.D. Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong

There is a counterfactual fantasy, not much indulged but not dismissed entirely, in which Prime Minister Anthony Albanese went to his second election in the brief 'vibe shift' between Donald Trump's triumphant return to the US presidency in 2024 and his clumsy tariff whammy in 2025. Perhaps, if the Australian election had taken place before 'Liberation Day' the outcome would have been different for Peter Dutton. More likely, it would not. In any case, such imaginings are of no use to the Coalition. It's as helpful to them as the reverse counterfactual is to the Social Democrats I spoke to in Germany this week. Germany held its election in February. The incumbent government was led by a chancellor from the Social Democratic Party (SPD), the German analogue of the Labor Party. Perhaps if the election had come after Trump's global tariff day, the SPD might also have retained power. But as the German election was set for February, only 20 per cent of German voters chose the SPD. The Social Democrats now have a lower primary vote than the Alternative for Germany (AfD), an economically conservative-turned-far-right party that has made immigration control its primary platform. If the Albanese government cared to take the German experience as a cautionary tale – a possible but avoidable future – it could reflect that what occurred there is just part of a pattern rolling through the Western world. These trends come to Australia late and slowly. But they do seem to come eventually. US Vice President J.D. Vance described what was about to happen to Germany at the Munich Security Conference in February. He warned that European governments must listen to and respect their citizens, even when the message is not agreeable to the official and intellectual classes. And in this context he urged the conference to bear in mind that 'when political leaders represent an important constituency, it is incumbent upon us to at least participate in dialogue with them'. The problem is one of free speech. The precise amount of it which should be permissible, the dose which inoculates against social strife and what constitutes an overdose which would poison the social waters. Germany has taken the homeopathic approach to free speech, hoping that a minuscule amount, heavily diluted, will cure what ails the nation. Vance's words generated indignation among European leaders and officials. But it spoke from the soul of many voters. Days later, the German public delivered a historic high primary vote for the AfD. The gulf between what is said and what is thought was dramatically exposed by democracy.

J.D. Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong
J.D. Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong

The Age

time2 hours ago

  • The Age

J.D. Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong

There is a counterfactual fantasy, not much indulged but not dismissed entirely, in which Prime Minister Anthony Albanese went to his second election in the brief 'vibe shift' between Donald Trump's triumphant return to the US presidency in 2024 and his clumsy tariff whammy in 2025. Perhaps, if the Australian election had taken place before 'Liberation Day' the outcome would have been different for Peter Dutton. More likely, it would not. In any case, such imaginings are of no use to the Coalition. It's as helpful to them as the reverse counterfactual is to the Social Democrats I spoke to in Germany this week. Germany held its election in February. The incumbent government was led by a chancellor from the Social Democratic Party (SPD), the German analogue of the Labor Party. Perhaps if the election had come after Trump's global tariff day, the SPD might also have retained power. But as the German election was set for February, only 20 per cent of German voters chose the SPD. The Social Democrats now have a lower primary vote than the Alternative for Germany (AfD), an economically conservative-turned-far-right party that has made immigration control its primary platform. If the Albanese government cared to take the German experience as a cautionary tale – a possible but avoidable future – it could reflect that what occurred there is just part of a pattern rolling through the Western world. These trends come to Australia late and slowly. But they do seem to come eventually. US Vice President J.D. Vance described what was about to happen to Germany at the Munich Security Conference in February. He warned that European governments must listen to and respect their citizens, even when the message is not agreeable to the official and intellectual classes. And in this context he urged the conference to bear in mind that 'when political leaders represent an important constituency, it is incumbent upon us to at least participate in dialogue with them'. The problem is one of free speech. The precise amount of it which should be permissible, the dose which inoculates against social strife and what constitutes an overdose which would poison the social waters. Germany has taken the homeopathic approach to free speech, hoping that a minuscule amount, heavily diluted, will cure what ails the nation. Vance's words generated indignation among European leaders and officials. But it spoke from the soul of many voters. Days later, the German public delivered a historic high primary vote for the AfD. The gulf between what is said and what is thought was dramatically exposed by democracy.

Trump threatens Musk with 'serious consequences' in spending bill row
Trump threatens Musk with 'serious consequences' in spending bill row

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Trump threatens Musk with 'serious consequences' in spending bill row

US President Donald Trump threatened his former advisor Elon Musk with "serious consequences" Saturday if the tech billionaire seeks to punish Republicans who vote for a controversial spending bill. The comments by Trump to NBC News come after the relationship between the world's most powerful person and the world's richest imploded in bitter and spectacular fashion this week. The blistering break-up -- largely carried out on social media before a riveted public on Thursday -- was ignited by Musk's harsh criticism of Trump's so-called "big, beautiful" spending bill, which is currently before Congress. Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk -- one of the Republican Party's biggest financial backers in last year's presidential election -- to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," Trump, who also branded Musk "disrespectful," told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be. He also said he had "no" desire to repair his relationship with the South African-born Tesla and SpaceX chief, and that he has "no intention of speaking to him." Just last week, Trump gave Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But their relationship cracked within days as Musk described as an "abomination" the spending bill that, if passed by Congress, could define Trump's second term in office. Trump hit back in an Oval Office diatribe and from, there the row detonated, leaving Washington stunned. With real political and economic risks to their falling out, both had appeared to inch back from the brink on Friday, with Trump telling reporters "I just wish him well," and Musk responding on X: "Likewise." - 'Old news' - Trump spoke to NBC Saturday after Musk deleted one of the explosive allegations he had made during their fallout, linking the president with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Musk had alleged that the Republican leader is featured in unreleased government files on former associates of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while he faced sex trafficking charges. The Trump administration has acknowledged it is reviewing tens of thousands of documents, videos and investigative material that his "MAGA" movement says will unmask public figures complicit in Epstein's crimes. Trump was named in a trove of deposition and statements linked to Epstein that were unsealed by a New York judge in early 2024. The president has not been accused of any wrongdoing in the case. "Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files," Musk posted on his social media platform, X. "That is the real reason they have not been made public." Musk did not reveal which files he was talking about and offered no evidence for his claim. He initially doubled down on the claim, writing in a follow-up message: "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." However, he appeared to have deleted both tweets by Saturday morning. Trump dismissed the claim as "old news" in his comments to NBC on Saturday, adding: "Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it." Supporters on the conspiratorial end of Trump's "Make America Great Again" base allege that Epstein's associates had their roles in his crimes covered up by government officials and others. They point the finger at Democrats and Hollywood celebrities, although not at Trump himself. No official source has ever confirmed that the president appears in any of the as yet unreleased material. Trump knew and socialized with Epstein but has denied spending time on Little Saint James, the private redoubt in the US Virgin Islands where prosecutors alleged Epstein trafficked underage girls for sex. "Terrific guy," Trump, who was Epstein's neighbor in both Florida and New York, said in an early 2000s profile of the financier. "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store