Texas House bill would ban cellphones in schools: 'Kids are facing a mental health crisis'
Modeled by a national and statewide trend to lessen instances of bullying and keep students focused in schools, an Austin-area legislator is seeking to ban cellphones in Texas classrooms.
Texas House Bill 515 by Rep. Ellen Troxclair, R-Marble Falls, would require Texas school districts to adopt a policy prohibiting students from using their personal electronic devices during the day and have them place their cellphones in a lockable container or specified location.
Amid myriad concerns such as bullying, student focus and teachers' ability to manage a classroom, there has been a recent uptick in legislation similar to Troxclair's filed across the country, a move that has largely been praised by mental health researchers but has left some parents worried about not having easy access to their children during the school day, especially during emergencies.
Troxclair's main drive to file the bill was the harmful mental health effects of social media and students' ability to access that content during the school day, she said. Social media use contributes to bullying issues, she said.
'It is no surprise that our kids are facing a mental health crisis, and we've seen that play out a lot of different ways,' Troxclair said. 'It's very clear now with the data that we have that a big driver of the increase in suicide and mental health is because of social media.'
Troxclair also pointed to research that indicates cellphones distract students from focusing on academics during the school day.
'It's impossible for a teacher to compete with an addictive device that's in kids' pockets,' Troxclair said.
The bill would require schools to make a district-provided phone accessible to students during the day to contact parents if needed, and it would allow students who need to use a personal device because of a medical condition to have access to their personal phone if they provide a doctor's note.
HB 515 also directs the Texas Education Agency to create an annual report about the policy's effectiveness.
A parent who needs to reach their child during the day can call their school's front office, Troxclair said, adding that for parents who are concerned about not being able to communicate with their children during emergencies, her recommendation would be to have students listen to teachers and law enforcement officers during such incidents, she said.
'In the case of an emergency, you want kids listening to instructions,' Troxclair said. 'We've seen situations in the past where we've seen those things hampered by kids being on their phones.'
Students have turned to their phones to communicate with parents and emergency responders in school emergencies. During the May 24, 2022, mass shooting at Uvalde's Robb Elementary School, children called 911 multiple times from inside their classroom as they waited 77 minutes for law enforcement officers to confront the shooter. Two teachers and 19 children were killed in the shooting.
But the Uvalde school shooting is unique because of multiple systemic failures, Troxclair said. There are other things that the Legislature has and should do to protect students in schools, such as requiring secure infrastructure to protect student safety, she said.
'Failure': DOJ's scathing Uvalde school shooting report criticizes law enforcement response
Troxclair told the American-Statesman that she hopes to allocate money from the state's school safety funding to cover any costs districts might incur as a result of her proposed cellphone ban, she said.
Multiple Texas school districts have already taken up similar bans on their own.
Lake Travis enacted a cellphone ban at the middle and elementary level this year, and its School Health Advisory Committee at a meeting last month noted that members would like to discuss a possible ban at the high school.
Eight states have bans or restrictions on cellphone use in schools either in effect or slated to go into effect within the next 18 months, including California, Florida, Indiana and Virginia, according to KFF, formerly the Kaiser Family Foundation, a San Francisco-based health policy research nonprofit. Another eight states issued guidance or policy recommendations from state-level education departments recommending or piloting programs with the goal of restricting cellphone use, KFF reported.
Texas isn't alone in its proposed legislation this session.
Fourteen other states have introduced similar legislation to Troxclair's HB 515, according to KFF's analysis.
An October Pew Research Center poll found that while 68% of surveyed adults support a ban on cellphones during class, only 36% support a ban during the entire school day.
The data don't vary much whether or not an adult is a parent of a K-12 child, but it varies drastically by age groups.
Only 45% of adults 18-29 years old support a ban on cellphones in class, compared with 80% of adults who are 50 or older, according to the data. Only 18% of 18- to 29-year-olds support a ban during the entire school day, compared with 44% of people 50 or older.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Texas Legislature: House bill would ban student cellphones in schools
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Weak GOP Funds DEI, Ignores Tax Relief: Rep. Brian Harrison Exposes Session Flop
State Rep. Brian Harrison didn't mince words when reflecting on the 89th Texas legislative session: 'Just about everything' went wrong. In a blistering post-session assessment with The Dallas Express, the Waxahachie Republican said the session marked a dramatic failure of conservative governance, charging that GOP leadership enabled the growth of government, increased spending, and squandered a historic opportunity to cut property taxes. 'The Texas government has been too weak, too liberal, for too long,' Harrison said. 'We trampled liberty on the way to becoming a progressive liberal nanny state.' For Harrison, who served in the first Trump administration and has allied with Texas' medical freedom and anti-DEI movements, the clearest symbol of misplaced priorities came in the form of a pop icon. 'We spent more time deliberating and voting on Beyoncé than we did property tax elimination,' he said. 'And as crazy as that sounds, it is literally true.' The failure to deliver sweeping property tax relief dominated much of Harrison's critique. Despite a $24 billion surplus, he said the legislature failed to give Texans the relief they demanded. 'If we had one job this session, it was to get the crushing burden of property taxes under control,' Harrison said. 'Instead, we spent it on liberal pet projects.' One of the most prominent examples he cited was a bill to allocate $1.5 billion in taxpayer money to Hollywood production incentives, a dramatic increase from the $200 million spent last session. 'That's Texans going to work so government can steal their wages to give it to rich Hollywood liberals,' Harrison said. 'It's immoral. It's unethical.' Harrison also condemned the passage of Senate Bill 3, which bans certain hemp-derived products, calling it 'destructive of liberty.' He said the bill would push consumers into dangerous black markets and reverse the loosened restrictions created under President Trump in 2018. 'I think I'm the only member of the Legislature who asked the governor to veto SB3,' he said. He also singled out the legislature's near-total ban on flavored vaping products, despite Trump's support for vaping as a harm-reduction alternative to cigarettes. 'The Texas House is going directly against Trump policy on both counts,' he said. The legislature's fiscal policy also drew fire from Harrison, who called the state's budget—SB1—'the most reckless, bloated, liberal progressive budget in the history of Texas.' He pointed out that it represented a 42% increase in state funds over the past two budget cycles. 'There is no defense—none—for any Republican who voted for that,' he said. 'Every time the government increases spending, it is stealing from Texans. That makes them less free.' Harrison warned that this session expanded the government's cultural influence as well, particularly through diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and university funding. 'Texas has not banned DEI in any way, shape, or form,' he said. 'Our public universities are still allowed to engage in DEI in their classrooms.' He added that the state government, including agencies like TxDOT, continues to award contracts based on DEI criteria. 'I had a state agency admit in a hearing that they've awarded over $1 billion in DEI-based contracts,' he said. On higher education, Harrison said lawmakers had doubled down on 'transgender indoctrination,' funding universities that offer LGBTQ studies and programming. 'Every public university in Texas has LGBTQ coursework,' he said. 'Guess what funded that? SB1. Everybody who voted for SB1 voted for DEI and transgender indoctrination.' Harrison also expressed frustration that the legislature failed to advance HB 3175, which would have made ivermectin available over the counter. 'Making medicines like ivermectin available should have been the least controversial thing we did down here,' he said, adding that the session signaled a lack of seriousness on medical freedom. He blamed House leadership—specifically then-Calendar Committee Chairman (now Speaker) Dustin Burrows—for blocking legislation that would have ended COVID-19 vaccine mandates for students in the last session and this session. 'We could have done that two years ago,' Harrison said. When asked where to place blame, Harrison was blunt: 'The people responsible for the bad legislation in Austin are Republicans. Completely. Texans are starving for bold, unapologetic, conservative leadership. We don't have that right now.' Still, Harrison acknowledged that a few positive outcomes emerged. He praised HB 3441, authored by Rep. Shelley Luther, which allows Texans to sue vaccine manufacturers that advertise in the state if someone is injured. But even that, he said, was a partial correction of previous government overreach. 'Almost all of the good things fall into one of three categories: they're either too weak, undo a previous bad, or are years overdue,' he said. Harrison also criticized the education savings account (ESA) program passed this session as misleading. While he voted for it, he emphasized that it would serve only about 1% of Texas students. 'This is not universal school choice,' he said. 'And to get it passed, we had to give Democrats a billion-dollar payoff.' Could there be a special session with the type of 'bold' leadership he seeks? Harrison is not optimistic. 'To my knowledge, I'm the only legislator who has asked for a special session.' As the legislature adjourns, Harrison said his message to constituents is clear: 'The Texas government has lost its way. Top to bottom.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
In a first for states, Texas might put MAHA warning labels on snack foods
A customer shops for produce at an H-E-B grocery store in Austin, Texas, in February. The Texas legislature recently passed a bill that would require warning labels on foods that contain certain artificial additives and dyes. (Photo by) In a first-of-its-kind effort, the Texas legislature has passed a bill to require warning labels on foods such as Mountain Dew and white bread that contain certain artificial additives and dyes. The measure, now awaiting action by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, would require a warning label prominently displayed on foods containing any of 44 artificial dyes and additives — a mandate that would apply to popular foods from Doritos and Skittles to Toaster Strudels and breads made with bleached flour. It marks the first time a state, rather than the federal government, has tried to put its own warning labels on food. While the bill passed the Texas House and Senate with bipartisan support, its sponsors are eagerly tying it to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' movement. State lawmakers embrace RFK Jr.'s health policies 'This is about the MAHA parents and the crunchy granola parents coming together to say we are sick and tired of being sick and tired,' state Rep. Lacey Hull, who partnered with fellow Republican state Sen. Lois Kolkhorst to sponsor the bill, told legislators before the House voted on May 25. 'I have personally spoken to the White House, who said they are looking to us, to Texas, to get this done, to stand for our children and for our future,' Hull said. Abbott has not yet said whether he will sign the bill. It also includes other statewide health mandates, such as expanding physical activity requirements in public schools and setting new nutrition education requirements for high school and higher education students. But the food warning label has drawn the most attention. The label would read: 'WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom.' This is about the MAHA parents and the crunchy granola parents coming together to say we are sick and tired of being sick and tired. – Texas Republican state Rep. Lacey Hull Critics of food dyes and additives say they are most often found in low-nutrient, ultra-processed foods that promote unhealthy eating habits and contribute to chronic diseases like obesity and diabetes. Some artificial dyes that are permitted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in foods are not recommended by its counterparts in other Western countries. European Union regulators require warning labels on some foods containing synthetic dyes, saying they may have an adverse effect on children's activity and attention. In January, the FDA banned the artificial coloring Red No. 3, which is used in many foods and drinks in the U.S. but has been linked to cancer in animals. California became the first state to ban its use in 2023. That bill was sponsored by a Democrat and goes into effect in 2027. But in Texas, the snack industry is pushing back. A coalition of dozens of food industry and business groups — including Walmart, General Mills and Coca-Cola — wrote a letter in opposition to the Texas bill's warning label provision, saying it 'casts an incredibly wide net' and goes too far. 'Problematic' MAHA report minimizes success of lifesaving asthma medicines, doctors say 'Texans deserve honest labeling; but they also deserve public policy that's been studied, vetted, and evaluated for health considerations as well as economic impacts,' the organizations said in a letter circulated around the Texas legislature ahead of the House vote in May. Yet opposition from some of the country's largest food manufacturers may not be enough to halt the MAHA train. The legislation with the labeling requirement joins other Republican-sponsored bills in the Texas legislature and around the country that reflect Kennedy's MAHA agenda, from ending the addition of fluoride to public waters systems to loosening vaccine restrictions. In March, West Virginia became the first state to pass a sweeping ban on synthetic food dyes. At least two dozen other states considered similar food dye bans in this most recent legislative session, according to data from the Environmental Working Group, a research and advocacy group that pushes for removal of chemicals from food and consumer products. At the federal level, the FDA under Kennedy's direction has also asked the food industry to phase out certain synthetic dyes by the end of 2026, though some of the largest companies have said the timeline may not be feasible. Stateline reporter Anna Claire Vollers can be reached at avollers@ SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Abbott signs bill to protect law enforcement from ‘being targeted by rogue prosecutors'
AUSTIN (KXAN) — In a social media post Tuesday, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed Senate Bill 2570 into law. SB 2570 relates to legal justification for the use of force with a less-lethal force weapon by a correctional facility guard or a peace officer. 'In Texas, our law enforcement officers are on the front lines to keep Texas a law-and-order state. To have their backs, I am signing a law to ensure they can use every tool available to combat criminals without being targeted by rogue prosecutors,' Abbott said as he signed the bill into law. 'In Texas, we support our law enforcement officers.' SB 2570 was first presented in March. The Texas Senate signed the bill May 27, and the Texas House followed suit May 28. It was then sent to Abbott's office. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
