
China Rejects Trump's Accusation That It Violated Trade Truce
China said on Monday that the United States had 'severely undermined' the trade truce the two countries reached last month, striking back against President Trump's accusations that it was violating the terms of their agreement.
In a statement, China's Ministry of Commerce called Mr. Trump's attacks on social media last week 'baseless.' He had accused Beijing of failing to live up to its end of their trade deal, a 90-day rollback of tariffs and other trade barriers to give the two countries more time to negotiate and prevent an all-out trade war.
China's commerce ministry said it had continued to honor its agreement responsibly and accused the United States of 'erroneous practices' by introducing a series of 'discriminatory restrictive measures.' These included restrictions on the sale of chip design software to China and barring American companies from using or financing artificial intelligence chips from the Chinese technology giant Huawei.
It also criticized the Trump administration's announcement that it planned to 'aggressively revoke' the visas of Chinese students and that it would enhance scrutiny of all future applications from China, including Hong Kong.
'The U.S. side has unilaterally escalated new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' the ministry wrote in its statement. 'Instead of reflecting on its own actions, it has turned the blame onto China.'
China said it would take measures to 'safeguard its legitimate rights and interests' if the United States continued to harm Chinese interests.
The growing confrontation over the fragile trade truce between the world's two largest economies has raised questions about whether they can strike a permanent accord within the 90-day deadline.
The United States has grown increasingly concerned about access to rare earth magnets, which are crucial for producing cars, semiconductors, aircraft and other vital items. China maintains a near monopoly on the production of rare earth metals.
American companies' ability to keep factories running could be in jeopardy without a sufficient supply of those magnets.
Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative who negotiated the deal along with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, said during a Friday appearance on CNBC that China was 'slow-rolling their compliance' and that the flow of some critical minerals has not returned to levels that American officials were expecting.
The agreement, announced on May 12, offered a temporary reprieve to the escalating trade tensions between the two largest economies. The United States had pushed tariffs on Chinese imports to 145 percent and China responded by raising import duties on American products to 125 percent.
Under the truce, the United States agreed to lower its tariffs to 30 percent, while China cut its import tax to 10 percent for 90 days.
Amy Chang Chien contributed reporting from Taipei.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Advisors Say $1,000 ‘Trump Accounts' Won't Benefit Families Who Need Help Most
Are your clients planning on having children? Tell them to hurry it up. Inside the Trump administration's key $4 trillion tax bill is a proposed idea to open accounts for each new baby born in the US until 2028. The so-called 'Trump Accounts' are seeded with $1,000 that gets invested in equities and locked up until the child's 18th birthday. Parents can also contribute up to $5,000 annually. Previously called MAGA accounts, the funds are designed to help parents prepare for their children's financial futures. But, what do advisors think about the proposed accounts? 'They are stupid,' said Catherine Valega, an advisor with Green Bee Advisory, adding that the wealthy have plenty of options to save, while the less affluent won't be able to afford additional contributions. READ ALSO: Bitcoin Rules for Now, but the Crypto Landscape Is Vast and RIA Headcount, AUM Shattered Records in 2024 The idea of funding accounts for newly born children is nothing new. In fact, before the current administration, the accounts were called 'Baby Bonds' and have been floated by politicians on both sides of the aisle. Well-known financial advisor Ric Edelman has been a prominent supporter of the idea, and even started a trust product with annuities for babies in 1999. But today, most advisors said the proposed Trump accounts will largely benefit upper-class families who can afford to contribute annually. 'The real advantage will go to families with enough disposable income to consistently fund the account,' said Edzai Chimedza, a CFP and advisor at Tobias Financial, adding that it's an attractive tool for upper-middle-class and affluent families, who are more likely to be able to contribute after covering essentials, like retirement savings and emergency funds. The accounts aren't the only savings options out there, either. Who can forget those 529 plans that have grown significantly more flexible over the years and are a great option to save for college, Valega asked. A guardian Roth IRA can also help children jump-start their retirement savings, while helping them get up to speed with the stock market. Baby Got Tax. For families that can pitch funds into the accounts, it makes sense to stop and think about a client's intentions, said Sarah Avila, an advisor with VLP Financial Advisors. 'If you are eligible to open the account for your baby, it is worth it to get the free $1,000 from the government,' she said. But clients should be aware that earnings on qualified withdrawals will be taxed at long-term capital gains rates. 'If the idea is to save for college, contributing to a 529 plan is more advantageous, from a tax perspective, because the money is tax free,' she said. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive financial advisor news, market insights, and practice management essentials, subscribe to our free Advisor Upside newsletter.


CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
‘It is a whole different environment': Republicans revisit key Biden investigations with new momentum
The House Judiciary Committee is expected to interview former Hunter Biden special counsel David Weiss behind closed doors on Friday, two sources familiar with the interview told CNN, as part of a broader Republican effort to revisit previous probes into the Biden family that stalled last Congress but are gaining new momentum now that Republicans control both chambers of Congress and the White House. The scheduled interview, which could still be moved, would be the second time the Republican-led panel will interview Weiss about his work as Republicans continue to probe whether the investigation was hampered by political interference. Weiss has still never testified publicly about his six-year criminal probe into the president's son, which included three convictions, but was ultimately short-circuited as a result of the former president's unconditional pardon of his son. House Judiciary Republicans have long wanted to call Weiss, the Trump-appointed US attorney, back for questioning after his first closed-door interview in 2023. Committee Republicans were also able to finally secure interviews with two Department of Justice tax division prosecutors involved in the Hunter Biden probe who they had been aggressively pursuing for months, one of the sources familiar told CNN. The Justice Department is working with Weiss to provide access to documents he may need for his interview, a person briefed on the matter said. Any delays in getting access to documents would be a scheduling issue and the ability to have personnel who can oversee it, the person briefed on the matter said. It's not the only Biden investigation Republicans are reexamining that leans into a fresh political appetite with GOP control of Washington. House Oversight Chair James Comer is returning to his probe of the former president's mental fitness in an entirely new landscape after a recent book by CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson put Joe Biden's physical and mental decline back in the spotlight. Comer told CNN he is in the process of scheduling key interviews with Biden's White House physician, Dr. Kevin O'Connor, and other senior aides who had all rebuffed his efforts last Congress. Beyond the five initial interviews from Biden's orbit, the Republican Chairman told CNN he wants to look at the executive orders Biden signed in his last six months in office and use of the autopen. In the weeks immediately after Biden's disastrous 2024 debate performance that unraveled his presidential campaign and upended the Democratic party, Comer requested to interview Biden's doctor and subpoenaed three senior Biden aides to discuss their roles in the Biden White House, which never materialized. Now, Comer said in an interview with CNN, 'it is a whole different environment.' At the time of his 2024 interview requests, Comer's impeachment inquiry into the Biden family's business dealings had fallen apart and the Biden administration felt no incentive to comply with the House Oversight Committee. Probing Biden's decline now, Comer says, will be a lot easier than trying to convince his colleagues of an alleged Biden family foreign influence peddling scheme, which even Comer conceded was difficult to do, particularly in a minute or less on Fox News. Republicans failed to uncover evidence to support their core allegations against the president, and lacked the votes in their divided, narrow majority last Congress to impeach the president. 'The money laundering and the shell companies, the average American couldn't understand that. I mean, that was hard to understand,' Comer told CNN. 'You know, I did not do a good job explaining that.' But with his investigation into Biden's mental and physical decline, Comer said, 'people see a president that clearly is in decline. They saw it in the debate.' Democrats sought to dismantle the Republican-led 11 month impeachment inquiry into Biden last Congress at every turn. Comer told CNN that although those Democrats aren't jumping at the opportunity to cooperate now, he does not see them as being obstructive either. 'I take that as a step in the right direction,' he told CNN. Tapper and Thompson's book documents how Biden, his closest aides and his family forged ahead with the former president's doomed 2024 reelection bid despite signs of his physical and mental decline. In a previous statement to CNN, a Biden spokesman criticized the book, saying that evidence shows that 'he was a very effective president.' Former Democratic Rep. Dean Phillips, who launched a long-shot challenge to Biden and was outspoken about his concerns over the former president's age, told CNN he did not think there needed to be an investigation on Capitol Hill at this point into Biden's fitness as president. 'This case already went to trial, the jury of American voters convicted the party of the accused, and handed out the harshest political punishment possible-losing the single most consequential election in modern history,' Phillips told CNN. Instead, Phillips called on Biden to authorize his physician to disclose his health file and condition under oath. 'Only if the former president refuses, or if questioning uncovers possible criminal activity, should an investigation be initiated,' Phillips added. Biden was recently diagnosed with an 'aggressive form' of prostate cancer.


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Meta faces moment of truth
The Big Story The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Meta have wrapped up a six-week trial over the Facebook and Instagram parent's alleged social networking monopoly, leaving the final decision in the hands of the judge. © Thibault Camus, Associated Press The trial, which came to a close last week, seeks to determine whether Meta has a monopoly over personal social networking that the company entrenched with its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. Here's what to know about the trial and what comes next: Full-circle moment for Trump administration The FTC's trial with Meta represented a full-circle moment for the second Trump administration, after the agency originally brought the case at the tail end of President Trump's first administration. The agency sued Meta, then known as Facebook, in December 2020. The case came as part of a push by the Trump administration to take aim at major tech firms, following the Department of Justice's (DOJ) antitrust lawsuit against Google. Zuckerberg tries to settle, ends up on stand Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg reportedly courted Trump and White House officials to settle the case in the weeks leading up to the trial. However, these efforts don't appear to have paid dividends. The Meta CEO's initial offer of $450 million was brushed aside, with the FTC demanding at least $18 billion and a consent decree, according to The Wall Street Journal. Zuckerberg reportedly upped his offer to $1 billion, but to no avail. The Meta trial began mid-April, and the FTC immediately called Zuckerberg to the stand, where he spent three days facing questions. Who is Meta's competition? At the heart of the trial is the FTC's claim that Meta has a monopoly over personal social networking — a market that includes Meta's apps, as well as Snapchat and MeWe and is centered on sharing between family and friends. Meta has pushed back on this market definition, arguing it faces competition from a much broader swath of social media platforms, including TikTok, YouTube, X and iMessage. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg has seemed skeptical of the FTC's proposed market, noted Geoffrey Manne, president and founder of the International Center for Law & Economics. 'The judge has expressed some reservations about the way the FTC is trying to demonstrate its market definition, but obviously the underlying issue is monopoly power,' Manne told The Hill. Read more in a full report at tomorrow. Welcome to The Hill's Technology newsletter, we're Miranda Nazzaro and Julia Shapero — tracking the latest moves from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the tech sector now and in the future: Greene says she'll oppose Trump's 'big beautiful bill' if AI provision isn't removed Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) is calling on the Senate to eliminate a provision that would ban state regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) from President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' arguing it violates states' rights. 'Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,' Greene … Warren releases 130-accusation report on Elon Musk's tenure Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Tuesday released a 130-accusation report on tech billionaire Elon Musk's time as a special government employee, arguing he profited from his work in the Trump administration. 'While serving as a 'Special Government Employee' in the White House and leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk has maintained extensive financial conflicts of interest through his ownership or stake … 'Disgusting abomination': Elon Musk tears into Trump megabill Billionaire Elon Musk ramped up his criticism of the megabill of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities, calling the legislation a 'disgusting abomination.' 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk posted Tuesday on his social platform X. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know … Speaker Johnson calls Musk criticism of Trump agenda bill 'terribly wrong' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Tuesday said Elon Musk's sharp criticism of the party's massive tax cuts and spending bill is 'terribly wrong.' The comments came minutes after Musk torched the sprawling package on X, calling it 'a disgusting abomination.' 'Let me say this: It's very disappointing,' Johnson told reporters at the Capitol, later adding: 'With all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong about the one big, … The Refresh News we've flagged from the intersection of tech and other topics: Crypto Corner A new crypto wallet for $TRUMP token? © Samuel Corum/Politico/Bloomberg via Getty Images Welcome to Crypto Corner, a daily feature focused on digital currency and its outlook in Washington. Magic Eden, a non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace, announced Tuesday it is partnering with the team behind the $TRUMP memecoin to launch a crypto wallet. A crypto wallet is a tool that allows users to store and manage their cryptocurrencies or other blockchain assets. In a statement on X, Magic Eden said the wallet is 'coming soon,' and described it as the 'first and only crypto wallet for true Trump fans.' A waitlist for the $TRUMP Wallet began Tuesday at and Magic Eden said it will offer up to $1 million in $TRUMP rewards for those who sign up or refer at least one other person. The wallet, like the $TRUMP meme coin, is marketed with a graphic of President Trump, and is the latest expansion of Trump's crypto ventures. Both the president and first lady have meme coins with their image and likeness. Jack Lu, the CEO of Magic Eden, said the partnership 'represents our commitment to onboarding mainstream audience deeper into crypto.' Using the wallet, users will be able to trade the $TRUMP token, along with major assets like Bitcoin, Solana and Ethereum. Trump's sons, Eric and Donald Trump Jr., who lead efforts at the family's cryptocurrency company World Liberty Financial, said they had no knowledge of the product. 'The Trump Organization has zero involvement with this wallet product. @EricTrump and I know nothing about it. Stay tuned—World Liberty Financial @worldlibertyfi, which we have been working tirelessly on, will be launching our official wallet soon,' Trump Jr. wrote on X. 'I run @Trump and I know nothing about this project! @worldlibertyfi $Trump @AmericanBTC,' Eric Trump added. Trump has come under scrutiny for his crypto ventures, especially his meme coin. Last month, he hosted a private dinner with the top investors in his meme coin, which Democrats dubbed as a 'pay-to-play scheme.' In Other News Branch out with other reads on The Hill: Trump administration extends tariff pause on Chinese-made chips for 90 days The Trump administration has extended a long-running exemption for Chinese-made chips from a 25 percent tariff imposed during President Trump's first administration. The office of U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a notice posted Saturday it was extending the exemption, set to expire that day, to Aug. 31. The 25 percent tariff, which initially went into effect in 2019, would have applied to a variety … What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Hegseth orders Navy strip oiler ship USNS Harvey Milk of name Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the Navy to rename an oil ship named after gay rights activist Harvey Milk, a move that pointedly comes … Read more White House sends Congress request for $9.4B in DOGE cuts The White House on Tuesday sent Congress a request to claw back $9.4 billion in funding for foreign aid and to public broadcasting — the first package … Read more What Others are Reading Opinions related to tech submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow!