
Alberta regulator approves Northback coal exploration project in Rocky Mountains
The Alberta Energy Regulator approved on Thursday a controversial coal exploration project on the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains.
Northback Holdings Corp.'s project at Grassy Mountain was rejected in 2021, when a panel ruled likely environmental effects on fish and water quality outweighed potential economic benefits.
The project, located on an inactive legacy coal mine site in the Municipal District of Ranchland, was revived two years later. Last year, it was exempted from the Alberta government's decision to ban open-pit coal mines, because Northback's application was considered an 'advanced' proposal.
A written decision from the regulator says it determined approving the project is in the public interest and the project won't have negative effects on water quality or wildlife, which many at public hearings argued will happen.
The decision grants Northback permits to drill and to divert water to the site, which was also a concern raised by farmers in drought-ridden parts of southern Alberta.
The approved deep drilling permit will allow Northback to drill more than 150 metres underground on both public and private land in its search for coal deposits.
The company will only be able to draw water from a nearby end pit lake that it owns and that's not directly connected to other water bodies or rivers, the decision says.
The decision notes that it's possible there will be some runoff from the lake, but it had been determined the project won't have any effect on water quality or quantity downstream.
It also says the potential for the project to generate toxic selenium is unlikely, 'because there will be no excavation, no coal-mining operations and no new waste rock piles created.'
'If the existing waste rock piles are not elevating downstream selenium levels, it is reasonable to conclude that these exploration activities are unlikely to elevate selenium levels,' the decision says.
The regulator also determined that potential harm to wildlife is unlikely, as no new roads are to be constructed as part of the project.
The regulator was satisfied overall with the project's public interest, saying as it would provide employment opportunities to nearby residents, including First Nations communities, while allowing the company to continue investing in the area.
'We assessed the social and economic effects of the exploration program and found it to be positive,' the decision says, adding that Northback plans to spend at least $2.5 million locally as part of the exploration.
'While the magnitude of the economic impacts may appear modest, they are proportional to the program scale and duration.'
The decision says the company has spent over $1 billion since 2015 trying to advance the project but that it wasn't a consideration for the regulator.
The project will also give Albertans additional information on the scale of the coal deposit at Grassy Mountain, says the decision.
'The exploration program will contribute to the ongoing evaluation of this coal resource and, based on our assessment, will do so in an orderly, efficient and environmentally responsible manner,' it says.
Rita Blacklaws, a spokesperson for Northback, said in an email the company thanked the regulator for the decision.
'With this outcome, Northback continues our commitment to bring benefits to Albertans while adhering to the highest environmental standards,' Blacklaws said.
Opposition NDP environment critic Sarah Elmeligi said the decision is wrong.
'Albertans have been clear they do not want coal mining on the eastern slopes,' she said.
'What a horrible day for Alberta.'
Energy Minister Brian Jean said the government respects the regulator's 'carefully considered decision on this application,' noting it isn't an application to mine. He said Northback will be responsible for reclamation related to the exploration work.
'We reiterate our commitment to protect Alberta's waters and ensure that any development in the eastern slopes is done to the highest environmental standards,' Jean said in a statement Thursday.
The decision followed days of public hearings in December and January, as well as a non-binding vote last year in the nearby community of Crowsnest Pass. About 72 per cent of voters said they were in favour of the project.
The regulator notes that concerns were raised in the hearings that granting exploratory permits would lead to a full-blown coal mine. It says that possibility couldn't be factored into the decision-making process.
'Exploration is only one step taken by a resource company in the long and complex series of activities that may or may not lead to the development of a mine,' the decision says. 'Accepting the need for this exploration program does not constitute approval of a coal mine.
'If, in the future, Northback decides to proceed with mine applications at Grassy Mountain, it must follow a rigorous regulatory process that all resource development applications must follow.'
Conditions attached to the exploratory permits require the company to dispose of drilling waste to the regulator's satisfaction, follow erosion control and weed management plans, and adhere to recommended environmental mitigation measures.
The company's permits are valid for five years, with the last three years to be set aside for reclamation work.
— With files from Lisa Johnson in Edmonton and Bill Graveland in Calgary
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 15, 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
20 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Canada's biggest off-grid solar project coming to B.C.'s Chilcotin
The Ulkatcho Energy Corporation (UEC) hosted a groundbreaking ceremony on Wednesday, June 11 as construction begins on the Anahim Lake Solar Project. Located at the western edge of B.C.'s Chilcotin, Ulkatcho First Nation will soon access solar generated power from Canada's largest off-grid solar project, expected to complete construction in October 2025. 100 per cent owned by UEC, a member of the nation's Ulkatcho Group of Companies (UGoC), the project is expected to reduce the use of diesel in the remote community by 64 per cent, about 1.1 million litres per year, and to significantly reduce carbon emissions in the region. 'This solar project in Anahim Lake marks a new path for the Ulkatcho First Nation, creating significant lasting environmental and economic benefits,' said Stephen James, CEO of the UGoC. 'We look forward to the future opportunities that this project will help create – and value the strong partnerships that we have developed with both the public and private sectors in this process.' UEC will be transforming the lands of an old sawmill site to construct the solar plant, which will include new access roads, a control and monitoring facility, site fire management, signage and security. 'We are giving our people a cleaner environment and preserving our lands through reducing green-house gas emissions on our Traditional Territory,' said Chief Charlie Williams in a June 11 press release about the ceremony, adding the project would have a positive impact on the community. 'The Ulkatcho First Nation is proud to be a leader in the future of green energy in British Columbia.' Canada's Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson said the project marks a major step forward in emission reduction. 'This is what bold, community-led action looks like. The Anahim Lake Solar Project — now Canada's largest off-grid solar initiative — marks a major step forward in reducing emissions, strengthening local economies and advancing economic reconciliation. With construction now underway, we're proving that Canada has what it takes to lead in the global clean energy transition — and that we're doing it in partnership with Indigenous Peoples,' Hodgson noted in a government news release. Once construction is complete, BC Hydro will purchase the energy produced by the plant and integrate it into its microgrid for the community to access. This is a first of its kind initiative in B.C., made possible by the signing of an April 2024 Community Electricity Purchase Agreement (CEPA) between UEC and BC Hydro. 'Our collaboration with Ulkatcho Energy Corporation not only sets the foundation for future partnerships with First Nations across the province but also underscores BC Hydro's commitment to supporting Indigenous-led clean energy initiatives – ensuring reliable, sustainable power for generations to come,' said Chris O'Riley, president and CEO of BC Hydro. In an April 2024 news release following the signing of CEPA, the Government of Canada said scientific studies and a business case determined solar power was the best solution for the community as it transitions to clean energy. At the time, a total of $15,841,000 was to be invested into the project by federal and provincial governments. 'This is what bold, community-led action looks like,' said Tim Hodgson, B.C. minister of energy and natural resources. 'With construction now underway, we're proving that Canada has what it takes to lead in the global clean energy transition — and that we're doing it in partnership with Indigenous Peoples.' The Anahim Lake Solar Project is being supported through a blend of funding from the Green Infrastructure Stream of the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program, the Natural Resource Canada's Clean Energy for Rural and Remote Communities Program, the Community Opportunity Readiness Program, the CleanBC Communities Fund, the New Relationship Trust through the Community Energy Diesel Reduction and BC Indigenous Clean Energy Initiative programs and through contributions by the UGoC and Ulkatcho First Nation. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Hamilton Spectator
11 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Opponents rally as Ford government barrels ahead with Bill 5
After an atypically quick process, the Ford government last week passed Bill 5, leaving a large group of opponents scrambling to carry on the fight Bill 5, the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, was passed on June 4, pushed through just before the legislature adjourned for a 137-day summer break. The bill includes sweeping changes to the province's endangered species and environmental protection laws. It also creates 'special economic zones' that can override provincial and municipal laws for certain projects the province wants to fast-track, the likes of Northern Ontario's Ring of Fire. Premier Doug Ford said in a press conference June 5 that he was simply trying to speed up the process to bolster the economy in the face of U.S. tariffs and other threats. 'Bill 5 is going to bring prosperity, especially to our First Nations community, and support them with prosperity, growth, and job opportunities, and we just look forward to getting out throughout the province,' said Ford. Opponents, including many First Nations groups, weren't embracing the changes. 'Our chiefs have made it clear that they fully reject Bill 5, and the Chiefs of Ontario stand by and defend the position of the chiefs,' said Ontario Regional Chief Abram Benedict in a release. 'First Nations rights holders must be at the table, and the government must fulfill its constitutional and treaty obligations.' The Chiefs of Ontario also invited Ford to their annual assembly on June 17-19 to 'understand the real consequences' that the legislation will have. At his press conference, Ford added that many chiefs are on board with Bill 5 and are 'excited for an opportunity – they're excited to be equity partners.' Another controversial part of Bill 5 comes with the changes being made to the Endangered Species Act, which has seen many protections removed. Ontario Nature's Shane Moffat told The Observer that these new changes were a huge concern. 'The scrapping of the Endangered Species Act is a stunning move by this government in the middle of a global biodiversity crisis. That is just one of the most short-sighted decisions I've ever seen,' said Moffat. He added that this legislation will allow developers to register and then be able to operate simply without any 'clear requirements to protect air, water, forests, other important natural ecosystems and species habitats.' Kitchener Centre MPP and Green Party deputy leader Aislinn Clancy echoed that sentiment, and criticized the speed at which the bill was pushed through. 'There were different kinds of filibustering, delays for votes, and interruptions of the normal process. The government itself allocated time, and it put a firm stop on things, so used their toolbox to kind of limit further debate on the bill,' said Clancy. She said there was hope that the widespread opposition to the bill could lead to a better dialogue with the community. 'If there was more time over the summer, the government could kind of hear from their communities about the disapproval and the lack of support this has in our communities. Clancy added that there has been a pattern from the Conservative government of putting legislation through without consultation. 'They put it together without consulting with Indigenous people in the first place. 'Right off the start, they've broken trust and broken norms and gone back on their word. So, I think the opposition parties were trying to express how unpopular this bill was.' Clancy noted that another issue that faces this bill is the major conflict of interest that could arise from the power the bill gives to the cabinet. 'It puts the cabinet in an unhealthy position where they could make decisions to pursue their interests and put the needs of a corporation ahead of anything else,' she explained. She pointed to the likes of controversies around the Ontario Place redevelopment, a new landfill site in Dresden and the construction of Highway 413 through the Greenbelt as examples of what might be pushed through under Bill 5. 'They could use these special economic zones anywhere in Ontario to justify overriding all rules. I don't think anybody should be complacent about this power grab. They should be speaking out against this awful threat to democracy,' said Clancy. Now that the bill has passed, opposition MPPs and nature groups have to shift gears from stopping this bill to attempting to get it repealed. Clancy added that this will be similar to the Greenbelt situation, where people were in the streets working to get that piece of legislation repealed. 'I anticipate that, over the summer, Indigenous communities have said, 'This is idle no more, part two. So they've been determined to block roads. I think there will be court challenges. I think political parties, partner organizations, and environmental groups, labour is galvanized by this as well,' said Clancy. She added that many groups will come together to show that they believe in 'due process and fair democracies'. 'I think we're going to see a lot of groups uniting across the province and demonstrating a really aggressive distaste for this kind of sweeping, authoritarian-style, Trump-style legislation.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alberta premier faces raucous, angry town hall on province's coal policy
FORT MACLEOD — Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and three of her ministers got an earful on Wednesday night from southern Alberta locals at a rowdy, hours-long town hall to discuss the province's coal policy. About 500 people, dressed in cowboy hats, belt buckles, and jeans, packed a community hall in Fort Macleod, Alta., for an event marked by heckling, competing applause and placards. "If we are not prepared to look and find middle-ground solutions to allow for industries to proceed while reducing our environmental footprint, you're going to find that different industries become the next on the hit list," Smith said through a chorus of protesting voices and verbal jabs. "Banning industries is just not something we are going to do." The premier and her ministers of energy, environment and agriculture took questions and were shouted down on several occasions by attendees as they defended changes to the province's coal policy. Many in the crowd held small placards reading "lie" and "false," raising them each time they disagreed with a statement. There was a notable group that came in support of the province's coal policy, frequently applauding the ministers and shooting back at other crowd members. Many attendees carried notebooks and pens, keenly taking notes throughout. The town hall came weeks after the Alberta Energy Regulator, or AER, granted an Australia-based coal company permission to start a controversial coal exploration on the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains. Northback Holding Corp.'s project at Grassy Mountain was initially rejected in 2021 when a panel ruled that the likely environmental effects on fish and water quality outweighed the potential economic benefits. Late last year, the project was exempted from the Alberta government's decision to ban open-pit coal mines because Northback's application was considered an "advanced" proposal. The issue has been polarizing in southern Alberta, where the debate has primarily revolved around the economic implications of development against environmental effects. A non-binding referendum in Crowsnest Pass saw 70 per cent of voters saying they'd support the nearby coal project. Despite frequent pushback over the two-and-a-half-hour event, Smith rarely chose to get into back-and-forth discussions with attendees. She defended the province's approach to coal developments, pitching responsible development that prioritizes environmental standards. Smith also frequently cited a lawsuit by five coal companies that say they're owed $15 billion by the province in lost revenues and sunk costs. She argued again on Wednesday that she had taxpayers in mind when the province lifted its moratorium on coal mining and development on the eastern slopes. "If we do nothing, then we are told we'll likely lose those cases and have to pay ($15 billion)." An energetic Brian Jean, the province's energy minister, frequently challenged the boisterous crowd and at times trotted offstage to hand his business card to those asking questions. "I live in the oilsands. You can't tell me what I'm concerned about and what I'm not concerned about. I'm very concerned about our earth and our planet," he said. Several questions returned to a new study by Alberta government scientists, yet to be peer reviewed, which recently said old coal mines on the eastern slopes are poisoning fish and any further coal mining there would result in 'population collapse' of fish species in a nearby lake. Asked about the report, Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz said the province is looking into the issue and is waiting for it to be confirmed by the peer-review process. She said further studies to be released later this year are being conducted. "We want to understand what is happening there so that we can prevent that from happening in the future." The premier also jousted with protesters while speaking to reporters before the town hall. When a group gathered behind her and started yelling, she turned around and asked them to let her finish the interview. "I'm looking for a little bit of courtesy," she said. The event was scheduled to last two hours, but Smith asked to take questions for an extra 30 minutes after the clock had run out. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025. Matthew Scace, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data