logo
How much has soaring take-up of pension credit eaten into Winter Fuel Payment savings?

How much has soaring take-up of pension credit eaten into Winter Fuel Payment savings?

Daily Mail​6 days ago

Pension credit claims have soared as poorer pensioners try to hang on to their Winter Fuel Payments, eating into savings the Government hoped to make, This is Money analysis shows.
Some 58,800 extra pension credit claims have been awarded since means-testing of the annual payment, worth up to £300 per household, was announced last summer.
That represents a 57 per cent jump to 162,800 successful claims between last July and the end of May.
Pension credit tops up weekly income to a minimum of £227.10 for single people and £346.60 for couples - and is worth £4,000 on average a year to those eligible.
Extra claims therefore will have cost the Treasury around £235million, versus projected savings of £1.3billion from restricting Winter Fuel Payments in the first year, and £1.5billion in subsequent years.
However, this sharp increase in claims was actively encouraged by the Government, which has tried to drive up pension credit applications.
So, it is likely to have been anticipated and factored into the sums to some extent.
The Government has now U-turned on its scrapping of Winter Fuel Payments for most pensioners, and said more will be made eligible.
MPs grilled Pensions Minister Torsten Bell on how this will be achieved when he appeared before the work and pensions committee on Wednesday morning.
The committee put out a statement in advance of the hearing about the restriction of formerly universal Winter Fuel Payment to those in receipt of pension credit.
It said: 'Following a backlash against the move, the Prime Minister announced that he would make more people eligible this winter, without saying how many or how.
'Bell will be questioned on how the Government is tackling poverty in retirement, including around pension credit.
'In previous sessions, the committee has heard how many pensioners are having to tighten their belts as a result of the increased cost of living and the support cliff-edge experienced by those who are just above the pension credit threshold and consequently miss out on thousands of pounds in income support.'
If you are elderly and not well off, pension credit tops up weekly income and also opens the door to a lot of additional help with household bills.
You can gain many further thousands of pounds, including help with housing costs, heating, council tax, TV licences if you are over 75, and other bills.
> Claiming pension credit: Find out how to top up your weekly income
Morgan Vine, director of policy at charity Independent Age, says: 'While this increase in pension credit recipients is a positive step, it is sadly still a drop in the ocean compared to the latest pension credit take-up figures which show there are almost a million eligible older people not receiving this entitlement.'
She is urging the Government to introduce a take-up strategy that targets those on very low incomes and in need of support, and notes the latest claim figures reveal a large number of unsuccessful applications.
'There is a real person behind each application that made the decision to seek out financial support,' says Vine.
'In many cases, they will be living on a low income but sitting just above the pension credit threshold by only a few pounds.
'The older people we speak to in this situation have been forced into making drastic cutbacks just to get by.
'We have heard terrible accounts of people not washing to save on water, having one small meal a day and avoiding meeting up with loved ones as they cannot afford to buy a hot drink in a cafe. This cannot be allowed to continue.'
Tom Selby, director of public policy at AJ Bell, says: 'The furore over Rachel Reeves' decision to scrap the Winter Fuel Payment for all but the lowest income pensioners has created a political nightmare for the Government, with the issue repeatedly raised on the doorstep during the local elections and seized upon by Labour's opponents.
'What's more, the dramatic rise in pension credit applications following the change will eat into the already limited savings the Chancellor expected to make from the policy.'
He says at the time of the Winter Fuel Payment announcement, the Government said it wanted to ensure pension credit was being claimed by every eligible pensioner, with estimates suggesting around 800,000 were failing to claim the benefit.
Selby adds: 'The Government would surely argue that boosting pension credit uptake is a worthy outcome anyway, regardless of the Winter Fuel Payment issue.'
Jon Greer, head of retirement policy at Quilter, says: 'Pension credit has been a perennially underclaimed benefit.
'But the Government's decision to means test the Winter Fuel Payment has clearly kicked many into action to start claiming it in order to receive the highly prized payment.'
Greer says the surge in applicants may have left many disappointed as 146,000 claims were not awarded between last July and the end of May, a 99 per cent increase on the year before.
Meanwhile, he says the increase is also having a huge impact on the systems used by the Government to assess claims
'Our recent freedom of information request found that pension credit application processing times peaked at 87 working days in December 2024, significantly above the Department for Work and Pensions' 50-working-day target.
'If we are to make the drive to get people on the correct benefits, we must not be leaving them in limbo for that long.'
Greer adds recent figures show the DWP has reduced the pension credit backlog from 85,500 at its peak in December 2024 to 10,800 in mid-May.
Stephen Lowe, a director at Just Group, says of the boost in pension credit take-up: 'This is a significant success that will see these low income pensioner households receiving this much-needed financial support as well as unlocking the gateway to other valuable benefits.'
But he says there is an important job to be done to increase the take up of pension credit.
'People may be failing to claim for a number of reasons – they may simply be unaware of the benefit, not know how to claim or assume they are not eligible if they own their own home.
Lowe urges people who might qualify, or their family members, to use the Government's calculator to check eligibility, or contact charities or their local council for help.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diane Abbott is pushing the Left's biggest myth about immigration
Diane Abbott is pushing the Left's biggest myth about immigration

Telegraph

time13 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Diane Abbott is pushing the Left's biggest myth about immigration

The Labour Left were always bound to loathe Sir Keir Starmer's recent speech about the downsides of mass immigration. All the same, one of their objections to it strikes me as somewhat peculiar. At a rally on Saturday, the veteran Labour MP Diane Abbott thundered that Sir Keir's speech was 'nonsense' – because, as she stoutly reminded her audience, 'immigrants built this land'. Stirring stuff. I can see only one small problem. It's not strictly true, is it? Clearly Ms Abbott disagrees. Indeed, she proudly declared that her own parents 'helped to build this country'. As she herself acknowledged, though, they only arrived here from Jamaica in the 1950s. What precisely does Ms Abbott think Britain looked like, before her parents' ship pulled in? A barren, primitive, uncivilised wilderness, whose humble natives dwelt in bushes and subsisted on nettles and raw shrew? Did her parents look around, sigh, and then patiently set about erecting St Paul's Cathedral and Blenheim Palace? I'm not convinced that they did. In fact, I'm reasonably sure that most of this country was built a fair bit earlier, largely by people who were born in it. This is because, until quite recently, only a very small percentage of the population was born abroad. Between 1951 and 2001, the average annual net immigration figure was 7,800. In 2023, by contrast, it was 906,000. It doesn't take a mathematician of Ms Abbott's stature to recognise that this is quite a sharp increase. Still, I don't mean to pick on her. She's far from alone. In recent years, any number of Left-wing politicians and pundits have taken to pushing the line that 'immigrants built Britain'. On last week's edition of the BBC's Question Time, for example, the retired trade union leader Mark Serwotka informed viewers that Britain is only 'the great country it is because of centuries of immigration'. From the Left's point of view, I suppose I can see this tactic's advantages. Any time a voter dares suggest that net immigration of almost a million a year is a touch on the high side, and possibly not entirely sustainable in the longer term, shut them up by telling them that a) it's always been like this, and b) they should be grateful. The risk, though, is that some voters might feel a tiny bit insulted. Because the claim that 'immigrants built Britain' implies that the natives were so ignorant, lazy and useless, they achieved nothing until their superiors arrived from abroad to lift them out of savagery. Come to think of it, I'm reasonably sure that the Left used to have a word for that type of attitude. It was 'colonialism'. If you want a picture of the present... It was a bright cold day in June, and Winston Smith had just sat down at his desk in the Ministry of Truth. This morning he had an important job to do. A dangerous book urgently needed to be memory-holed. It was entitled Nineteen Eighty-Four. For decades, Nineteen Eighty-Four had been acclaimed as a landmark work of literature. Suddenly, however, it had been found to contain the most sickening thoughtcrime. The person who had made this shocking discovery was an American novelist named Dolen Perkins-Valdez. In a foreword she'd been commissioned to write for the book's latest edition, she declared that its main character exhibited attitudes towards women that were appallingly 'problematic'. Not only that, but the book didn't feature any characters who were black. 'A sliver of connection can be difficult for someone like me to find,' she wrote, 'in a novel that does not speak much to race and ethnicity.' Privately, Winston suspected that the reason the book did not speak much to race and ethnicity was that it had been written on a Scottish island by an Edwardian Englishman in the late 1940s. That was probably also the reason why none of its characters identified as genderqueer or pansexual, and why none of them had glued their buttocks to the M25 in support of puberty blockers for Palestine. But it was not Winston's place to make excuses for crimethink. In any case, he was used to such tasks. Not long ago he had been presented with the complete works of a children's author named Roald Dahl, and ordered to replace the entire text of each book with the endlessly repeated phrase 'BE KIND'. Had it been up to him, Winston would have been perfectly willing to rectify the text of Nineteen Eighty-Four, until all traces of crimethink had been eliminated. He could have ensured that it contained the correct number of characters who were 2SLGBTQIA+, neurodivergent or of Colour, and that they all expressed the officially mandated opinions about Islamophobia and net zero. The Ministry, however, had decided that there was no time. Better just to drop the offending object down the memory hole, and move swiftly on to his next task. This one was going to be tough. According to reports, there was a new TV adaptation of Harry Potter on the way, and the cast had completely failed to denounce JK Rowling. Winston had a lot of unpersoning to do.

New ultrasound forecast to cut Addenbrooke's treatment times
New ultrasound forecast to cut Addenbrooke's treatment times

BBC News

time16 minutes ago

  • BBC News

New ultrasound forecast to cut Addenbrooke's treatment times

NHS patents will be the first in Europe outside a trial setting to have access to a liver cancer treatment described as "cutting-edge and non-invasive".Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge will start using a histotopsy system, an ultrasound treatment that can be delivered in a single short session. It could potentially take no longer than 30 minutes with limited or no pain and a quick Sinker, chief executive of Cambridge University Hospitals (CUH), said the technology could make a "huge difference" and reduce cancer treatment times. The Edison Histotripsy System, made by US-based HistoSonics, is expected to be fully installed at CUH later this year. It will initially be used to treat patients with primary and secondary liver tumours, and research is exploring its potential on treating other hard-to-reach Sinker said: "Histotripsy is an exciting new technology that will make a huge difference to patients. "By offering this non-invasive, more targeted treatment, we can care for more people as outpatients and free up time for surgeons to treat more complex cases. "The faster recovery times mean patients will be able to return to their normal lives more quickly, which will also reduce pressure on hospital beds, helping us ensure that patients are able to receive the right treatment at the right time." The incisionless surgery uses pulsed sound waves to create "bubble clouds" from gases present in the targeted form and collapse in microseconds, creating mechanical forces able to destroys tumours without surgery, scalpels or has been procured following a donation to the University of Cambridge from the Li Ka Shing Foundation, a supporter of cancer research at the Deborah Prentice, vice-chancellor of the university, said: "Through his longstanding support of cancer research at Cambridge, Sir Ka-shing Li continues to make a significant impact on outcomes for cancer patients. "Cutting-edge technology such as this histotripsy machine allows Cambridge to remain at the forefront of understanding and treating cancer, a position we aim to strengthen further with Cambridge Cancer Research Hospital."Previously, 23 patients from Europe were recruited in a histotripsy clinical trial. More than 1,500 patients worldwide have received the treatment, mainly in the United States. Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

NHS, defence, education and more in focus for voters in government's Spending Review
NHS, defence, education and more in focus for voters in government's Spending Review

BBC News

time17 minutes ago

  • BBC News

NHS, defence, education and more in focus for voters in government's Spending Review

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is facing more difficult choices in the Spending Review on will sets the budgets for all government departments over the next few review will confirm how much taxpayers' money will be spent on the NHS, defence, police, education and other public services used by millions, as well as how much money the government plans to invest in projects like new public she makes her final preparations, people living in Cleckheaton in West Yorkshire outlined what they think her priority should be. 'The NHS is on its knees' Melissa Marley, 32, has spent the last two years studying at the University of Huddersfield to become a midwife but has quit her course after amassing debt of £60,000 and said there was "no hope for jobs at the end of it".The mother-of-three would like the chancellor to put more money into the NHS because it is "on its knees" and added "people abroad would kill for a system like that, so it needs protecting". Originally from Wakefield, she went back into education in 2021 to provide a better life for her began training as a nurse in 2022 before training as a midwife in well as £20,000 of tuition fees, she also owes about £40,000 in her maintenance grant accrued through her studies over the past few was originally going to defer due to health issues but decided to stop her course and is now hoping to become a maternity support role supports midwives, rather than being a midwife said the lack of jobs in midwifery was "sad because there are so many people putting so much work in. "They are working hard, having to miss times with their family, their children and then to have nothing at the end of it is sad". 'A less stable world' Pensioner John Addison agreed that a big part of the Spending Review had to be more funding for the NHS .He said that it was "hard work getting appointments".Mr Addison expressed his concern about spending on defence - and how more money was needed for that. He explained that he worried about the future for his grandchildren and younger people growing up in a less stable said that the Army had "been run down lately so we need to up it a bit because you never know what is around the corner with what's going off in the world." Earlier this month, a British defence review published recommendations which welcomed the government's ambition to spend 3% of Gross Domestic Product by 2034 but warned "as we live in more turbulent times it may be necessary to go faster."Several Nato allies have already committed to spending more than 5%. School buildings 'in a terrible state' Bill and Pauline Wardlaw would like to see funds focused on the education system and investing in the future. Bill was particularly concerned about problems with school said they were in "a terrible state" which meant "children are going to school in inadequate buildings and a lot of money should be spent getting them up to a decent standard".Pauline agreed with her husband but would also money spent on ensuring infrastructure around new housing estates is in place. She said when new housing is built "they need to make sure there is provision for the people that they are going to put in those houses - like doctors, education, schools etc because it is just not there".Ms Wardlaw was also frustrated with trying to get a GP appointment: "It's three weeks before you can see a doctor unless you ring up at 08:00 and then you are in a queue." 'Support for mums is needed' Beth Flannagan-Jones was out with her 16 month old daughter wanted to see more cash targeted at activities and support groups for mothers and babies. She said toddler groups could help mums who felt "alone".Ms Flannagan-Jones said there were "a couple of options but many of them are private and you have to pay for them"."If you have not got a lot of money and are on a budget I think a few more council groups and mum groups are missing," she added. 'Green investments need oversight' Pensioner David Lumb acknowledged the cuts to winter fuel allowance had been damaging to Labour party as some older people relied on the payment. He backed a more targeted approach to the benefit - which seemed to chime with the announced on Monday changes to the level the benefit would be paid at, meaning 75% of pensioners would now be eligible. His biggest priority was the NHS citing "the way the nation relied" on the service during the pandemic. However, Mr Lumb said he would also like to see more investment in green initiatives, but when it comes to home insulation he said it depended on "how efficiently it is done". "Quite often the government sponsor these things and they aren't properly monitored," he added. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store