Inside the crime wave targeting innocent Aussie grandmothers
A global investigation has uncovered the devastating crime wave targeting and manipulating innocent Australian grandmothers into international drug mules.
The bombshell revelations are uncovered on 7NEWS Spotlight as journalists Michael Usher, Mylee Hogan and Denham Hitchcock go undercover in Brazil, Japan and Hong Kong to expose the cruel deception of online romance scammers.
It comes just days after a Brazilian judge cleared Veronica Watson, 59, of drug smuggling after she was found with 1.5kg of cocaine leaving Sao Paulo Airport last December.
The Queensland grandmother has always maintained her innocence and says she was scammed by a man posing as a love interest.
'I trusted him. He said he loved me,' she told Spotlight.
'I thought we were going to get married.'
In December, Perth grandmother Donna Nelson was sentenced to six years behind bars after smuggling 2kg of meth in a suitcase into Japan's Narita Airport in 2023.
The 59-year-old said she received the suitcase from a man she met on social media in 2020, and brought it from Laos to Tokyo as instructed. A sketch of Donna Nelson at her drug smuggling trial. Credit: 7NEWS / 7NEWS
The judges acknowledged Nelson was a victim of an online romance scam, but said she should been suspicious enough to not carry his suitcase.
Nelson's lawyer, Rie Nishida, said the verdict was a 'very unreasonable decision'.
'We need to talk with Donna but we will fight until the end, until she gets freedom,' she told reporters outside court last year.
'She's devastated but she's a strong woman so we will discuss and prepare for the next fight.'
Nelson's family have since confirmed they will be appealing the verdict.
'These online relationships were real, in both cases they went on for two and a half years (with) messages and video calls,' Hitchcock said.
'This is a new type of scam, insidious, evil and cruel.
'We're not just telling these women's stories; we're attempting to track down the people who destroyed their lives and show how it can happen to anyone.'
Love Mules airs on 7NEWS Spotlight on Sunday at 8pm on Seven and 7Plus.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Schoolkids don't need smartphones: A Sydney mum's ban on her teenager having a phone should not baffle educators
A 13-year-old boy is being teased by classmates. Not for his clothes, his grades, or his hairstyle - but because he doesn't have a smartphone. Sydney mother of three and primary school teacher, Monica Cura, made the decision years ago to hold off. No screen time before age five. An iPad at nine, purely for schoolwork. And phones? That's a firm not yet. 'It wasn't even something we discussed,' Ms Cura told me. 'It just didn't occur to us to give him one. He'll get one when he can afford to buy it himself. Until then, there's no need.' Her stance is clear, consistent, and deeply rational: her son doesn't need a phone, she can't adequately monitor one, and frankly, he's still a child. But apparently, that makes Ms Cura, and her son, a target. 'He does get comments from other kids' she said. 'His friends call him 'iPad boy' because that's what he uses at home to talk to them.' What's more disturbing is that the comments aren't just coming from other kids. 'Teachers have made comments to him suggesting it was odd that he didn't have a phone," she told me. 'His sporting coach pulled my husband aside to ask why he wasn't on the team group chat with the other children'. This is where the story stops being quirky and starts being concerning. Because when adults are reinforcing the idea that every child should have a smartphone, and subtly shaming those who don't, we've lost our way. As a child psychologist, I hear stories like hers far too often. What used to be a considered parenting decision - to delay giving a child a phone - has now become something a parent feels they must defend. Ms Cura's son isn't isolated or unsafe. He trains at an elite level in soccer, catches public transport independently, and communicates with friends at home via his iPad - with appropriate boundaries in place. And yet, he's being made to feel like an outsider, not just by his peers, but by the very adults meant to support his wellbeing. 'He doesn't even nag us about it,' Ms Cura said. 'He knows where we stand. He did try to make a case - he said he needs it for training updates or because he catches the bus. But we get the emails too. 'And he can actually walk to school if he wants. He just thought maybe that excuse would convince us.' But she and her husband held firm. 'We've had parents come up to us and say, 'Wow, that's amazing, I wish I'd done that.' Others have said they gave their kids phones and now regret it.' I see the clinical consequences of early, unrestricted smartphone access every week. Kids who are anxious, distracted, emotionally volatile. Children as young as 10 exposed to violent pornographic content. Pre-teens addicted to dopamine-driven social media feedback loops. And parents bewildered at how fast they lost control. As of 2023, 37 per cent of Australian children under the age of 12 own a smartphone, an increase from 22 per cent in 2018. According to a global OECD report, Australian teenagers average 49 hours a week on digital devices, placing them among the heaviest users worldwide. Notably, 12 per cent of Australian teenagers spend over 80 hours weekly on screens. That's the equivalent of a full-time job - plus overtime - spent staring at a screen. For a generation still forming its identity, attention span, and social skills, this level of exposure isn't just excessive; it's developmentally catastrophic. Smartphones aren't neutral tools. They're highly sophisticated devices designed to hold adult attention - let alone that of a still-developing brain. From a neurological standpoint, the prefrontal cortex, responsible for impulse control, planning, and risk assessment, continues developing into the mid-20s. Children and early teens are simply not equipped to self-regulate their usage, navigate social comparison, or resist the pull of addictive algorithms. Giving them unfiltered access to that kind of power is, quite literally, developmentally mismatched. And yet culturally, we're doing exactly that - en masse. The problem isn't just that kids want phones. It's that adults have normalised this want as a need. Teachers ask why a child doesn't have a phone, instead of asking why so many do. Coaches expect group chats with 13-year-olds, instead of communicating with parents. We act like having a device is a developmental milestone, rather than a lifestyle choice. Ms Cura, to her credit, has stood her ground. 'We just don't see why he needs one,' she said. 'They're on screens all the time at school. Homework's online. That's already enough. Outside of that, they need to be looking around, being present. But instead you see kids and adults walking around with their heads down, staring at screens.' She's right. The presence of a phone changes the entire ecology of a child's world. It alters how they interact with peers, with parents, with boredom, with the physical world itself. And often, it robs them of things that are developmentally essential - creativity, stillness, resilience, even real friendship. Some parents justify early phone use for safety. Ms Cura doesn't buy it. 'People say, 'Oh, they need it to get picked up from school.' But there are phones that just receive calls,' she said. 'There are other ways to manage that. You don't need a smartphone with access to everything.' She's right again. The real reason most kids have phones isn't necessity. It's convenience. It's conformity. It's because the rest of us gave in. But Ms Cura's story shows something powerful: you cansay no. You can delay. And your child will not combust. They may, in fact, turn out better for it. We need more parents like her, not fewer. Parents who don't outsource boundaries to the crowd. Who understand that development doesn't speed up just because society has. And who are willing to put up with the teasing, the eye-rolls, and the awkward silences because they care more about raising a whole child than a popular one. And if you're a parent holding out, or wanting to, let this story be your reminder: you're not crazy. You're just ahead of the curve. Clare Rowe is a Sky News contributor.
Herald Sun
10 hours ago
- Herald Sun
Sydney man charged after allegedly stranding family overseas
Don't miss out on the headlines from National. Followed categories will be added to My News. A southwest Sydney man who allegedly stranded his wife and one-year-old child in Pakistan is facing human trafficking charges. The Australian Federal Police's Eastern Command Human Trafficking team launched an investigation in February 2025, after a woman reported her husband had left her in Pakistan without documentation after the family travelled overseas together from Australia. It will be alleged the man, 45, deceptively convinced his wife and child to travel with him to Pakistan in August 2024. On arrival, he allegedly took the child's passport and abandoned the pair at the airport. He returned to Australia by himself later that month. A Sydney man is facing human trafficking charges. Picture: AFP The man then allegedly fraudulently cancelled the Australian visa of his wife in November 2024, and retained possession of the child's passport. The wife reported the matter to the AFP when she was able to return to Australia in February this year. AFP investigators engaged with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to facilitate the child's return to Australia. The child was born in Australia and is an Australian citizen. AFP investigators executed a search warrant at an Austral home on Thursday and seized a number of electronic items and documents. The man was later charged with two counts of trafficking a person from Australia using deception. The offences carries a maximum 12 year prison sentence. The 45-year-old was arrested at Austral, Sydney. Picture: AFP He was also charged with one count of dealing with identification information involving the use of a carriage service. That charge carries a maximum penalty of five years' imprisonment. AFP Detective Acting Superintendent Luke Needham said the allegations in this matter could be described as potential 'exit trafficking' offences. 'Carrying out actions to force or encourage someone to travel overseas and then impede their ability to return to Australia can be a serious criminal offence, and the AFP will not hesitate to act when we have evidence of criminal actions,' Detective Needham said. 'Exit trafficking offences quite often occur within family units or in situations where close relationships have disintegrated, and there is a concern these types of offences are under-reported in Australia. 'The AFP encourages anyone who suspects they, or someone they know, has been a victim of exit trafficking to come forward. All complaints will be taken seriously and appropriately assessed with dignity, and the AFP can help victims obtain the support and assistance they require.' Originally published as Sydney man charged after allegedly stranding family overseas
Sky News AU
10 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Can't ignore the irony': Anti-lockdown protest organiser points out 'double standard' after Australian journalist shot by rubber bullets in US previously celebrated his jailing
Anti-lockdown figurehead Anthony Khallouf has accused Nine News US correspondent Lauren Tomasi of applying a "double standard'' on protest reporting after she previously celebrated his jailing during the Covid pandemic. Ms Tomasi was shot in the leg by a rubber bullet on Monday while covering the immigration riots in Los Angeles, in an incident which has sparked concern at the highest levels for the Australian government. During the incident a law enforcement officer appeared to line his weapon up and fire directly at Ms Tomasi while she was reporting. The Australian journalist was seen grabbing her leg and yelling in pain before running away and telling her cameraman she was ok. However, her reporting has now been critcised by Mr Khallouf after she previously described his jailing as a 'good result' and a "warning" to others who chose to protest the government's lockdown laws during the pandemic. In a 2021 tweet that has now resurfaced Ms Tomasi wrote: 'This is a good result. And hopefully a warning to any other 'freedom rally' protesters who want to attend tomorrow". The Nine journalist was responding to a breaking news report of Mr Khallouf being sentenced to a maximum of eight months in prison – with a non-parole period of three months – for his involvement in organising an anti-lockdown protest in Sydney, and for breaching public health orders by travelling to Sydney from Queensland. Following the news of Ms Tomasi being struck in the LA riots, Mr Khallouf told the journalist applauded state force when it "suited her", and now she has been "hit by the same system she defended". "There's a clear double standard in how protests are treated—ours were criminalised, others were celebrated," he said. "I can't ignore the irony. "She once said my sentence should be a warning, now the warning's come full circle." Mr Khallouf also called out other journalists and how they reported on his jailing, and told anti-lockdown supporters they could be tracked down by police. "The media acted like government enforcers during COVID—vilifying dissent and silencing debate," he said. "They helped normalise authoritarianism, and people aren't forgetting that." Australian anti-lockdown protests were met with extreme force during the Covid pandemic, including the use of rubber bullets.
