Sask. Métis representatives denied entry to swearing-in ceremony
Re-elected members of the Métis Nation Saskatchewan Provincial Council were turned away from Tuesday's swearing-in ceremony.
The representatives were suspended from duty in a move some citizens are calling undemocratic.
'Corruption is screaming as loud as it can,' said one Métis citizen.
Western Region 2 regional director Sherry McLennan and Western Region 3 regional director Wendy Gervais were denied entry to the June 24 swearing-in ceremony.
The council members are calling for answers from leadership regarding the suspension of the two regional directors.
A statement from Métis Nation Saskatchewan says the council members had violated the respectful workplace policy and questioned CEO Richard Quintal's Métis heritage on a public forum in November 2024.
'This came after an investigation that we maintained was procedurally flawed and conducted without our participation,' said McLennan.
The two representatives were told to apologize to Quintal before they could resume their duties.
Métis citizens in attendance at McLennan and Gervais' June 26 press conference were not happy with the nation.
'When we send our delegate, the person that we allow to go in and support us and ask those questions we need to, and to have something like this done to our delegate is absolutely wrong,' aid one of the attendees following the press conference.
'Thinking about what type of precedent we're setting,' said another attendee. 'How are we respecting processes, and what do these legislations and constitutions mean if we don't follow them?'
'There is absolutely no reason for our representatives not to be at that table if they were voted in,' another Métis citizen told CTV. 'It's called democracy.'
McLennan and Gervais maintain this course of action by Métis Nation Saskatchewan does not line up with its constitution.
'The Michif way is about coming to the table,' said Gervais. 'It's about having those good debates, you know, having those discussions because that's how we grow. It's not about coming to the table and everybody putting their hand up in agreement, even though they're not agreeing to what's going on.'
CTV News reached out to Métis Nation Saskatchewan, but the involved parties were unavailable for an interview.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
43 minutes ago
- CBC
Bills 5 and C-5 spur Six Nations teach-in on Haudenosaunee rights
Social Sharing Speakers at a Haudenosaunee community event last weekend say they know their inherent rights and will assert them if provincial or federal legislation infringes upon them. Protect the Tract, a Haudenosaunee-led environmental initiative, organized a Solidarity Teach-in on National Indigenous Peoples Day on Six Nations of the Grand River, near Hamilton, Ont., in response to Ontario's Bill 5 and Canada's Bill C-5. Ontario passed Bill 5, a law aimed at speeding up the building of large projects, particularly mines, on June 4. Canada's Bill C-5, which gives cabinet the ability to pick certain projects to speed through the regulatory process, passed the House of Commons last week and is before the Senate. Both have been criticized for allowing governments to disregard laws to expedite development and potentially infringe on Indigenous rights. Leroy Hill, secretary for the Council of Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs and a Cayuga sub-chief, said at the event that it's Indigenous people who will pay the price for bills' promise of economic growth. He said in his 41 years working with the traditional Haudenosaunee council, he's seen the community work hard to reconnect with their traditions and regain their language despite the exploitation of their lands and water, shortage of land and housing and lack of clean drinking water on the Six Nations reserve. "We'll continue with that because we know that's part of our strengthening and if that intersects with these decisions [governments] have made; our people will not stand still," Hill said. Terri Monture, who is Kanien'kehá ka, Wolf clan from Six Nations, and a volunteer with Protect the Tract, said both Bill 5 and C-5 could create trample Indigenous rights protected in Canada's Constitution under section 35. "We have inherent rights that we're going to exercise and we're not afraid to exercise them because we have that inherent responsibility to our coming generations, but also to our ancestors," she said. She said they have considered themselves stewards of the land, since the Haldimand Tract was granted to them in 1784 for allying with the British during the American Revolution. The tract ran along roughly 10 kilometres on each side of the Grand River from its source around Waterhen, Ont., to Lake Erie, covering roughly 384,451 hectares. The land allotted to Six Nations has since dwindled to about 19,425 hectares. "Everything east of the Number 6 highway still along the Grand River was never surrendered and was literally squatted upon and then taken by the Crown and given to settlers," she said. In 2021, Monture said the Confederacy chiefs declared a moratorium on development on the tract because of the land dispute that is before the courts. She said Canada's foundation is predicated upon agreements and treaties like these the Crown made with Indigenous nations. Ford's comments reflect a 'lack of awareness' Last Wednesday Ontario Premier Doug Ford said of Bill 5, "This is like handing an opportunity on a silver platter to First Nations that, by the way, I have treated like gold." "When I first came into office, I told [Indigenous Affairs] Minister (Greg) Rickford, 'Treat them well, give them what they need, whatever they want for them to prosper.' But there's going to be a point that you can't just keep coming hat in hand all the time to the government, you've got to be able to take care of yourselves." Ford apologized the following day for his comments saying, "I get passionate because I want prosperity for their communities. I want prosperity for their children and their grandchildren." Rick Monture, who is Kanien'kehá ka, Turtle Clan from Six Nations and an associate professor in Indigenous Studies at McMaster University in Hamilton, said Ford's comments demonstrate a lack of awareness about treaty relationships. He said there was often diplomatic mishandling and a lack of good faith on part of settlers when they entered into these agreements, which continues to this day. The Trump administration's tariffs is the latest thing that "gives Canada licence to say, 'OK, we need to utilize all the resources in [our] own country," without consideration of Indigenous rights, he said. He said in Six Nations, it's land use for development and water protections that are the biggest concerns from the bills. Promises of prosperity by governments passing these bills are insincere, he said. Land claims need to be addressed meaningfully instead of each government just passing those obligations onto the next government.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Debate rages at city hall over Oilers event-park funding in hearing on future of tax levy
Edmonton city council is divided over a directive from the province to use money from a special tax levy on projects on land owned by the Oilers. It was the Edmonton Oilers arena debate all over again at city hall on Thursday with a slightly different flavour. Most city councillors and business leaders agree a special tax program in the core is vital for the future prosperity of downtown. The sticking point is a directive from the provincial government to spend tens of millions of public dollars to build projects on land owned by the Oilers. City councillor and mayoral candidate Andrew Knack wants to halt a $250-million event park beside Rogers Place, the home of the Edmonton Oilers. The Oilers Entertainment Group (OEG), which owns the site, is using it as their outdoor Fan Park. The event park is listed as one of the so-called catalyst projects city money would help fund through the downtown Community Revitalization Levy (CRL). 'I do support downtown revitalization, but I will not support a bad deal,' Knack, who represents the west-end Ward Nakota Isga, told media on Thursday morning. 'We don't even know if we need an event park yet ... there's just this assumption that something new and shiny will solve everything.' Event park rendering Conceptual rendering of the event park in downtown Edmonton. (Oilers Entertainment Group) The CRL was introduced in 2014 as part of the deal to build Rogers Place, which opened two years later with a final price tag of $613.7 million. The city paid $312 million of it in cash and through the levy, the team paid $165.5 million and the rest came via a ticket surcharge, the federal government and MacEwan University. The home arena of the Oilers opened in 2016, replacing Rexall Place, following years of debate and negotiation after Daryl Katz bought the National Hockey League team in 2008 from the Edmonton Investors Group for a reported $200 million. As the area within its boundary is redeveloped, the CRL is meant to reinvest that extra tax revenue into downtown. City staff have crunched the numbers and say extending the 20-year levy by an extra decade is worthwhile. Event park site The site of the proposed downtown Edmonton event park, right, that's currently being used by the Oilers Entertainment Group as its Fan Park, with Rogers Place in the background on June 26, 2025. (CTV News Edmonton) 'It is a comprehensive approach to developing downtown Edmonton, encompassing underground utilities, beautification of our streets and parks, creation and expansion of event spaces, improvement to transit stations and incentives for attainable housing,' Brett Latchford, the city's director of strategy and emerging economy, said at Thursday's public hearing. Kris Sims, the Alberta director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, drove to Edmonton from Lethbridge to express her concerns about the deal along with those from several others. 'That's fine, go ahead and revitalize the downtown … but why are you tying it to one element of corporate welfare?' Sims said. 'That is not fair, and it's not right.' The provincial government has final say over the CRL. Municipal Affairs Minister Dan Williams says it won't be approved unless it includes the event park and site servicing for the housing planned north of Rogers Place. The province said it would contribute more than $100 million for those projects. CRL hearing People in attendance for a public hearing at Edmonton city hall about the future of the downtown Community Revitalization Levy on June 26, 2025. (Jeremy Thompson/CTV News Edmonton) Mayor Amarjeet Sohi said he understands why Edmontonians are upset but believes the deal would fall apart without the event park, which he says would be a major missed opportunity for downtown. '(The province is) a major funder of this, a major enabler of this plan, so they're definitely going to have a say in this,' Sohi told media between hearing sessions. 'Anyone who believes that we can find $175 million of new revenue or $103 million of grant funding I think is not living in reality.' A representative of the Oilers Entertainment Group (OEG), which operates Rogers Place and the Ice District plaza as well as the NHL team among other sports and entertainment enterprises, said the corporation is proud of its contributions to the CRL. Edmonton Rogers Place downtown skyline spring/summer overcast An aerial image of Rogers Place in downtown Edmonton on June 17, 2025. (Cam Wiebe / CTV News Edmonton) 'It has been a powerful tool for revitalizing Edmonton's downtown core and helping to strengthen our education, arts, housing, and business districts,' Tim Shipton, OEG's executive vice-president of external affairs, said in a statement to CTV News Edmonton. 'The CRL has supported critical public infrastructure, attracted billions in private investment and created safer, more vibrant spaces for all Edmontonians. The MOU (memorandum of understanding) signed with the city and province represents a transformational city building opportunity, focused on additional housing when it's needed most, and a one-of-a-kind community event facility with vibrant public realm spaces — developments that will not just benefit downtown, but the city as a whole.' The public hearing is expected to be held all day Thursday and Friday. Edmonton city council Edmonton city council on June 26, 2025. (Jeremy Thompson/CTV News Edmonton) Michael Janz, the city councillor for south-side Ward papastew, told CTV News Edmonton he believes the deal isn't really about downtown, rather how a 'provincial tax grab' is going to be distributed, asking would it 'go back to Edmontonians, or is it going to go to one private business?' 'We don't even know the other options, because this was decided behind closed doors in a private negotiation between one business and our premier with the city of Edmonton along for the ride,' Janz said. 'When you can't walk away, when you're being told you have to accept this deal on terms acceptable to the OEG, that's not a negotiation.'
Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
U.S. Republicans agree to drop retaliatory tax from Trump's big budget bill, citing G7 agreement
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced Thursday that he had asked Republicans to pull what has been called the 'revenge tax' from President Donald Trump's signature tax bill, after an agreement among G7 countries. Republican Senators quickly agreed to remove the revenge tax, Section 899 of the legislation. The proposed tax measure was a major concern for a broad range of Canadian investors and had caused some on Wall Street to speculate that it could chase away foreign investment in the United States. The original version of the bill would have allowed the U.S. to impose levies in response to what it calls 'discriminatory or unfair taxes' in foreign countries, including Canada's digital services tax, which was introduced in 2024. The first DST payment is due just days from now, on June 30. It also took aim at a global minimum tax deal reached in 2021, in which many countries, including the U.S. under then-president Joe Biden, backed a push by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development to tax companies at a rate of at least 15 per cent no matter where they were headquartered. But the U.S. never implemented such a tax, and the idea was opposed by Republicans. 'After months of productive dialogue with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal, we will announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests,' Mr. Bessent said Thursday in a post on X, as he announced the decision to remove the revenge tax. Mr. Bessent did not make specific reference to the DST. He said G7 countries will work with countries in the G20 and the OECD to implement the agreement over the coming weeks and months. 'This understanding with our G7 partners provides greater certainty and stability for the global economy and will enhance growth and investment in the United States and beyond,' he said. The Associated Press reported that Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith said they would remove Section 899 from the bill. Canada's Finance Minister, François-Philippe Champagne, responded positively to Mr. Bessent's statement on X, but did not provide further detail as to what the change would mean for Canada. 'At our last G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting we agreed to work together to restore greater stability and predictability for the world economy. We welcome Sec. Bessent's work to have Section 899 removed from consideration in the bill before Congress,' he said. The G7 did not release a statement Thursday. Mr. Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill, the sprawling piece of legislation that would extend his 2017 tax cuts and implement much of his domestic agenda, continues to be debated in Washington. What's in Trump's big budget bill? From cuts to taxes and Medicaid, here's what to know Mr. Trump has said that he wants the bill finalized for his approval by the fourth of July, a timeline that his press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, repeated Thursday. In recent weeks, Canadian wealth managers have warned of potential U.S. tax hikes on foreign investors based on the provisions of Section 899. As originally worded, the provision would have increased the U.S. tax rate for Canadian companies and other international investors. It could have cost Canadian investors who own U.S. securities up to $81-billion in additional taxes over seven years, according to an estimate by the Securities and Investment Management Association. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce also warned that the bill could result in Canadians' retirement savings being withheld to pay U.S. taxes, as retaliation for Canada's digital services tax or other provisions related to undertaxed profits or a global minimum tax. That's because Section 899 could have imposed withholding taxes on hundreds of billions of dollars of U.S. investments held by government-sponsored pension-fund managers in Canada. David Pierce, the Chamber's vice-president of government relations, said it in a statement that the U.S. move was a positive one. 'Section 899 was bound to escalate the consequences of this trade war for consumers, investors, pensioners, and businesses. We are glad to see the U.S. administration de-escalating, and we hope this leads to further co-operation at the international level,' he said, adding that the chamber still believes Canada should drop its DST in response to the 'olive branch' from the U.S. Canada refuses to pause digital sales tax as trade talks with U.S. continue Friday Canadian tax experts say Mr. Bessent's comments leave many questions unanswered as to what exactly has been proposed. Canada and other members of the OECD have been negotiating for years about acting together on tax reform related to multinational corporations. The talks have been divided into two pillars. Pillar one has generally focused on issues such as digital services taxes, where a country would collect taxes on the profits of services provided by a multinational in that country. This would affect businesses such as Netflix, Disney and other streaming services. Pillar two has focused on the idea of a global minimum corporate tax in an effort to address concerns that countries are in a race to the bottom to compete with each other through lower taxes. Mr. Bessent's statement only referred to pillar two and did not mention pillar one. Canadian tax experts say it's unclear what this latest development means for the continuing tension between the U.S. and Canada over its DST. It is possible that the DST could be an issue for negotiation in the planned summer negotiations between the two countries on trade. Allison Christians, the H. Heward Stikeman Chair in Tax Law at McGill University, said more details need to emerge before the full implications can be understood. 'The original bill could have increased taxes Canadians pay on certain U.S. investments every year until Canada relinquished its digital services tax and its application of global minimum corporate taxes to U.S. companies,' she said. 'All I know is that they're saying that we've agreed to something that seems to exempt the U.S. companies from a global minimum corporate tax, and I don't understand whether that also means U.S. companies won't have to pay digital services taxes.' Prof. Christians said it was debatable whether the U.S. bill's provisions would have applied in Canada anyway. 'We're in such a state of flux,' she said. Brian Ernewein, a senior adviser at KPMG and a former senior tax official with the federal Finance Department, said many clients have been concerned about the potential implications of the revenge tax. 'It's a very positive result that 899 has come off,' he said in an interview. 'There was high anxiety about it.' Mr. Ernewein reviewed Mr. Bessent's statements, but said it is unclear what exactly the G7 agreement involves. 'There are a lot of questions as to what that means,' he said. With a report from Clare O'Hara in Toronto
