
Bruins review: Sizing up underperforming roster ahead of daunting playoff push
Brad Marchand:
He may not be a top-five winger these days, but the 36-year-old captain is still on pace for 29 goals while remaining one of the better spark plugs in the game. That profile — coupled with his Stanley Cup pedigree — would make him a coveted asset at the trade deadline.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Elias Lindholm:
The Bruins handed Lindholm a seven-year, $54.25 million contract in July to slot in as the top-line pivot. But to this point, he looks more like a defensive-minded 3C. The initial hope that he'd become a 60-point player while stapled next to Pastrnak fizzled quickly, with the 30-year-old on pace for 14 goals and 42 points.
Advertisement
Morgan Geekie:
After tallying one goal over his first 15 games, Geekie found new life on a line next to Pastrnak — lighting the lamp 16 times over his last 34 games. Geekie's age (26), versatility, and contract status as a pending restricted free agent would make him an appealing player to keep. But his trade value might also be at its peak.
Pavel Zacha:
Zacha seems to be at his best when slotting in at center next to Pastrnak. He's flirting with a third-straight season with 50-plus points, although the offensive ceiling of a top line centered by Zacha might be limited —
Matt Poitras:
An extended stint in Providence seems to have done Poitras some good, as the 20-year-old recorded seven assists over 12 games since returning to the NHL. He still needs to pack on some muscle if he wants to develop into a legitimate top-six pivot, but the poise with the puck is hard to ignore.
Advertisement
Trent Frederic:
When he's on his game, Frederic thrives as a steady middle-six scorer happy with doling out punishment after the whistle. Unfortunately, those performances have been few and far between for the pending free agent — with Frederic on pace for just 22 points. He might be the most likely trade candidate on the roster.
Charlie Coyle:
A year removed from a career-best 25 goals and 60 points, the Weymouth native is on pace for just 19 tallies and 29 points. The 32-year-old's standing as a puck-possession center with a versatile skill set could make him an intriguing trade chip.
Mark Kastelic:
One of the few lineup regulars who has exceeded expectations, Kastelic has been a spark whenever he hops over the boards. The Bruins were wise to sign him to a three-year extension in January, with the 25-year-old ranking 10th in the NHL in hits (184) while winning 56.3 percent of his faceoffs.
Justin Brazeau:
After a hot start, Brazeau has cooled off significantly with just one goal and three points in his last 16 games. His size (6 feet 6 inches) and touch around the net could make the pending UFA a trade target.
Cole Koepke:
Koepke looked like he wrapped up the Seventh Player Award in October after scoring three goals and seven points over his first nine games. Since then, he has five points in his last 40 games. Still holds value as a fleet-footed, straight-line skater on a checking unit.
Advertisement
Johnny Beecher:
There's no knocking Beecher's skating ability or faceoff skills (55 percent). But the 23-year-old still has work to do to unearth more offense (three goals in 55 games).
Oliver Wahlstrom:
The Bruins'
hopes of Wahlstrom finding his offensive footing haven't panned out, with the waiver pickup limited to one goal and one assist over 15 games.
Defensemen
Charlie McAvoy:
Few NHL blue liners can mimic McAvoy's game as a puck-moving presence who can shift momentum by way of a bone-crunching check.
Mason Lohrei:
Amid the expected growing pains in the defensive zone,Lohrei has had solid stretches as a playmaker in his first full NHL season — leading Bruins blue liners in assists (20). He could use more reps on the power play, as he ranks first on the team
Hampus Lindholm:
Lindholm was arguably Boston's most impactful skater at the time he was struck by a puck off the knee Nov. 12. The 31-year-old's veteran's return would provide a lift to a
Brandon Carlo:
It hasn't been the strongest season for the respected veteran. Lindholm's return should help steady Carlo, although the 28-year-old could also be regarded as a trade chip as a right-shot, second-pairing regular signed for another two seasons.
Nikita Zadorov:
The good? Zadorov is a punishing presence who is happy to agitate and antagonize opponents. The bad? Those antics have put him in the penalty boxfar too often (league-high 117 minutes), while he's prone to miscues that often end with pucks sailing past Jeremy Swayman and Joonas Korpisalo.
Advertisement
Parker Wotherspoon:
Wotherspoon has developed into a useful asset as a steady depth defenseman who can slot into the third pair when needed. Plays a lot larger than his 6-1, 192-pound frame might indicate.
Andrew Peeke:
Peeke has been as advertised as a solid third-pairing D who can land a few hits and eliminate scoring chances. His value tends to wane if handed heavier minutes, but Peeke fits the mold of what teams are looking for further down the depth chart.
Jordan Oesterle:
Pressed into service following injuries to key cogs, the 32-year-old isn't flashy, but moves his feet and doesn't put himself in bad spots with the puck. Could be in line for more reps, given McAvoy's status.
Goaltenders
Jeremy Swayman:
An offseason rife with drama seemed to throw Swayman off his game early.
Joonas Korpisalo:
Despite his seemingly pedestrian stat line (.892 save percentage), Korpisalo has been a solid backup — recording three shutouts in 19 starts.
Conor Ryan can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Could The Canadiens Accomplish a Rare Feat Next Season?
T.J. Oshie Will Always Be A Blues Fan Favorite, Someone Who Helped Set Wheels In Motion For A Franchise Finally Winning Stanley Cup ST. LOUIS -- The 2005 NHL Draft was important for the St. Louis Blues.

Miami Herald
22 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
How many Panthers fans want another Stanley Cup more than sex or $1 million?
Some Panthers puckheads figure even if their team loses this year's Stanley Cup Final against Edmonton, which the Panthers lead 2-1 going into Thursday's Game 4, three consecutive Cup Finals and last year's Stanley Cup counts as unimagined bounty. Smaller groups want another Panthers' Stanley Cup more than they want $1 million, sex in the near future or beer in the next year. That's what says its survey of 2,000 Panthers fans discovered. The study addressed not only personal sacrifice, but personal superstition. READ MORE: Panthers in contract years are thriving in playoffs. What it means for Florida's future Hops, money, sex and marriage ▪ Money: Only 10% of Panthers fans would give up a month's salary for the Panthers to win another Cup, and, just 1% would give up their savings. Neither should surprise anybody living in a metro area with a high rent/income ratio and in a state where half the residents are living without much cushion. READ MORE: Nearly half of Floridians are living paycheck to paycheck, report finds But, one in five fans, 20%, 'would rather see the Panthers win the Stanley Cup than win $1 million in the lottery' themselves. ▪ Sex and marriage: Only 4% said they would give up their marriage or relationship to see the Panthers get another Stanley Cup, but 10% said they can abstain from sex for six months if it meant a Panthers repeat. The survey didn't break down how many of that 10% were married or how many didn't expect to have sex in the next six months anyway. ▪ Beer: Panthes parade with Stanley again, but you don't drink any beer for a year? That's a deal 25% of fans surveyed would make, the most popular sacrifice on the board. ▪ Vacation: A year of vacation days was worth the Stanley Cup to 10% of fans. Not very superstitious...? The superstition that most Panthers fans will admit is 'wearing a certain color' for luck, something 48% said they do. After that, it dropped off precipitously to avoiding betting on the Panthers (14%), 'wear a lucky piece of clothing (e.g. underwear) (10%); perform an athlete's routine (9.5%); watch the game in a specific location (9%); don't eat a certain food (5%); and rub a lucky token (4.5%).


New York Times
32 minutes ago
- New York Times
Would Bruins GM Don Sweeney trade the No. 7 pick?
Don Sweeney is nothing if not thorough. He engaged 14 head coaching candidates before identifying Marco Sturm as his preferred target. He attacks problems from left, right, top and bottom. It is no surprise, then, that the Boston Bruins general manager is considering every possibility ahead of the 2025 NHL Draft. That includes moving the No. 7 pick. Advertisement 'We will use the draft capital and try to improve our hockey club this year and moving forward in every capacity possible. It might mean making the selection,' Sweeney said Tuesday. 'But it won't mean we weren't having conversations that say how we improve our hockey club today and moving forward.' You can understand why other GMs would query Sweeney about the No. 7 selection. Difference-making players have been picked at that position, including Matvei Michkov, Quinn Hughes, Clayton Keller and Mark Scheifele. Pick No. 7 represents a good opportunity for a team to draft an impactful prospect who would earn three years of relative peanuts on an entry-level contract. Those are the reasons, then, that such trades almost never happen. Sweeney ran his first draft as GM in 2015. Within that stretch, only one top-seven selection has been moved at this time of year. On June 23, 2017, the first day of that year's draft, the Arizona Coyotes traded Tony DeAngelo and the seventh pick to the New York Rangers for Derek Stepan and Antti Raanta. The Rangers used the pick to draft Lias Andersson. In retrospect, trading No. 7 was worth it for the Coyotes. Stepan, 27 at the time, scored 14 goals and 42 assists in 2017-18. Meanwhile, Raanta posted a .930 save percentage in 47 appearances. Andersson scored three goals and six assists in 66 career games for the Rangers before he was moved to the Los Angeles Kings for a second-round pick. Other players the Rangers should have considered at No. 7 include Martin Necas, Nick Suzuki, Robert Thomas and Jason Robertson. The fact that the 2017 trade is the exception and not the rule, however, proves how valuable clubs consider the No. 7 pick. By now, with the NHL Scouting Combine complete and the draft just over two weeks away, teams are finalizing their lists. GMs and scouts are excited about the chance to make their selections. Advertisement As a rule, they don't trade high-end picks when the draft is this close. This is not to say the Bruins won't break the mold. One of Sweeney's first tasks is to supply new coach Sturm with NHL players. The seventh selection, in all likelihood, will not collect his first NHL paycheck until 2026-27 at the earliest. Sturm needs help today. If, to use the 2017 example, it gets Sturm a veteran center like Stepan was at the time, the first-year coach would jump on the trade call to help it guarantee approval. 'I haven't had a coach worry too much about draft capital,' Sweeney said with a smile, 'other than if you're going to use it to improve his current club. That would always be the recommendation of the coach.' But one of the things Sweeney learned during the coaching search was how far the Bruins have slipped when it comes to incorporating young players. It is a valid critique. Matt Poitras, the No. 54 pick in 2022, only stuck for 33 games up top in 2024-25. Fabian Lysell, the 2021 first-rounder once considered a possible Jake DeBrusk replacement, scored one goal in 12 games. Johnny Beecher, the team's first-round selection in 2019, scored just three goals. Whoever the Bruins pick at No. 7 would have a far greater likelihood of making an NHL impression. It could be Jake O'Brien. Maybe it will be Brady Martin. Both play center. The Bruins are short-handed at the position. In 2003 and 2004, the Bruins used second-round picks to draft Patrice Bergeron and David Krejci. They were seismic selections. Sweeney has noted, following the centers' retirements, how drafting pivots of their caliber does not happen often, especially given how late the Bruins had traditionally picked. Sweeney has also observed how rarely game-changing centers become available on the trade market or in free agency. When it happens, the cost is through the roof. The draft, then, is the most efficient button Sweeney can push for dramatic improvement.