
While Trump and Musk feud, student aid burns: Pell Grant, loan subsidies to face brutal cuts in ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
While Trump and Musk feud, student aid burns.
As Donald Trump and Elon Musk trade public swipes once again, something far more consequential is smoldering in the background: the future of federal student aid. At the heart of the political wildfire is Trump's so-called
'Big Beautiful Bill'
— a sweeping legislative package designed to slash social safety nets under the banner of
'fiscal responsibility.'
The House passed its version last month, but the Senate's freshly unveiled draft is fanning the flames even further — and for millions of college students, especially those from low-income families, the heat is rising fast. The bill proposes major changes to Pell Grant eligibility and student loan access, threatening to lock thousands out of higher education entirely.
Elon Musk has once again slammed the bill, this time calling it
'utterly insane.'
But while Musk argues it doesn't cut enough, Trump wants it signed and sealed — leaving students, families, and educators caught in the middle of a billionaire showdown.
The bill isn't law yet. But if it passes, the consequences will be real, swift, and painful. Here's what's at stake — while the billionaires argue.
Pell Grants: Fewer students, stricter rules, less aid
If you're relying on a Pell Grant to pay for college, this bill could change everything. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, over half of current Pell Grant recipients would see a reduction in aid — and at least 10% could lose their grants altogether.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Reporter Wear Bad Fitting Dress In Public? Look At Photos.
Vetob
Read Now
Undo
Why? Because the bill raises the bar. To get the maximum $7,395 Pell Grant, students would now have to complete 30 credit hours per year instead of 24. Part-time students? You'll need 15 credits instead of 12. And if you're enrolled less than half-time — forget it. You're out.
The idea, on paper, is to push students to progress faster. But real life isn't paper. Many Pell Grant recipients are juggling jobs, caregiving, or both.
Adding more coursework isn't a productivity hack — it's a barrier. The ones most affected are those who can't afford to go full time, and that includes a significant number of community college students. According to the American Association of Community Colleges, about 400,000 Pell recipients could see their aid disappear.
The era of high-interest degrees
Pell Grants aren't the only target. The
Big Beautiful Bill
would also eliminate subsidized federal loans — the kind that don't accrue interest while students are in school.
That means borrowing gets more expensive before you even graduate.
But there's more: the bill adds a lifetime cap on how much students can borrow, pegged to the median cost of their program. Sounds neat in theory — until you realize it doesn't adjust for where you live or what you're studying. Planning to become a doctor or lawyer? Good luck. Professional programs are pricey, and these new limits could make them unreachable for all but the wealthy.
And when federal support dries up, private lenders step in — often with higher interest rates and fewer protections. In short, students will be forced to pay more to learn less, and many might opt out of college entirely.
Low-income families risk losing their only path to college
Pell Grants have long been a lifeline for low-income families. They're not loans, they don't accrue interest, and they don't have to be paid back. For families making under $30,000 a year — which accounts for two-thirds of Pell recipients — these grants are often the difference between attending college and not.
This bill threatens to cut off that path. Critics argue that it would widen the education gap, especially for Black, Latino, and first-generation college students who are statistically more likely to rely on need-based aid. And while the bill's supporters frame it as a push for 'accountability,' what it really does is shift the burden of higher education back onto those who can least afford it.
So, what now?
The Senate hasn't passed the bill yet, and with reconciliation rules in play and public drama between Trump and Musk still unfolding, nothing is final. But the stakes are painfully clear. If the bill becomes law, it won't just be another win or loss in the Trump–Musk power struggle. It'll reshape the financial future of millions of American students — and not in a good way.
So while the billionaires feud on social media, students, parents, and educators are left watching the fallout. Because if this bill passes,
'beautiful'
won't be the word anyone uses to describe what happens next.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
15 minutes ago
- First Post
US Supreme Court chief cautions against political rhetoric targeting judges
Chief Justice John Roberts refrained from naming specific individuals, but his rare public warning coincided with President Donald Trump's frequent rhetorical assaults against courts that are halting some of his most controversial proposals read more The US Supreme Court's chief cautioned that political hyperbole and 'threats of violence and murder' are endangering judges. Chief Justice John Roberts refrained from naming specific individuals, but his rare public warning coincided with President Donald Trump's frequent rhetorical assaults against courts that are halting some of his most controversial proposals. Roberts warned against 'expressing a high degree of hostility to the court' or judges who may be considered 'part of the problem' amid increasingly heated political disagreements when speaking to a judicial conference in North Carolina on Saturday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The danger, of course, is somebody might pick up on that, and we have had, of course, serious threats of violence and murder of judges just simply for doing their work,' Roberts told the conference. 'I think the political people on both sides of the aisle need to keep that in mind,' he said, stressing he did not believe the threats were associated more with Republicans or Democrats. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has launched harsh assaults on federal judges who have ruled against his unilateral orders or stymied his efforts to deport migrants or reduce the government workforce. The administration has escalated its scathing attacks on judges. In April, the FBI detained Hannah Dugan, a Milwaukee judge, for attempting to assist a person evading Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials. The White House has been accused of disobeying some court rulings that it disagrees with, something the administration rejects. Amid multiple standoffs between the Trump White House and federal courts, the president and some Republican lawmakers have called for the impeachment of judges who have temporarily paused Trump's orders to cut government spending or ramp up deportations. He has blasted federal judges as 'monsters' who suffer from a 'sick' ideology and want the United States to 'go to hell.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As recently as Friday he lashed out at 'radical left judges' who he said pose a 'grave threat to democracy' for seeking to curb the president's powers. Violence and threats against judges in the United States have risen in recent years. A man in 2022 was arrested for threatening to kill Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. In 2023 a Maryland judge was murdered, while a judge in Kentucky was shot and killed in his courthouse in 2024. Roberts said people from across the political spectrum should be mindful of the dangers. 'Threatening the judges for doing their job is totally unacceptable,' he said. In March, Roberts clashed in extraordinary fashion with the executive branch when he rebuked Trump for seeking the impeachment of US District Judge James Boasberg, who had issued an order blocking deportation flights that Trump was carrying out. Trump had blasted Boasberg as a 'Radical Left Lunatic.'


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Globalisation 2.0: India well positioned to emerge as one of new centres of gravity: Anand Mahindra
A growing wave of protectionism is challenging decades of liberal trade order, dramatically highlighted by the Trump's tariffs, but economic nationalism does not spell the death of globalisation rather it heralds its rebirth, presenting an opportunity for India to emerge as a vital player, according to M&M Ltd Chairman Anand Mahindra . In his address to shareholders in Mahindra & Mahindra (M&M) Annual Report for 2024-25, Mahindra, said "India, too, will face challenges" due to the ongoing global turmoil in the midst of a growing wave of protectionism. He said globalisation is evolving and the US market centrality and China-centric supply chains are being replaced by multi-polar, regional collaborations. As structural and political uncertainties diminish US dominance, alternative capital destinations are emerging, Mahindra noted. Similarly, global supply chains are diversifying away from China, creating new trade partnerships. Lower tariff barriers among regional partners may emerge, boosting free trade and reshaping international trade centres of gravity. Live Events "Ironically, the US shift toward de-globalisation may lead to a new avatar of globalisation 'multi-polar, regional, and driven by domestic imperatives. In such shifting sands, I believe India is well-positioned to emerge as one of the new centres of gravity," Mahindra asserted. He further said, "We are a stable democracy, generally regarded as a trustworthy partner, and are bolstered by a strong military that is not politicised." Referring to Pakistan, he said, "The situation with our provocative neighbour is always volatile, but I am optimistic that we can demonstrate the limits to our tolerance without impeding our path to economic ascendance." These implications offer a portal to a stronger future for India and Indian companies, he noted, adding "but the future remains uncertain." On how the Mahindra group should navigate these turbulent waters, he said, "Whether it be a country or a business, the winners will be the ones who can successfully navigate uncertainty and ambiguity -- the ones who are resilient." Referring to the current global situation, he said it remains fluid. Recent US-China tariff talks and strengthened trade ties with the UK suggest a pragmatic layer to US trade policy, combining protectionism with strategic global engagement. "However, there remains a strong likelihood of significant decoupling between the US and China, he added. Whatever the outcome, it is apparent that many nations will have to swallow some "poison", Mahindra said adding, "international trade has already slowed amidst heightened uncertainty and dampened investor confidence." Noting that industries reliant on global supply chains -- like electronics and consumer goods -- will bear the brunt of rising input costs, Mahindra said "countries deeply integrated into global trade networks must rethink dependencies and diversify sourcing." Established geopolitical alliances are being realigned, ushering in a new era of economic nationalism. Businesses worldwide will adapt by localising operations, re-engineering supply chains, and exploring alternate markets. "India, too, will face challenges. Our large trade deficit, vulnerabilities in certain sectors, increased competition among nations, and uncertainties affecting GDP aspirations are all challenges that must be met," Mahindra said. He pointed out that key industries, such as steel and aluminium, could face headwinds, and export volumes may be impacted. "The challenge will be to minimise the adverse effects, akin to how Lord Shiva confined the poison to his throat without letting it spread (during Samudra Manthan)," Mahindra said. He cautioned against focusing solely on mitigation saying it reflects a reactive mindset. "Instead, we can proactively view this as an opportunity to enable some 'Amrit' to emerge," he said, suggesting to "seize this challenge as an opportunity to accelerate economic growth exhorting private enterprise to play a pivotal role in this transformation. Mahindra noted that China's adversarial stance may create opportunities for India to position itself as a supply chain alternative -- a long-term goal for Indian business. "Innovation and R&D could receive renewed focus, while manufacturing could once again take centre stage. Restrictions on China and high tariffs for other competing countries could open new markets for Indian goods," he said. While the potential exists, he said achieving it will require a concerted focus on manufacturing and a palpable increase in private investment. "Speed and agility are essential, as countries like the Philippines and Vietnam are already touting themselves as future manufacturing hubs. We must act swiftly and strategically to secure our share of the Amrit," Mahindra said.


Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Says He Doesn't Expect to Extend July 9 Tariff Deadline
President Donald Trump said he doesn't think he'll need to extend the July 9 trade deadline he has imposed on countries to secure deals with the US to avoid higher tariffs. 'I don't think I'll need to,' he said in an interview on Fox News's Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo that was taped Friday. He then added, 'I could, no big deal.' The comments follow Trump's remarks on Friday that the administration could do 'whatever we want' with the deadline, including extending it or making it shorter. 'I'd like to make it shorter. I'd like to just send letters out to everybody, 'Congratulations, you're paying 25%,'' he told reporters Friday in a press briefing. Trump and his advisers earlier this year laid out ambitious plans for a negotiating period, and have said repeatedly they're in talks with dozens of trading partners on reducing trade deficits and eliminating barriers. On Friday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cast doubt on the timeline, saying 'we have countries approaching us with very good deals' but they all might not be finished by the date when Trump's April 2 country-based tariffs are set to kick back in. 'If we can ink 10 or 12 of the important 18 — there are another important 20 relationships — then I think we could have trade wrapped up by Labor Day,' Bessent said on Fox Business. It's also unclear how comprehensive the trade deals the administration is hoping to secure will be. The pact with the UK that Trump has touted as comprehensive still leaves critical points unresolved, and the recently inked China accord leaves questions unanswered with regard to fentanyl trafficking and US exporters' access to Chinese markets. Trump has suggested India is one nation that could be close to finalizing a deal. A team of Indian trade officials held meetings with officials in Washington last week. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.