logo
A 9th planet in our solar system might be found — and no, it's not Pluto

A 9th planet in our solar system might be found — and no, it's not Pluto

Independent03-05-2025

There have been questions about a mysterious ninth planet in our solar system for nearly a decade.
Pluto was unseated as number nine in 2006. Now, a group of international researchers say they may have found a candidate — although nothing is certain.
'I felt very excited,' Terry Long Phan, an astronomy graduate student at Taiwan's National Tsing Hua University, told Science this week. 'It's motivated us a lot.'
Phan was the lead author of the findings in a study that has been accepted for publication in the journal Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia. The research was initially posted to the preprint server arXiv.
The researchers used surveys of the sky from two infrared space telescopes that were launched in 1983 and 2006. They theorized that a potential planet's long orbit would enable them to see it move across the sky. They found 13 pairs of dots that could be explained by a moving planet that resembled Planet Nine. One set of dots had matching colors and brightness.
But, the announcement has been met with some skepticism.
Mike Brown, an astronomer at Caltech who was part of the team responsible for the hypothesis in 2016, told the publication he isn't convinced that the infrared dots Phan and his team identified out of old, infrared satellite data is a ninth planet. His calculations suggested the body would be on a much greater tilt than the solar system's plane and would orbit in a different direction from the known planets.
This difference "doesn't mean it's not there, but it means it's not Planet Nine," Brown told Science. "I don't think this planet would have any of the effects on the solar system that we think we're seeing."
But, if the researchers are right, their planet would disprove the original planet. They would make each other's orbits unstable and could not exist together, he explained.
'It's kind of fun that a paper that purports to find a candidate for Planet Nine is really finding something that would basically say that we were wrong the entire time,' he noted.
However, skepticism doesn't mean there's nothing there.
The argument for the planet has to do with the Kuiper Belt: a region of icy debris far beyond Neptune's orbit. The hypothetical planet would explain some strange orbits of the objects there.
Theoretically, the Neptune-sized planet Brown and his colleague Konstantin Batygin found would orbit about 20 to 30 times farther from the sun than Neptune, taking between 10,000 and 20,000 Earth years to make one full orbit around our star.
"Although we were initially quite skeptical that this planet could exist, as we continued to investigate its orbit and what it would mean for the outer solar system, we become increasingly convinced that it is out there," Batygin, an assistant professor of planetary science, said in 2016. "For the first time in over 150 years, there is solid evidence that the solar system's planetary census is incomplete."
No observational evidence for Planet Nine has been found, although this is not the first time a candidate has been identified in infrared data. The last time was in 2021.
Some researchers even posit that evidence pointing toward the existence of an undiscovered ninth planet may actually indicate our ideas of gravity are incorrect.
the Vera C. Rubin Observatory on Chile's Cerro Pachón mountain.
'It is pretty amazing to think that something as big as Neptune could be sitting out there and no one would have ever noticed it,' Gary Bernstein, an astronomer at the University of Pennsylvania, told Science. 'But if you put it far enough away, it gets fainter and fainter very fast.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BREAKING NEWS Elon Musk makes spiteful move against Trump that could lead to NASA stranded astronauts 2.0
BREAKING NEWS Elon Musk makes spiteful move against Trump that could lead to NASA stranded astronauts 2.0

Daily Mail​

timea day ago

  • Daily Mail​

BREAKING NEWS Elon Musk makes spiteful move against Trump that could lead to NASA stranded astronauts 2.0

Elon Musk has just taken his new feud with President Trump to the next level, essentially promising to strand NASA 's astronauts on the International Space Station. The SpaceX CEO posted on X Thursday that he has decided to decommission his company's Dragon spacecraft 'immediately.' The move was in response to Trump posting on Truth Social that he would consider terminating all of the US government's contracts with Musk's commercial space company. Just two months ago, Musk's Dragon spacecraft came to the rescue of astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, who were stranded on board the ISS for 286 days. The decommissioning of the Dragon capsule would leave NASA without a proven American spacecraft capable of sending and retrieving astronauts from the space station. There are currently four NASA astronauts on the ISS after the rescue of Williams and Wilmore. It is unknown if Musk would allow astronauts to return to Earth on board the Dragon capsule still attached to the station. This is a developing story. More updates to come.

Elon Musk says he will slay Dragon space station transport after Trump contract threat
Elon Musk says he will slay Dragon space station transport after Trump contract threat

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

Elon Musk says he will slay Dragon space station transport after Trump contract threat

The online feud between billionaire SpaceX founder Elon Musk and President Donald Trump has been jettisoned into outer space. Social media users worried Thursday that the president's suggestion of terminating his former special federal employee's government subsidies and contracts could have potential implications for the operation of the International Space Station. As it turns out, they were right. 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' the Tesla co-founder said, responding to Trump's suggestion. The Dragon spacecraft, which first launched in 2012, has been used to get astronauts to and from the space station for years. In March, the pair of NASA astronauts who had been in space since last summer used it to return home. Musk initially replied to a tweet from Ars Technica's Senior Space Editor Eric Berger, who had written that terminating the contracts would 'both end the International Space Station and simultaneously provide no way to safely deorbit it.' 'Is he really holding astronauts hostage??? 😳' astrophysicist Dr. Meredith Wills added on BlueSky. 'RIP international space station,' said user @seggl. SpaceX is one of the biggest federal contractors. Since 2008, SpaceX has received more than $20 billion in contracts from NASA, the Air Force and other agencies, according to CNBC. It's unclear if any of this will actually happen, but the spat comes at a fraught moment for the rudderless agency. Trump's pick for future administrator, who had ties to Musk, was just cast out. Last week, NASA released its proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2026, slashing funds for climate satellites, astronomy and other science, and focusing on spaceflight and missions to the moon and Mars. The space station, which first launched in 1998, is expected to be deorbited in 2030 and 'at the end of [its] useful life.' Last year, NASA gave that responsibility to SpaceX, selecting them to deliver and develop the vehicle that will provide the capability to deorbit the laboratory. Musk, however, has said he wants to take it down sooner, rather than later. In February, he said it had 'served its purpose' and recommended it come down in two years. Instead, his focus has largely been trained on the red planet and making humans a multi-planetary civilization. 'Progress is measured by the timeline to establishing a self-sustaining civilization on Mars,' Musk said. SpaceX is a large part of future of NASA's prioritized moon-to-Mars missions. The company was selected to provide the human landing system that will transport astronauts to the surface of the moon and back. Musk has been testing the Starship with mixed success. Trump himself was at a test flight with Musk in November. A timeline for Artemis II — the first crewed mission on the Space Launch System — and the Orion spacecraft, remains April 2026, according to the agency's website. SpaceX also helped fill a critical hole for NASA after a Northrop Grumman spacecraft used to bring food, fuel, and supplies to the space station was damaged.

Dehorning rhinos reduces poaching by 80%, study finds
Dehorning rhinos reduces poaching by 80%, study finds

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

Dehorning rhinos reduces poaching by 80%, study finds

Cutting the horns off rhinos causes a large reduction in poaching, according to a new study, which raises questions about the effectiveness of expensive anti-poaching techniques used to protect the African mammals. Poaching for horn is a significant threat to the world's five rhino species. The substance, which is similar to human fingernails, is commonly used for traditional medicine in China, Vietnam and other Asian countries. Dealers in the hidden market will pay tens of thousands of dollars for the horns, which are falsely believed to be effective at treating fevers, pain and a low sex drive in traditional medicine. But new research in the journal Science has highlighted ways to better protect the animals from illegal hunters. An assessment of rhino protection methods in the Greater Kruger region of South Africa – home to a quarter of the continent's rhinos – found that removing horns reduced poaching by nearly 80% between 2017 and 2023. In a collaboration between scientists, conservationists and government officials, the research found no statistical evidence that traditional anti-poaching interventions – such as rangers, detection cameras, dog tracking and helicopters – caused significant reductions in rhino poaching, despite their multimillion-dollar cost, even though they were successful at detecting hundreds of poachers. 'Dehorning rhinos to reduce incentives for poaching was found to achieve a 78% reduction in poaching using just 1.2% of the overall rhino protection budget,' said Dr Tim Kuiper of Nelson Mandela University, a lead author of the study. 'We might need to rethink our goals. Do we just want to arrest poachers? It doesn't appear to be making a massive difference to reducing rhino poaching.' To dehorn a rhino, workers sedate the animal, apply a blindfold and earplugs, and cut off the horn with a power saw. The horn will gradually regrow – an average rhino needs to be dehorned every 1.5 to two years. The process poses a very low risk to the animal and does not hurt it. 'The headline result is that dehorning stood out for its effectiveness. We are cautious to say that the other interventions are not working. They worked when measured by whether they were detecting poachers. But detecting and arresting a load of poachers doesn't necessarily bend the curve on rhino poaching,' Kuiper said. In South Africa, rhino poaching remains high, with 103 killed in the first three months of 2025. Last year, 420 were lost. In recent decades, rhino populations have collapsed in Asia and Africa due to poaching and habitat loss, continuing falls driven by European colonial hunters. But the researchers behind the project, representing the University of Cape Town, Nelson Mandela University, University of Stellenbosch and the University of Oxford and other conservation institutions, cautioned that dehorning rhinos was not a magic bullet. A significant stump of horn mass remains on the rhino after dehorning, and some poachers were still prepared to kill rhinos for this section. Sharon Haussmann, a pioneer in rhino conservation in South Africa and co-author on the paper, played a leading role in coordinating conservation efforts in the study area. She died unexpectedly at the weekend and Kuiper wanted to highlight the collaboration between different sectors that are often mistrustful of each other in her memory. 'Is a rhino still a rhino without its horn? That's a bigger question,' said Kuiper. One study of black rhinos indicated that while poaching rates decreased, dehorned animals became more timid and covered much smaller ranges. Researchers believe that horn is used to establish territories and dehorned rhinos were unable to do this after the procedure. 'We wouldn't like to keep dehorning them for the next 100 years,' Kuiper said. 'Ideally we would like to address the drivers of poaching. But it is better than the impacts of poaching' Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield in the Guardian app for more nature coverage

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store