On the front line with British troops preparing to protect Europe from Russia
In below-freezing conditions, British soldiers, armed with guns flung over their backs, drag their bodies through snow-covered trenches for hours in an effort to hunt down and kill the enemy.
Tanks circle in the distance ready to fire and drones zoom overhead, providing intelligence to the men who are navigating the sprawling networks of mud tunnels, dug deep into the frozen ground where their adversaries hide.
While in this exercise the British troops are firing blanks and throwing fake grenades at the Romanians to 'clear out' the trenches in which they move, their presence on eastern Romania's border with Moldova and Ukraine is a clear message to Russia: We are ready. We will protect Europe against Russia.
Exercise Steadfast Dart comes at a time when Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put British troops into Ukraine in the event of a peacekeeping deal Donald Trump has promised to make with Russia.
It is part of what Brigadier Andy Watson, Commander 7th Light Mechanised Brigade Combat Team, has stressed is 'more than just an exercise' and is, in fact, an 'operational rehearsal'.
Nearly 3,000 British troops have travelled across road, rail and sea, moving 730 vehicles, weapons and personnel at short notice from the UK, to make up 10,000 Nato troops to enact a rapid reinforcement of Nato's eastern flank.
In an interview with The Telegraph at a make-shift office at the military base near Galati, Brg Watson had no doubts about whether his soldiers, who are held at high readiness with a notice to move of two days, could be sent to Ukraine.
'This brigade is absolutely ready,' he said.
'In terms of this brigade's readiness to conduct the whole range of military operations, absolutely, we've trained very well, we are well-resourced and clearly in this construct we are part of a well-resourced coalition.'
'We are prepared,' Brg Watson stressed, adding that the UK would be providing a contribution to any Nato or European effort, 'as opposed to the UK going alone'.
With the British Army's troop numbers set to fall below 70,000 for the first time this year, there have been concerns that putting soldiers into Ukraine could expose an already constrained military.
However, Brg Watson insisted that was not the case.
'I'm absolutely confident the Ministry of Defence would not send us into theatre without having the correct force package,' he said.
Meanwhile, the British soldiers on the ground in Romania are not shying away from the now very real prospect that all the training they have done in these brutal winter conditions could soon be put into practice.
Corporal Richard Gillin of 4 Scots said that when he heard the Prime Minister's comments on sending British soldiers to Ukraine, he would be 'up' for going to the warzone because 'it's what we signed up for'.
'At the end of the day, it's a new challenge for everyone,' he told The Telegraph. 'Being part of it is actually bringing ourselves to the table and supporting them. I think it would be quite a good thing.
'We have already been supporting them outside of ammunition and weapons training in the UK.'
Cpl Gillin's comments were echoed by Lieutenant Colonel Gordon Muir, Commanding Officer of 4 Scots, who added that his men and women did not sign up to the army to sit around.
'My soldiers didn't join the Army in order to sit at home in their living rooms. They joined for this challenge, they joined to have the hardship and that experience.'
Steadfast Dart, which is showcasing Nato's newly formed Allied Reaction Force (ARF), is working to prove the alliance's readiness, capability, mobility, and commitment to defend every inch of Nato territory.
Set up as the first responder in the event of crisis, Lt Col Muir acknowledged that the force is on the precipice of crisis.
'We've been preparing ourselves for well over a year now to assume the role and work alongside Nato allies and partners to make sure that should the call come, we are ready to go.
'I think the message from Exercise Steadfast Dart and why we are here alongside so many Nato nations is to show that if the political decision is made, the force is ready to go and it is able to deploy as one.'
While land, sea, cyber and air components are key to the nine Nato allies who make up the ARF, trench and urban warfare have been critical to their training.
With lessons learnt in Ukraine from how trenches are still key, to fighting on land and to how beneficial drones can be for soldiers moving on foot, The Telegraph watched on as three platoons drilled the 'clearing out' of trenches, including an enormous trench with a frontage of 270 metres.
'With interconnected positions, it makes it complicated for the enemy to fight through it, putting the holder at an advantage as they have learnt how to manoeuvre on a multi-layered battlefield.
Major James Graham, officer commanding of Delta 10, 4 Scots, explained.
'The war in Ukraine shows trenches haven't gone away in the 21st century,' he added.
'They are really complicated battlespaces in small areas, so you can do thorough training and test everyone's individual skills without using a huge amount of ground. These skills in the trenches are applicable elsewhere on the battlespace because you could be fighting through small bunkers, urban areas. We also share each other's tactics, which is how we get better at what we do.'
Company Sergeant Major Edward Buntine, of the same regiment, said he felt the troops had learnt a lot from working alongside Nato partners as part of a Nato-sized divisional deployment.
'We moved my company all the way from North Yorkshire as a full complete unit with all our kit and equipment in just four days,' he said. 'We then floated the vehicles over from Greece and then drove up.'
Asked why Steadfast Dart was so important, he said: 'It's shown interoperability and that we as an organisation can project ourselves forward at short notice.'
Although soldiers have yet to have the call that they will be deployed to an active warzone, the location of their training, on the border with Ukraine, has not gone a miss.
'It is sending a message to Russia that we are ready,' one soldier fresh out the trenches said. 'We've prepared, we've practised, and now we'll wait.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fisherman caught in diplomatic row with France breaks silence
A British fishing skipper whose boat was seized by the French has accused them of threatening his livelihood. Phil Parker said the French maritime authorities had seized 200 whelk pots and robbed him of £6,000 of fishing income by impounding the Lady T for six days before releasing it for a bond of €30,000 (£25,200). He also faces a fine of €45,000 (£38,000) on top of the bond if found guilty by a French court of 'non-authorised fishing in French waters' in a boat from outside the EU. Speaking publicly about the incident for the first time, Mr Parker told The Telegraph that he intended to fight the case to the bitter end, claiming he had been only 288 metres into EU waters when his boat was stopped by the French. He has the backing of British fishing industry leaders, who have accused the Labour Government of selling out the British fleet, and said the treatment of the Lady T showed the French were not interested in partnership. The Lady T, based in Eastbourne, East Sussex, was intercepted by the Pluvier, a French navy ship, on May 22 for 'non-authorised fishing in French waters'. Four days later, the vessel, which was accused of fishing for whelks without an external waters licence, was allowed to return to Britain following the payment of the bond. Mr Parker said that he failed to realise that his boat's licence to fish in the waters where he was stopped had not been renewed when he set sail. But he said the French maritime authorities behaved vindictively by impounding his boat rather than letting him off with a warning. He said: 'I was bang in the middle of the English Channel. Thirty miles from the English coast and 28.9 miles from the French coast. But they stopped me and jumped on board, even though I was only 288 metres inside the 30-mile EU waters line. 'For some reason, the boat's licence to be in those waters had not been reissued, as it is automatically every year, so they said I was fishing illegally. 'I could understand it if I had been inside their 12-mile French waters limit, but it was in the middle of the English Channel. All I needed to be there legally was a bit of paper I thought we had.' The seizure of the Lady T came just days after Sir Keir Starmer granted EU fishermen access to British waters for another 12 years in a deal critics fear will damage the industry. One industry source said: 'Nobody across the fishing fleet sees any fairness in the deal. It's terrible news for the whole of the industry. We are less protected than they [the French] are under the new deal. And then they go and seize a boat like The Lady T. 'Yes, the boat should have had the right paperwork, but the French should have exercised some discretion, especially as it came just after the new deal was agreed. They should just have had some stern words with the skipper and sent him on his way, not seize the boat. 'You'd have thought the French, especially the French government, would have handled it differently given the circumstances of the deal. But that's not how the French seem to do things.' After being seized, the Lady T was taken to Boulogne, where it was held for six days. Its crew stayed in local accommodation, but Mr Parker remained with the boat, with no toilet or shower, to ensure its safety. 'I couldn't just leave the boat. Eventually, after six days, they got my €30,000 deposit and I got to sail back. I could still get fined on top of that, which I'm not very happy about,' he said. Mr Parker claims the French maritime authorities appear determined to put him and other fishermen like him out of business. 'It's not nice having this prosecution hanging over me,' he said. 'But I'm going to fight this.' Despite the uncertainty Mr Parker, who has a wife and six children, has no choice but to continue fishing, this time with the external waters licence he should have had when his boat was seized. This has now been issued, allowing him to set sail once again. But his task has not been made any easier by the seizure of 200 of his 800 whelk pots, which he will have to replace. These were taken despite Mr Philips maintaining that when his boat was stopped he only had a small number of whelks from the EU side of the Channel in them. 'I've been fishing for 14 years and I would never break the law, but for some reason that bit of paper, the licence we needed, hadn't come, so technically I was in the wrong,' he said. 'I thought I was simply doing the job I've done for years. You'd have thought they could have been a bit more lenient with me.' Following the seizure of the Lady T, Olivier Lepretre, the chairman of the regional fishing committee in northern France, suggested it had been intercepted in a tit-for-tat spat. The skipper and owner of Pierre D'Ambre, a French-registered vessel, were fined £40,000 at Newcastle magistrates' court in April after pleading guilty to bottom-trawling in a prohibited area of the offshore Brighton marine conservation zone. Mr Lepretre said last week: 'Until now, the French government has always favoured discussions to repression, as opposed to the British government which always imposes rules that are more and more restrictive, and more and more counterproductive for French fishermen. 'There comes a moment when you have to say: stop.' Another French official said at the time that the Lady T was 'looking for it' after entering exclusive French waters. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Abbott calls Starmer's immigration comments ‘fundamentally racist' at rally
Backbench Labour MP Diane Abbott has criticised Sir Keir Starmer's comments on immigration as 'fundamentally racist' at a protest rally, suggesting the Government was copying the rhetoric of Reform UK. Thousands of trade unionists, campaigners and activists gathered to 'send a message' to the Government at a demonstration over spending cuts and welfare reform in central London on Saturday. Former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn and Ms Abbott were among those who gave speeches at the rally outside Downing Street following a march. Organisers The People's Assembly accused the Government of making spending cuts that target the poorest in society. The Prime Minister said the UK risked becoming 'an island of strangers' when he unveiled plans for tighter controls on immigration in a major speech last month, leading to a mixed reaction from different parties. Addressing the protest crowd in Whitehall, Ms Abbott – who was previously suspended by Labour in 2023 before being allowed to run in last year's general election – said there was an international struggle to 'fight the rich and the powerful (and) to fight the racists', including in her own party. The Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP said: 'I was very disturbed to hear Keir Starmer on the subject of immigration. 'He talked about closing the book on a squalid chapter for our politics – immigrants represent a squalid chapter. 'He talked about how he thought immigration has done incalculable damage to this green and pleasant land, which, of course, is nonsense – immigrants built this land. 'And, finally, he said we risk becoming an island of strangers. 'I thought that was a fundamentally racist thing to say. It is contrary to Britain's history. 'My parents came to this country in the 50s. They were not strangers. They helped to build this country. 'I think Keir Starmer is quite wrong to say that the way that you beat Reform is to copy Reform.' Reform's leader Nigel Farage previously said his party 'very much enjoyed' Sir Keir's speech, as it showed he was 'learning a great deal' from them. Representatives from the National Education Union, Revolutionary Communist Party, Green Party and the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union could be seen at the demonstration's start point in Portland Place. The large crowd then set off towards Whitehall shortly before 1pm. Many of the protesters were holding placards that read 'Tax the rich, stop the cuts – welfare not warfare'. Other signs being held aloft said 'Nurses not nukes' and 'Cut war, not welfare'. Mr Corbyn, who also criticised Sir Keir's 'island of strangers' comments, told protesters at the rally: 'As the wars rage around the world – the killing fields in Ukraine and Russia, the abominable, deliberate starvation of children in Gaza and the genocide that's inflicted against the Palestinian people continues – surely to goodness we need a world of peace. 'We need a world of peace that will come through the vision of peace, the vision of disarmament and the vision of actually challenging the causes of war, which leads to the desperation and the refugee flows of today.' The Independent MP for Islington North urged protesters to 'go forward as a movement of hope, of what we can achieve together (and) the society we can build together'. The People's Assembly said trade unionists, health, disability, housing and welfare campaigners with community organisations came together for the protest under the slogan 'No to Austerity2.0'. A spokesperson said: 'The adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps us in a public service funding crisis, increasing poverty, worsening mental health and freezing public sector pay. 'Scrapping winter fuel payments, keeping the Tory two-child benefit cap, abandoning Waspi women, cutting £5 billion of welfare by limiting Pip and universal credit eligibility, and slashing UK foreign aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP, while increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, are presented as 'tough choices'. 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
British lawyers for Hamas investigated by watchdog
The law firm trying to remove Hamas from the UK's list of proscribed terrorist groups is being investigated by a solicitors' watchdog, The Telegraph understands. Riverway Law made headlines in April when it launched an appeal to have Hamas taken off Britain's list of proscribed groups. The firm made a submission to Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, arguing that Hamas posed 'no threat to the UK people' and should be allowed to operate here on free speech grounds. Just days after submitting its appeal to the Home Office, the firm was reported to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) by Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary. Mr Jenrick argued that Riverway's appeal potentially breached UK sanctions rules on terror groups. He also drew attention to apparent social media posts about the war in Gaza by Fahad Ansari, the leading lawyer in the case and the director of Riverway. The posts included claims that Hamas is a 'legitimate resistance movement' protecting Palestinians from 'UK-sponsored Israeli genocide'. The SRA is understood to be at an early phase of its investigation and no conclusions have yet been reached. In a letter to the watchdog sent in April, Mr Jenrick said there was 'a clear need to uphold public confidence in the legal profession and to ensure rigorous enforcement of the UK sanctions regime'. He said that there were 'significant questions as to whether Riverway have complied with their obligations under the UK sanctions regime, the SRA's own published guidance and broader professional standards expected of solicitors'. Mr Ansari has defended his firm's actions. In response to Mr Jenrick's complaint he said: 'We were in contact with OFSI [the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation], external counsel and others who had represented sanctioned organisation[s], to ensure that we did not breach our duties under the sanctions regime.' Riverway submitted a 106-page application to the Home Office in April, accompanied by a video which was posted to its social media channels. The application argued the proscription of Hamas in the UK should be lifted in line with European Convention of Human Rights protections in the interest of freedom of speech. It also claimed the ban is disproportionate and that Hamas poses 'no threat to the UK people'. The ongoing appeal, believed to be the first of its kind, is being fronted by Mousa Abu Marzouk, Hamas's head of international relations and its legal office. Mr Jenrick welcomed the SRA's investigation on Saturday, telling The Telegraph: 'Our sanctions regime is pointless if it isn't enforced. 'Ansari is a shameless apologist who argues Hamas poses no threat to the British people. What nonsense. This evil death cult threatens free people everywhere.' Mr Ansari has previously appeared to make a series of controversial social media posts related to the ongoing Israel-Gaza war. In posts dating from last year he appeared to praise fighters of the 'courageous Palestinian mujahideen', wrote 'you should view Hamas as an army of angels' and dismissed international courts as 'hopeless', saying that 'only armed resistance' would help Palestinians. In April last year, a post on his X account said: 'Eid Mubarak to everyone celebrating especially the courageous Palestinian mujahideen who continue to resist the Western-backed Israeli genocide entirely on their own. You are the pride of this Ummah. May you celebrate Eid one day in a fully liberated Palestine.' Another comment posted in June said: 'If you believe genocidal Israel is the most moral army in the world, then you should view Hamas as an army of angels.' The SRA declined to comment. Mr Ansari and Riverway Law were approached for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.