How the ANC lost Nelson Mandela Bay municipality
The ANC's downfall in Nelson Mandela Bay can be traced as far back as 2009.
By then, the golden era of Nceba Faku's mayorship had faded and his legacy, once influential, was increasingly tainted by allegations of corruption.
Alongside then-ANC regional secretary Zandisile Qupe, Faku turned on former mayor Nondumiso Maphazi, who had resisted political interference from Standard House (later Florence Matomela House).
Maphazi's refusal to toe the line triggered a targeted campaign against her.
At the centre of the controversy was municipal manager Graham Richards, suspended by the council on what Maphazi described as frivolous charges.
This was widely seen as a strategic move to clear the way for political control of the city's administration.
Enter Elias Ntoba, a virtually unknown figure parachuted in from the Northern Cape, appointed as acting municipal manager.
His tenure marked the start of an exodus of respected senior managers, who left in droves, unwilling to work under increasing political pressure.
Ntoba wasted no time consolidating control.
He removed CFO Kevin Jacoby as chair of the bid adjudication committee and replaced him with Sithembele Vatala, head of the integrated development plan unit.
He also placed communications director Roland Williams in charge of the tender evaluation committee.
Both men were close allies of Faku and their appointments were widely viewed as a deliberate effort to secure ANC influence over municipal tenders.
With Maphazi removed and Zanoxolo Wayile installed as mayor in November 2009, many believed the gates of patronage had fully opened.
But Wayile proved unexpectedly independent, defending the role of a strong, non-partisan city administration.
His tenure, however, was marked by fierce infighting within the ANC caucus, which saw him, deputy mayor Nancy Sihlwayi and speaker Maria Hermans as obstacles.
In 2013, they were removed and 81-year-old Ben Fihla was brought in as a pliable replacement.
It was during Fihla's tenure that corruption surged.
Funds meant for the Integrated Public Transport System were shamelessly looted.
The cases linked to that period are still before the courts today.
Fihla, seen largely as a figurehead, followed the lead of his deputy Chippa Ngcolomba and regional secretary Qupe.
Even the high-profile appointment of Danny Jordaan in 2015 couldn't reverse the rot in time for the 2016 local government elections.
Jordaan, alongside acting city manager Johann Mettler, brought a measure of administrative competence and direction.
But it was too little, too late. The damage had been done.
The ANC's grip on the metro slipped and, in 2016, it lost the municipality for the first time since the first democratic municipal elections in 1995.
That election redrew SA's political map and Nelson Mandela Bay was no exception.
Like Ekurhuleni and the City of Joburg, the metro was thrust into the era of coalition politics.
Key political figures emerged, including former DA MP-turned-ActionSA member Athol Trollip, ex-COPE MP-turned-DA leader Nqaba Bhanga and former ANC MP Litho Suka.
But it was the UDM's Mongameli Bobani who embodied the chaos to come.
With just two seats, Bobani rose from councillor to mayor, leveraging his 'kingmaker' status while outmanoeuvring opponents.
Bobani and Trollip became bitter rivals, clashing on nearly every issue.
Bobani, who died during the Covid-19 pandemic, was linked to serious allegations of multimillion-rand money laundering.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
DA says Joburg mayor's 'Bomb Squad' a ploy to help ANC cadres
The DA says it will scrutinise the appointments and work of the City of Johannesburg's 'Bomb Squad' — a unit the metro says will assist in halting crime, combating lawlessness and unlocking service delivery. On Thursday, mayor Dada Morero announced the members of the squad, which will be led by ANC veteran Snuki Zikalala. The 12-member team will operate for the next two years. However, DA Johannesburg caucus leader Belinda Kayser-Echeozonjoku questioned the constitutionality of establishing the team. She said Morero's initiative was just 'a ploy to help out ANC cadres who have fallen on hard times'. 'It is unclear what the purpose of this squad is and whether it is part of a comprehensive plan to turn service delivery around in Johannesburg,' she said. Kayser-Echeozonjoku said Morero would have to account to the council on which sections of the Municipal Structures Act made provision for what she said were 'seemingly unconstitutional deployees'.
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Open letter to Thabo Mbeki on the crisis in the DRC
Former president Thabo Mbeki. Your Excellency Thabo Mbeki, It is never easy to address publicly a figure of your stature, former president of the Republic of South Africa, architect of the New Economic Partnership for African Development (Nepad) and moral heir to the pan-African struggle of Nelson Mandela. Your life's journey stands as a testament to the historical fight for the dignity of African peoples, the sovereignty of African states and a vision of peace grounded in justice. Precisely because of this extraordinary legacy and the moral authority you represent, your recent remarks in Tanzania, which have been perceived as an implicit endorsement of former president Joseph Kabila's narrative on the crisis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, have caused deep concern. These statements urgently call for clarification historically, politically and morally, given the responsibilities that come with preserving regional stability. At a time when some manipulate pan-African ideals to legitimise subversive agendas, it is imperative that respected voices on the continent demonstrate strategic discernment and ethical coherence. In a nation at war, words carry weight. They are never neutral. Spoken by a continental authority figure, each word becomes a weapon in the information battlefield. Speech often precedes action. It guides, legitimises and sometimes triggers conflict. What you recently expressed goes beyond neutral commentary. It carries the tone of pre-hostile rhetoric laced with accusatory language, ethnic insinuation and indirect justification of violence. This was not a neutral political analysis. It laid the foundation for a latent casus belli , activating well-known levers in the playbook of information warfare: • Emotional mobilisation through references to ethnic exclusion; • The implicit identification of a Congolese political actor as an obstacle to peace; and • The suggestion that violence may be legitimate when carried out by a 'frustrated' or 'ignored' people. As an expert on regional dynamics, you know full well that such rhetoric in such a volatile context functions as a precursor to violent escalation. In this instance, your words resonate as a veiled forecast of conflict. Your statements reawaken unhealed wounds. The implicit and explicit references to the Luba people of Kasaï and Katangan communities evoke painful memories of the 1992–94 ethnic violence in Katanga, a tragedy many historians consider an attempted ethnic cleansing that displaced more than 800,000 Kasaïans. That violence was, in part, orchestrated by individuals now close to Joseph Kabila, including General John Numbi, currently a fugitive. Your speech risks legitimising a new spiral of tribal violence in a region already on edge. This is not merely a misreading of history, it is a grave political error, one that gives strategic momentum to armed destabilization agendas. What is most striking is the dissonance between the peaceful tone of your speech and its martial undercurrent. On the surface, you call for peace, dialogue and protection of certain communities. Yet beneath that, you echo albeit indirectly justifications often invoked by the M23 rebel group, backed by Rwanda. This dual posture — peace on the surface, mental preparation for war underneath — is a well known tactic in influence strategy. It rests on a simple principle: those who shout loudest against violence before a conflict often turn out to be its most active architects. This is not the legacy of Mandela. It is rather the rhetoric of geopolitical manipulation, where the suffering of Congolese Tutsi communities is exploited for strategic gain. While the concerns of these communities deserve recognition and justice, they cannot under any circumstances justify military aggression against a sovereign state. Excellency, in speaking as you did, you did not speak as a statesman working for continental peace, but as a discursive vector of a war project. Where we expected the voice of a Mandela disciple, we heard instead the voice of a factional tribune tacitly justifying the political overthrow, or even elimination, of a sitting, democratically elected president. At this point in your journey, your moral and political responsibility demands that you weigh every word with the precision of a continental mediator. Today, words can kill literally. It bears repeating, a single word voiced in the press in Dar es Salaam or Johannesburg today can reverberate with tangible consequences in Goma or Kinshasa. Pan-Africanism is not symbolic solidarity or a shared colonial memory. It is built on cooperation between sovereign states, equality among peoples, justice, peace and mutual respect. The role of a pan-African elder is not to choose sides in an armed conflict, but to serve as a moral and diplomatic compass. But what we heard in Tanzania was not a voice of peace. It was a factional narrative, a coded endorsement of destabilization, potentially aimed at a sitting head of state. Let us be clear: the current crisis in eastern DRC is neither a mere governance failure nor a case of 'ethnic marginalisation' . It is a transnational hybrid war disguised as a rebellion, in which the M23 plays the dual role of armed proxy and political facade for Kigali's ambitions. By publicly endorsing Kabila's concerns without simultaneously condemning M23's atrocities you strengthen this hybrid strategy. You grant political credibility to a movement responsible for thousands of deaths and more than seven million displaced people. Even worse, your statements help invert the narrative: any criticism of the rebellion is now recast as ethnic hatred, while the rebellion itself is framed as a legitimate 'popular aspiration'. This manipulation erodes Congolese sovereignty and seriously jeopardises any hope for sustainable peace. Excellency, Africa is entering a new era of hybrid conflicts fueled by identity-based frustration, economic rivalries and manipulated narratives. In this context, our leaders must be more vigilant than ever. The Great Lakes region does not need rhetoricians of conflict disguised as diplomats. It does not need moral sponsors of violence. It needs peace, truth, justice and reconciliation. It needs bridge-builders not grave-diggers. We solemnly urge you to clarify your statements, to denounce all rhetoric of war, and to reclaim your rightful place among Africa's peacemakers. The world is watching. So is History. Respectfully, Roger B Bope Roger B Bope is a security analyst and strategist.
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
We must all reclaim our information space
Elon Musk. (File photo) More South Africans arrived in the United States this week. But it is an old resident who made the most headlines. Elon has left the Doge office. He did so in bizarre pomp and ceremony, with Donald Trump looking to save both their faces with a predictably awkward golden key award ceremony. Musk and his Javier Milei-inspired chainsaw are no longer a factor in Washington. The same cannot be said for public life. Musk owns X/Twitter, one of the biggest social media platforms on the planet. He's had a huge following on it long before he took control in 2022. He relishes using that influence to peddle all manner of absurdity and falsity. Musk has been the figurehead of the open conspiracy of tech oligarchs that reign in the White House. They have made no secret of their willingness to do whatever is asked of them, knowing that the reciprocation will be ample (or indeed, the punitive repercussions for a failure to toe the line would be grave.) Meta owner Mark Zuckerberg's sycophantic about-turn on moderation was a perfect example of that reality playing out in real time. In that now infamous announcement video, he waxed lyrical about how he created Facebook to be a democratic marketplace of free ideas. That is a lie, of course. He created Facebook so college boys could rate women on the internet. Regardless, with other media and search engine owners included in the cohort, the fact remains that a few powerful men control the dominant means of creating and sharing information in 2025. Those white South Africans arriving as refugees in the US should be all the reminder we need of how pernicious a narrative can be; and that real-world consequences need not be grounded in truth or rational reasoning. It bears repeating: there is no white genocide in South Africa. It is imperative that we, as individual news consumers and practitioners, reclaim our information space. For as much as the oligarchs strut with the swagger of impunity, that is far from the case. While this would be an obvious segue into launching into a pitch to get you to subscribe, the struggle we face goes beyond promoting ideas of established media. There's a war going on for our attention. The mistake would be in thinking we have to take sides. We have to respect each other and the process of sharing ideas civilly, with a respect for the truth. If our engagement begins and ends with a retweet, our society will begin to look even bleaker. The algorithm only wins if you surrender to it.
