LILLEY: Premiers hopeful after Carney meets Trump at White House
A day after he went to the White House to meet with Donald Trump, newly elected Prime Minister Mark Carney faced a tougher crowd — Canada's premiers. Yet, Carney seemed to escape that meeting unscathed and even agreed to meet with the premiers in person three weeks from now.
In a tip of the hat to Western Canada, Carney will meet with provincial and territorial premiers in Saskatoon during the first week of June.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Carney comes to office facing a real problem of Western alienation as residents of Saskatchewan and Alberta, in particular, feel they aren't wanted in Conferderation. The Trudeau Liberal government seemed to revel in picking fights with these provinces which often didn't vote Liberal. Trudeau also gave them very little reason to back his party with policies that attacked not only the oil and gas industry but also agriculture.
While Ontario Premier Dog Ford came out of the virtual meeting on Wednesday saying Carney had done a good job in Washington, he said the new Liberal government needed to start respecting the Prairie provinces.
'I said it's time that your government starts showing some love to Saskatchewan and Alberta, because the last prime minister showed no love, in fact, to the contrary,' Ford said.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, often seen as an opponent of Ottawa, said that dealing with Mark Carney is a welcome departure from engaging with Justin Trudeau.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
'I can tell you that he certainly has set a different tone with the premiers,' Smith said.
Recommended video
'The fact that he's already had several meetings with us, we have an in-person meeting planned. He's made sure to be in touch with us every time he comes back to give us bit of an update.'
Smith said she had some sympathy for the press conference that Carney had to sit through on Tuesday, noting that the PM had very few chances to speak.
'As you know, I met the president and I, too, had to spend more time listening than talking,' Smith said.
She went on to say that she felt Prime Minister Carney did a good job of trying to get his points across while keeping the meeting cordial.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
'I don't think I'd have had the restraint that he had,' Ontario Premier Doug Ford said, while speaking to reporters.
There has been an attempt to drive a wedge between Ford and Smith, especially given her government's decision to allow a referendum on separation to happen at a lower threshold. In her interview with The Toronto Sun, Smith explained that the legislation on direct initiatives was more than a year in the making and while the threshold was lower than what was previously in place, it was still higher than recall or direct initiative legislation in places like California.
She dismissed the idea that Ford was criticizing her by calling for a united Canada, something she said this week that she supports.
'Doug's a friend and he and I find a lot of common ground when we're talking about the issues that matter to our respective provinces,' Smith told me.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Ford also downplayed the idea of a rift.
'We get along. I think there is this big misnomer that we don't get along,' Ford said. 'There isn't this big rift that everyone is playing out.'
Ford said that he wants to support Alberta and Saskatchewan in getting their projects built. He submitted his projects earlier this week as did Alberta.
Carney asked each province to submit a list of nation building projects they want the federal government to support, and Smith said she's hopeful the new government will change course and support these projects.
'Every single premier has a priority project that has been stymied in some way because of onerous federal regulations. And I think that now we're beginning to see how important it is for us to support each other so we can develop our economy, become that economic powerhouse,' Smith said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
At this point, while Carney is making the right noises, by the meeting in Saskatoon in June, we will find out if he is serious.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hegseth's long week on Capitol Hill
The Big Story Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday closed out his third and final day of hearings on Capitol Hill. © Associated Press The final day was not without its fireworks, with several clashes with lawmakers as he dodged questions on invading Greenland, Ukraine aid, his use of the app Signal, and troop deployment in Los Angeles. Hegseth, in his first appearance before the House Armed Services Committee, was quickly hit with queries from panel Democrats, starting with ranking member Adam Smith (Wash.). Smith pressed the Pentagon chief on whether it is the Defense Department's policy that the U.S. military be prepared to take Greenland or Panama by force. Hegseth would not rule out the possibility of a future military invasion of the Arctic territory and Central American country, suggesting to lawmakers the Pentagon could have such plans and that the U.S. has an interest in protecting both areas from Chinese influence. The Defense Department 'plans for any particular contingency,' he said, adding that 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for anything.' The answer caused Smith to scoff, replying: 'I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland. I'm going to go out on a limb on that one.' Hegseth was later pressed by Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio), who implored him to confirm that 'it is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct? Because I sure as hell hope that it is not that.' Hegseth would only repeat that the 'Pentagon has plans for any number of contingencies' and that officials 'look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats.' Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.) took his five minutes to supply Hegseth with the most direct questioning he's yet faced on whether he shared classified information on U.S. attack plans in Yemen via the Signal messaging app. Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-Calif.) then lambasted the Defense secretary as an 'embarrassment,' demanding he resign over a range of issues including the Signal group chat, deploying Marines to Los Angeles amid protests and his views on Russia's war in Ukraine. 'I have called for your resignation. I didn't think you were qualified before your confirmation, and you have done nothing to inspire confidence in your ability to lead competently,' Carbajal said. The hearing caps off Hegseth's long week on Capitol Hill, which began on Tuesday with a relatively quiet House Appropriations defense subcommittee hearing. But on Wednesday, Hegseth faced heated questions from the Senate's version of the Appropriations panel, which bombarded Hegseth over the Russia-Ukraine war, the Pentagon's delays in delivering budget information and the administration's focus on Greenland in its Arctic strategy. Read the full report at Welcome to The Hill's Defense & National Security newsletter, I'm Ellen Mitchell — your guides to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect defense and national security now and inthe future: Rain, thunderstorms forecast for DC military parade Rain and thunderstorms are forecast for Saturday in the nation's capital, where a day of festivities and a military parade are scheduled to celebrate the U.S. Army's 250th birthday — which happens to coincide with President Trump's 79th birthday. The daylong festivities in Washington will take place mostly on the National Mall, where a fitness event will be held at 9:30 a.m. and a festival will kick off at 11 a.m. The festival … US troops begin detaining migrants on border defense zone U.S. troops at the southern border started detaining migrants last week as part of the 'Deep South Campaign' to prosecute individuals found trespassing in National Defense Areas (NDAs). President Trump has currently designated the U.S.-Mexico stretches between El Paso to Fort Hancock, Texas, as an NDA alongside the land line marking the country's boundaries in New Mexico. U.S. Army Lt. Col. Chad Campbell said three individuals … Newsom says Trump never discussed sending National Guard: 'Stone cold liar' California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said in a podcast episode Thursday that President Trump did not discuss sending the National Guard to Los Angeles when the two recently spoke to each other before Trump's announcement. 'He lied, he lied. On my mother and dad's grave. I don't mess around, when I say this, he lied. Stone cold liar,' Newsom said on The New York Times's 'The Daily.' Host Michael Barbaro had said the … On Our Radar Upcoming things we're watching on our beat: In Other News Branch out with a different read from The Hill: Senate Democrats calls for Noem to resign Multiple Senate Democrats on Thursday called for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign after Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was forcibly removed and later handcuffed for interrupting a press conference Noem held in Los Angeles. 'Kristi Noem should resign in disgrace,' Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) … On Tap Tomorrow Events in and around the defense world: What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets: Trending Today Two key stories on The Hill right now: Republicans lay groundwork for 'total tax cliff' at end of Trump's term Congressional Republicans are laying the groundwork for a tax cliff at the end of President Trump's term in office. While the conference is pushing … Read more Trump on 'No Kings' protests during military parade: 'I don't feel like a king' President Trump was asked Thursday to respond to planned counterprotests that will coincide with a military parade in the nation's capital to … Read more Opinions in The Hill Op-eds related to defense & national security submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Hegseth clashes with Democrats in third day of hearings
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday closed out his third and final day of hearings on Capitol Hill with several clashes with lawmakers as he dodged questions on invading Greenland, Ukraine aid, his use of the app Signal, and troop deployment in Los Angeles. Hegseth, in his first appearance before the House Armed Services Committee, was quickly hit with queries from panel Democrats, starting with ranking member Adam Smith (Wash.). Smith pressed the Pentagon chief on whether it is the Defense Department's policy that the U.S. military be prepared to take Greenland or Panama by force. Hegseth would not rule out the possibility of a future military invasion of the Arctic territory and Central American country, suggesting to lawmakers the Pentagon could have such plans and that the U.S. has an interest in protecting both areas from Chinese influence. The Defense Department 'plans for any particular contingency' he said, adding that 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for anything.' The answer caused Smith to scoff, replying: 'I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland. I'm going to go out on a limb on that one.' Smith also warned that the Trump administration is sending a message to the rest of the world 'that the U.S. is purely in it for itself and does not care about alliances' in seeking to take over its ally countries. President Trump for months has floated the possibility of using military force to take over Greenland and Panama by refusing to rule out such an action. The thought has alarmed allies, including Denmark, which owns Greenland and has opposed any U.S. efforts to take over the territory. Hegseth was later pressed by Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio), who implored him to confirm that 'it is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct? Because I sure as hell hope that it is not that.' Hegseth would only repeat that the 'Pentagon has plans for any number of contingencies' and that officials 'look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats.' Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.) took his five minutes to supply Hegseth with the most direct questioning he's yet faced on whether he shared classified information on U.S. attack plans in Yemen via the Signal messaging app. Moulton asked Hegseth whether when U.S. Central Command relayed the launch time for fighter jets set to strike Houthi militant targets in March — information the Pentagon chief would go on to share with at least two Signal group chats — the information was relayed on a classified or unclassified system. Hegseth declined to answer, asserting that 'any way that the secretary of Defense communicates or provides information in and of itself is classified and not to be discussed.' He also wouldn't say what the classification markings were on the information Central Command relayed, prompting Moulton to grow exasperated. 'It's not classified to disclose whether or not it was classified,' he said, eventually getting Hegseth to admit that he was not saying that the information was unclassified. 'So you took classified information from Central Command that had a classification marking on it — because that's what's required by DOD regulations — and you put it on an unclassified system,' Moulton stated, asking whether Hegseth plans to take any accountability for that. But Hegseth continued to dodge: 'I serve at the pleasure of the president, like everybody else does.' Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-Calif.) then lambasted the Defense secretary as an 'embarrassment,' demanding he resign over a range of issues including the Signal group chat, deploying Marines to Los Angeles amid protests and his views on Russia's war in Ukraine. 'I have called for your resignation. I didn't think you were qualified before your confirmation, and you have done nothing to inspire confidence in your ability to lead competently,' Carbajal said. Later, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pressed the secretary on U.S. military posture with Israel reportedly threatening an imminent attack on Iran. Khanna repeatedly asked Hegseth whether he could commit to not directly attacking Iran unless the Islamic Republic first fired on the United States. Hegseth would make no such assurance. 'It wouldn't be prudent for me to commit or not to commit. My job is to be postured and prepared,' Hegseth said. He also said Trump is 'giving Iran every opportunity, with talks ongoing, but he also fully recognizes the threat that Iran, with a nuclear blowup, would exist.' Khanna also asked Hegseth whether he would commit to following federal court or Supreme Court rulings regarding the Pentagon's extraordinary deployment of National Guard members and Marines into Los Angeles. But the Pentagon chief repeatedly dodged the question, saying only that 'my job right now is to ensure the troops that we have in Los Angeles are capable of supporting law enforcement.' After another effort, Hegseth said the U.S. should not have 'local judges determining foreign policy or national security policy for the country.' Khanna pointed to signals from others in the Trump administration, specifically Vice President Vance, that they could ignore court orders they disagree with. The hearing caps off Hegseth's long week on Capitol Hill, which began on Tuesday with a relatively quiet House Appropriations defense subcommittee hearing. But on Wednesday, Hegseth faced heated questions from the Senate's version of the Appropriations panel, which bombarded Hegseth over the Russia-Ukraine war, the Pentagon's delays in delivering budget information and the administration's focus on Greenland in its Arctic strategy.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Proposal Would Sell Off Millions of Acres of U.S. Public Lands
A new proposal being pushed by Republicans calls for the sale of millions of acres of public land after deeming them "eligible for disposal." Specifically, the Republican majority on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee is proposing that the U.S. government sell up to 3 million acres of public land. Why? The committee deduces that, by selling these millions of acres, revenue directed to the U.S. Treasury would help to hit revenue goals in the federal budget. Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), chairman of the committee, on Wednesday released the 69-page draft bill, which lists Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service land in most Western states as "eligible for disposal." Those states include Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. And, as first reported by Outdoor Life, Montana is conspicuously absent from the list of states possibly affected if the bill passes. The outlet reports that Montana's Congressional delegation has been vocal in their opposition to land sales or transfers. The bill's language calls for the "disposal not less than .50 percent and not more than 0.75 percent of National Forest System land, and shall dispose of all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to those tracts selected for disposal." The bill claims that selling off the public lands "would address local housing needs (including housing supply and affordability) or any associated community needs."Federally protected lands, such as national parks and national monuments, are safe from the sale. But as Outdoor Life reports, a sale of this magnitude would be "by far the biggest proposed federal land sale in modern U.S. history." The outlet also reports that Republican leadership stripped the land-sale provision from the so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" before kicking it up to the Senate, where Republicans have a wider majority versus a slim majority in the House. The bill, even if passed, would face a significant uphill battle, given that the bill's language also calls for the Secretary of the Interior to "consult with the Governor of the State in which the nominated tract is located regarding the suitability of the area for residential development; each applicable unit of local government; and each applicable Indian Tribe." In an effort to calm the waters among avid hunters and fishermen who have long opposed the sale of public lands, Lee shared video assuring the conservation community that they will not be affected. 'To our hunters, anglers, and sportsmen, you will not lose access to the lands you love," he said in the video. "Washington has proven it can't manage this land. This bill puts it in better hands.' New Proposal Would Sell Off Millions of Acres of U.S. Public Lands first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 12, 2025
