logo
Publishers, a library and others sue over Idaho's law restricting youth access to 'harmful' books

Publishers, a library and others sue over Idaho's law restricting youth access to 'harmful' books

Independent05-02-2025

Several large book publishers, a tiny public library and others are suing Idaho officials over a law that forces libraries to keep some books in an adults-only section if community members believe they are 'harmful to minors.'
The Donnelly Library, Penguin Random House and the others suing say the law is overly vague and violates the First Amendment rights of students, librarians and other residents by forcing libraries to sequester literary classics like 'Slaughterhouse-Five' and 'A Clockwork Orange.'
It's the second such lawsuit filed in Idaho. A coalition of small private schools and libraries sued last summer, and that case is ongoing. Similar cases have been filed in Arkansas, Iowa, Florida, Texas and other states with laws restricting access to books in libraries or schools.
'Many are first introduced to these books as minors at their schools or local libraries, under the guidance of trained professional educators and librarians,' the plaintiffs' attorneys wrote in the lawsuit filed in Idaho's federal court this week. 'Not anymore. Idaho now demands that public schools and public libraries either sequester these books — and others like them — away from young people or face the risk of challenge, litigation, and statutory damages for allowing these classic and valuable books to be accessed by minors.'
A spokesman for Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador, who is named as a defendant in the lawsuit, declined to comment because the case is pending.
Book banning efforts have soared recent years, according to the American Library Association. Public and school-based libraries have been flooded with complaints about allegedly inappropriate books, and the efforts often organized by conservative groups such as Moms for Liberty.
In some Republican-led states, lawmakers have responded by passing laws creating new punishments — including lawsuits, fines and even imprisonment — for libraries or individuals that distribute books deemed unsuitable. Some Democratic-led states including Washington and Illinois have responded by banning book bans.
Idaho's law took effect last year, requiring schools and public libraries to move material deemed 'harmful to minors' to an adults-only section or face lawsuits. If a community member complains that a book is harmful to minors, the library has 60 days to address it or children or their parents can sue for $250 in damages. The law relies on Idaho's legal definition of obscene materials, which includes 'any act of homosexuality."
At the time, the Idaho Library Association warned that the law was vague and subjective, and said it would likely lead to significantly limited access to information for the public.
In fact, that's exactly what happened, according to the lawsuit. The Donnelly Public Library operates the only after-school program in Donnelly, a town of about 250 residents, but it had to bar minors from entering unless a parent or guardian first completed a waiver.
That's because the library operates out of a small log cabin and a handful of teepees, and there is not enough room to create an adults-only section for some books like 'The Handmaid's Tale,' according to the lawsuit.
Christie Nichols, a librarian in the state's largest school district and one of the plaintiffs in the case, said she was instructed to pull roughly 30 books from her library at Rocky Mountain High School in Meridian and send them back to the West Ada School District headquarters, 'even though she believes these books have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for her students.' That's because the books were on a list of about 60 the district had deemed problematic.
Two students also joined in the lawsuit, including a 17-year-old from Lewiston who noted that even though he is taking college-level courses through his school's dual-credit program, he is restricted from accessing books that he feels he needs to foster his learning. An 18-year-old student from Meridian said in the lawsuit that even though she is now old enough to check out the restricted books from her school library, it's unclear how she can gain that access.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JD Vance divulges how Donald Trump really feels Elon Musk feud
JD Vance divulges how Donald Trump really feels Elon Musk feud

Daily Mirror

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

JD Vance divulges how Donald Trump really feels Elon Musk feud

JD Vance revealed how Donald Trump truly felt after his spectacular bromance breakdown with Elon Musk, which played out online, as the US Vice President addressed some major accusations JD Vance has revealed how Donald Trump really felt about this week's huge online spat between the President and Elon Musk. The bizarre bromance between the world's richest and world's most powerful men spectacularly broke down after petty insults and loaded accusations were thrown at one another through social media. The fallout came to a tense point on Thursday night when Musk claimed the President was "in the Epstein Files", before Trump claimed the Tesla boss "went crazy". The US Vice President spoke about the fight right when it was in the heat of the moment, on a podcast on Thursday. ‌ ‌ Vance gave a real time insight into how Trump was feeling, when Musk spiralled during their spat, which started about a tax bill disagreement. Vance, speaking to podcaster Theo Von, said: "I know the president, for a couple of days, I'll tell you, I don't want to reveal too many confidences, but he was getting a little frustrated, feeling like some of the criticisms were unfair coming from Elon." The Vice President also claimed that Trump had been restrained in his responses to the South African billionaire, who bought his way into Washington by pumping millions of dollars into the Republican's election campaign. Pinning the blame on Musk, Vance said: "But I think it's been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk. I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine." He also said Musk was new to politics but remarked it would be a "huge mistake" for the tech boss to go against Trump. The Vice President, in his podcast appearance, even spoke about Musk's post where he appeared to disagree with the idea Trump should be impeached and replaced with Vance. He said: "I just think the idea that the president should be impeached, I'm sorry, it's insane. It's totally insane." Musk shocked the world when he launched a "really big bomb" about the President, during his social media tirade. The tech billionaire claimed Trump "is in the Epstein files". Trump's name was released as previously sealed court documents were made public last year, in which he was named as an associate of the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. There is no suggestion Trump knew of any crimes or participated in any criminal behaviour. ‌ Vance also addressed this mammoth accusation, despite admitting he hadn't seen the post yet. Vance said: "Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein. Like, there's the guy is whatever the Democrats and the media says about him, that's totally BS." It was claimed that Trump and Musk had made up following a phone call after the feud. Trump however appeared to dismiss this idea yesterday in a call with ABC News' Chief Washington Correspondent Jonathan Karl. Karl said: "As for reports that there is going to be a Trump/Musk call scheduled for today, Trump told me he is 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk although he says Musk wants to talk to him."

Oscar winner says Hollywood friends 'cancelled' him as he voted for Donald Trump
Oscar winner says Hollywood friends 'cancelled' him as he voted for Donald Trump

Daily Mirror

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Oscar winner says Hollywood friends 'cancelled' him as he voted for Donald Trump

Producer Brian Grazer, a long-time Democratic donor, said the reaction he received after admitting he voted for Donald Trump made him feel like he was 'getting cancelled' An Oscar-winning producer has said he felt "cancelled" by his Hollywood friends because he voted for Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election. Brian Grazer, a long-time Democratic donor who identifies himself as "centrist", opened up about the reaction he received for supporting Trump during a new Fox Nation docuseries titled Art of the Surge. The behind-the-scenes documentary follows Trump's return to the White House - and in one scene, Brian can be seen alongside the then president-elect in a VIP box at the Army-Navy game. ‌ On that occasion, Brian book a photo with Trump and confessed to a group of surprised women in the box that he had voted for the Republican. At that point, the women asked him: "You mean, you're not voting for Kamala?" to which he replied: "I just can't do that." ‌ Brian explained: "And then, one of them leaned in further, and said, 'Are you voting for Trump?' And I said, 'I am. I swear!'" As part of the series, the producer, known for working on films such as A Beautiful Mind and Apollo 13, confessed the reaction he received made him feel like he was "getting cancelled." The New York Times reported that Brian explained his Trump vote by saying: "As a centrist, it was because I could feel and see Biden's deterioration and the lack of direction in the Democratic Party at that time." The second season of Art of the Surge, produced by former Tucker Carlson Tonight executive producer Justin Wells, is currently streaming on Fox Nation. Before voting for Trump, Brian reportedly donated to Kamala Harris in the past, and also raised money for other Democrats. After his confession emerged, fans took to Reddit to share their reactions - and while some agreed with his thought process, others said the fact that he no longer agreed with the direction of Democrats doesn't justify voting for Republicans, as there are "other choices" too. A person wrote: "Does he understand that if he doesn't like the Democrats he doesn't have to vote for Republicans? There are other choices." Another said: "He knew that as a rich person he'd be safe whichever party won. Not everyone has that privilege." A third expressed: "Every centrist is just a republican that is ashamed to admit it." One asked: "Does centrist mean something totally different in the US? In the UK it's synonymous with liberal (rather than left) and generally describes people who would never vote conservative. But in the US it seems to mean people who could happily vote far right?" Brian isn't the only Hollywood celebrity who voiced support for Trump. Other supporters of the president also include actor Mel Gibson, TV host Dr Phil, comedian Tony Hinchcliffe and actress Victoria Jackson.

Why did Donald Trump and Elon Musk fall out? Feud explained
Why did Donald Trump and Elon Musk fall out? Feud explained

Metro

time3 hours ago

  • Metro

Why did Donald Trump and Elon Musk fall out? Feud explained

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'The girls are fighting, aren't they?' This is how US congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez summarised the fallout between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. It would be funny if it were not two of the most powerful men in the world. Yes, their bromance has imploded in full public view, complete with snarky swipes, tantrums and accusations that could have huge legal implications. The first major cracks in their relationship showed at the end of last month on what turned out to be Musk's last day in the White House. The Tesla CEO had become bolder in expressing his dissent over Trump's budget and tax cut bill currently making its way through Congress. Asked about Musk's disapproval of his 'Big, Beautiful Bill', the US president told reporters last night: 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more.' Musk responded, lashing out further overnight, branding it a 'disgusting abomination' that will explode federal budget deficits. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' he wrote on X. The criticism quickly escalated into an all-out brawl between the pair, each on their own social media sites Truth Social and X, or in press conferences. Trump threatened to pull back billions of dollars in government contracts for Musk's companies, while the billionaire bit back, suggesting that Trump would have lost the election without him. It was Musk's tweet – linking Trump with the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein – that caused the most controversy. He alleged that the Republican leader is featured in the secret government files on rich and powerful former associates of thesex offender, reigniting long-running conspiracy theories. Musk posted: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' He later reposted a video from 1992 of Trump partying with Epstein and memes about their feud – amplifying them to his 220 million followers on X. Supporters on the conspiratorial end of Trump's base allege that Epstein's associates had their roles in his crimes covered up by government officials and others. They point the finger at Democrats and Hollywood celebrities, however, not at Trump himself. No official source has ever confirmed that the president appears in any of the material. Musk did not reveal which files he was talking about, and offered no actual evidence for his claim. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt on Thursday called Musk's behavior 'an unfortunate episode' adding the tycoon is 'unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' But the allegation prompted fresh demands for a release of the material – this time from Democrats keen on turning a MAGA conspiracy theory back on its proponents. The breakup could reshape both men's futures. For Musk, the stakes are potentially even higher. More Trending This was already evident minutes into the online feud as Tesla's stock price plunged 14%. The break risks intensified scrutiny of his business practices that could jeopardize government contracts and invite regulatory probes, which might threaten his companies' profits. For Trump, losing Musk's backing threatens his growing influence among tech donors, social media audiences, and younger male voters – all key groups that may now be harder to reach. It could also complicate fundraising ahead of next year's midterm elections. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: The Dark MAGA conspiracy about Trump, Musk and a new world order MORE: Zelensky refutes Trump's take on war and calls Putin 'murderer who came to kill the kids' MORE: Urgent recall of 1,700,000 air conditioners over fears they harbour mold

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store