
‘Overwhelmed, successor Justice Gavai will uphold Supreme Court's values': CJI Sanjiv Khanna demits office
Overwhelmed by the rich accolades on his last day at the Supreme Court, Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna on Tuesday (May 13, 2025) said he was certain his successor CJI-designate Justice B.R. Gavai would uphold values of the Supreme Court, fundamental rights and the basic constitutional doctrines.
The ceremonial Bench comprised the outgoing CJI, Justice Gavai, and Justice Sanjay Kumar, showcasing a rare moment of reflection, celebration, and reverence, not just for Justice Khanna's contributions, but the legacy of his uncle, former Supreme Court judge Justice H.R. Khanna, he took forward.
The CJI called Justice Gavai his "biggest support" while expressing confidence in the latter's leadership and commitment to constitutional values.
'What to say about justice and CJI designate B.R. Gavai, we got elevated the same year. Here we are in the collegium, and thereafter, we have interacted on several occasions. And I must say, he has been my biggest support. And I am sure that you have in Justice Gavai an excellent chief justice who's going to uphold the institution and who's going to uphold the fundamental rights who's going to uphold our basic doctrines which we have adopted and applied,' he said.
Also Read | No compromise if somebody hurts dignity of court, says Justice Gavai
In his parting remarks, Justice Khanna expressed gratitude, reflecting on the memories he carries from his years in the judiciary and said, 'I am overwhelmed.'
'I carry with me a lot of memories. Memories that are very nice and will remain with me throughout my life,' he said.
Emphasising the role of the bar and the bench in earning public trust, he shared, 'The judiciary is not just judges; it includes the bar. You are the conscious keepers of the system.'
CJI Khanna lauded the collegiality among judges from diverse regions and backgrounds, saying such diversity allowed for richer deliberations and more nuanced decisions.
'Another thing is the biggest plus factor in this court. We have judges from different parts of the country, and they with different thought processes, different backgrounds, they are able to when we discuss, we are able to find a lot of solutions. We were able to find out the right path,' he said.
Justice Gavai, who would assume the CJI office on May 14, said Justice Khanna "embraced his legacy" and built his own.
PROFILES | B.R. Gavai | A firm hand
He called it not a farewell but a transition and said, "What ends today is not a career, but the beginning of another."
Justice Gavai acknowledged the weight of legacy Justice Khanna bore as the nephew of Justice H.R. Khanna, the lone dissenter in the 1976 ADM Jabalpur case who stood for constitutional rights during the emergency.
'To walk in the shadow of such a name is no small task,' he said, 'but Justice Sanjiv Khanna did more than uphold that legacy he made it his own.'
Justice Gavai praised his predecessor for his clarity, moral conviction, and commitment to fundamental rights, describing his judgments as 'simple, elegant, and imbued with constitutional values'.
He also recalled their collegial relationship, noting their shared journey from elevation to the Supreme Court to collegium deliberations.
'It has been a privilege,' he said, 'and I extend my heartfelt gratitude.'
Justice Sanjay Kumar, who sat alongside the CJI for over 10 months, reflected candid and heartfelt insights into Justice Khanna's working style.
'He doesn't make notes. Everything: page numbers, paragraph numbers, contents come from memory,' he said.
Highlighting the outgoing CJI's calm and patient demeanour with lawyers, Justice Kumar said, 'Even when advocates came unprepared, he never lost his temper. Instead, he gently urged them to come prepared next time.'
The judge was all praises for Justice Khanna's 'single-minded focus and clarity of thought'.
'He approached every problem, whether judicial or administrative, with sincere intent and relentless commitment,' he said.
Justice Kumar added, 'Sitting with him, I learned that I also had to inculcate pragmatism into that perspective.'
Recalling one such occasion, the judge said a case he had to author would have otherwise remained pending if not for Justice Khanna's words of wisdom.
'I would have perhaps kept it pending. This was a procedural matter, and I was to write the judgment. When I discussed it with him, he pointed out that if I kept it pending, cases all over the country would just pile up, and that was not a good situation,' he said.
When it came to the bar, Attorney General R. Venkataramani said CJI Khanna added "immense value" to the court.
'Your lordship leaves a void not easily filled. Like a river flowing quietly, you accomplished much with grace,' he said.
The judgments the CJI penned were stated to carry "impeccable logic, simplicity, and elegance".
He underscored Justice Khanna's firm commitment to liberty, fairness, and institutional integrity aside from the values he upheld without personal bias, whether in procedural justice or constitutional interpretation.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta commended the CJI's legal acumen and clarity in judgment.
'Even if litigants lost, we lawyers felt enriched. We always left with a new insight,' he said, 'as your verdicts were crisp, clear, and always enlightening.'
He praised Justice Khanna's ability to maintain the distinction between legal judgment and academic treatise, consistently delivering concise and impactful rulings.
The Supreme Court Bar Association president and senior lawyer Kapil Sibal apart from other bar members and lawyers showered praises on the outgoing CJI.
A lawyer said the week saw country's two greats hang their boots, one of whom was the CJI and the other cricketer Virat Kohli.
"You are the streak across the sky that is never forgotten," Mr. Sibal said.
Mr. Sibal called Justice Khanna "a beacon of light" who elevated the stature of the court.
Saying he symbolised the best in a judge, Mr. Sibal went on, 'Your intuitive sense of justice, your transparency, and your encouragement to young lawyers will not be forgotten. You've set a standard for generations to come.'
Reflecting on Justice H.R. Khanna's historic dissent in the ADM Jabalpur case, Mr. Sibal drew a parallel and said, 'Today, that dissent echoes louder than the forgotten majority. And you, Justice Khanna, have carried that flame forward.'
'You may be retiring from the bench,' said another senior lawyer, 'but your service to the Constitution is far from over.'
Justice Khanna was elevated as the 51st Chief Justice of India on November 11, 2024, and demitted office on May 13, 2025.
His tenure, though brief, was marked by landmark decisions, transparency initiatives, and a steadfast commitment to judicial accountability and constitutional morality.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Rush Hour: SC directs Karnataka to release Kamal Haasan's film, Indians asked to leave Tehran & more
We're building a brand-new studio to bring you bold ground reports, sharp interviews, hard-hitting podcasts, explainers and more. Support Scroll's studio fund today. Criticising the 'extra-judicial ban' on the screening of the film Thug Life in Karnataka, the Supreme Court has directed the Congress government in the state to ensure its release. 'We cannot allow mobs and vigilante groups to take over the streets,' said the bench. The film, starring Kamal Haasan, had run into trouble in Karnataka after the actor and politician's remark that the Kannada language 'was born out of Tamil'. Asking Haasan to apologise for his remark, the High Court had on June 3 said that the actor's statements had caused 'unrest and disharmony' in Karnataka. The actor refused to apologise, saying he had 'no malice' behind his remarks. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court expressed disapproval of the High Court's directive asking Haasan to apologise. Read on. Indian citizens in Tehran have been asked to leave the Iranian capital by the Indian embassy. Additionally, Indians who are in Tehran but not in touch with the embassy have been asked to contact the diplomatic mission immediately and provide their location and contact numbers. Separately, the Ministry of External Affairs said that Indian students in the Iranian capital had been moved out of the city for 'reasons of safety' through arrangements made by the embassy. Some Indians were also facilitated to leave Iran through its border with Armenia. The development comes amid the latest round of the conflict between Israel and Iran. The conflict began on Friday when the Israeli military struck what it claimed were nuclear targets and also other sites in Iran with the aim of stalling Tehran's nuclear programme. The attacks have led to concerns of an escalation and a wider conflict in the region. Read on. The Karnataka High Court has restrained Bengaluru Police from arresting or taking any coercive action against officials of Royal Challengers Bengaluru or event management company DNA in connection with the stampede outside Bengaluru's Chinnaswamy Stadium. The decision follows the High Court's June 12 ruling, which declared the arrests as illegal. The court had also granted them interim bail. The four men were arrested on June 6, two days after the stampede that killed 11 persons and injured more than 50. Read on. Fugitive businessman Mehul Choksi has accused India of orchestrating his abduction from Antigua and Barbuda in 2021. Choksi has claimed the alleged event was to extradite him in connection with the Rs 13,000-crore Punjab National Bank fraud case. Choksi is one of the prime accused in the fraud case, along with his nephew Nirav Modi. He had fled India for Antigua and Barbuda in January 2018, a few weeks before the fraud came to light. In July 2021, Choksi had accused Indian agencies of trying to abduct him. The businessman had gone missing on May 23 that year from Antigua and Barbuda, and was detained in Dominica the next day. On Monday, Choksi's lawyers told London's High Court that only India had the motivation and resources to abduct him. India's lawyer Harish Salve said that 'there is no evidence of India having anything to do with the alleged events'.


United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
SC slams 'mob rule,' questions Karnataka's inaction over 'Thug Life' screening ban
New Delhi, June 17 (UNI): The Supreme Court on Tuesday took strong exception to the unofficial blockade of the Tamil film 'Thug Life' in Karnataka, warning against allowing mob threats and vigilante actions to undermine constitutional rights and the rule of law. A bench comprising Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice Manmohan was hearing a public interest litigation filed by Mahesh Reddy, who sought directions to ensure the film's release in Karnataka, where its screening has been obstructed by fringe groups following controversial remarks made by actor-producer Kamal Haasan. Haasan had reportedly stated that Kannada originated from Tamil, which sparked backlash from pro-Kannada organisations. Voicing concern at the outset of the hearing, Justice Bhuyan said, 'We cannot allow the streets to be taken over by mobs and vigilantes. If someone has made a statement, respond with another statement, not with threats or violence. This is not how a democracy functions.' The petitioner alleged that despite the film having received certification from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), it has not been released in Karnataka due to fear of attacks on cinema halls. The state, he argued, has failed to act against those issuing open threats. Justice Manmohan strongly reinforced this view, stating, 'Once a film is certified by the CBFC, it must be allowed to release. The state cannot cite fear of arson to justify inaction. People are free to choose not to watch the film, but the right to screen it must be upheld.' When the state's counsel mentioned that the producer had approached the Karnataka High Court and was in talks with the Film Chamber, the bench expressed dissatisfaction, especially with the High Court's reported suggestion that Haasan should apologise for his comment. 'That is not the business of the High Court,' Justice Bhuyan remarked sharply. 'This is a question of fundamental rights and freedom of speech, which this court is duty-bound to protect.' The bench further observed that the producer's individual decision not to screen the film cannot substitute the state's legal obligation. Justice Manmohan added, 'Is the rule of law subject to one person's stand? Let there be debate, not intimidation.' Referring to past precedents, Justice Bhuyan cited the Bombay High Court's ruling in the Me Nathuram Godse Boltoy case, which upheld freedom of expression despite a controversial content. 'Even if someone is revered as the Father of the Nation, a differing view cannot be banned,' he noted, in the context of protecting speech that may be unpopular. The court ordered that the pending petition before the Karnataka High Court regarding the film's release be transferred to the Supreme Court. The matter will be heard next on June 19. Earlier, on June 13, the court had issued notice to the Karnataka government after being apprised that the state had 'surrendered' to threats from extremist elements opposing the release. The petitioner also cited public threats from pro-Kannada groups, including a call by Karnataka Rakshana Vedike to burn theatres screening Kamal Haasan's films. The plea urges the Supreme Court to direct the state to provide police protection to cinemas and multiplexes willing to show the film, and to initiate criminal proceedings against those inciting violence. It also seeks to restrain the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce and other bodies from enforcing or calling for any informal bans. Despite the global release of 'Thug Life' on June 5, the film remains unreleased in Karnataka, effectively curtailed by what the petition describes as a 'campaign of fear and silence.' The producers maintain that they have been denied their fundamental rights under Article 19 of the Constitution. UNI SNG PRS


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
'We Have To Abide..': DK Shivakumar On Screening Of 'Thug Life' In Karnataka
Bengaluru: Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar on Tuesday appealed to Kannada activists to abide by the Supreme Court order, which directed the state government to ensure the screening of the Kamal Haasan-starrer movie 'Thug Life'. Kannada activists have been up in arms against the screening of the movie after the 70-year-old actor's comments about the language sparked a major controversy. They staged protests, lodged police complaints and warned film theatres not to screen the movie, alleging that Mr Haasan insulted Kannada without knowing its rich history. The Supreme Court on Tuesday came down heavily on the Karnataka government after 'Thug Life' was not screened in theatres in the state. The court said mobs and vigilantes cannot be allowed to take over the streets. Reacting to the court order, Mr Shivakumar said, "We have to abide by the Supreme Court order with honour. Everyone has limitations. I appeal to various organisations that we must have our limitations...I appeal to all the Kannada activists, please be calm, we should respect the court. No one should take the law into their hands," he said. The deputy chief minister underlined that Karnataka has always been a peace-loving state. Noting that there is nothing wrong in expressing an opinion, Mr Shivakumar said the state government too gave activists a chance to express their views. He appealed to the people of Bengaluru to be generous. "We have accommodated all the castes, languages and culture in Bengaluru. This is an international city. The people of Karnataka have always been large-hearted," he underlined. He also pointed out that no one can spoil the self-esteem of Kannada and the state government is also in favour of it, but one has to honour the court. 'Thug Life' released in cinema halls across the country on June 5.