logo
Multiunit homebuyers are turning sour on Portland

Multiunit homebuyers are turning sour on Portland

Yahoo07-05-2025

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
May 7—Just a few years ago, when a multifamily home in Portland hit the market, real estate agents could hardly keep up with the demand. Dozens of showings in a matter of days, sometimes tens of offers, almost all well over the asking price.
But last year, the same kind of two- or three-unit building drew only a trickle of visitors, maybe one or two offers. For the first time in years, agents were seeing listings expire.
"It seemed like we could hardly get anyone to come look at anything," said Brit Vitalius, principal and designated broker at Portland's Vitalius Real Estate Group.
The number of unsold two- to four-unit buildings in Portland dropped 91% last year, compared to 2023, according to the Vitalius group's 2025 market report. The listings expired, were withdrawn or were canceled.
Multiunits in Portland had long been "the gold standard" for both investors and young people looking to break into real estate. What changed?
Industry experts say Portland's market is finally saturated. The combination of high prices (the median two-unit sold for $729,000 last year), rent control and competition from newer apartment buildings with swanky amenities has stripped away some of the allure for live-in landlords and investors alike.
With prices in surrounding cities like Saco and Biddeford also climbing, many of these would-be buyers instead set their sights on lower-priced areas like Lewiston and Auburn.
"It's turning my world on its head," said Vitalius, who specializes in multiunit sales. "It's harder to sell in Portland now than it is in non-Portland cities."
DOING THE MATH
Tom Landry, owner of Benchmark Real Estate in Portland, has also noticed the slowdown.
A lot of prospective buyers look at buildings like The Casco and The Armature featuring amenities like rooftop pools and pet spas, and they hear announcements of more units coming to Washington Avenue or Thompson's Point. Owners of the city's traditional three-deckers are suddenly competing against luxuries they can't match. They start to worry, Landry said.
"(Portland's) population is growing, but it's just barely growing," he said.
The city's rent control ordinance could also have a dampening effect.
City voters approved the ordinance in November 2020, and it went into effect Jan. 1, 2021. It ties housing costs to inflation in the region by capping annual rent increases at 70% of the consumer price index for that year — for 2025 the maximum increase is 2.5%
"As the market is mellowing out, people are doing the math," Vitalius said.
The added inventory, coupled with rent control, has helped to slow the rapid rent increases, and buyers can't charge enough to recoup their investment.
"(So) they look to other areas," Landry said.
'IT'S STILL NOT AFFORDABLE'
The draw of an owner-occupied building was once that a first-time homebuyer could buy an old two- or three-unit, move into one and fix up the others, ultimately increasing the value, and therefore the rent, to help pay down the mortgage.
But with the average multiunit in Portland creeping up on $1 million, the initial purchase — let alone the money for renovations — feels out of reach.
"Even if two people are really kind of killing it," Landry said, "it's still not affordable."
But in Lewiston and Auburn, where the average two-unit sold for $335,000 last year, it feels more achievable.
Landry purchased a two-unit home in Auburn in 2023 for $180,000. He put in a little work, made a few updates and sold it in January for just under $600,000.
That property would have been listed for $1.3 to $1.5 million in Portland, he said.
The price growth for multiunit sales in Portland appears to be slowing. According to data from Vitalius, the median sale price for multiunit buildings increased just 2% between 2023 and 2024, to a median of $822,500.
Between 2019 and 2024, the median sale price increased 61%.
In Lewiston-Auburn, however, the median increased 13% between 2023 and 2024 to $386,000. That's a 156% increase from 2019.
PRICES UNAPPEALING TO INVESTORS
There have always been investors who decide to forgo Portland in favor of Lewiston, Vitalius said, but there used to be trade-offs. The properties were in worse conditions, the tenants were harder to work with.
But as Portland has gotten more expensive, the gap in desirability between the two cities has narrowed.
While Lewiston-Auburn's growth has outpaced Portland's, multiunit sales are still, on average, slowing there, too. Sales activity in both metro areas was still below prepandemic norms.
The number of unsold listings in the Twin Cities increased from 29 to 42, or 71%, between 2023 and 2024.
Vitalius blamed prices for the declines in both Portland and Lewiston-Auburn, but for different reasons. In Portland, he said, prices are simply too high. The median sale price for a three-unit last year was $800,000. It cost $1 million for a four-unit.
In Lewiston, he mused, sellers could have been "reaching" for that higher price point, listing something to see if it could sell for more and then when it didn't, deciding to hold onto it. The median price for a three-unit last year was $400,000, and $465,000 for a four-unit.
David Foster, an associate broker with the Fontaine Family real estate group, said the area is particularly good for owner-occupied buyers, but like in Portland, the rising prices are starting to turn off investors.
For some investors and their spreadsheets, the cost of buying the building and rehabbing the units compared to the rent they can feasibly get in the area is getting harder to justify.
In Lewiston, the fair-market rent for a two-bedroom apartment is $1,268, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. In 2019, it was $915 — just a 38% increase, compared to the 156% increase in home prices.
"It's not finding a house that catches your heart and you'll do anything to be there," he said. "Investors look at numbers and 'does this make sense or not?'"
Increasingly, the answer is no.
'A GOOD PLACE TO LIVE'
But for first-time homebuyers looking for an owner-occupied situation, the Twin Cities are an attractive option.
There are federal and state loan programs and grants that can help with the down payment and closing costs, and the generally lower price point makes it more affordable, according to Tony Poulin, a broker with Meservier and Associates in Auburn.
If a person is willing to commute the 45 or so minutes to Portland, it's a smart investment, he said.
Poulin said that reasonably priced buildings are still selling quickly but that he doesn't expect to see as much drastic price appreciation this year.
Amato Polselli, an associate broker with Benchmark who grew up in the Lewiston area, said there's a lot to love about the area.
It's affordable and has easy access to the highway, he said. Like Portland, the buildings are older, "so they have a charm factor," but they generally have more outdoor space.
The area has great restaurants and breweries, as well as a burgeoning arts and culture scene, Foster added.
"It's definitely a good place to live."
Copy the Story Link

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trading Day-War fears crush confidence
Trading Day-War fears crush confidence

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trading Day-War fears crush confidence

ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - - TRADING DAY Making sense of the forces driving global markets By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist A week that started with investors in a reasonably optimistic mood, betting that the U.S. and China would strike a deal in their trade talks in London, ended on a sour note as Israel's strike on Iran sparked a sharp rise in oil prices and a selloff in world stocks. Washington and Beijing did reach a 'framework' deal, and although there is some ambiguity around the details and it has yet to be ratified, it helped ease global tariff tensions. Investor sentiment was also boosted by signs that global inflation pressures are cooling. Consumer and producer price inflation figures from the U.S., Japan, India and China were all weaker than expected, although the big caveat is the impact of tariffs has yet to be properly felt. Strong demand for long-dated U.S. Treasuries at auction this week also soothed concerns over U.S. debt sustainability. President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill', the budget deficit and federal debt still loom over the market, but there was a temporary reprieve this week. Not so for the dollar. It slumped to its weakest level against a basket of currencies in more than three years and failed to draw any discernible 'safe haven' demand from the flaring geopolitical risk and tensions in the Middle East. Non-U.S. investors continue to reassess their exposure to dollar-denominated assets. Those wanting to cut their exposure will either sell assets outright, buy less, or hedge more. Many long-term investors in Europe are increasing their hedge ratios, which effectively equates to selling dollars on a large scale. The other big move of the week was oil, which surged nearly 10% at one point on Friday. It cooled a bit, but the specter of high energy prices is suddenly back. If so, what does that do for the inflation outlook? We may get an insight into what policymakers think about that next week. The G7 leaders' summit in Canada gets underway on Sunday, and three of the world's most important central banks deliver their latest policy decisions - the Federal Reserve, Bank of Japan and Bank of England. I'd love to hear from you, so please reach out to me with comments at . You can also follow me at @ReutersJamie and @ This Week's Key Market Moves * Oil. Brent crude rose 12% this week and WTI rose 13.5% -at one point they were up nearly 10% on Friday alone - markingthe biggest weekly rise since February and October, 2022,respectively. * Gold ends the week 3.5% higher, within $50 of April'srecord high $3,500/oz. * The dollar weakens 1%, ending the week near three-yearlows, while the euro rises 1.3%, having traded above $1.16earlier this week for the first time since 2021. * U.S. Treasury yields fall after weak economic data, strongauctions. But weekly declines at the long end of the curve arevirtually halved by Friday's spike. * World stocks and Wall Street end slightly lower. TheMSCI World hits record highs earlier in the week but Friday'sweakness bites. The S&P 500 falls 0.5% on the week, MSCI Worldsheds 0.3%. Chart of the Week My generosity knows no bounds, so two charts for you again this week. Both highlight current relative market price dynamics that have not been seen for around half a century. The first from Bank of America shows that, in dollar terms, emerging market stocks are the weakest relative to U.S. stocks in 50 years. BofA analysts are in no doubt what investors should do: "long EM... easy allocation decision." I wrote about this last month. The second chart is from veteran strategist Jim Paulsen, who calculates that the market cap value of U.S. fixed income assets as a share of total U.S. equity market cap is the smallest in over 50 years. Along with a historically low equity risk premium, it raises the question of how much further the gap between stocks and bonds can widen. Emerging markets and bonds, your time is ... now? Here are some of the best things I read this week: 1. Dealing with Trump: Dos and don'ts 2. The 2025 trade war: Dynamic impacts across US states andthe global economy 3. The Dollar's Global Role and the Financing of the Deficit - Brad Setser 4. Abundance for Workers - Dani Rodrik 5. Bruce Springsteen faces the end of America What could move markets on Monday? * China's monthly "data dump" - house prices, industrialproduction, retail sales, investment, unemployment (May) * India wholesale price inflation (May) * U.S. 20-year bond auction * U.S. New York Fed manufacturing index (June) * G7 leaders' summit in Calgary, Canada Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. Trading Day is also sent by email every weekday morning. Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also sign up here. (Writing by Jamie McGeever; Editing by Bill Berkrot) Sign in to access your portfolio

Trading Day-War fears crush confidence
Trading Day-War fears crush confidence

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trading Day-War fears crush confidence

ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - - TRADING DAY Making sense of the forces driving global markets By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist A week that started with investors in a reasonably optimistic mood, betting that the U.S. and China would strike a deal in their trade talks in London, ended on a sour note as Israel's strike on Iran sparked a sharp rise in oil prices and a selloff in world stocks. Washington and Beijing did reach a 'framework' deal, and although there is some ambiguity around the details and it has yet to be ratified, it helped ease global tariff tensions. Investor sentiment was also boosted by signs that global inflation pressures are cooling. Consumer and producer price inflation figures from the U.S., Japan, India and China were all weaker than expected, although the big caveat is the impact of tariffs has yet to be properly felt. Strong demand for long-dated U.S. Treasuries at auction this week also soothed concerns over U.S. debt sustainability. President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill', the budget deficit and federal debt still loom over the market, but there was a temporary reprieve this week. Not so for the dollar. It slumped to its weakest level against a basket of currencies in more than three years and failed to draw any discernible 'safe haven' demand from the flaring geopolitical risk and tensions in the Middle East. Non-U.S. investors continue to reassess their exposure to dollar-denominated assets. Those wanting to cut their exposure will either sell assets outright, buy less, or hedge more. Many long-term investors in Europe are increasing their hedge ratios, which effectively equates to selling dollars on a large scale. The other big move of the week was oil, which surged nearly 10% at one point on Friday. It cooled a bit, but the specter of high energy prices is suddenly back. If so, what does that do for the inflation outlook? We may get an insight into what policymakers think about that next week. The G7 leaders' summit in Canada gets underway on Sunday, and three of the world's most important central banks deliver their latest policy decisions - the Federal Reserve, Bank of Japan and Bank of England. I'd love to hear from you, so please reach out to me with comments at . You can also follow me at @ReutersJamie and @ This Week's Key Market Moves * Oil. Brent crude rose 12% this week and WTI rose 13.5% -at one point they were up nearly 10% on Friday alone - markingthe biggest weekly rise since February and October, 2022,respectively. * Gold ends the week 3.5% higher, within $50 of April'srecord high $3,500/oz. * The dollar weakens 1%, ending the week near three-yearlows, while the euro rises 1.3%, having traded above $1.16earlier this week for the first time since 2021. * U.S. Treasury yields fall after weak economic data, strongauctions. But weekly declines at the long end of the curve arevirtually halved by Friday's spike. * World stocks and Wall Street end slightly lower. TheMSCI World hits record highs earlier in the week but Friday'sweakness bites. The S&P 500 falls 0.5% on the week, MSCI Worldsheds 0.3%. Chart of the Week My generosity knows no bounds, so two charts for you again this week. Both highlight current relative market price dynamics that have not been seen for around half a century. The first from Bank of America shows that, in dollar terms, emerging market stocks are the weakest relative to U.S. stocks in 50 years. BofA analysts are in no doubt what investors should do: "long EM... easy allocation decision." I wrote about this last month. The second chart is from veteran strategist Jim Paulsen, who calculates that the market cap value of U.S. fixed income assets as a share of total U.S. equity market cap is the smallest in over 50 years. Along with a historically low equity risk premium, it raises the question of how much further the gap between stocks and bonds can widen. Emerging markets and bonds, your time is ... now? Here are some of the best things I read this week: 1. Dealing with Trump: Dos and don'ts 2. The 2025 trade war: Dynamic impacts across US states andthe global economy 3. The Dollar's Global Role and the Financing of the Deficit - Brad Setser 4. Abundance for Workers - Dani Rodrik 5. Bruce Springsteen faces the end of America What could move markets on Monday? * China's monthly "data dump" - house prices, industrialproduction, retail sales, investment, unemployment (May) * India wholesale price inflation (May) * U.S. 20-year bond auction * U.S. New York Fed manufacturing index (June) * G7 leaders' summit in Calgary, Canada Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. Trading Day is also sent by email every weekday morning. Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also sign up here. (Writing by Jamie McGeever; Editing by Bill Berkrot) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump says 'changes' are coming to immigration enforcement after complaints from farmers and the hospitality industry
Trump says 'changes' are coming to immigration enforcement after complaints from farmers and the hospitality industry

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says 'changes' are coming to immigration enforcement after complaints from farmers and the hospitality industry

Trump is signaling that changes are coming to immigration enforcement. He said that farmers and people in the hospitality industry are losing good workers. "We're going to have to use a lot of common sense," Trump said. There may be some changes coming to the Trump administration's approach to immigration enforcement. President Donald Trump said in a Truth Social post on Thursday that both farmers and "people in the Hotel and Leisure business" have said that his approach to immigration enforcement "is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace." "In many cases the Criminals allowed into our Country by the VERY Stupid Biden Open Borders Policy are applying for those jobs," Trump added. "This is not good. We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!" At a White House event later on Thursday, he said that "we're going to have an order on that pretty soon, I think." "We can't do that to our farmers," Trump said. "We're going to have to use a lot of common sense." It comes one day after Tom Homan, the Executive Associate Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations, told Semafor that the administration would begin prosecuting companies that employ immigrants living in the country illegally. According to Census data, the agriculture and leisure industries have relatively high proportions of non-US citizen workers. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store