
PMQs Review: U-turn if you want, the lady's not listening
Were Kemi Badenoch the interviewer, and her interviewee not only turned up to the studio clad in a garish yellow jumper proclaiming 'I THREATENED TO OVERRULE HIM', but also beginning the grilling by loudly singing 'I threatened to overrule him' to the tune of Katy Perry's I Kissed A Girl, it is entirely possible the Tory leader would have still asked the question 12 times. That was the takeaway from today's PMQs.
In 1997, then Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman famously asked home secretary Michael Howard the same question 12 times in an interview. Evaded over and over again on a point central to a scandal which has long since been forgotten, the rottweiler repeated, 'Did you threaten to overrule him?' while Howard found various artful ways to avoid confirming or denying the threat. (On Paxman's final show, 17 years later, Howard confirmed he did not threaten to overrule whoever it was he was accused of threatening to overrule, thus rendering the whole thing a complete waste of everybody's time).
Keir Starmer committed the cardinal sin of prime minister's questions today: he created news. PMQs is not supposed to be the place to do news: it is for avoiding saying anything interesting, hopefully clobbering your opponent around the head a few times and allowing a backbench MP from Dimwit-upon-Sea to ask if you'll join him in congratulating his local non-league team on making the play-offs.
So it was not without shock that Starmer had something to say, and had tasked an obscure backbench MP to tee him up with a question straight from the whips' office.
'While the economy is showing signs of improving, many pensioners are still impacted by the cost of living crisis,' asked Sarah Owen (Luton North). 'People in Luton who have worked hard all their lives are seeing their precious savings slip away. Will the prime minister tell us what measures he will take to help struggling pensioners in towns like mine?'.
Starmer took a deep breath, engaged the clutch and prepared to swing his metaphorical car in the opposite direction. Following a preamble about the absolute state his predecessors left the economy in, he said: 'I recognise that people are still feeling the pressure of the cost of living crisis, including pensioners, and as the economy improves, we want to make sure that people feel those improvements each day as their lives go forward.
'That is why we want to ensure that more pensioners are eligible for winter fuel payments as we go forward. As you would expect, Mr Speaker, we will make only the decisions that we can afford, and that is why we will look at that as part of a fiscal event.'
And there you go: an actual, screeching, 180-degree U-turn on the most contentious act of the Labour government's programme since returning to office almost 10 months ago. All performed in front of the leader of the opposition. Surely even Kemi couldn't stuff this up?
Except, of course, she could. To be fair, she could have been thinking about something else entirely while Starmer performed a humiliating U-turn both expensive and almost certainly too late to win back any support lost: the exact wording of her first question, what to have for dinner tonight, whether the mooted cuts to Loose Women would have an impact on her post-leadership career plans. Whatever, she wasn't listening.
'It was extraordinary listening to that last answer from the prime minister,' said the woman who'd not been listening. 'Inflation was two per cent when the Conservatives left office; it is now nearly double that. When will he recognise that it is Labour's Budget that is driving up inflation?'.
What? Starmer couldn't believe his luck. 'What the right honourable lady forgot to say was that inflation rose to more than 11% on the Conservatives' watch, and she did not say a word,' he began, before launching another attack on the Tories' record and oddly quoting George Osborne's podcast approvingly. Had she missed it?
Following a second question (also on inflation) and third (on tax rises), by the fourth she finally asked her question. 'I shall ask him a simple question. It requires only one word: yes or no. Is he planning to U-turn on winter fuel cuts?,' she asked the man who, just a few minutes ago and two sword-length's away, had announced he was planning to U-turn on winter fuel cuts.
'I made it clear in my earlier answer that as the economy improves, we want to take measures that will impact people's lives, so we will look at the threshold, but that will have to be part of a fiscal event,' repeated Starmer.
'I made it really easy for the prime minister, ' fumed Badenoch. 'It was a simple question – yes or no – and he could not answer it. I wonder how the public feel about a man who cannot give a straight answer to a simple question.' And on she went: 'Hands up who here wanted winter fuel cuts? Not a single one of them. The fact is, this prime minister is destroying them. They need to look at what they are doing to the country.'
The Tory leader might have been better turning around and asking for a show of hands among her own MPs as to who still wanted her, or might prefer a leader with an ability to think even slightly on their feet – this had been woeful.
A few weeks ago, Keir Starmer made a joke at PMQs and it was genuinely funny. It is with some regret that we must report he has taken the lesson from it that he is a comedian, and he must be stopped immediately. Or we will get more of this sort of nonsense in response to a question about immigration from Reform foghorn Lee Anderson.
'It is very good that the honourable member is standing in for the honourable member for Clacton today,' joshed the prime minister of Nigel Farage, reported to be on holiday in France. 'There was no sign of him yesterday at the EU summit. He was the first through the e-gates to somewhere in the south of France: Nice work if you can get it!'.
Alas for Starmer, the Hansard recording doesn't note that he pronounced 'Nice' like the French city, in France, like where Farage is. Geddit? It is to Badenoch's shame that, following this joke and the first handbrake turn of his premiership yet, the prime minister still came out on top in this session.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Edinburgh Live
42 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Live
Fiona Bruce forced to intervene as BBC guest yells 'do something'
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Question Time's Fiona Bruce was compelled to interrupt the BBC programme when an audience member persistently implored: "Do something!" The show witnessed a fiery exchange on Thursday evening as Labour's transport secretary Heidi Alexander encountered a tough question on the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict from a woman in the audience. The tension mounted when the woman, starting off composed, accused the Labour Party of betrayal: "I feel such a sense of betrayal from the Labour Party. I would never vote Tory, I would never vote UKIP [Reform UK] and I used to vote Labour. "Why are you still friends with Israel, an apartheid state, and why are you still- why is the Labour Party still sending components of F-35 weapons to Israel that are killing and targeting babies, children, hospitals, schools? Enough of this rhetoric about being anti-Semitic if you support Palestinian babies and children." The scenario intensified, prompting Fiona to intervene, saying: "Okay, okay, let's let Heidi answer." However, the audience member pressed on: "Wait! I just want to ask Tim [Montgomerie] something as well." Fiona had to cut in: "Well hang on, because I've only got about 30 seconds left, so I'm going to let Heidi answer, forgive me." Despite the interruption, the woman continued: "And then please-" but Fiona relented, "If I have time, but I must let Heidi answer that." Attempting to refute the claim, Heidi started: "We're not sending F-35 components-" (Image: BBC) Yet she was sharply interrupted by the insistent audience member, reports the Express. They asserted: "You are still sending components of F-35 weapons, yes you are." Fiona interjected with: "Let her answer," amid uproar, but the disgruntled audience member continued, vociferously proclaiming: "You have reduced weapons by only 8% to Israel! By 8%!" which led Fiona to concede: "I hear your passion, I must let her answer." Heidi managed to voice her view amidst the clamour: "I find it as sickening and as harrowing as every single person in this audience seeing those images on television of children wandering around rubble who are never going to find their parents and who are being starved to death. That is why we have got to find a way-" but was swiftly interrupted again as the passionate spectator interjected: "Do something!" (Image: BBC) Nevertheless, Heidi continued: "-of finding a sustainable solution to the region and lasting peace, and getting significant humanitarian aid in. Because none of us want to wake up tomorrow and see those scenes on our television screens, and I think every single one of us on that panel would agree with that sentiment." Concluding the discussion, Fiona remarked: "Listen, we will come back to the subject of Gaza, there is no question about that. "We've covered it many times and we will cover it again, and I hear your passion about this subject and everyone on the panel understands that you feel very strongly about it." Question Time is available to watch on BBC iPlayer.


The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Revealed: How Farage's £80bn tax cuts would benefit the richest most
Nigel Farage 's claim Reform UK is the 'party of workers' has been called into question as figures show his plans to slash taxes would benefit the richest most. The Reform leader on Tuesday outlined up to £80bn of welfare and tax handouts - without saying how he would fund them - in a bid to entice Labour voters, declaring 'Reform really are now the party of working people'. But economists have warned that the billions of pounds worth of unfunded pledges would cause economic chaos and say Mr Farage's plans would benefit top earners far more than those on the lowest incomes. The centrepiece of Mr Farage's tax plans was a pledge to lift the tax-free income allowance from £12,500 to £20,000, costing between £50bn and £80bn per year. Stuart Adam, a senior economist at the influential Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), said 'the biggest beneficiaries are the top 10 per cent'. 'It mainly benefits the better off,' he told The Independent. He said: 'We are talking about the upper middle [class] being the biggest beneficiaries as a percentage of income, and the best off being the biggest beneficiaries in cash terms.' Mr Adam said around a third of adults already earn too little to pay income tax, while the changes would also penalise those on universal credit, as any uplift in their take-home pay would be clawed back in lower welfare payments. He said a better way of targeting specifically 'working people' with the tax cut would be to target employee national insurance, which is only paid by those in work. Calculations for The Independent by the research institute Policy Engine reveal that Mr Farage's plans to hike the tax-free income allowance would boost the incomes of the bottom tenth of earners by 1.3 per cent. By contrast, the calculations show that the top 10 per cent of earners would see their incomes boosted by 4.2 per cent under Reform's plans. Max Mosley, senior economist at the New Economics Foundation, told The Independent that Reform's attempts to appear progressive on issues such as winter fuel payments and the removal of the two-child benefit cap are 'a distraction'. He said: 'It comes as part of a wider set of reforms which include regressive tax changes and cuts to public services working people rely on. When we put all their policies together it is the wealthiest households that benefit the most, and poorest who will see the smallest difference in their standard of living. 'Being a 'party of workers' does not mean giving pennies to the poorest and pounds to the richest.' Reform UK said its plans would 'undoubtedly help working people and benefit the lowest earners'. A spokesman said: 'Our plans to scrap the two-child benefit cap will lift 350,000 children out of poverty, while raising the tax-free salary allowance to £20,000 will save every worker almost £1,500 a year, putting an extra £30 per week back in people's pockets. 'This is in stark contrast to this government, who hiked national insurance for working people and stripped winter fuel payments from over 10 million pensioners.' But it came after an extraordinary speech on Thursday, which showed the severity of the threat Sir Keir believes Labour faces from Reform, in which he directly attacked Mr Farage's tax plans. The prime minister said: 'The question you have to ask about Nigel Farage is, can you trust him? 'Can you trust him with your future? Could you trust him with your jobs? Could you trust him with your mortgages? Your pensions? Your bills? 'He gave the answer on Tuesday - a resounding no. He set out economic plans that contain billions upon billions of completely unfunded spending, precisely the sort of irresponsible splurge that sent your mortgage costs, your bills, and the cost of living through the roof. 'It's Liz Truss all over again.' Sir Keir said Labour was elected to clean up the mess left by Ms Truss, and that 'we are once again fighting the same fantasy, this time from Farage'. And Labour MPs lashed out at Mr Farage over the plans. Dover and Deal MP Mike Tapp, one of Mr Farage's most prominent critics in the Commons, said: 'Nigel Farage is a rich bloke who is trying to trick the public into thinking he is a working class hero. 'His policies speak the truth, in it for himself and his rich mates. Reform have voted against all of Labour's policies standing up for working people…don't be fooled.' Bury North MP James Frith added: 'Farage's plans would prioritise those at the top and be a hammer-blow for family finances through a return to the chaos of Liz Truss. Only the Labour Government can be trusted to drive growth in every part of our country to give working people the security they deserve and our country the renewal it needs."


Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
BBC's Fiona Bruce tells Question Time guest 'hang on' in heated debate
BBC's Fiona Bruce tells Question Time guest 'hang on' in heated debate BBC Question Time host Fiona Bruce was forced to intervene as one guest screamed "do something" at Labour's transport secretary Heidi Alexander on the panel. Fiona Bruce was compelled to momentarily halt the proceedings of BBC's Question Time as a persistent audience member demanded action, imploring: "Do something!" The scene unfolded on Thursday night, when during a fervent exchange on the Israel-Palestine conflict, a woman confronted Labour's transport secretary Heidi Alexander, questioning the party's relationship with what she called "an apartheid state." The interaction commenced with the audience member expressing a sense of betrayal, they said: "I feel such a sense of betrayal from the Labour Party. "I would never vote Tory, I would never vote UKIP [Reform UK] and I used to vote Labour. Why are you still friends with Israel, an apartheid state, and why are you still- why is the Labour Party still sending components of F-35 weapons to Israel that are killing and targeting babies, children, hospitals, schools? Enough of this rhetoric about being anti-Semitic if you support Palestinian babies and children." BBC's Fiona Bruce tells Question Time guest 'hang on' in heated debate Casualty star Olly Rix addresses future on BBC medical drama READ MORE: As tensions mounted, Fiona stepped in, stating: "Okay, okay, let's let Heidi answer." When the woman attempted to question panelist Tim Montgomerie, Fiona interjected: "Well hang on, because I've only got about 30 seconds left, so I'm going to let Heidi answer, forgive me." Despite Fiona's attempt to steer the discussion back, the woman pressed on, reports the Express. She said: "And then please-" prompting Fiona to respond: "If I have time, but I must let Heidi answer that." Heidi Alexander was barely allowed to get her words out (Image: BBC ) Heidi tried to clarify the Labour Party's position, stating: "We're not sending F-35 components-" but was interrupted by the insistent audience member who countered loudly: "You are still sending components of F-35 weapons, yes you are." Fiona stated: "Let her answer," despite the disruption, as a woman in the audience passionately interjected. They continued: "You have reduced weapons by only 8% to Israel! By 8%!" while Fiona acknowledged: "I hear your passion, I must let her answer." Heidi was granted a moment to speak, saying: "I find it as sickening and as harrowing as every single person in this audience seeing those images on television of children wandering around rubble who are never going to find their parents and who are being starved to death. "That is why we have got to find a way-" but an interruption followed, with the same audience member calling out: "Do something!" Heidi Alexander was barely allowed to get her words out (Image: BBC ) Undeterred, Heidi continued: "-of finding a sustainable solution to the region and lasting peace, and getting significant humanitarian aid in. "Because none of us want to wake up tomorrow and see those scenes on our television screens, and I think every single one of us on that panel would agree with that sentiment." Article continues below Wrapping up the segment, Fiona said: "Listen, we will come back to the subject of Gaza, there is no question about that. "We've covered it many times and we will cover it again, and I hear your passion about this subject and everyone on the panel understands that you feel very strongly about it." Question Time is available to watch on BBC iPlayer.