
What should you do when ICE comes to the ballpark? Bay Area teams are already preparing
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents went knocking on the door of the Los Angeles Dodgers, and they might soon be coming to a ballpark or stadium near you.
Bay Area sports teams are quietly — very quietly — bracing for the increasing probability that ICE will show up and knock down the invisible wall that shields sports from real-world political turmoil and fear.
The eyes of the sports world are now on the Dodgers, who are facing what might be called a courage check. They might have to choose between cooperating with ICE as it zeroes in on Los Angeles in its mass-deportation campaign, and siding with their fans and fellow Angelenos.
Thursday, the Dodgers reportedly denied entrance to a Dodger Stadium parking lot to ICE vehicles. Coincidentally or not, ICE tried to move into the lot on the day the Dodgers were going to announce team plans to assist local immigrant communities affected by recent ICE raids.
The Dodgers are walking a tightrope. In April, the team ignored pleas and protests of many by visiting the White House, to be honored as World Series champions. It was just weeks after President Donald Trump's Department of Defense removed a tribute to Dodgers great Jackie Robinson — a veteran as well as a sports trailblazer — from its website. Trump had already ordered the deportation of one million undocumented immigrants per year. About 47% of Los Angeles residents are Latino, and the Dodgers claim that more than 40% of their fans are Latino.
The Dodgers were also criticized for not taking a public stand against recent ICE raids in Los Angeles, and they drew more fire for reportedly telling last Saturday's pregame national anthem singer that she could not sing the anthem in Spanish. She did so anyway, and said the team was irate, which the Dodgers deny.
While the Dodgers team has long been seen as the on-field enemy by Bay Area sports fans, local teams and restaurant owners in Northern California worry that they might soon be sharing the Dodgers' pain.
'Those (ICE) people are so vindictive, so belligerent, they're going to single someone out,' said one long-time Bay Area restaurant owner. 'They'd love to show off in San Francisco.'
One Bay Area pro sports team earlier this year sent a memo to its game-crew supervisors, detailing how employees should react in the event of an ICE raid, summarizing the rights of employees and outlining the legal limits of ICE agents' actions.
It's not unusual for a sports team to issue instructions on emergency procedures and personal rights. Live-shooter training, for instance, has become standard. What is unusual is for multiple team executives to ask — plead, actually — that their team name not be used in a news report about ICE raids, for fear of the team becoming a target of the increasingly aggressive raids and roundups.
'We don't want somebody back there (ICE headquarters in Washington D.C.) seeing our name and saying, 'Hey, let's visit those guys,'' an executive for one Bay Area team said with genuine concern. 'We don't want to get in their crosshairs.'
Many see ICE using fear as a tool in its efforts to meet Trump's reported deportation quota of about 3,000 per day. In response to Trump's recent demand to increase arrests in cities run by elected Democrats, the Chronicle sent a query to ICE asking if detention and deportation efforts would increase in San Francisco. This is the email response, attributable to Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin:
'The President has been incredibly clear. There will be no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine ICE's efforts. Worksite enforcement remains a cornerstone of our efforts to safe guard (sic) public safety, national security and economic stability. These operations target illegal employment networks that undermine American workers, destabilize labor markets and expose critical infrastructure to exploitation.'
The statement, a boilerplate response also sent to other news organizations, has an element of irony. The president himself seems incredibly un clear on his own deportation strategy. He recently said that ICE would no longer target agriculture and hospitality industry sites. Two days later he urged ICE to intensify its raids in all sectors.
The fear and the confusion are real. The Chronicle reached out to several pro sports teams in the Bay Area (and one in Los Angeles) and to some San Francisco restaurants, asking if they have alerted their employees to their rights and procedures in the event of an ICE visit.
The only on-the-record response was from the Oakland Coliseum and Arena.
'We try to make sure that the people we hire are here legally,' said Henry Gardner, executive director of the Oakland-Alameda Coliseum Joint Powers Authority Commission, which oversees both venues. 'It's not a perfect system. But we don't want our staff to be intimidated, so we do have protocols in place for how they should behave and how our senior managers should behave should (ICE) show up.'
No other team spokesperson or restaurant owner would speak on the record.
'We don't want to put a target on our back,' said one team's representative.
'Please leave us out of this' story, a restaurant owner pleaded. 'I don't trust those crazy (ICE) people.'
It's not that teams and businesses fear being punished for hiring undocumented immigrants. All claim that their employees and their vendors' employees are vetted and in compliance with U.S. work rules.
The problem is that many of the ICE raids appear to have been indiscriminate, with agents rounding up workers now and asking questions later, while employing tactics of questionable legality, morality and use of force.
The service workforce in California has a high percentage of Latino workers. Trump has an ongoing and escalating feud with this state and its governor. Trump has also threatened to withhold federal funding to California over the state's refusal to ban transgender athletes from competing in girls' and women's sports.
Such economic threats have been a staple of this White House, and it's not hard to envision a team's perceived refusal to cooperate being used as reason to punish the team economically or legally. Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, recently said of anyone suspected of aiding undocumented immigrants or shielding them from ICE, 'When they cross the line of harboring and concealing, that's a felony.'
That 'line,' however, often defies clear definition. A week ago last Friday, David Huerta, president of Service Employees International Union California, which has 3,200 members working at sports venues in the state, was arrested at the Los Angeles protests and charged with felony obstruction.
'It's scary as hell to think that they (ICE agents) could just come in here and do what they're going to do,' said an usher for a San Francisco sports team. 'I'd say more than half the people I work with … are just targets for (ICE). It's horrifying. I have a lot of friends who work in immigrant communities, and they've been saying a lot of people are just staying home, they're not going to work, they're so afraid.'
Even the athletes might not be immune. As ICE targets undocumented people from Central and South America, the San Francisco Giants have five players from the Dominican Republic and one from Venezuela on their roster. Latino players make up a large segment of the rosters of Bay Area pro soccer teams.
The Chronicle obtained the ICE memo that one local team distributed to its game-day workforce supervisors earlier this year, shortly after Trump took office.
The two-page memo, titled 'Workplace Guidance for Handling Potential ICE Interactions,' seems carefully worded, perhaps to avoid the appearance of being antagonistic or obstructionist.
The memo's first item is, 'Stay Calm and Professional' if ICE agents arrive in or near the venue. Other items drill down on the legal rights of employees, immigrants or otherwise, and explain the limits of ICE powers. Among memo items:
• 'Do Not Provide Access Without a Warrant'
• 'Do not bring an employee to ICE or direct them to an exit.'
• 'What to Do if ICE is Waiting Outside'
• 'Do Not Consent to a Search — ICE agents may ask to search your belongings. You have the right to refuse unless they have a warrant.'
The various labor unions whose workers service stadiums and arenas have been working to inform and protect their members since Trump took office.
'Our union contract protects workers from ICE raids by obligating the employer to demand a warrant before allowing any searches in the workplace or of I-9 documents (verifying employment eligibility), and our members know their rights,' said Yulisa Elenes, vice president of the Unite Here Local 2, which represents food service workers at Oracle Park, the Oakland Coliseum/Arena, and other venues. 'We're currently in contract negotiations with Aramark, and given the climate of fear about workplace raids, we're negotiating for even stronger protections.'
Last February, Huerta told the Chronicle, 'We do know-your-rights training and make available legal counseling. … We're considering (requesting) legislation that would obligate employers to post and make available know-your-rights information, so workers feel a sense that they are protected, whether they're at work or at home.'
But the concept of protection becomes increasingly nebulous with every new account of commando-style raids by heavily-armed ICE agents wearing masks, showing no ID, asking no questions and making workers disappear.
A San Francisco restaurant owner told this story: 'We ran out of ice the other night. I called for more, and I told our hostess to alert the kitchen staff when the delivery arrived. It got here, the hostess popped her head into the kitchen and shouted, 'The ice is here!'
'Everyone disappeared. One guy was hiding on top of the walk-in refrigerator, three of them were in a closet.'
The restaurant owner told the story without so much as a smile. He knows he might soon face his own courage check.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Luka Doncic reacts on social media to sale of Lakers
On Wednesday, the Buss family reportedly agreed to sell a majority share of the Los Angeles Lakers to Mark Walter for a valuation of $10 billion. Walter has owned a sizable chunk of the Los Angeles Dodgers for many years, and fans are anticipating that this transaction could lead to the Lakers having the type of sustained success the Dodgers, the defending World Series champions, have had in recent years. While Jeanie Buss, who has been the Lakers' governor for years, will remain in that role, it could mark a major shift as far as how they do business financially when it comes to personnel decisions. Advertisement They have long been criticized for being run like a family-owned small business, but apparently, those days are now ending. One item on their to-do list this summer is to get Luka Doncic, the new face of the franchise, to sign some sort of long-term contract extension. He can opt out of his current contract next summer, and he can officially agree to an extension starting on Aug. 2 of this year. In the meantime, he seems happy with the change in team ownership, judging by a post he made on X (formerly known as Twitter). Doncic was sent to the Lakers by the Dallas Mavericks in a seismic trade that took place on Feb. 1. While many outside the Lakers' sphere of influence are still upset over the low price (Anthony Davis, Max Christie and one future first-round draft pick) L.A. paid, the Purple and Gold's championship window has been pried open, and it could remain ajar for many years to come. This article originally appeared on LeBron Wire: Luka Doncic reacts on social media to sale of Lakers
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump criticizes ‘non-working holidays' on Juneteenth
President Donald Trump took to social media Thursday on Juneteenth, a federal holiday, to criticize the number of 'non-working holidays' in the United States. 'Too many non-working holidays in America. It is costing our Country $BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to keep all of these businesses closed. The workers don't want it either! Soon we'll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year. It must change if we are going to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform. Juneteenth is the oldest regular US celebration of the end of slavery. It commemorates June 19, 1865 – the day that Union Army Maj. Gen. Gordon Granger rode into Galveston, Texas, and told a group of slaves that the Civil War had ended and they were free - more than two years after President Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation. During Thursday's White House press briefing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Trump was unlikely to mark the federal holiday. 'I'm not tracking his signature on a proclamation today,' Leavitt said. 'I know this is a federal holiday — I want to thank all of you for showing up to work. We are certainly here, we're working 24/7 right now.' Trump has previously tried to take credit for making Juneteenth 'very famous,' saying during his first term in 2020 that, 'nobody had ever heard of it.' His comments came while the nation was reeling from ongoing civil unrest after George Floyd's death at the hands of Minneapolis police officers. Trump had previously pledged to make Juneteenth a federal holiday during his 2020 presidential campaign. Juneteenth didn't become an official holiday until 2021, under President Joe Biden's administration. Since his reelection, Trump has made the elimination of DEI programs a centerpiece of his administration, cracking down on diversity efforts in the federal government with a series of executive orders. CNN's Donald Judd contributed to this report.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
ICE Insists That Congress Needs Its Permission To Conduct Oversight
This week, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) released new guidance on "facility visit and engagement protocol for Members of Congress and staff." "ICE detention locations and Field Offices are secure facilities. As such, all visitors are required to comply with [identity] verification and security screening requirements prior to entry," it specified. "When planning to visit an ICE facility, ICE asks requests to be submitted at least 72 hours in advance." Incidentally, it's perfectly legal for members of Congress to visit ICE detention facilities, even unannounced. And ICE's attempt to circumvent that requirement threatens the constitutional system of checks and balances. The Further Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2024, which funded the government through September 2024, specified that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) may not "prevent…a Member of Congress" or one of their employees "from entering, for the purpose of conducting oversight, any facility operated by or for the Department of Homeland Security used to detain or otherwise house aliens" or to modify the facility in advance of such a visit. It also clarified that the DHS cannot "require a Member of Congress to provide prior notice of the intent to enter a facility." ICE's new guidance tries to get around this by stipulating that "ICE Field Offices are not detention facilities and fall outside of the [law's] requirements." Nevertheless, it adds that "while Member[s] of Congress are not required to provide advance notice for visits to ICE detention facilities, ICE requires a minimum of 24-hours' notice for visits by congressional staff" (emphasis in the original). Further, "visit request[s] are not considered actionable until receipt of the request is acknowledged" by ICE. The new rules also stipulate that visiting members of Congress may not bring in cellphones or recording devices, they must be escorted by ICE staff at all times, and they may not "have any physical or verbal contact with any person in ICE detention facilities unless previously requested and specifically approved by ICE Headquarters." In recent weeks, Democratic lawmakers have tried to enter ICE facilities, only to be turned away or threatened with imprisonment. Last week, authorities charged Rep. LaMonica McIver (D–N.J.) with three felony counts of assaulting, resisting, or impeding federal officers. McIver and other lawmakers visited Delaney Hall Federal Immigration Facility in Newark last month. A scuffle apparently ensued when authorities arrested Newark Mayor Ras Baraka for trespassing, though those charges were later dropped. This week, four members of Congress who visited the ICE Processing Center in Broadview, Illinois, were apparently denied access when they arrived. "We have reports that immigrants are being detained here without access to their attorneys, sleeping on the floor and without food," Rep. Chuy Garcia (D–Ill.), one of the members in attendance, alleged in a post on X. The DHS replied from its official account, "Congressman, all members and staff need to comply with facility rules, procedures, and instructions from ICE personnel on site." On Wednesday, Reps. Jerry Nadler and Dan Goldman (D–N.Y.) visited an office in Manhattan where migrants were allegedly being kept, only to be denied entry by Bill Joyce, the deputy director of the field office. Joyce denied it was a detention facility, saying that even though migrants were being kept on-site, ICE was simply "housing them until they can be detained." In video captured at the scene in Manhattan, Goldman said he and Nadler had requested permission to visit—even though they "have the authority to show up unannounced"—but were denied. This isn't uncharacteristic of the agency: Earlier this year, ICE agents denied Reason's C.J. Ciaramella access to an immigration court at a federal detention facility in Miami, in defiance of both federal law and guidance listed on the agency's own website. (ICE later admitted the facility was "open daily to the public.") Regardless of the actual conditions of any ICE facility, it's clear Congress' intent was to establish its legislative oversight role over an executive agency. Checks and balances are a key feature of American government: Each of the three branches has the power to keep the others in check. For ICE to claim an all-encompassing right to operate in the dark, apart from the prying eyes of even a co-equal branch of government, flies in the face of the Constitution's clear meaning. "This unlawful policy is a smokescreen to deny Member visits to ICE offices across the country, which are holding migrants – and sometimes even U.S. citizens – for days at a time. They are therefore detention facilities and are subject to oversight and inspection at any time," Rep. Bennie Thompson (D–Miss.), the ranking member on the House Homeland Security Committee, said in a statement. "There is no valid or legal reason for denying Member access to ICE facilities and DHS's ever-changing justifications prove this….If ICE has nothing to hide, DHS must make its facilities available." The post ICE Insists That Congress Needs Its Permission To Conduct Oversight appeared first on