Stand-off leaves Kosovo unable again to elect speaker
Lawmakers in Kosovo on Tuesday again failed to elect a new parliamentary speaker, after 14 previous unsuccessful attempts that have plunged Europe's youngest state into unprecedented political deadlock.
Political life has been at a standstill since February 9 elections, in which Prime Minister Albin Kurti's Self-Determination (VV) party win only 48 out of 120 seats -- not enough to form a majority government.
Opposition parties have, since mid-April, refused to vote for VV's candidate for the post of speaker, former justice minister Albulena Haxhiu.
Her appointment had been expected to be a formality but it has now turned into an impasse, with repeated votes -- and failures -- on the issue.
Several political leaders are now hinting at the possibility of fresh elections.
According to parliamentary rules, the parliament cannot be considered inaugurated without a speaker, and without its inauguration a new government cannot be formed.
- 'Hostage' -
Several opposition parties now accuse VV of deliberately blocking progress by refusing to propose an alternative candidate.
"VV is keeping Kosovo in an institutional crisis at all costs," said Memli Krasniqi, president of the right-wing Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK), whose party came second with 20.95 percent of the vote.
Krasniqi on Tuesday suggested that the VV consider another candidate, pointing to the last US election when the Democratic Party ditched then president Joe Biden for Kamala Harris.
"That wasn't considered anything extraordinary," he added.
The centre-right Democratic League of Kosovo (LDK), which finished third on 18.27 percent, said the current crisis was down to the "failure of the party that came first in the vote to create political partnerships for a new majority".
For Ramush Haradinaj, leader of the right-wing Alliance for the Future of Kosovo (AAK), a potential solution could involve the intervention of President Vjosa Osmani.
She is seen as more pragmatic and diplomatic than her prime minister and could turn to the judiciary for an interpretation of the constitution.
Osmani's office on Tuesday said she was launching "a series of consultations" with political parties from Thursday.
University of Pristina sociology professor Fadil Maloku said he believed that the "crisis is the result of shameful hostilities between leaders".
"Kosovo has been their hostage for three months," he added.
Political analyst Arben Qirezi, writing for the online newspaper Koha Ditore, said the young country lacks a "culture of political compromise".
He believes that this is essential for maintaining the political system's stability, legitimacy, and democratic representation of the citizens.
- Economic consequences -
The current deadlock could be costly for Kosovo, which declared independence from Serbia in February 2008. Serbia refuses to recognise Kosovo's independence.
The parliamentary stand-off has delayed the ratification of agreements under the European Union's Growth Plan for the Western Balkans, depriving the country of access to 882.6 million euros ($981.5 million) in loans and grants.
"If ratification does not occur by June it could end into delays in fund disbursement and potentially a redistribution of funds," to other countries, warned Besar Gergi, from the Group for Legal and Political Studies, a Pristina-based think-tank.
Even if parties agree to new elections, the current legislature must still vote to ratify the Growth Plan agreement, added Blerina Istrefi, a researcher at the same think-tank.
The parliamentary session that began on April 15 can only be concluded with the election of a president, three vice-presidents and the formation of parliamentary groups.
However, the Constitution does not specify a strict deadline for this process, meaning it could, in theory, continue indefinitely.
"The parties have locked themselves into their camps... the political schizophrenia continues," said Maloku.
As for Kurti, asked by a journalist about a possible solution to the crisis, he replied: "I am the prime minister, let's move on."
ih/al/phz/jm
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
HMRC admits £47 million loss in breach of 100,000 taxpayer accounts
HMRC has lost £47 million of taxpayers' money after a phishing scam breached tens of thousands of tax accounts. Two senior civil servants at HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) told the Treasury Committee that 100,000 people have been contacted, or are in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down in what they said was an 'organised crime' incident which began last year. Taxpayers who are being affected will suffer 'no financial loss', according to John-Paul Marks, the chief executive of HMRC, the UK's tax authority. Mr Marks told the Committee: 'It's about 0.2% of the PAYE population, around 100,000 people, who we have written to, are writing to, to notify them that we detected activity on their PAYE account.' Asked if this applied to individual working people's PAYE accounts, not companies, he replied: 'That's right, individuals. To be clear, no financial loss to those individuals. Mr Marks added: 'This was organised crime phishing for identity data outwith of HMRC systems, so stuff that banks and others will also unfortunately experience, and then trying to use that data to create PAYE accounts to pay themselves a repayment and/or access an existing account.' An investigation into the matter, which took place last year 'including jurisdictions outside the UK', led to 'some arrests last year,' Mr Marks told MPs. Angela MacDonald, HMRC's deputy chief executive and second permanent secretary, added: 'At the moment, they've managed to extract repayments to the tune of £47 million. 'Now that is a lot of money, and it's very unacceptable. 'We have overall, in the last tax year, we actually protected £1.9 billion worth of money which sought to be taken from us by attacks.' Get your tax return done early and find out sooner if you're owed money. ⏲️ We'll let you know if you've overpaid tax after you file your Self-Assessment tax return and refund you. 💷 File today. 👇 — HM Revenue & Customs (@HMRCgovuk) June 3, 2025 Ms MacDonald stressed the breach was 'not a cyber attack, we have not been hacked, we have not had data extracted from us'. She later added: 'The ability for somebody to breach your systems and to extract data, to hold you to ransomware and all of those things, that is a cyber attack. That is not what has happened here.' HMRC said it had locked down affected accounts and deleted log-in details to prevent future unauthorised access. Any incorrect information has been removed from tax records and officials have checked to ensure no other details have been changed. People affected will receive a letter from HMRC over the next three weeks. Elsewhere, Mr Marks told MPs that HMRC phone lines were down on Wednesday afternoon, but said this was 'coincidental'. They will be 'back up and available in the morning', he added. Recommended reading: HMRC urging parents to claim £2,000 tax-free childcare HMRC Child Benefit changes with opt-in campaign for parents More than half a million more savers to benefit from HMRC cash - apply today An HMRC spokesperson said: 'We've acted to protect customers after identifying attempts to access a very small minority of tax accounts, and we're working with other law enforcement agencies both in the UK and overseas to bring those responsible to justice. 'This was not a cyber-attack – it involved criminals using personal information from phishing activity or data obtained elsewhere to try to claim money from HMRC. 'We're writing to those customers affected to reassure them we've secured their accounts and that they haven't lost any money.'
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
‘Rolling up our sleeves': Gov. Kotek, Mayor Wilson unveil action plan to build more housing in Portland
PORTLAND, Ore. () — Oregon Governor Tina Kotek and Portland Mayor Keith Wilson are unveiling their plans to bolster housing development in the Rose City with a series of strategies, informed by a workgroup with multiple local stakeholders. This comes after the duo previously announced a plan to earlier this month. 'I believe in a vision for Oregon and for Portland where everyone can afford a home, where people can live in the places they want and still make ends meet at the end of the month,' Governor Kotek said. 'Rolling up our sleeves together like this is how we are going to make that happen. Thank you to Mayor Wilson for convening this workgroup with me and to the developers who shared their experiences to guide these actions.' Largest K-12 budget in Oregon history advances This past spring, Kotek and Wilson , which informed the leaders on recommendations to spur more multifamily housing construction. The workgroup members and attendees included multiple Portland City councilors, state housing officials, and people representing housing, construction and development organizations. One major focus in the slate of strategies is cutting down on the permitting process. 'Portland is open for business — for housing, for opportunity, and for a thriving future,' Portland Mayor Keith Wilson said. 'By expanding Self-Certification and investing in office-to-housing conversions, we are cutting red tape and accelerating the creation of much-needed homes for Portlanders.' Some of the initiatives being adopted as part of the effort to accelerate multifamily housing construction include streamlining the permitting process, as well as increasing the number of permits for developers, converting some office structures into housing and allowing more affordable housing to be built. The plan also includes Kotek sending staff from the state's Building Codes Division down to the Portland city level. They won't be replacing the city staff, but rather, working with them. She's also ordered a mutual aid agreement between the state and the city to share the workload in the plan review process. Kotek said they're focused on customer service. 'Our Building Codes Division staff will be helping the City of Portland achieve greater goals in the work that they're doing. It's going to bring down the cost of construction, because when you get through your permitting, faster time is money that's going to help build things — more effectively and more affordably,' Kotek said. As part of Wilson's plan to bring back and expand the city's Self-Certification program, experienced developers would be able to certify on their own that their plans meet building codes and regulations. Bypassing that review process should speed up construction. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
Institutions own 17% of Propel Funeral Partners Limited (ASX:PFP) shares but retail investors control 53% of the company
Significant control over Propel Funeral Partners by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions 46% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders Institutions own 17% of Propel Funeral Partners Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. If you want to know who really controls Propel Funeral Partners Limited (ASX:PFP), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 53% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Meanwhile, institutions make up 17% of the company's shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Propel Funeral Partners. See our latest analysis for Propel Funeral Partners Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. Propel Funeral Partners already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Propel Funeral Partners, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Propel Funeral Partners. Our data shows that DKH Ti Pty Ltd is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.6% and 5.1% of the stock. In addition, we found that Albin Kurti, the CEO has 2.0% of the shares allocated to their name. Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. We can see that insiders own shares in Propel Funeral Partners Limited. As individuals, the insiders collectively own AU$40m worth of the AU$613m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 53% stake in Propel Funeral Partners, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability. It seems that Private Companies own 15%, of the Propel Funeral Partners stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Propel Funeral Partners better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Propel Funeral Partners that you should be aware of. Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
