‘They've hit other vehicles': North Buffalo neighborhood pushes for installation of speed bumps
NORTH BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) — Some North Buffalo residents say the speeding on their street is getting out of control and are now pushing for the installation of speed bumps.
Valaine Perez, who lives on Taunton Place in North Buffalo, said the traffic on her street is a hazard and that believes sooner or later, someone is going to get seriously injured.
'We have a serious problem with speeding cars. They fly through stop signs. They've hit other vehicles,' Perez said. 'We've actually had three cars flip over. Who has that happen on a residential street?'
Last week, a First Student school bus was allegedly speeding and crashed into a tree a few houses down from Perez.
'We are thankful no one was hurt in the incident. No students were on the bus at the time,' a First Student spokesperson said in a statement. 'The driver is on administrative leave.'
Perez and several other neighbors on the street have been asking the city to install speed bumps to make it safer.
'Somebody is going to get hurt and that's a concern,' she said. 'Someone has to do something. If speed bumps aren't the answer, something has to be.'
Residents have been asking the city to approve their request to have speed bumps installed for almost a year.
Back in December, Perez was told the Department of Public Works is working closely with Buffalo fire and police on the city's Slow Streets Program, which includes speed humps.
WIVB News 4 reached out to the city for comment and are waiting for a response.
Sarah Minkewicz is an Emmy-nominated reporter and Buffalo native who has been a part of the News 4 team since 2019. Follow Sarah on Twitter @SarahMinkewicz and click here to see more of her work.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Residents voice outrage after ICE raid in North Buffalo
BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) — A neighborhood in North Buffalo is voicing its outrage after it said armed ICE agents detained a number of roofers in broad daylight. A homeowner on Crescent Avenue in the Parkside neighborhood recently posted on social media saying that on May 12, armed ICE agents stopped by her home and removed four roofers while they were on their lunch break. The homeowner, who for privacy reasons will remain anonymous, claimed these were legally employed roofers with the proper paperwork and documentation. The post has since gained a lot of attention on social media. One resident took photos of the raid and the large police presence in her neighborhood. In an email to the Parkside Community Association, she wrote in part, 'Many of us neighbors were outside observing this, in shock.' Local leaders say they understand why people in the neighborhood are upset. Braden Pritchard is the president of the Parkside Community Association. He said for this to happen during the day, with schools nearby and in a quiet neighborhood, is alarming. 'We felt that was a totally inappropriate response to detain four unarmed roofers. To the best of our knowledge, there was no reason to suspect there was a threat,' he said. The PCA released a statement when this happened, saying in part, 'This kind of operation traumatizes our community, creates fear among law-abiding residents, and undermines trust in public institutions. Parkside is a strong, inclusive neighborhood, and we believe it is unacceptable for our streets to be treated like a battleground.' State Senator Sean Ryan told News 4 that neighbors have reached out to his office outraged and concerned. He said they described the scene last month as chaotic and confusing. 'There's a lot of questions about why would the FBI be involved in this. We don't know the details of the people who were detained, but generally the thought is the FBI should have a lot more important things going on in terms of enforcing major crimes in our community,' Ryan said. News 4 has reached out to ICE officials for comment and we have yet to hear back. Sarah Minkewicz is an Emmy-nominated reporter and Buffalo native who has been a part of the News 4 team since 2019. Follow Sarah on Twitter @SarahMinkewicz and click here to see more of her work. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Boston Globe
20 hours ago
- Boston Globe
‘She knew nothing about it': Newton judge Shelley Joseph denies helping defendant evade ICE in 2018
Monday's hearing involves the latest chapter in a saga that stretches from President Trump's first term to his second, amid a renewed immigration crackdown that has sparked As part of that agreement, Joseph admitted she knew that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were waiting to detain defendant Jose Medina-Perez, that she asked them to leave the courtroom, and that she had an off-the-record conversation with court parties that violated court rules. But she did not admit wrongdoing or deliberately helping Medina-Perez avoid ICE. Advertisement The Advertisement Joseph's disciplinary case is being heard before Denis J. McInerny, a former deputy assistant attorney general with the Department of Justice, and the commission has appointed former Superior Court chief justice Judith Fabricant as special counsel to prosecute the case. McInerny will submit his findings to the Commission within 30 days of the hearing, and the Commission can then recommend discipline to the Supreme Judicial Court. Only the Legislature can remove a judge from the bench for misconduct. The hearing began with a site visit to Newton District Court Monday morning. Proceedings resumed in Boston with the questioning of defense attorney David Jellinek, who acknowledged hatching the plan to help his client evade ICE. Fabricant accused Joseph of allowing an off-the-record conversation in violation of court rules, and accused her of lacking transparency when she later discussed the incident with senior judges. 'She did not volunteer information she should have volunteered,' Fabricant said. The hearing is scheduled to resume Tuesday morning, with testimony from former Middlesex assistant district attorney Shannon McDermott, the prosecutor for Medina-Perez' case. The controversy dates back to April 2018, when Medina-Perez, a Dominican national who had been deported twice before, was in court to face charges for possessing drugs and for being a fugitive from justice. An ICE agent had shown up to the courthouse to detain him, and Joseph had him wait outside the courtroom, what she said was in accordance with policy set by Newton District Court's First Justice Mary Heffernan. Advertisement Joseph and the prosecutor agree on a certain set of facts. On the day at issue, Medina-Perez had switched from a court appointed defender to Jellinek, a veteran private attorney who frequently practiced in Newton District Court. After a lunch break, Jellinek asked for a side bar conference, telling Joseph and McDermott that he was concerned ICE had misidentified his client and was going to detain him anyway. Jellinek then asked to go off-the-record, leading to a 52-second unrecorded conversation between himself, Joseph and the prosecutor. McDermott agreed to drop the fugitive charge, and Joseph ordered Medina-Perez released without bail pending his next hearing on the drug counts. Instead of exiting through the front door, which would be typical, Jellinek and the court officer went downstairs with Medina-Perez and released him through a back door, which the waiting ICE agents did not discover until he had already left the building. But what exactly was said during that 52-second gap in the tape recording remains under dispute. Jellinek, who was given immunity by federal prosecutors, told a grand jury he told Joseph of his plan to help Medina-Perez avoid capture, and that she agreed to it. 'My impression was she did also did not want ICE necessarily to pick up the wrong person,' Jellinek said at Monday's hearing. But Joseph's attorneys argued that Jellinek had incentive to exaggerate the judge's knowledge to avoid facing federal charges himself. Thomas Hoopes, one of Joseph's attorneys, described Jellinek's deal as a 'get-out-of-jail-free card.' 'Did anyone explain to you how rare it is for the mastermind of any crime — federally — to be immunized?' Hoopes said. Advertisement 'I never had that conversation,' Jellinek said. Mulvey described Jellinek as the 'mastermind' of an 'ill conceived scheme,' saying Joseph was left in the dark about his true intentions. 'Nobody told her Medina Perez had gone out the back door,' Mulvey said. 'She knew nothing about it.' Jellinek denied deceiving Joseph, and defended his behavior as legitimate advocacy for his client's interests. He said he asked to talk off-the-record because he knew helping Medina-Perez leave by the back door was 'right on the edge of acceptable or appropriate.' 'I was trying to protect everybody, but myself and the judge especially,' Jellinek said. Joseph is not the only judge to face federal prosecution for allegedly helping a defendant evade ICE. Last month, a federal grand jury Shelley Murphy can be reached at
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Newton judge contests her role after man evaded ICE capture at court
A district court judge from Massachusetts appeared in a disciplinary hearing on Monday after a Dominican man eluded Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in her courthouse in 2018. Judge Shelley Joseph appeared for her hearing at 10 a.m. on Monday in the Suffolk County Courthouse, before the Commission for Judicial Conduct and a hearing officer appointed by the Supreme Judicial Court, attorney Denis McInerney. The hearing will determine whether she can remain a judge. She has been accused of helping Jose Medina-Perez, a man subject to an immigration detainer, avoid capture in April 2018 by allowing him to slip through the back door of the Newton District Courthouse where he was on trial. Medina-Perez had been charged with being a fugitive from justice based on a warrant issued in a case in Pennsylvania, and two misdemeanor counts of controlled substance violations. Joseph was indicted in 2019 on charges of conspiracy to obstruct justice, aiding and abetting obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting obstruction of a federal proceeding and perjury. A major flashpoint of the case against Joseph is what was said in a 52-second, off-the-record conversation in the courtroom that April day between her and Medina-Perez's attorney, David Jellenik. Joseph has maintained her innocence and alleged that Jellinek falsely implicated her to obtain immunity for himself, which he was officially granted in 2019 after speaking with federal authorities about the 52-second sidebar chat. The indictment against Joseph was filed while Andrew Lelling, a Trump appointee, served as U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts. However, the charges were dismissed in 2022 under Rachael Rollins, a Biden appointee, after Joseph attested to a statement of relevant facts and agreed to refer herself to the Commission on Judicial Conduct. Since then, the commission filed its charges against Joseph to kick off a process that began with Monday's hearing. The appointed hearing officer, McInerney, will issue a report with proposed findings and recommendations within 30 days of the hearing. In the Boston courtroom on Monday, Joseph's attorney, Elizabeth Mulvey, emphasized misconceptions around her client's role in Medina-Perez leaving the courthouse. 'If you were to walk down the street and take a survey of the people you meet, 100% of them would tell you Judge Joseph let an illegal immigrant out the back door of the district court,' Mulvey said. '50% of them would tell you that she's a criminal, and she should go to jail. 50% would tell you she's a folk hero for what she gave. But 100% would tell you she did it,' Mulvey said. The case has become such a part of 'local lore' in Boston that media outlets have 'dropped the niceties of alleged or charged,' she said. 'They report and make references to this incident as if a dozen people had seen Judge Joseph get off the bench, escorted the defendant to the door, gave him a hug and wished him Godspeed,' she said. In reality, it was Jellenik who was the 'mastermind' and came to Joseph with the plan to take his client out a back door, she said. Conversely, Judith Fabricant, a retired judge, presented a methodical opening statement and said the case is 'about the integrity, impartiality and independence of American justice.' Fabricant argued on behalf of the commission. Her argument on Joseph's judicial misconduct was based on that 52-second period of off-record conversation between Joseph and Jellenik in the Newton courtroom on April 2, 2018. Fabricant said the two discussed the presence of ICE in the courthouse that day and how Medina-Perez could exit the building without coming into contact with the agents. 'Judge Joseph conducted an unrecorded discussion with counsel in violation of district court ... so far, these facts are undisputed,' Fabricant said. 'What happened in those 52 seconds when they weren't recording?' she asked before relaying a timeline of Medina-Perez's escape. Joseph was the only judge sitting in Newton District Court on that day in April — the first time in her relatively short tenure as the only judge in a courthouse, according to the commission. That day, Joseph oversaw Medina-Perez's arraignment. When the case was first called, Joseph appointed a public defender for the case. The prosecutor told Joseph she was asking for Medina-Perez to be held without bail on a charge, and the case was recessed. After the first call — but before the case was called for the final time that day — Joseph learned there were ICE agents at the courthouse with a civil detainer, giving them permission to detain Medina-Perez if he were to be released from custody in Massachusetts. While the case was recessed, Joseph told the session clerk to tell the ICE agent to wait outside the courthouse or on the first floor of the building, consistent with the court's policy. During the recess, Medina-Perez retained a private lawyer. By the time the final hearing began, the commission writes, the lawyer had formulated a plan with the court officer to permit Medina-Perez to avoid ICE. The Commission for Judicial Conduct formally accused Joseph of 'willful judicial misconduct' and conduct 'prejudicial to the administration of justice.' Although it remains unclear as of Monday afternoon when the disciplinary proceedings will conclude, McInerney will issue a report within 30 days of it ending. Mass. weather: Central Mass. could see over 1 inch of rain on Tuesday Some Nantucket short-term rentals in jeopardy after land court decision Criminal defendants are being held without lawyers in Mass. as bar advocates refuse new cases Big Y plans changes to its Tower Square store Mass. labor groups rally against ICE arrest of California union leader Read the original article on MassLive.
