How lab-grown food could be on UK shelves within two years
Once the stuff of sci-fi novels, food grown in a laboratory could be approved for human consumption in the UK within two years.
Companies in the UK have already been producing meatballs, animal fat and other foods in laboratories, but have complained about the difficulties in getting them approved by the Food Standards Agency (FSA).
However, the government department has now said a team of scientists and regulatory experts will begin gathering "rigorous scientific evidence" about the products and how they are made.
The FSA added that it is committed to completing a "fully safety assessment" of two lab-produced foods which would allow them to be sold in the UK within the next two years.
How the sausages are made
The foods, which include burgers, steaks, sausages and salmon, are developed from tiny animal cells by scientists working in chemical plants.
They are known as cell-cultivated products (CCPs) and are made without using traditional farming methods such as rearing livestock.
Lab-grown meats therefore have strong environmental credentials because their production doesn't require huge amounts of land and the greenhouse gas emissions resulting from livestock farming are reduced.
Scientists have also reportedly suggested altering the nutritional contents of cell-cultured meat so that it could be healthier than the animal product.
Farmers' fears
However, some say the development of CCPs marks another move away from natural foodstuffs at a time when there is already concern about the consumption of ultra-processed foods.
And some animal farmers fear lab-grown meats pose yet another threat to their livelihoods.
Singapore, Israel and pockets of the US have approved cultivated meat for human consumption, but the UK has so far only allowed it in pet food.
This is despite the UK being one of the leaders in the field of producing CCPs.
Announcing its "pioneering programme for cell-cultivated products" on Monday, the FSA said eight companies that produce lab-grown foods will be involved in the programme.
Hoxton Farms, Roslin Technologies and Uncommon are the three UK-based companies that will take part.
The other five are BlueNalu from the US, Mosa Meat from the Netherlands, Gourmey and Vital Meat from France and Vow from Australia.
The FSA programme comes months after the UK's innovation agency, UKRI, dished out £15m to the newly-formed National Alternative Protein Innovation Centre (NAPIC) in August.
2:46
A solution for 'bad vegetarians'?
In 2023, Sky News climate reporter Victoria Seabrook - a self-confessed "bad vegetarian" - signed a disclaimer to try pork meatballs that had been produced in a lab by Oxford-based start-up Ivy Farm.
She was interested in whether cell-cultivated meat would provide a good alternative to sometimes indulging in the real thing.
After devouring one of the lab-grown products, she said: "The cultivated meatball has an authentically crispy exterior, oozes fatty juices and chews the same way as pork. It smells like cooked meat too.
"The only difference is that the normal meatball has a slightly stronger flavour, which could be due to the fact it is a little larger, so juicier."
Commenting on the programme announced today, Professor Robin May, chief scientific adviser at the FSA, said "safe innovation" was at its heart.
"By prioritising consumer safety and making sure new foods, like CCPs are safe, we can support growth in innovative sectors. Our aim is to ultimately provide consumers with a wider choice of new food, while maintaining the highest safety standards."
Lord Patrick Vallance, science minister, said: "By supporting the safe development of cell-cultivated products, we're giving businesses the confidence to innovate and accelerating the UK's position as a global leader in sustainable food production.
"This work will not only help bring new products to market faster, but strengthen consumer trust, supporting our Plan for Change and creating new economic opportunities across the country."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Gov. Gavin Newsom is suing Donald Trump for ‘illegally' deploying National Guard to California ICE protests
California Governor Gavin Newsom says his state will go to court to stop President Donald Trump from taking control of state National Guard units without cause and using them against protesters opposed to the administration's mass deportation efforts. In a post on X on Monday, Newsom said the violence that has broken out in parts of Los Angeles during three days of weekend protests over Immigrations and Customs Enforcement raids and arrests, leading the president to activate California National Guard units to protect federal property, is 'exactly what Trump wanted.' Newsom accused Trump of having 'flamed the fires and illegally acted to federalize the National Guard' with a memorandum on Saturday in which Trump called the protests 'a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States' and at least 2,000 soldiers into federal service for the next two months. He also pointed out that the memorandum does not specifically mention California but instead leaves open the possibility of using both National Guard and active duty military to quell protests nationwide. 'It will allow him to go into ANY STATE and do the same thing,' he said. He added: 'We're suing him.' In a separate post late Sunday, Newsom said Trump was 'putting fuel on this fire' by 'commandeering a state's National Guard without consulting the Governor of that state' and called Trump's actions both 'illegal and immoral.' "California will be taking him to court,' he said. It was not immediately clear whether any litigation had been filed in any federal court, but White House spokesperson Abigal Jackson hit back against the California governor's threat in a statement, accusing Newsom of 'feckless leadership' that made him 'directly responsible for the lawless riots and violent attacks on law enforcement in Los Angeles.' 'Instead of filing baseless lawsuits meant to score political points with his left-wing base, Newsom should focus on protecting Americans by restoring law and order to his state,' Jackson added. For his part, Newsom had equally harsh words for Trump and top administration officials during an interview with Los Angeles-based actor turned progressive podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen in which he called Trump 'unhinged' and referred to the White House and Trump's cabinet as a 'band of misfits.'
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
These are Britain's options for tactical nuclear weapons. We must choose, and act
As the dust begins to settle on the Strategic Defence Review, Lord Robertson's interview with the Telegraph 's Roland Oliphant answered a number of important issues. However his lordship danced around the critical and pressing issue of re-introducing a tactical nuclear capability to our national deterrent. This is vital against the background of continuous nuclear threats against the UK and Europe from President Putin and the gangsters who advise him. The need to show military strength to Moscow could not be more pressing. The re-introduction of a tactical nuclear capability would impact Putin's decision-making far more than a few hundred tanks or half a dozen capital ships, but it is not quite so straight forward as strapping a nuclear bomb to a jet or on the end of a cruise missile. If the UK sticks with our closest ally, probably still the US, we will most likely purchase some F-35A runway stealth jets to go alongside our existing jumpjet F-35Bs. The Bs have the advantage of being able to operate from our carriers, but their vertical thrust equipment means that they lack range and cannot carry larger weapons in their internal bays. The F-35A is also the only 5th generation stealth jet that is certified to carry nuclear weapons – specifically the American B61-12 nuclear gravity bomb. This can be carried by German jets, will soon be certified on Italian ones, and would most likely be our tactical option also. But this may not be a credible enough option to effectively deter Putin. Though the F-35 is paraded as the stealthiest thing in the sky it is not actually invisible to radar and it might be shot down before it could get above its target to drop its B61-12s. This brings up the need to be able to knock out Russian air defences in order to make our tactical nukes (or other air power) effective. Air defence is nowadays hugely important and has been possibly the defining issue in the Ukraine war. In my day, you became an air defence officer – a 'cloud-puncher' – if no other path was open. Today the air defence officers are the first pick. Air defences, even modern and powerful Russian ones such as the S-400, can be suppressed: we have seen Israel do this against Iran's S-300s before bombing some of Iran's nuclear research establishments this and last year. Recent Ukrainian attacks, most especially the strike last week on the Russian military air base at Bryansk show that Russian AD is not as water-tight as the Kremlin would have us believe. Nonetheless it might be a big ask to get F-35s almost on top of their target in order to deliver a free-falling gravity bomb like the B61-12. The other option possibly available to the UK is to do what the French have done: rather than a free-falling nuke, France has the Air-Sol Moyenne Portée (ASMPA) supersonic cruise missile, which can be released from its carrying jet hundreds of miles from the target. The ASMPA is supersonic, making it harder to knock down than a normal subsonic cruise missile. Our missile making capability is joint with France and Europe anyway, so if we went down this route we could partner with the French, who already know what they're doing in this area. Our existing subsonic Storm Shadow cruise missile is actually French too – the warhead is the only British part. It has been put to good use against Russia in Ukrainian hands, though it appears to need help – either US defence-suppression technology or special forces operations against Russian defence radars – to be fully effective. It could be argued that it is now Monsieur Macron and France who are our closest allies, as President Trump seems to shun us 'pathetic' Europeans. This could be a viable way forward. Even I, a soldier, can recognise that reintroducing a tactical nuclear air delivered capability is not an insignificant task. It is complicated by our current lack of any AWACS radar planes and other specialist defence-suppression equipment. Nonetheless we have been in the nuclear deterrence game almost since the beginning and our Atomic Weapons Establishment can at least furnish us with the key: the actual warhead. We might alternatively make a beginning by developing a home-grown nuclear tip for our stock of US-made, submarine-launched Tomahawk cruise weapons: the Tomahawk was originally developed to deliver nukes, so we know it can do that job. One thing I am sure of is the need. As a former commander of the UK and Nato's chemical and nuclear defence forces, I know the overwhelming impact that tactical nuclear weapons can have on the battlefield, and the huge advantage they give to an aggressor against somebody who does not possess these weapons. We must be ready to deal with the Russian bear. Putin will not be deterred by 12 more submarines in the ocean in the next decade, and Dad's Army covering the White Cliffs perhaps sooner – useful and vital as these things will be. As Uncle Sam backs away from the fight, the prospect of the UK joining France in fielding a tactical capability which could cripple a Russian army in the field would likely get Putin talking peace quicker than most other threats. For 80 years there has been nuclear equilibrium in Europe, but this has become unbalanced. It is the major metric in Putin's decision making, psychologically if not physically. It isn't very important which tactical nuclear option we choose – F-35A, a French style standoff weapon, or Tomahawk. What is important is that we choose at least one and get it into service.
North Wales Chronicle
44 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Claire Hughes MP was gifted ticket to the BAFTA Games Awards
Ms Hughes, who was elected last July, has declared the ticket on her register of financial interests. This states that, on April 8, the UK Interactive Entertainment Association Ltd gifted the ticket, valued at £700, which she accepted the same day. The BAFTA Games Awards, which were this year held on April 8 and hosted by comedian Phil Wang, celebrates achievements in the video game industry in the last 12 months. Ms Hughes' Labour colleague, Warrington North MP Charlotte Nichols, was also gifted hospitality at the event, also worth £700. Ms Nichols stated in her own register of financial interests that this was 'in my capacity as chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on video games and e-sports". Ms Hughes is not a member of this APPG. All of the other items on Ms Hughes' register of financial interests date back to last year. These include a £10,000 donation from Labour Together Ltd, which was 'to support campaign activities leading up to the general election'. Ms Hughes was approached for further comment by the Pioneer. She posted on her Facebook page this afternoon: "Wales is starting to become a significant player in the global gaming landscape. But I want North Wales to have a much bigger slice of the pie. "At the start of Easter recess, I attended the BAFTA Games Awards celebrating the best of the UK games industry with UK Interactive Entertainment. "I'm not a gamer myself. As someone who previously worked in the sector, though, I recognise the massive value of the sector and opportunity for growth; the video games sector is bigger than the music and film sectors combined, contributing almost £7bn a year to UK GVA. "Recent growth in video games in Wales is thanks partly to support from Welsh Government including the Games Scale Up Fund for Wales, which last week announced a total of £850,000 funding support for Wales-based developers via Creative Wales. "But with the creative industries highlighted as one of the key growth areas in the UK Government's upcoming Industrial Strategy, we could be doing much more to encourage young people to consider a career in immersive entertainment, and to support up-and-coming businesses to thrive. "We have brilliant opportunities for people to gain the skills to build a career in the industry in our area - Coleg Llandrillo have long offered highly respected courses in 3D arts and games development, and the recent investment in a state-of-the-art new campus in Bangor makes it clear the Welsh Government is serious about putting pounds behind promises. "I hope that in future years, we will see games made in Wales featured at the gaming BAFTAs. More than that, though - I want more young people in Bangor Aberconwy knowing that a career in video games is up for grabs. "I'll be doing more on this over the summer, including workshops for school-leavers and an industry roundtable. If this is something you're interested in being part of, get in touch."
