Sheffield landlords close pub they took on after wedding
A couple from Sheffield who become landlords of the pub that hosted their wedding party have now closed the venue after less than a year of trading.Despite having no experience of licensed trade, James and Tamsin Kaminski took over the running of The Sportsman in Lodgemoor in March 2024 after celebrating their marriage in the grounds the previous summer.In a statement posted on Facebook, the couple said: "It is with a heavy heart we announce we will not be extending our lease."The cost of running The Sportsman is beyond what we can invest as a family."
The Sportsman is one of the highest pubs in Sheffield, sitting at the top of Redmires Road with views over the Rivelin Valley.The Kaminskis' wedding was the last event at the pub before the death of the former long-term landlady, Jill Hoffman.Mr Kaminski admitted that although much of their tenure had been "enjoyable", it had also been a "rough year" with wages making up 40% of their turnover."We had no experience in the field. You hear all the time about pubs closing, we are finding out why ourselves."There is a breaking point. We really struggled with utility costs - they are massive, much bigger than we forecast for."Another factor that affected The Sportsman's revenue was the unpredictable weather."We are a destination pub, the views are incredible but we rely on walkers and cyclists and when the weather is bad people don't come out."We seemed to have one storm after another," said Mr Kaminski.
The couple's last official day as landlords will be Saturday 8 February. Mr Kaminski acknowledged that the support from locals had been "incredible" and the final shift would be an "emotional" experience."Financially Saturday will be a huge relief but you can't keep passing that cost on to the customer. Ultimately it's not a charity, we have to make some money to live ourselves."The Kaminskis have not ruled out returning to the pub industry and running their own place again but for now are looking for work elsewhere.The Stonegate Group, who own The Sportsman, have advertised the fixed term tenancy on their website.Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North or tell us a story you think we should be covering here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
‘Can I avoid inheritance tax by setting up a joint account with my daughter?'
Email Mike: taxhacks@ Dear Mike, Recently, I was told that a joint account, for example, between an elderly parent and their child, would not be liable for inheritance tax. The bank would transfer the account to the survivor's name on presentation of the death certificate. In addition, this joint account could be set up at any time prior to death, and not be subject to the seven-year rule. Is this true? Kind regards, – James Dear James, Your question is more complicated than it may seem, and I am aware that there are some differing views on this. I will give you my view, which is consistent with the HMRC manuals. In doing so, I recognise that these manuals are not the law, just guidance. Ultimately it is for the courts to determine the law. I will also assume that you live in England, Wales or Northern Ireland, so my apologies to readers in Scotland where I know different rules can apply. One point that often causes confusion is that, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, on death the assets in a joint bank account pass automatically to the survivor. The bank account does not therefore appear in the death estate for probate purposes. However, that does not mean that it escapes IHT. Whether it does so will depend on the facts, and these can become convoluted. The key point to keep in mind is that for inheritance tax purposes it is the beneficial ownership that counts. The problem can be in determining how the beneficial ownership of the money in an account is split, and this is typically not equally. The starting point is to consider who contributed to the account. This is explained in IHTM15042 as follows: 'You should normally regard each account holder as beneficially entitled to the proportion of the account which is attributable to their contributions. So – if the deceased provided the whole of the money, the whole of the account at death should be included in the IHT400.' For readers in Scotland, the equivalent guidance is in IHTM15051 and IHTM15054. This can become complicated when withdrawals are made. For this, the guidance says: 'When calculating this proportion, you should assume that any money withdrawn by each person should be set as far as possible against their own contributions, despite, the rule in Clayton's Case [1816].' I have deliberately left in this reference to a court case over 200 years ago to demonstrate how far back we sometimes have to consider legal judgements. At this point, I imagine some of you are wondering who is supposed to work all this out. The answer is that HMRC is entitled to make enquiries into the inheritance tax position of an estate, and the onus is on the executors to provide the evidence to support their view of the position. It is the therefore a matter for you to keep the necessary documentation, including records of transactions into and out of the joint account, and ensure that your executors know where these are kept. If large amounts are involved, it would be worth consulting a solicitor who might advise setting up a finance lasting power of attorney. As the HMRC guidance to inspectors explains: 'When establishing the share based on the deceased's contributions you should note that the true legal position is far from clear so it is important to establish the facts and obtain any relevant documents, such as application forms, withdrawal mandates, passbooks, terms and conditions of account before considering the legal and equitable rules.' As it happens, a case came before the courts a few years ago where there was a shortage of the appropriate documentary evidence. The judges decided that the inspector was entitled to ascribe an equal beneficial ownership by the father and son. So, in my view, if all you do is open a joint account with you and your daughter named and put funds into it, on your death you will remain the beneficial owner and the money will form part of your estate for inheritance tax purposes. However, if you make a declaration that the beneficial ownership rests entirely with your daughter, this will count as a lifetime gift to her at that time. In the event of your death within seven years the gift will then fall back into your estate under the general seven-year rule. I realise that all this can become complicated and some advisers are wary of joint accounts for this reason. Nevertheless, in my view joint accounts can be very useful in the right circumstances. For example, I think a couple who are married or in a civil partnership should consider having at least one bank account in joint names into which regular income flows. In the event of one dying, the survivor then has full control of the account without having to wait for probate. As you will appreciate, transfers between spouses and civil partners are automatically free of inheritance tax. A joint bank account can have other advantages. In particular, some banks have become reluctant to hold accounts for non-residents. One of my relatives has lived overseas for many years and chooses to keep most of his investments in the UK. I manage these for him and we have a joint UK bank account to collect the dividend income with all the money in the account arising from his investments. He retains full beneficial ownership and on his death this balance would fall into his estate for inheritance tax purposes. This is not a straightforward matter and I genuinely welcome comments from anybody who disagrees with my analysis. Likewise, I am hoping that some readers will be able to contribute with their practical experiences of dealing with HMRC on this issue. Mike Warburton was previously a tax director with accountants Grant Thornton and is now retired. His columns should not be taken as advice, or as a personal recommendation, but as a starting point for readers to undertake their own further research.
Daily Mirror
11 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Martin Lewis helped me get £14k in council tax but I'm not happy
One of the consumer champion's fans shared a story on how he successfully challenged his council tax payment, only for there to be a sting in the tail Consumer champion Martin Lewis was heaped with praise online after his sage advice helped a man claim back more than £14,000 in excess council tax payments – yet the story took a bittersweet turn. One of his followers heeded the expert's advice and was over the moon to get tens of thousands of pounds back after discovering his property was placed in the wrong council tax band, only later to share there was a "sad" twist to the tale. Martin had initially uploaded a video on his X account encouraging the public to tune in to the latest instalment of his self-titled BBC Sounds podcast. In it, he complained about the council tax band system in England and Scotland. His message was paired with the caption: "Are you in one of 400,000 homes that are in the wrong council tax band? If so, you could be due £1,000s back!" He added: "It really is quite unbelievable that if you live in England and Scotland, the council tax band you are in today is still dictated by a stop-gap, drive-by valuation done back in 1991 that was only meant to last a couple of years. "And when I say drive-by, I'm literally talking a couple of estate agents in a car often, with a clipboard in second gear going, 'Band C, Band D, Band E' – and that is still in place today. So no surprise up to 400,000 homes are in the wrong band. If you're in the wrong band and if you challenge it, not only can you get it lowered, you can get a backdated payout back to when you moved in or 1993, whichever was sooner." The expert, who also hosts The Martin Lewis Money Show on ITV, later told people not to dispute their council tax band without doing their research first, adding: "However, don't just do this speculatively because then you could get it wrong and they put your band up or even your neighbour's band up. You need to follow my full, step-by-step check and challenge process that I go through in detail in the podcast." Taking this advice on board, one fan, Rob Dean, sought about correcting the council tax band for not only his mother's property but also that of his neighbours. He replied to Martin's video: "Did that for my mum following your guidance and got £6000+ back and then told the three neighbours who were also in the wrong band. Overall total was £14.5k. Only sad part is that we'd all overpaid the water rates too!" He made no suggestion that he had managed to claw back any of that money. Others also shared their experiences of challenging their council tax bands. One person said: "I've been waiting for a decision for more than six months," while another follower added: "Just checked mine as I've always thought it seemed too high – turns out I am in the right band, but right at the bottom of it!" A third person sought Martin's help, saying: "My sister challenged her band last October. VOA [Valuation Office Agency] said it can take up to a year before they decide!! Is this right??" Challenging your council tax band Martin's Money Saving Expert website offers a comprehensive guide on how to contest your council tax band, detailing the steps homeowners can take to secure a refund if they believe they've been incorrectly categorised. For an in-depth look at the procedure, click here. But in brief, he proposed two approaches for those looking to challenge their council tax band. The first step is to compare your band with that of neighbours in similar or identical properties, with resources available on his website for residents in England and Scotland to facilitate this comparison. The second step involves a valuation check, where individuals can use the Money Saving Expert site to estimate the value of their property back in 1991, which was when the current bands were established, despite the tax being introduced in 1993. Martin pointed out that anyone who purchased their home after 1991 can "use its price and date of sale" as a basis for valuation. However, he warned: "This can't be used as evidence if you challenge your band. But it enables you to check out various property prices on your street and is an important test that you're on the right track." If both criteria are met, Martin said that you can then present a challenge to the VOA, either formally or informally, recommending the formal route although acknowledging it's "available to fewer people". Those eligible to lodge a formal challenge must have "lived in the property for six months or less (it doesn't matter whether you own or rent, though if renting you should notify the landlord as a courtesy)". For individuals who can't make a formal challenge, Martin suggested: "Over the years we've heard feedback from people who've been told they can't challenge as they've lived in their property too long – yet the VOA has a statutory duty to uphold the integrity of Council Tax bands list. "This means you can still submit a request for an 'informal review' of your Council Tax band, though the burden is on you to provide compelling evidence that your band is wrong, to persuade the VOA to do the review."
Press and Journal
11 hours ago
- Press and Journal
Expert advice for first-time buyers in Aberdeen
Buying your first home is an exciting milestone. While most of us might not purchase our dream house as a first-time buyer, your first property will always be special. Some Press and Journal online content is funded by outside parties. The revenue from this helps to sustain our independent news gathering. You will always know if you are reading paid-for material as it will be clearly labelled as 'Partnership' on the site and on social media channels. This can take two different forms. This means the content has been paid for and produced by the named advertiser. This means the content has been paid for and approved by the named advertiser but written and edited by our own commercial content team. However, learning the intricacies of the Scottish property system, navigating mortgage offers and securing the final deal can all be a bit of a challenge. As a first-time buyer it pays to seek out the right help. James & George Collie are a full-service law firm with extensive expertise in property. Their solicitors have been helping first-time buyers in Aberdeenshire for generations. Dating back to 1841, James & George Collie is one of the longest-established legal practices in the north-east of Scotland. When it comes to supporting house buyers, the firm has unparalleled knowledge of the local property markets, which in turn makes it a valuable ally for those looking to buy in the north-east – especially first-time buyers. We spoke to Brian Sutton, a partner at James & George Collie, to get the inside scoop on how first-time buyers should navigate the Aberdeenshire property market. 'The Aberdeen market is definitely a buyers-market,' explained Brian. 'You can often get properties for under the asking price – you don't get that in the likes of Glasgow or Edinburgh, but it's possible in Aberdeen. 'Here in the north-east house sellers are more inclined to take into account people's situation. So as a first-time buyer with no property to sell, that will carry weight.' If you're stepping into the world of property purchase for the first time, that's a very reassuring start. And with the experienced team of James & George Collie on your side, you won't need to worry about getting involved in negotiations or avoiding common pitfalls of home-buying. They take care of everything for you, working in your best interest to secure you the best deal. Brian said: 'An estate agents' job is to sell properties and get the highest price for the seller. Coming up against that as a first-time buyer can be daunting. We're there to give you the advice and backup you need to get the best deal for you. 'When first-time buyers have seen a property on the open market they want to go for, that's usually when they come to us in order to put the offer forward. From the outset we get involved in negotiations. We can advise on the property value and if there's scope to take it a bit below the asking price, or if it's a very popular property we can give advice on how much over to offer.' Informed advice on what to pay for a property is especially important in Scotland, where the 'offers over' system can leave buyers unsure of where to pitch their offer. However, there are two main pieces of advice Brian gives to first-time buyers, especially those house hunting in and around Aberdeen. 'Don't be too fixed on the asking price,' he advised, 'particularly if the property has been on the market for a while. Even if the offers over price is over budget, don't rule it out. There's often times we can negotiate, taking into account the situation of both the buyer and seller. He continued: 'Another thing first-time buyers need to be aware of is the reverse of that – so if you're in a situation where you're planning to pay over the valuation. 'For example, say a property is valued at £150,000 and you have a mortgage in principle that says you can borrow up to £160,00, you can't borrow the full £160,000 on a property that's valued at £150,000. Your limit of borrowing is whatever is the lowest between the property valuation or your mortgage limit. 'So, if you want to offer £155,000 on a property valued at £155,000, the extra £5,000 needs to come out of your pocket. Many people don't realise this, and sometimes it's an unwelcome discovery at the last minute!' Brian urges first-time house hunters to come in a see him at any point on their house-buying journey, even before they've viewed a property or explored mortgage options. He told us: 'If people aren't too sure of the house-buying process and haven't yet got their finance in place, I'd still urge them to come and see us. We can introduce them to people who can help with their mortgage and give them advice all along the journey. 'There's no harm at all in speaking to us early. It also means if they find a property and they need to move quickly due to a closing date for example, we're ready to act instantly.' Brian's final advice? 'Don't be afraid to approach us, we're not scary!' he joked. 'We were first time buyers too at one point. We've got a lot of experience at helping people. It's an amazing feeling when you get a deal done and we call our client to give them the good news. We love to be a part of that.'
