logo
Ukraine crushes Putin's bombers, but can China and Russia do the same to the US?

Ukraine crushes Putin's bombers, but can China and Russia do the same to the US?

Fox Newsa day ago

With Operation Spider's Web, Ukraine inflicted the worst attack on Russian air power since World War II. The final damage is yet to be determined, but one tally is nine Tu-95s and three Tu-22M3 bombers gone, along with an A-50 "Mainstay" radar plane and an unlucky An-22 transport plane.
Whatever the final count, the strategic impact is clear. Never before have drones taken out a big chunk of a nuclear-capable bomber force. Unlike tanks, Russian President Vladimir Putin cannot replace his bombers because none are still in production. They'll be chopping up the wreckage for parts once the smoldering carcasses cool down.
Here's what Putin's lost, and why the U.S. should be worried about drone threats from China.
Before Sunday, Russia's air force had about 55 Tu-95 Bear bombers and as many as 57 Tu-22 bombers. Russia's bombers are not aeronautically impressive, but they deliver lethal Russian cruise missiles, hypersonic missiles and, of course, they can be armed with nuclear weapons, too.
The Tu-95 "Bear" is that ugly, four-engine plane with contra-rotating propellers and the long refueling probe above the cockpit. Since 2007, Putin has used the Bear to harass U.S. and NATO airspace. Don't forget a pair of Tu-95 Bears barged into Alaskan airspace along with two Chinese planes last year, which is typical behavior for them.
The Tu-22M3 "Backfire" is a supersonic jet that was supposed to be sleek, but turned out gawky like most Soviet designs. The Tu-22's Cold War mission was to launch high-speed cruise missiles at U.S. Navy ships. Instead, Tu-22 squadrons ended up bombing Syria a decade ago. The Tu-95 and Tu-22 squadrons no doubt thought they were hotshots. Until Sunday.
Ukraine's reason was clear enough. Russian tactics are vile. Armed Tu-95s and Tu-22s take off from their bases, reach altitude, fly to a designated point, and launch cruise missiles against Ukraine, all while staying inside the sanctuary of Russian airspace. Ukraine's air defenses do a great job knocking down inbound missiles and drones. But they can't reach far enough to take out the bombers while in flight.
During Putin's blitzes of Ukraine's cities, the A-50 "Mainstay" dome-mounted radar plane monitors Ukraine air defenses and provides command and control for Russian bombers launching missiles. Ukraine has already shot down two A-50s and the drones got another on Sunday. Good riddance.
Ukraine's drone strike was an important blow. But this is an attack that must be taken seriously by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and planners in the Pentagon, as they revive America's industrial base.
What stunned me was the timing: near-simultaneous attacks at multiple Russian bases. By using 117 drones smuggled into Russia, the close-in attacks achieved surprise and left no time for the Russians to activate electronic warfare or other defenses. Apparently, unsuspecting Russian truckers said they were hired to deliver modular houses. Then the lids of their cargo loads opened and drones flew out.
Even more consequential was the reach of the strikes. Belaya airbase is in Siberia, 3,000 miles from Kyiv, near Lake Baikal. They lost 4 Tu-95s, 3 Tu-22s and the A-50. Olenya airbase is up on the Kola peninsula near Murmansk. The local Barents Observer photographed columns of oily black smoke billowing into the air, probably from the 5 Tu-95s, hitting that base.
Putin should have known better. Ukraine's drones hit the Kremlin in May 2023. Other attacks have damaged Su-24 and Su-30 fighters parked in occupied Crimea. Ukraine has hit Russian bombers with smaller drone attacks, like one in August 2023 that claimed two Tu-95s.
Yet beyond question, the coordinated drone strike of June 1, 2025, opened a new chapter in drone warfare. "Yesterday was a really good example of just how quickly technology is changing the battlefield," Army Chief of Staff General Randy George said Monday, June 2.
Operation Spider's Web should send a chill down the spine of every U.S. base commander.
Right now, the U.S. military also needs to be asking: what if a Russian or Chinese "fishing vessel" off the coast of Guam or Virginia Beach pops open drones to attack U.S. bombers or fighters lined up on runways? B-52s and B-1s are based mainly in the heartland, and the B-2s live in climate-controlled hangars in Missouri. However, the bombers sit out on host nation runways when deployed around the globe on Bomber Task Force missions.
It's not just trucks and containers launching drones. In May, China showed off its Jiu Tan drone carrier, an unmanned plane with an 82-foot wingspan that carriers up to 100 smaller drones. To an American fighter pilot, China's drone mothership is one big fat target, but you get the idea. Enemy drones can come from anywhere. It takes tremendous intelligence and surveillance and help from AI to keep track of all the possible Chinese attack vectors.
Even more consequential was the reach of the strikes. Belaya air base is in Siberia, 3,000 miles from Kyiv, near Lake Baikal. They lost 4 Tu-95s, 3 Tu-22s and the A-50. Olenya airbase is up on the Kola peninsula near Murmansk.
The Pentagon finished a classified counter-drone strategy last December and has many ways to protect our planes against drones. Close in, the Army and Marines have systems like the Coyote, a 24-inch drone that intercepts other drones. Fighter jets are a great counter-drone weapon. Central Command deployed F-15s to Diego Garcia to protect B-2 and B-52 bombers. Back in January 2024, Navy F/A-18EF Superhornets from the USS Eisenhower shot down five Houthi drones with air-to-air missiles.
But drone defense needs to be a top priority. Just to be safe, better buy more of the new B-21 Raider stealth bombers for good measure. It's the only bomber America has in production.
For the moment, savor Ukraine's brilliant strike on Putin's terror bombers. Too bad Ukraine can't do it again. Or can they?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Has Russia Moved Strategic Aviation Nearer to Alaska? What We Know
Has Russia Moved Strategic Aviation Nearer to Alaska? What We Know

Miami Herald

time6 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Has Russia Moved Strategic Aviation Nearer to Alaska? What We Know

Russia has likely not moved one of its nuclear-capable heavy bombers further from Ukraine, analysts and satellite imagery indicate after reports suggested Moscow had transferred one of its hefty Tu-160 supersonic aircraft closer to Alaska following extensive Ukrainian strikes on Russian airfields. Ukraine said it hit 41 of Russia's expensive, hard-to-replace warplanes on June 1 in a meticulously timed operation across three different time zones using drones smuggled over the border. Ukrainian outlet Defence Express reported on Thursday that Russia had relocated one of its Tu-160 strategic bombers to the Anadyr airfield in Russia's far eastern Chukotka region, citing satellite imagery captured by the European Space Agency's Sentinel satellites on June 4. Satellite imagery provided to Newsweek by Planet Labs, captured of Anadyr on May 26 - prior to the audacious Ukrainian strikes - showed three aircraft lined up on the main apron. The image, while low quality, does not indicate the presence of the distinctively shaped Tu-160s, analysts said. A separate image from June 3 showed four aircraft on the main apron of the base, but none of the aircraft - including the one that appeared since May 26 - appear to be the world's heaviest operational bomber, experts told Newsweek. It is fairly standard practice for militaries to move aircraft around and may not indicate anything more than a "sensible approach to looking after your aircraft," said Frank Ledwidge, a senior lecturer in Law and War Studies at Portsmouth University in the U.K. and a former British military intelligence officer. Under the New START Treaty limiting nuclear weapons, strategic bombers have to be kept out in the open, Ledwidge added. Russia will likely move around its aircraft more following the success of the Ukrainian strikes, retired Air Marshal Greg Bagwell, a former senior commander in the U.K.'s Royal Air Force, told Newsweek. Kyiv said after the strikes, it had targeted at least one of Moscow's scarce A-50 airborne early warning and control aircraft and several long-range, nuclear-capable bombers across four air bases thousands of miles apart. Russia reported drone assaults on five bases, including strikes on a long-range aviation hub in the country's far east that Kyiv did not publicly acknowledge. One Ukrainian official said 13 aircraft had been destroyed. Satellite imagery from the Siberian air base of Belaya and Olenya, an Arctic base in Murmansk-just two of the targeted bases-showed several destroyed Tu-95 and Tu-22 bombers. Ukraine said it had also attacked the Ivanovo airbase northeast of Moscow and Dyagilevo in the Ryazan region. The Belaya airfield sits just shy of 3,000 miles from Ukraine. At least six Russian Tu-95MS and four Tu-22M3 aircraft appear to have been destroyed, Justin Bronk, a senior research fellow for airpower at the U.K.-based Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), said in recent days. While unlikely to hack away at how many aerial assaults Russia can mount on Ukraine, the simultaneous strikes known as Operation Spiderweb caused roughly $7 billion in damage, according to Kyiv, and exposed how vulnerable airfields and their aircraft now are to drone strikes while landing an embarrassing slap on the Kremlin. U.S. President Donald Trump said earlier this week that Russian President Vladimir Putin had "very strongly" insisted he would retaliate for the strikes. The main base in Russian territory where the operation was masterminded was "directly next to" an FSB regional headquarters, Ukraine's President, Volodymyr Zelensky, said as he praised the "brilliant" operation. Russia's FSB domestic security agency is the main descendant of the Soviet-era KGB. Russia used a Tu-160 in intensive overnight missile and drone strikes across Ukraine, Kyiv's air force said on Friday. Moscow fired more than 400 attack drones, six ballistic missiles, 38 cruise missiles and one anti-radar air-to-surface missile at the war-torn country overnight, according to the air force. Ukraine's military separately said on Friday it had hit Dyagilevo in fresh strikes and the Engels long-range aviation hub in the Saratov region. Newsweek has reached out to the Russian Defense Ministry for comment via email. Related Articles G7 Invite for Modi Signals India's Growing Weight for Democratic AllianceRussia Offers Political Asylum to Elon Musk Over Trump FeudRussia Reacts to Trump's 'Young Children Fighting' CommentUS Demands 'End' to Military Cooperation Between North Korea and Russia 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Pentagon watchdog investigates if staffers were asked to delete Hegseth's Signal messages

time18 minutes ago

Pentagon watchdog investigates if staffers were asked to delete Hegseth's Signal messages

WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon watchdog is looking into whether any of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's aides was asked to delete Signal messages that may have shared sensitive military information with a reporter, according to two people familiar with the investigation and documents reviewed by The Associated Press. The inspector general's request focuses on how information about the March 15 airstrikes on Houthi targets in Yemen was shared on the messaging app. This comes as Hegseth is scheduled to testify before Congress next week for the first time since his confirmation hearing. He is likely to face questions under oath not only about his handling of sensitive information but also the wider turmoil at the Pentagon following the departures of several senior aides and an internal investigation over information leaks. Hegseth already has faced questions over the installation of an unsecured internet line in his office that bypassed the Pentagon's security protocols and revelations that he shared details about the military strikes in multiple Signal chats. One of the chats included his wife and brother, while the other included President Donald Trump's top national security officials and inadvertently included The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg. Neither the Pentagon nor the inspector general's office immediately responded to Friday requests for comment on the investigation. Besides finding out whether anyone was asked to delete Signal messages, the inspector general also is asking some past and current staffers who were with Hegseth on the day of the strikes who posted the information and who had access to his phone, according to the two people familiar with the investigation and the documents reviewed by the AP. The people were not authorized to discuss the investigation and spoke on the condition of anonymity. Democratic lawmakers and a small number of Republicans have said that the information Hegseth posted to the Signal chats before the military jets had reached their targets could have put those pilots' lives at risk and that for any lower-ranking members of the military it would have led to their firing. Hegseth has said none of the information was classified. Multiple current and former military officials have said there is no way details with that specificity, especially before a strike took place, would have been OK to share on an unsecured device. 'I said repeatedly, nobody is texting war plans,' Hegseth told Fox News Channel in April after reporting emerged about the chat that included his family members. 'I look at war plans every day. What was shared over Signal then and now, however you characterize it, was informal, unclassified coordinations, for media coordinations and other things. That's what I've said from the beginning.' Trump has made clear that Hegseth continues to have his support, saying during a Memorial Day speech at Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia that the defense secretary 'went through a lot' but 'he's doing really well.' Hegseth has limited his public engagements with the press since the Signal controversy. He has yet to hold a Pentagon press briefing, and his spokesman has briefed reporters there only once. The inspector general is investigating Hegseth at the request of the Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, and the committee's top Democrat, Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island. Signal is a publicly available app that provides encrypted communications, but it can be hacked and is not approved for carrying classified information. On March 14, one day before the strikes against the Houthis, the Defense Department cautioned personnel about the vulnerability of the app. Trump has said his administration targeted the Houthis over their 'unrelenting campaign of piracy, violence and terrorism.' He has noted the disruption Houthi attacks caused through the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, key waterways for energy and cargo shipments between Asia and Europe through Egypt's Suez Canal.

Trump's open to discussion and committed to NATO, Germany's chancellor says
Trump's open to discussion and committed to NATO, Germany's chancellor says

New York Post

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump's open to discussion and committed to NATO, Germany's chancellor says

BERLIN (AP) — German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Friday, a day after meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House, that he encountered a U.S. administration open to discussion and returned confident that Washington remains committed to NATO. Merz described his Oval Office meeting and extended lunch with Trump as constructive but also candid, noting that the two leaders expressed different views on Ukraine. 'Yesterday, in the meeting at the Oval Office, I expressed a distinctly different position on the topic of Ukraine than the one Trump had taken, and not only was there no objection, but we discussed it in detail again over lunch,' Merz said in Berlin after his return. 5 German Chancellor Friedrich Merz (right) said the U.S administration is open to discussion and returned confident that Washington remains committed to NATO, after meeting with President Trump. Xinhua/Shutterstock Thursday's White House meeting marked the first time the two sat down in person. Merz, who became chancellor in May, avoided the kind of confrontations in the Oval Office that have tripped up other world leaders, including Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy and South Africa's Cyril Ramaphosa. The two leaders opened with pleasantries. Merz presented Trump with a gold-framed birth certificate of the president's grandfather, Friedrich Trump, who emigrated from Kallstadt, Germany. Trump called Merz a 'very good man to deal with.' The American administration, he said, is open to discussion, listens, and is willing to accept differing opinions. 5 Merz gifted President Trump with a gold-framed birth certificate of his grandfather during their meeting at the White House on June 5. REUTERS 5 Trump describes Merz as a 'very good man to deal with.' AP Add he added that dialogue should go both ways: 'Let's stop talking about Donald Trump with a raised finger and wrinkled nose. You have to talk with him, not about him.' He said he also met with senators on Capitol Hill, urging them to recognize the scale of Russian rearmament. 'Please take a look at how far Russia's armament is going, what they are currently doing there; you obviously have no idea what's happening,' he said he told them. 'In short, you can talk to them, but you must not let yourself be intimidated. I don't have that inclination anyway.' 5 Chancellor Merz strategizes talking with president Trump by 'talking with him, not about him.' REUTERS Merz, who speaks English fluently, stressed the need for transatlantic trust and said he reminded Trump that allies matter. 'Whether we like it or not, we will remain dependent on the United States of America for a long time,' he said. 'But you also need partners in the world, and the Europeans, especially the Germans, are the best-suited partners. 'This is the difference between authoritarian systems and democracies: authoritarian systems have subordinates. Democracies have partners — and we want to be those partners in Europe and with America.' 5 The German Chancellor stresses the importance of allyship with the U.S. AP He reiterated that the U.S. remains committed to NATO, particularly as Germany and others boost their defense spending. Trump has in the past suggested that the U.S. might abandon its commitments to the alliance if member countries don't meet defense spending targets. 'I have absolutely no doubt that the American government is committed to NATO, especially now that we've all said we're doing more. We're ensuring that we can also defend ourselves in Europe, and I believe this expectation was not unjustified,' Merz said. 'We've been the free riders of American security guarantees for years, and we're changing that now.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store