Shein working towards Hong Kong listing after London IPO stalls
Shein is working towards a listing in Hong Kong after the online fast-fashion retailer's proposed initial public offering (IPO) in London failed to secure the green light from Chinese regulators, said three sources with knowledge of the matter.
The China-founded company aims to file a draft prospectus with Hong Kong's stock exchange in the coming weeks, one of the sources said. Shein plans to go public in the Asian financial hub within the year, two of the sources said.
Shein plans to change the listing venue as it had not yet received approval for its London IPO from Chinese regulators, notably the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), the two sources said.
The company in March secured approval from Britain's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for its IPO in London, and soon informed the CSRC, one of the sources said.
The company initially expected the green light from Chinese regulators to follow swiftly after the FCA but has since experienced an unexpected delay and limited communication from the CSRC, said the source.
Details about Shein's Hong Kong listing plan have not been reported previously. All the sources spoke to Reuters on the condition of anonymity as they were not authorised to speak to the media.
Shein and CSRC did not immediately respond to Reuters request for comment. A spokesperson for Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd declined to comment on individual companies.
Before its attempt to list in London, Shein had pursued a listing in New York, as part of its efforts to gain legitimacy as a global, rather than a Chinese company, and access to a wide pool of large Western investors.
A listing in Hong Kong would go against that strategy and could hurt its global credentials.
Allegations that Shein's products contain cotton from China's Xinjiang region and a planned legal challenge to the London IPO by a non-governmental organisation campaigning against forced labour in China have complicated the London listing and risk embarrassment for the Chinese government, a separate source with direct knowledge of the matter said.
Tensions with the US over trade only exacerbate the wariness of Beijing and the CSRC, the source said.
The US and NGOs accuse China of human rights abuses in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, where they say Uyghur people are forced to work producing cotton and other goods. Beijing has denied any abuses.
Shein says it has a zero tolerance policy for forced labour and child labour in its supply chain.
As it awaited a response from the CSRC, Shein dropped the communications firms Brunswick and FGS it had hired to help with public relations ahead of the London listing, Reuters reported earlier this month.
Reuters could not determine if Shein had sought or received a nod from the CSRC for the Hong Kong listing. The company had sought Chinese regulatory approval for going ahead with processes to list in New York and later in London.
Shein's filings with the CSRC makes it subject to Beijing's listing rules for Chinese firms going public offshore, two sources have said.
The rules are applied on "a substance over form" basis, giving the CSRC discretion on when and how to implement them, the sources added.
Shein does not own or operate any factories, and instead sources its products from 7,000 third-party suppliers in China as well as some factories in other countries like Brazil and Turkey.
Shein's aim was to go public in London in the first half of this year.
But its business model of sending products straight from factories to shoppers around the world has been disrupted by the Trump administration ending duty-free access and slapping steep tariffs on e-commerce packages from China.
The "de minimis" exemption allowed e-commerce packages from China worth less than $800 to enter the US duty-free and helped Shein, Temu, and Amazon Haul sell clothes, gadgets and accessories extremely cheaply.
Now, those parcels are subject to a minimum tariff of 30%.
Regardless of where Shein lists, its eventual IPO valuation will hinge on the impact of the removal of the de minimis exemption, the sources have said. The US exemption is still in place for goods that are not from China or Hong Kong.
The European Union has also proposed changes to its duty exemption on parcels under €150, adding to pressure on the business model.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
China 'firmly rejects' US claim that it violated tariff deal
China has said it "firmly rejects" US claims that it had violated a sweeping tariffs deal, as tensions between the two economic superpowers showed signs of ratcheting back up. Last month, China and the US agreed to slash staggeringly high tariffs on each other for 90 days after talks between top officials in Geneva. However, top US officials last week accused China of violating the deal, with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick saying Beijing was "slow-rolling" the agreement in comments to "Fox News". China hit back, saying the US "has made bogus charges and unreasonably accused China of violating the consensus, which is seriously contrary to the facts". "China firmly rejects these unreasonable accusations," the Chinese commerce ministry said in a statement. US President Donald Trump said last week that China had "totally violated" the deal, without providing details. China's commerce ministry said it "has been firm in safeguarding its rights and interests, and sincere in implementing the consensus". It fired back that the US "has successively introduced a number of discriminatory restrictive measures against China" since the Geneva talks. The ministry cited export controls on artificial intelligence chips, curbs on the sale of chip design software and the revocation of Chinese student visas in the United States. "We urge the US to meet China halfway, immediately correct its wrongful actions, and jointly uphold the consensus from the Geneva trade talks," the ministry said. If not, "China will continue to resolutely take strong measures to uphold its legitimate rights and interests," it added. Trump-Xi talks? US officials have said they are frustrated by what they see as Chinese foot-dragging on approving export licences for rare earths and other elements needed to make cars and chips. However, Washington's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent looked to ease the pressure, saying the two sides could arrange a call between their respective heads of state to resolve their differences. "I'm confident... this will be ironed out" in a call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, Mr Bessent said on CBS's "Face the Nation". He added, however, that China was "withholding some of the products that they agreed to release", including rare earths. On when a Trump-Xi call could take place, Mr Bessent said: "I believe we will see something very soon." China has been less forthcoming, and the commerce ministry's statement did not mention any planned conversations between the two leaders. The Geneva deal was "an important consensus reached by the two sides on the principle of mutual respect and equality, and its results were hard-won", the ministry said. It warned the US against "going its own way and continuing to harm China's interests".
Irish Examiner
15 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick denies EU now has 'leverage'
US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick yesterday downplayed the impact of legal uncertainty around tariffs on negotiations with the European Union, saying talks were ongoing. Mr Lutnick was asked about a report quoting an unnamed EU official close to negotiations who said the legal uncertainty of the tariffs in the US gave the EU "extra leverage". "You can't listen to silly people making silly comments," Mr Lutnick said. "All of the countries that are negotiating with us understand the power of Donald Trump and his ability to protect the American worker." A US trade court blocked most of Mr Trump's tariffs in a sweeping ruling last week that found the president overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from US trading partners. A federal appeals court paused that ruling a day later, allowing the tariffs to go into effect while it considered an appeal by the Trump administration. Mr Lutnick said the ruling "maybe cost us a week, but then everybody came right back to the table." Mr Trump in late May threatened 50% tariffs on all European goods by June 1 but days later delayed the effective date to July 9 to allow for time to negotiate. Mr Trump also said on Friday that he would increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50% from 25%, leading the European Commission on Saturday to say it could consider countermeasures. Speaking on ABC News' 'This Week,' White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said the US needed to protect its steel industry for national security reasons in light of economic rival China's steel production. "We have to show strength," Hassett said. "We have to have a steel industry that's ready for American defence." Meanwhile US Treasury Secretary Bessent said he believes Mr Trump and Chinese president Xi Jinping will speak soon to iron out trade issues including a dispute over critical minerals. Mr Trump accused China of violating an agreement with the US to mutually roll back tariffs and trade restrictions for critical minerals. "What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe. And that is not what a reliable partner does," Bessent said in an interview on Sunday with CBS' "Face the Nation." "I am confident that when President Trump and Party chairman Xi have a call, that this will be ironed out."
Irish Times
20 hours ago
- Irish Times
How a man described as ‘dumber than a sack of bricks' came to dominate global trade policy
Elon Musk called him 'a moron' and 'dumber than a sack of bricks' but he's probably the most consequential economist in the world right now. 75-year-old Peter Navarro is the intellectual driving force behind global tariffs and Donald Trump's attempt to rewire the global trading system. He wangled his way into Maga hearts with his 2011 book 'Death by China' (later a documentary) which paints China as the great Satan of world trade. In it, Navarro argues that Beijing engages in unfair trade practices, from intellectual property theft and currency manipulation to product dumping and abusive labour standards. READ MORE [ Donald Trump accuses China of violating US tariff truce Opens in new window ] And, more importantly, that the US worker is the chief fall guy. 'If the Chinese vampire can't suck the American blood, it's going to suck the UK blood and the EU blood,' he told the Daily Telegraph last month while accusing the UK of being a 'compliant servant of communist China'. The Massachusetts-born economist played a role in the first Trump administration but his push for a more aggressive stance on China was crowded out by free trade conservatives (the US did impose tariffs on Beijing but they were limited in scope). But Navarro is nothing but steadfast and he drinks the Maga Kool-Aid. He took part in the Rudy Giuliani-led campaign to have the 2020 US election result overturned and spent four months in prison last year for refusing to co-operate with the congressional inquiry into the January 6th attack on the US Capito l. His reward was to be appointed Trump's senior counsellor for trade and manufacturing and to have his tariff agenda elevated to the heart of US trade policy, the source of so much global turmoil at present. According to the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, Navarro was the brains behind Trump's reciprocal tariff formula presented by the president on a cardboard chart in the White House Rose Garden. The formula, which has no precedent in economic theory, took the US goods trade deficit with a specific country, divided it by that country's exports to the US, turned it into a percentage and then cut it in half to produce the tariff rate. It generated weird outcomes. Madagascar, one of the poorest countries in the world, qualified for a punitive 47 per cent tariff on a modest $733 million of exports of vanilla, metals and clothing to the US. Navarro is spearheading this protectionist drive or at least providing an economic rationale for Trump's isolationist tendencies. His standing in academic circles took a hammering a few years back when it emerged that he had fabricated one of the people frequently quoted in his books. 'Ron Vara' is cited in several of Navarro's books mainly to make the case against China but Ron Vara was an anagram of Navarro, and was in fact Navarro citing himself. He defended the fabrication as a 'whimsical device' but it seems even his co-authors weren't in on the joke and publishing companies are now adding advisory notes to his books. Like many in the current Washington administration, Navarro was a fringe figure (he used to write get rich quick investment books) before being anointed by Trump. If his views on tariffs are in the minority, his representation of China as the chief villain of the global trading system has become more mainstream and resonates strongly with Trump's voter base. The US has lost close to 5 million manufacturing jobs since 2001, the year China joined the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The decline has been unprecedented by US standards and has created, or at least compounded, what's often referred to as a Rust Belt from the Midwest to the Great Lakes, an area that spans from western New York to Michigan and north Illinois and encompasses states like West Virginia, Ohio and Indiana. It was once the backbone of US industry, but it has now become synonymous with economic decline, population loss and urban decay. You could argue that the US backlash against globalisation and politics currently playing out in Washington is largely a product of Rust Belt economics. Navarro penned a chapter in Project 2025 (reputedly the ultraconservative blueprint for Trump's second term) called 'the case for fair trade' in which he makes the argument for action against what he describes as China's 'institutionalised aggression'. And why the US's big trade deficits (in goods) with other countries (Ireland is highlighted as having the seventh biggest) has been so damaging. 'These trade deficit statistics implicitly measure the large amounts of America's manufacturing and defense industrial base and supply chains that have been offshored to foreign lands,' he says. 'Such offshoring not only suppresses the real wages of American blue-collar workers and denies millions of Americans the opportunity to climb up the rungs of the ladder to the middle class, but also raises the spectre of a manufacturing and defense industrial base that, unlike our experience in World Wars I and II, will not be able to provide the weapons and material that would be needed should America enter another major world war or seek to assist a major ally like Europe, Japan, or Taiwan,' he says. The above passage encapsulates why many in the US see globalisation as a betrayal of the American dream and a fundamental attack on US hegemony.
