There's a new questionnaire to determine if your cat is a psychopath — but let's get real, our cats are the ones keeping us sane
When will we stop slandering cats?
I ask after a headline in Science Alert this week: 'Scientists Developed a Questionnaire To Find Out If Your Cat Is a Psychopath.' Other animals are not subjected to such scrutiny. Scientists aren't trying to find out if your hamster is a narcissist. Or if turtles are agoraphobic.
Although, I did once ride a horse that was clearly bipolar.
The research, which started in 2021, sets out to quantify a 'Model of Triarchic Psychopathy Factors' in domestic cats. The 46 queries are statements you grade on a six-point scale, from 'does not describe my cat' to 'describes my cat extremely well.'
Samples: 'My cat does not appear to act guilty after misbehaving.' 'My cat needs constant stimulation.' 'My cat runs around the house for no apparent reason.'
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Question for science: Doesn't this describe all cats?
What's next? A study to see if fish can swim?
The people building the generative AI models that are going to kill us all often say they don't understand how these machines 'think.' Ditto for cat owners.
Our four-legged pals are like AI. I never know what my cats are thinking. Sometimes they hallucinate while tracking invisible ghosts. Sometimes they are inexplicably hostile to gravity. Sometimes they knock over a vase and then glare at me with projected judgment, as if I am Diddy and they are the jury.
Those are the rules of engagement. I feed them, shelter them, nurture them, play with them, love them and talk to them: 'Kitties, I'm so glad we defected from Leafs Nation!'
In exchange, they remain indifferent to my existence. It's wonderful.
What I'd like is if science stopped trying to plant seeds of doubt in my head.
Dogs are glorified as 'man's best friend.' Cats are now compared to Jeffrey Dahmer.
There is a book on Amazon titled, 'How to Tell If Your Cat Is Plotting to Kill You.' Is this really necessary? Do I need longitudinal studies that find cats are serial killers at heart? Or that 'cats are incredibly lazy.' Or that cats are 'killing machines.' Or that cats are 'naturally apathetic.'
Which is it?
Would my two cats, 18-month-old Bengal rescues, hurt a fly? Absolutely. They will murder anything that moves. This is why they are indoor cats. I must protect my backyard birds and squirrels. I can override any Triarchic Psychopathy.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
When a much bigger raccoon wanders on the deck at night, my cats are ready to rumble behind those patio doors. Their ears go down. Their bodies tense up. The battle cry is a cute chirp. Tails start wagging back and forth like metronomes.
Then the raccoon toddles off and Willow and Flynn snap out of the spell.
If they were true psychopaths, they'd grab a meat cleaver out of the counter block and force me to unlock the door to help them rough up that raccoon for violating their territory. But they've never hurt me beyond attacking my wiggling toes under the duvet.
One of the 46 queries: 'My cat disobeys house rules.'
Psst, scientists. Cats don't speak English. How can you disobey if you don't understand? My wife has house rules. Sometimes I feel like a cat: That cheesecake was for Saturday's dinner party? You never told me. You did tell me? I'm sorry. Maybe you should just rub my belly?
Dogs can be trained with verbal commands. You can say scream an emergency order to a cat and it will just stare through your soul or yawn and lick itself. My cats do like music. After a shower, I let them in and we have a concert. Well, I sing. They emit squeaks that imply they'd prefer if I stopped singing so we can go downstairs to watch the sparrows they yearn to kill.
But would psychopaths tolerate my off-key ABBA?
Here's the thing: all this feline pathologizing is undermining the spiritual joy of having fur babies in these anxious times. There was a global study this week of 30,000 pet owners. Some key findings: 58 per cent prefer to spend time with pets over loved ones when feeling stressed; 77 per cent are relaxed by talking to pets; and 'pets are even encouraging us to take breaks from activities that can fuel our stress — from doomscrolling, chores, work and other tasks.'
Science should go back to studying the five-second rule or coming to a consensus on red wine. Is it good or bad for our health? Leave cats alone. We love them and they need our love. They are curious and goofy, demanding and easygoing. They purr in our laps and snooze on our pillows.
They meow soothing sanity into this crazy world.
Is my cat a psychopath? Science, I really don't care.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
21-05-2025
- CBC
Fires in the Amazon drive record-shattering global forest losses in 2024
Massive fires fuelled by climate change led global forest loss to smash records in 2024, according to a report issued on Wednesday. Loss of tropical pristine forests alone reached 6.7 million hectares (16.6 million acres), an area roughly the size of Panama, marking an 80 per cent spike compared to 2023. One of the central drivers of these staggering numbers was Brazil, the host of the next global climate summit in November, struggling to contain fires in the Amazon amid the worst drought ever recorded in the rainforest. According to the data, issued by the World Resources Institute and the University of Maryland, the rate of tropical primary forest loss in 2024 was the equivalent of losing 18 soccer fields of trees per minute. Canada and Bolivia, along with myriad other countries, were also on the list of those ravaged by wildfires, with both tropical and boreal forests seeing huge impacts from fires. It was the first time the annual report showed fires as the leading cause of tropical forest loss, a grim milestone for a naturally humid ecosystem that is not supposed to burn. "The signals in these data are particularly frightening," said Matthew Hansen, the co-director of a lab at the University of Maryland that compiled and analyzed the data. "The fear is that the climate signal is going to overtake our ability to respond effectively." Globally, researchers estimated that more than 4.1 gigatonnes of greenhouse gases were released due to forest fires last year — more than four times the emissions released from air travel in 2023. Bolivia overtook the Democratic Republic of Congo as the second country with the most tropical forest loss despite having less than half the amount of forest as the African nation, which also saw a spike in forest loss last year. Bolivia's forest loss surged by 200 per cent in 2024, with a drought, wildfires and a government-incentivized agricultural expansion as the leading causes. In regions full of tropical forests, fire is used to clear lands for agricultural expansion, sometimes cutting into protected areas or causing illegal deforestation. One region in southern Bolivia bucked the trend of forest loss: Charagua Iyambae, a protected, autonomous Indigenous territory, which was able to keep the country's record fires at bay through land-use policies and early warning systems. The Charagua Iyambae region includes five million hectares of forest, and recent protection laws have strengthened the Guaraní Indigenous people's management of the lands, allowing them to better resist agricultural expansion. Southeast Asia also saw glimmers of hope, with Malaysia, Laos, and Indonesia all posting double-digit decreases in primary forest loss — something the report credits to domestic conservation policy, combined with efforts by communities and the private sector, effectively containing fires and agricultural expansion. Countries hit hard by fires Latin America was hit particularly hard, the report said, with the Amazon biome hitting its highest level of primary forest loss since 2016. Brazil, which holds the largest share of the world's tropical forests, lost 2.8 million hectares (6.9 million acres), the most of any country. It was a reversal of the progress made in 2023 when President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva took office promising to protect the world's largest rainforest. "This was unprecedented, which means we have to adapt all our policy to a new reality," said Andre Lima, who oversees deforestation control policies for Brazil's Ministry of Environment, adding that fire, which was never among the leading causes of forest loss, is now a top priority for the government. Increased forest loss in Mexico, Peru, Nicaragua, and Guatemala was spurred largely by wildfires and fires started for agricultural expansion, the report found. Conflicts in Colombia and the Democratic Republic of Congo also boosted deforestation rates, as armed groups used up natural resources. 5.2 million hectares in Canada Outside the tropics, boreal forests, which evolved with seasonal fires, also posted record-high tree loss in 2024, the data showed, with Canada and Russia each losing 5.2 million hectares (12.8 million acres) in 2024 as wildfires got out of control. It's part of a dismal trend for Canada. Data from the World Resources Institute published last year found that Canada's devastating 2023 wildfire season accounted for more than half of that year's global forest loss due to fire. WATCH | Fires in Canada drove forest loss in 2023: Wildfires in Canada blamed for increase in global tree loss 1 year ago Duration 2:00 More than half of all the forest lost to fire last year was in Canada thanks to an unprecedented wildfire season, according to an annual survey published by the World Resources Institute. In 2021, more than 140 world leaders, including Canada, signed the Glasgow Leaders Declaration reaffirming a promise to halt and reverse forest loss by 2030. But this new data suggests the global community is far off track in achieving that goal. Rod Taylor, the global director for forests at the WRI, said that as leaders descend on the Amazonian city of Belem for the next climate summit, he would like to see countries make progress in introducing better funding mechanisms for conservation. "At the moment," he said, "there's more money to be paid by chopping forests down than keeping them standing."
CBC
16-05-2025
- CBC
The internet is full of misinformation. That's by design, experts say
This current time period we're in has been called the Information Age, and it's easy to see why. This year, the global amount of data generated is expected to reach 181 zettabytes — or 181 trillion gigabytes — up from just two zettabytes in 2010. Some studies say that there is now more data out there than there are stars in the observable universe. But all this information comes at a cost. "We're living at a time that I've categorized as a knowledge crisis," says University of Alberta law professor Tim Caulfield. "We have access to more information now than ever before in human history ... despite that, we've never been more misled, more confused." A 2023 Statistics Canada survey said 43 per cent of Canadians feel that it's getting harder to decipher what's true and what's fake online — and that was even before the rise of AI and deepfakes. Several recent scientific studies have attempted to quantify just how much of this information is actually real. "Our information environment is completely manipulated, and often people don't realize the degree to which that is the case," said Caulfield. Analyzing TikTok, Amazon, and search engines In a 2024 study published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, Caulfield and his colleagues looked at the quality of books about cancer on Amazon. "We found 49 per cent of the books had misleading content in it, and some of it was just completely atrocious," said Caulfield. They also found that on the first page of results on Amazon, 70 per cent of the content was misleading. "And once again, sometimes just hardcore bunk," he adds. A study published in March, led by University of British Columbia PhD student Vasileia Karasavva, took aim at health information presented on TikTok. The researchers analyzed the top 100 TikTok videos by view count that mentioned ADHD, and shared them with clinical psychologists working with ADHD patients, who reported that half the videos contained some sort of misinformation. "We sort of saw that a lot of this information didn't match up with the diagnostic criteria," said Karasavva. "They were presenting things that have more to do with normal human behaviour as symptoms of ADHD." The team also looked at the creators themselves, and found that half of them stood to make financial gain from this content, posting direct sales links to supposed cures. Everybody is fighting for your attention, and that makes all of us vulnerable. - University of British Columbia psychologist Friedrich Götz In another study from March, Tulane University assistant professor Eugina Leung investigated how results on search engines like Google, Bing and ChatGPT differ depending on the search terms used. "What we find is that people tend to use search terms that lean toward what they already believe is true," said Leung. "Imagine, we asked participants to search for health effects of caffeine. If they believe that caffeine is quite likely to be harmful, then they're more likely to come up with search terms like dangers of caffeine, caffeine side effects, caffeine health risks." These narrow search terms, Leung said, mean that the users are just receiving results that are tied to their beliefs. "When we try to search for information online, a lot of times we actually are looking to learn something new," said Leung. "With the design of a narrow search engines and also our tendency to come up with a narrow search term, the combination of this means that we're often not actually learning something new." 'We are all susceptible' A 2024 paper by computer scientist Boleslaw Szymansky, published in the journal Nature Human Behaviour, argues that we should consider our information space as part of our natural environment — and acknowledge just how badly it's being polluted by this "data smog." Our inability to decipher what's true and what's false online is limiting people's capacity to evaluate information and make timely decisions, the authors write, and cites research that suggests this costs the U.S. economy over a trillion dollars annually due to lost productivity. "We live in a time where the attention economy is dictating a lot of our experiences. So everybody is fighting for your attention," says University of British Columbia psychologist Friedrich Götz. "And that makes all of us vulnerable." In his research, Götz wanted to understand who was most susceptible to false information online. In a global study published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences in March, Götz and his team asked over 66,000 participants to discern between fake headlines and real ones. Most people did poorly. "The biggest takeaway is that nobody is immune," he said. But the study found certain groups were more susceptible than others. This includes women, people with lower levels of education, people who lean conservative politically, and Gen Z. He points to education, and specifically the development and practicing of critical thinking skills, as being a defining factor in who fell for fake news more often. Caulfield echoes the need for more critical thinking skills to help people navigate information in the attention economy, and suggests something as simple as taking a moment to stop and process information can often help. "I think that's because it creates this break between your initial emotional response to the content and it allows, even for that moment, your rational mind to kick in." Researchers also point to other mitigation strategies in the works, such the University of Cambridge's Bad News Game and other programs that walk people through the mechanics of manipulation. There's also Concordia University's SmoothDetector, which harnesses AI and algorithms to parse through the data smog to find misinformation. "We are now at a stage where I think the interventions could be implemented at scale. They have been tested," said Götz.
Toronto Star
16-05-2025
- Toronto Star
There's a new questionnaire to determine if your cat is a psychopath — but let's get real, our cats are the ones keeping us sane
When will we stop slandering cats? I ask after a headline in Science Alert this week: 'Scientists Developed a Questionnaire To Find Out If Your Cat Is a Psychopath.' Other animals are not subjected to such scrutiny. Scientists aren't trying to find out if your hamster is a narcissist. Or if turtles are agoraphobic. Although, I did once ride a horse that was clearly bipolar. The research, which started in 2021, sets out to quantify a 'Model of Triarchic Psychopathy Factors' in domestic cats. The 46 queries are statements you grade on a six-point scale, from 'does not describe my cat' to 'describes my cat extremely well.' Samples: 'My cat does not appear to act guilty after misbehaving.' 'My cat needs constant stimulation.' 'My cat runs around the house for no apparent reason.' ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Question for science: Doesn't this describe all cats? What's next? A study to see if fish can swim? The people building the generative AI models that are going to kill us all often say they don't understand how these machines 'think.' Ditto for cat owners. Our four-legged pals are like AI. I never know what my cats are thinking. Sometimes they hallucinate while tracking invisible ghosts. Sometimes they are inexplicably hostile to gravity. Sometimes they knock over a vase and then glare at me with projected judgment, as if I am Diddy and they are the jury. Those are the rules of engagement. I feed them, shelter them, nurture them, play with them, love them and talk to them: 'Kitties, I'm so glad we defected from Leafs Nation!' In exchange, they remain indifferent to my existence. It's wonderful. What I'd like is if science stopped trying to plant seeds of doubt in my head. Dogs are glorified as 'man's best friend.' Cats are now compared to Jeffrey Dahmer. There is a book on Amazon titled, 'How to Tell If Your Cat Is Plotting to Kill You.' Is this really necessary? Do I need longitudinal studies that find cats are serial killers at heart? Or that 'cats are incredibly lazy.' Or that cats are 'killing machines.' Or that cats are 'naturally apathetic.' Which is it? Would my two cats, 18-month-old Bengal rescues, hurt a fly? Absolutely. They will murder anything that moves. This is why they are indoor cats. I must protect my backyard birds and squirrels. I can override any Triarchic Psychopathy. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW When a much bigger raccoon wanders on the deck at night, my cats are ready to rumble behind those patio doors. Their ears go down. Their bodies tense up. The battle cry is a cute chirp. Tails start wagging back and forth like metronomes. Then the raccoon toddles off and Willow and Flynn snap out of the spell. If they were true psychopaths, they'd grab a meat cleaver out of the counter block and force me to unlock the door to help them rough up that raccoon for violating their territory. But they've never hurt me beyond attacking my wiggling toes under the duvet. One of the 46 queries: 'My cat disobeys house rules.' Psst, scientists. Cats don't speak English. How can you disobey if you don't understand? My wife has house rules. Sometimes I feel like a cat: That cheesecake was for Saturday's dinner party? You never told me. You did tell me? I'm sorry. Maybe you should just rub my belly? Dogs can be trained with verbal commands. You can say scream an emergency order to a cat and it will just stare through your soul or yawn and lick itself. My cats do like music. After a shower, I let them in and we have a concert. Well, I sing. They emit squeaks that imply they'd prefer if I stopped singing so we can go downstairs to watch the sparrows they yearn to kill. But would psychopaths tolerate my off-key ABBA? Here's the thing: all this feline pathologizing is undermining the spiritual joy of having fur babies in these anxious times. There was a global study this week of 30,000 pet owners. Some key findings: 58 per cent prefer to spend time with pets over loved ones when feeling stressed; 77 per cent are relaxed by talking to pets; and 'pets are even encouraging us to take breaks from activities that can fuel our stress — from doomscrolling, chores, work and other tasks.' Science should go back to studying the five-second rule or coming to a consensus on red wine. Is it good or bad for our health? Leave cats alone. We love them and they need our love. They are curious and goofy, demanding and easygoing. They purr in our laps and snooze on our pillows. They meow soothing sanity into this crazy world. Is my cat a psychopath? Science, I really don't care.
