logo
Historic Shifts Offer Syria A Path Forward

Historic Shifts Offer Syria A Path Forward

Scoop21-05-2025

Press Release – UN News
After years of stalemate and suffering, Syria is beginning to see renewed international engagement.
21 May 2025
The United States, European Union and United Kingdom have taken steps to ease long-standing sanctions – moves that, according to UN officials, could pave the way for long-overdue progress on the political and humanitarian front, provided they are sustained and inclusive.
Speaking to the Security Council from the capital Damascus on Wednesday, UN Special Envoy for Syria Geir Pedersen called the developments 'historic,' highlighting their potential to improve conditions on the ground and allow a successful transition.
'They hold major potential to improve living conditions across the country and to support the Syrian political transition, giving Syrian people a chance to grapple with the legacy of misrule, conflict, abuses and poverty,' he said.
The sanctions, imposed mostly during the Assad era, have long been blamed for hindering economic recovery.
Regional powers including Saudi Arabia, Türkiye and Qatar are supporting renewed engagement, offering support to fund public salaries, energy infrastructure and Syria's obligations to international financial institutions.
National political movements
The easing of sanctions comes amid significant domestic developments, with Syria's interim government announcing last week the formation of two key bodies: the National Commission for Transitional Justice and the National Commission for Missing Persons.
Both are seen as essential to rebuilding trust and addressing the legacy of enforced disappearances and war crimes that have scarred nearly every Syrian household, Mr. Pedersen said.
He urged continued steps to ensure that the new People's Assembly is truly representative and that the rights and aspirations of women and girls are protected.
'Syrians also continue to look ahead to the envisaged future constitutional process, which needs to be inclusive of all social and political components in shaping a new social contract and paving the way for the free and fair elections as called for by [Interim Prime Minister] Ahmed al-Sharaa from the outset.'
Crisis on the ground
Despite political momentum, Syria's humanitarian crisis remains dire. Over 16 million people need aid and over half the population faces hunger, senior UN humanitarian Ramesh Rajasingham warned ambassadors.
Sectarian violence has deepened the crisis, displacing more than 670,000 people since November, among them 15,000 during a recent flare-up in Druze-majority areas of rural Damascus.
The situation has been further complicated by Israeli airstrikes, including near the presidential palace and during the unrest in Druze-majority neighbourhoods.
UN agencies meanwhile face a severe funding shortfall, having received only 10 per cent of a $2 billion appeal for the first half of 2025. Dozens of hospitals, community support centres and safe spaces for women – especially in the northeast and northwest – have already closed.
'The consequences are already visible and will become more so as time passes and as funding cuts take hold,' said Mr. Rajasingham, who is the Director of Coordination at the UN relief wing, OCHA.
Seize the moment
Both officials stressed that lifting sanctions must lead to tangible progress in recovery and stability.
'The Syrian people have taken heart from the fact that the decisions to lift sanctions give them a better chance than before to succeed against great odds,' Mr. Pedersen said.
'They are looking to the interim authorities to seize this moment and push towards a fully inclusive transition…and to all of us to do our part as genuine partners in support.'
US implementing sanctions relief
Speaking for the United States, John Kelley, Political Coordinator at the US mission, said government agencies are beginning the process of sanctions relief and restoring diplomatic ties with Syria.
He called on Syrian authorities to take bold steps and show sustained progress on the clear expectations the US has communicated.
This includes, removing foreign terrorist fighters, cooperate with the US and partners to prevent resurgence of ISIS detention facilities, and making peace with Israel through the Abraham Accords.
'We continue to urge the new government to choose policies that will reinforce stability, protect human rights of all Syrians, ensure peace with Syria's neighbours, develop Syria's economy and become at long last a responsible member of the international community.'
Syrians uniting for future prosperity
Riyad Khaddour, Syria's Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN, told ambassadors in New York that his country is committed to becoming a nation of peace and partnership – not a battleground for conflict or foreign ambitions.
'As countries in the region and beyond extend their hands to Syria, Syrians themselves are uniting across all factions, rejecting extremism, terrorism, and hate speech,' he said.
Mr. Khaddour noted that Syrian institutions are committed to international standards, working to improve the investment climate and advancing economic reforms.
He hailed the lifting of sanctions as a long-awaited turning point, adding that it offers 'real prospects' to alleviate the humanitarian crisis and accelerate recovery.
'Syrians have welcomed it with great hope, seeing it as a first step towards restoring normal life, reviving the economy, ensuring food security and returning to the path of sustainable development.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters to Editor: hospital, Winston Peters and job satisfaction
Letters to Editor: hospital, Winston Peters and job satisfaction

Otago Daily Times

time9 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Letters to Editor: hospital, Winston Peters and job satisfaction

Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including the new hospital, Winston Peters and getting people into jobs they love. I sympathise but turn your eyes to the north While I certainly sympathise with Dr Mac Gardner's frustration at the current government's total lack of progress on the new Dunedin hospital build (ODT 28.5.25), I do take issue with his suggestion that all the previous government contributed is a 'field of piles'. I would invite Dr Gardner to stand on the footpath adjacent to said piles and gaze northward. There he will see the finishing touches being put on the new hospital inpatient building - a testament to Labour's commitment, and always planned as stage 1 of the overall hospital campus development. The 'field of piles' on the other had, is both a factual and metaphorical testament to 18 months of the current government's complete (and costly) inaction. Max Reid Mornington Exhibit leadership Our Foreign Minister Winston Peters has, in his capacity as deputy prime minister, just days to exhibit leadership and convince his coalition colleagues to take a stronger and principled approach to the Gaza-Israel war. Having signed the 23-nation letter condemning the refusal of Israel to allow humanitarian aid to Gaza while over 14,000 babies and children face imminent death from starvation, New Zealand must continue to step forward and apply boycotts, sanctions and divest from Israeli companies. The genocide in Gaza is being televised. We are all witnesses. Our government must not continue to contract out of humanity and speak with a muffled voice. Gina Browne Caversham What to do Re Gaza, I have come to realise that I no longer know what to do with my outrage. Pete Hodgson Dunedin Extraordinary amounts Re the Otago Daily Times article on Winston Peters (21.5.25). I was disappointed that Mike Houlahan's piece failed to address Winston Peters' association with fringe groups and the anti-vaccination movement. Furthermore, there was no mention of his adoption of a divisive, Trumpian-style of politics. It seems Mr Peters is highly skilled at adapting his political stance to maintain relevance and garner votes. On a lighter note, I couldn't help but notice the similarity in colour between apple juice, reportedly his preferred drink on long flights, and whisky. Ann James Abbotsford Application pending In relation to Winston Peters' recent difference of opinion with an individual in Wellington, you quote employment law specialist Jennifer Mills asserting that a sacking offence had occurred. As a former union delegate for 20 years I would suggest that she remember the saying that ''it is better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.'' She has done the employer no favours by prejudging the situation, thus making it impossible for that employer to conduct the unbiased investigation to which the employee is absolutely entitled. As advocate for him I would challenge any claim from the company that it was not influenced by her unsolicited comments and this would permanently taint its case should it choose to act on her advice. I feel an application to the Employment Tribunal coming on. Barry Salter Invercargill Life in the Soviet republic of New Zealand A sanction is the penalty for disobeying a law or rule. When we hear that word, we naturally think about the sanctions that are placed on Russia right now. Well, Russia, and New Zealanders on a government benefit. The obligations of a job seeker is that you are expected to work at least 30 hours a week, but say yes to any job of any number of hours anyway. You have to go to job interviews for jobs that Winz told you to go to, seminars about how to get a job and then update Winz as reasonably as they require, about your progress. You may also be told to do volunteer work or work experience. You also must make sure you do not neglect to care for your children while you are working or volunteering. You must meet all of these obligations, despite the 5.1% unemployment rate which is now up at the Covid 2020 levels. But if you do decide to not meet these obligations, we will put half of your money to make ends meet on to a payment card. The card will likely show anyone who sees it, your name, and the title of being someone who has been sanctioned. You know, like Russia. When you see someone with one of these cards, don't look directly at them, they're clearly the bottom of society's barrel. Alternatively, we could treat everyone like valued human beings and pursue opportunities to not only help people into a job but a job they love and are passionate about. Vickie Cross Mosgiel Train please Would you please do one good deed for us Southeners? We need our train service reinstated. It is so missed, and so much more comfortable for us of a good age. And will clear the crowded roads, which is a real bonus. Pauline Watts Forbury Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@

Global Backlash: How The World Could Shift Israel's Gaza Strategy
Global Backlash: How The World Could Shift Israel's Gaza Strategy

Scoop

time11 hours ago

  • Scoop

Global Backlash: How The World Could Shift Israel's Gaza Strategy

The decision resonated as shocking for all sides. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose entire war strategy hinges on the starvation of Palestinians in Gaza, unilaterally decided on May 19 to allow 'immediate' food entry to the famine-stricken Strip. Of course, Netanyahu still maneuvered. Instead of permitting at least 1,000 trucks of aid to enter the utterly destroyed and devastated Gaza per day, he initially allowed a mere nine trucks, a number that nominally increased in the following days. Even Netanyahu's staunch supporters, who fiercely criticized the decision, found themselves confounded by it. The prior understanding among Netanyahu's coalition partners regarding their ultimate plan in Gaza had been unequivocally clear: the total occupation of the Strip and the forced displacement of its population. The latter was articulated as a matter of explicit policy by Israel's Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich. 'Gaza will be entirely destroyed, civilians will be sent to... third countries,' he declared on May 6. For food to enter Gaza, however minuscule its quantity, directly violates the established understanding between the government and the military, under the leadership of Netanyahu's ally, Defense Minister Israel Katz, and Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir. These two significant additions to Netanyahu's war cabinet replaced Yoav Gallant and Herzi Halevi. With these new appointments, Netanyahu stood poised for his master plan. When the war commenced on October 7, 2023, the Israeli leader promised that he would take control of the Gaza Strip. This position evolved, or rather was clarified, to signify permanent occupation, though without the Palestinians themselves. To achieve such a lofty objective–lofty, given Israel's consistent failure to subdue the Palestinians over the course of nearly 600 days–Netanyahu and his men meticulously devised the "Gideon's Chariots" plan. The propaganda that accompanied this new strategy transcended all the hasbara that had accompanied previous plans, including the failed"Generals' Plan" of October 2024. The rationale behind this psychological warfare is to imprint upon the Palestinians in Gaza the indelible impression that their fate has been sealed, and that the future of Gaza can only be determined by Israel itself. The plan, however, a rehash of what is historically known as ' Sharon's Fingers,' is fundamentally predicated on sectionalizing Gaza into several distinct zones, and leveraging food as a tool for displacement into these camps, and ultimately, outside of Gaza. However, why would Netanyahu agree to allow food access outside his sinister scheme? The reason behind this relates profoundly to the explosion of global anger directed at Israel, particularly from its most staunch allies: Britain, France, Canada, Australia, among others. Unlike Spain, Norway, Ireland and others that have sharply criticized the Israeli genocide, a few Western capitals have remained committed to Israel throughout the war. Their commitment manifested in supportive political discourse, blaming Palestinians and absolving Israel; unhindered military support; and resolute shielding of Israel from legal accountability and political fallout on the global stage. Things began to change when US President Donald Trump slowly grasped that Netanyahu's war in Gaza was destined to become a permanent war and occupation, which would inevitably translate to the perpetual destabilization of the Middle East – hardly a pressing American priority at the moment. Leaked reports in US mainstream media, coupled with the noticeable lack of communication between Trump and Netanyahu, among other indicators, strongly suggested that the rift between Washington and Tel Aviv was not a mere ploy but a genuine policy shift. Though Washington had indicated that the "US has not abandoned Israel," the writing was clearly on the wall: Netanyahu's long-term strategy and the US' current strategy are hardly convergent. Despite the formidable political power of the pro-Israel lobby in the US, and its robust support on both sides of the Congressional aisle, Trump's position was strengthened by the fact that some pro-Israeli circles, also from both political parties, are fully aware that Netanyahu poses a danger not only to the US, but to Israel itself. A series of decisive actions taken by Trump further accentuated this shift, which received surprisingly little protest from the pro-Israel element in US power circles: continued talks with Iran, the truce with Ansarallah in Yemen, talks with Hamas, etc. Though refraining from openly criticizing Trump, Netanyahu intensified his killings of Palestinians, who fell in tragically large numbers. Many of the victims were already on the brink of starvation before they were mercilessly blown up by Israeli bombs. On May 19, Britain, Canada, and France jointly issued a strong statement threatening Israel with sanctions. This unfamiliar language was swiftly followed by action just a day later when Britain suspended trade talks with Israel. Netanyahu retaliated with furious language, unleashing his rage at Western capitals, which he accused of 'offering a huge prize for the genocidal attack on Israel on October 7 while inviting more such atrocities.' The decision to allow some food into Gaza, though patently insufficient to stave off the deepening famine, was meant as a distraction, as the Israeli war machine relentlessly continued to harvest the lives of countless Palestinians on a daily basis. While one welcomes the significant shifts in the West's position against Israel, it must remain abundantly clear that Netanyahu has no genuine interest in abandoning his plan of starving and ethnically cleansing Gaza. Though any action now will not fully reverse the impact of the genocide, there are still two million lives that can yet be saved. - Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is ' Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out'. His other books include 'My Father was a Freedom Fighter' and 'The Last Earth'. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store