This news about ice cream might ruin your appetite — and summer
It's a marvel of food technology: ice cream that resists melting.
In a video explaining the science behind it, a seller of food chemicals shows scoops of ice cream holding their shape under hot lights. The super ingredient? Polysorbate 80.
Polysorbate 80 is an emulsifier, a chemical used to control the consistency of thousands of supermarket products. Other widely used emulsifiers or stabilizers include carboxymethyl cellulose, carrageenan, and maltodextrin.
Recently, such ingredients have been showing up in scientific studies for another reason: Researchers say they may cause a variety of health problems.
Studies have found that emulsifiers can alter the mix of bacteria in the gut, known as the microbiome or microbiota; damage the lining of the gastrointestinal tract; and trigger inflammation, potentially contributing to problems elsewhere in the body.
Emulsifiers and stabilizers are among the most common ingredients in ultraprocessed foods, a prime target of the 'Make America Healthy Again' campaign by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
They are on the department's radar: Their potentially harmful effects were flagged in a document HHS recently produced to support Kennedy's drive to eliminate petroleum-based food dyes.
But they illustrate the complexity of the war on food additives.
They show how, when it comes to food science, regulators are chronically playing catch-up. In the meantime, for many ingredients, regulators and consumers alike are left in a gray zone between suspicion and proof of harm in humans.
Emulsifiers' assault on the microbiome could help explain inflammatory bowel diseases such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, metabolic disorders, and even cancer, the studies suggest.
'There is a lot of data showing that those compounds are really detrimental for the microbiota and that we should stop using them,' said Benoit Chassaing, a research director at the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research and a co-author of several related studies.
Yet much larger and more ambitious clinical trials in humans are needed, Chassaing added.
For Lewis Rands, who has suffered from gastrointestinal illness, the research fits his own experience as a consumer. Changing his diet to avoid emulsifiers has made a shocking difference, easing symptoms that were debilitating, Rands said.
'Clinically, many patients have reported an improvement in symptoms with such changes,' said Ashwin Ananthakrishnan, a gastroenterologist and researcher at Massachusetts General Hospital.
The scientific findings come with caveats. For instance, much of the research has been done in mice, or by mimicking the human gut in a tube. There are many unknowns. Not all emulsifiers have bad effects, or the same effects, and some people are thought to be much more vulnerable than others. Even some researchers who have co-authored papers say that the substances have not been proven harmful to humans and that it's too soon to say regulators should ban them.
Still, the research poses a challenge for the FDA.
When emulsifiers began spreading through the food supply, the agency wasn't focusing on the gut microbiome, a relatively recent scientific frontier, researchers said.
Martin Makary, appointed by President Donald Trump to head the FDA, mentioned the microbiome at his Senate confirmation hearing in March. Though he didn't cite emulsifiers specifically or identify chemicals by name, he said substances that affect the microbiome deserve the FDA's attention.
'There's a body of research now that suggests concern with some of these ingredients,' he said. 'We have to look at those ingredients, and you have my commitment to do so if confirmed as FDA commissioner.'
'These chemicals are creating an inflammatory response in the gastrointestinal tract, and with an altered microbiome lining that GI tract, kids feel sick,' he added.
The FDA and the Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to questions about Makary's testimony.
However, when journalist Emily Kopp asked HHS for the science behind its recent announcement that it is phasing out petroleum-based food dyes, the agency provided a compilation of information on potentially harmful compounds commonly found in ultraprocessed foods. The document, which appeared to be a draft, included a section on emulsifiers, such as xanthan gum and carrageenan. It noted that the section needed more work.
HHS subsequently provided the document to KFF Health News.
As far back as 2020, an international organization for the study of inflammatory bowel diseases advised that, for people with those conditions, it 'may be prudent to limit intake' of maltodextrin, carrageenan, carboxymethyl cellulose, and polysorbate 80.
Emulsifiers are developed from a variety of sources, including plants and bacteria.
Some ingredients that might affect the microbiome show up in foods because they were deemed 'generally recognized as safe,' or GRAS.
'New information may at any time require reconsideration of the GRAS status of a food ingredient,' the Code of Federal Regulations says.
'More of a difference than any drug'
Rands, a genetic scientist, took matters into his own hands to battle severe inflammatory bowel disease. The illness caused bloating, stomach pain, cramps, frequent bowel movements, and bleeding, he said. It left him in a constant state of anxiety and stress, he added, wondering where the nearest bathroom was and whether he'd reach it in time.
Even taking a walk around the block with his wife and baby near their home in Australia was problematic.
Then, on the advice of a dietitian, Rands began avoiding foods with emulsifiers: chemicals such as carboxymethyl cellulose, carrageenan, guar gum, xanthan gum, and maltodextrin — plus other additives.
For instance, instead of eating Ben & Jerry's ice cream, he switched to Häagen-Dazs ice cream that is free of the substances at issue.
The relief was dramatic.
'It's a huge difference,' Rands said. 'To me, it's made more of a difference than any drug.'
He has been able to scale back or stop taking several drugs, which is an added relief — not least because some can have harmful side effects, and, he said, one was taking its toll.
Rands said he used a scientific approach, isolating variables in his diet and logging the results. Avoiding artificial sweeteners helps, he said, but most of the benefit relates to avoiding the emulsifiers.
Ben & Jerry's did not respond to a request for comment.
'Science that hasn't been done yet'
The Consumer Brands Association, which represents makers of processed foods, stands behind use of the chemicals.
'Food safety and protecting the integrity of the food supply is priority number one for the makers of America's food and beverage products,' Sarah Gallo, the group's senior vice president of product policy, said in a statement.
'Emulsifiers and thickening agents play an important role in improving food texture and consistency, and have been studied by the FDA through a rigorous scientific and risk-based process,' Gallo said.
Asked for specifics on how the FDA had analyzed potential effects on the microbiome, the group did not respond.
Chassaing said the chemicals were 'never considered for the potential effect on the microbiota.'
Robert Califf, who led the FDA under Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, said in an interview that scientists are just beginning to understand the microbiome. He compared it to where the field of genomics was 20 years ago, only much more complicated — 'multiplied by a thousand dimensions.'
He said the substances 'fell within the standards' when they were greenlighted. 'But hopefully most people agree that the standards need to be upgraded,' he added.
'This is different than traditional food safety thinking about, 'Does it cause an immediate problem?'' Califf said. 'We're talking about long-term health outcomes here.'
And has the FDA evaluated those?
'How could it? There was no way to do it,' Califf said. The answers will vary depending on the emulsifier, and 'proving whether it's bad or good is going to require rigorous science that hasn't been done yet.'
More recent scientific capabilities expand the possibilities, he said.
'A lot of confusion in the field'
For a consumer, trying to steer clear of emulsifiers can be difficult. Without realizing it, people can consume a variety of emulsifiers from a variety of foods — and the same chemicals from multiple sources.
Polysorbate 80 was listed as an ingredient on the labels of 2,311 products as of May 12, according to an online database posted by the Environmental Working Group using information from NielsenIQ. Carrageenan was listed on 8,100 product labels; maltodextrin, 12,769; and xanthan gum, 17,153.
Some emulsifiers have multiple names, making them harder to recognize. Some names can apply to more than one emulsifier. And some chemical names that appear on product labels don't appear in the FDA's 'Substances Added to Food' inventory.
Carboxymethyl cellulose — not to be confused with methyl cellulose — is also known as carboxymethylcellulose and cellulose gum. Maltodextrin can be derived from substances such as cornstarch, rice starch, and wheat starch — but the FDA doesn't consider it synonymous with the term 'modified food starch.'
The naming practices can frustrate efforts to track the chemicals in food, to measure how much of the stuff people are taking in, and even to figure out precisely which chemicals a scientific study evaluated, researchers said.
'There's a lot of confusion in the field,' said Christine McDonald, a researcher at the Cleveland Clinic who has studied maltodextrin. She called for more consistent naming of additives in the United States.
The very term 'emulsifier' is problematic. By strict definition, emulsifiers create an emulsion — a stable blend of liquids that would not otherwise mix, such as oil and water. However, the term is used broadly, encompassing chemicals such as maltodextrin that thicken, stabilize, or alter texture.
Gummed up
Emulsifiers can be found in foods marketed as natural or healthy as well as ones that look artificial. Some products contain multiple emulsifiers.
Products sold at Whole Foods, for instance, list a variety of emulsifiers on their labels. 365 brand Organic Vegan Ranch Dressing & Dip contained organic tapioca maltodextrin and xanthan gum. Pacific Seafood Starfish brand Cornmeal Crusted Fishsticks — marked as wild-caught and MSC-certified (sustainably sourced) — contain guar gum. Flour tortillas by 365 included monoglycerides of fatty acids and 'stabilizer (guar gum, xanthan gum, carrageenan).'
At a Safeway supermarket, Healthy Choice Grilled Chicken Pesto With Vegetables listed modified potato starch, modified corn starch, carrageenan, xanthan gum, and guar gum.
The label on Newman's Own Caesar salad dressing said the product contained no artificial preservatives or flavors, no colors from an artificial source, and was gluten-free. The ingredient label listed, 'as a thickener,' xanthan gum.
In response to questions for this article, Whole Foods Market said it prohibits more than 300 ingredients commonly found in food. 'Our experts evaluate ingredients for acceptability in all food products we sell based on the best available scientific research,' the company said in a statement provided by spokesperson Rachel Malish.
Safeway's parent company, Albertsons Companies, did not respond to inquiries. Nor did Pacific Seafood, Newman's Own, or Conagra Brands, which makes Healthy Choice.
A growing body of research
Research on emulsifiers has been building in recent years.
For example, a study published in January by the Journal of Crohn's and Colitis concluded that a diet low in emulsifiers is an effective treatment for mild or moderate Crohn's disease. The eight-week clinical trial, which tracked 154 patients in the United Kingdom, focused on carrageenan, carboxymethyl cellulose, and polysorbate 80.
A study published in February 2024 in the journal PLOS Medicine found that higher intakes of carrageenan and mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids were associated with higher risks of cancer. The study observed 92,000 French adults for an average of 6.7 years.
A study published in September 2023 in The BMJ, formerly known as the British Medical Journal, found that intake of several types of emulsifiers was associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease. The study observed more than 95,000 French adults for a median of 7.4 years.
A series of earlier studies found that emulsifiers 'can promote chronic intestinal inflammation in mice'; that two in particular, carboxymethyl cellulose and polysorbate 80, 'profoundly impact intestinal microbiota in a manner that promotes gut inflammation and associated disease states'; and that, based on a laboratory study of human samples, 'numerous, but not all, commonly used emulsifiers can directly alter gut microbiota in a manner expected to promote intestinal inflammation,' as recounted in a 2021 paper in the journal Microbiome.
Other findings diverge.
A study from Australia, published in February in Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, followed 24 Crohn's patients over four weeks and concluded that, in the context of a healthy diet, the emulsifier content had 'no influence over disease activity.'
Authors declared conflicts of interest, including payments from PepsiCo, drug companies, and Mindset Health Pty, which promotes hypnosis-based therapy.
One of the authors, gastroenterology professor Peter Gibson of Monash University in Australia, said the conflicts of interest 'have nothing whatsoever to do with the study.'
'It is important not to overinterpret results of studies,' he said, adding that his team's report 'does not mean that emulsifiers are good for you or that there are no health benefits in avoiding emulsifiers.'
'Keeping it real' (or not)
Häagen-Dazs touts the absence of such chemicals as a virtue.
'Keeping it real, the way it should be,' it said in an online plug for its vanilla ice cream. 'No emulsifiers. No stabilizers.'
However, at the company that makes Häagen-Dazs in the United States, Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, there are limits to that approach.
Under other brand names — such as Edy's, Dreyer's, and Drumstick — it markets products that contain emulsifiers or stabilizers. The company did not respond to questions. In addition, a spokesperson for Nestlé, which markets Drumstick and Häagen-Dazs brands internationally, did not respond.
Drumstick Vanilla Caramel Sundae Cones have no artificial flavors or colors, the package says — but they feature an array of other ingredients, including soy lecithin, guar gum, monogylcerides, and carob bean gum.
The cones, the company's website says, offer 'one incredibly creamy experience.'
And the creamy filling doesn't melt.
Instead, over 24 hours on a KFF Health News reporter's kitchen counter, it bled a caramel-tinged fluid and shrank into a sticky white foam that could be cut with a knife.
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Canadian fire smoke threatens air quality in Canada, US as it reaches Europe
Parts of Canada and the US received alerts for hazardous air quality as hundreds of wildfires spread throughout Canada, forcing 26,000 people to evacuate and spewing smoke across the Atlantic in Canada's latest extreme weather event. Canada's wildfires, which have already forced evacuations of more than 26,000 people, continued their stubborn spread Tuesday, with heavy smoke choking millions of Canadians and Americans and reaching as far away as Europe. Alerts were issued for parts of Canada and the neighboring United States warning of hazardous air quality. A water tanker air base was consumed by flames in Saskatchewan province, oil production has been disrupted in Alberta, and officials warned of worse to come with more communities threatened each day. "We have some challenging days ahead of us," Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe told a news conference, adding that the number of evacuees could rise quickly. Every summer, Canada grapples with forest fires, but an early start to the wildfire season this year and the scale of the blazes -- over two million hectares (494,000 acres) burned -- is worrying. Read moreClimate change made LA wildfires worse, says study The provinces of Saskatchewan and Manitoba have been hardest hit. Both declared wildfire emergencies in recent days. (FRANCE 24 with AFP) Read more on FRANCE 24 EnglishRead also:South Korea firefighters deploy helicopters as country's largest wildfires reigniteWildfire on remote French island threatens wildlife and research station
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman Whose Husband and Son Died in 'Titan' Sub Implosion Speaks Out: ‘I Will Never Be the Same'
Christine Dawood lost her husband, Shahzada Dawood, 48, and her son, Suleman, 19, in the Titan submersible implosion Now, she's speaking out in a new documentary, Implosion: The Titan Sub Disaster Later this year, the U.S. Coast Guard is expected to release its final report detailing the results of the investigationOn June 18, 2023, the Titan submersible imploded during a dive to visit the Titanic wreckage, killing all five passengers inside. Christine Dawood lost her husband, Shahzada Dawood, 48, and her son, Suleman, 19, in an instant. Christine is now speaking out in a new documentary, Implosion: The Titan Sub Disaster, as the second anniversary of the tragedy approaches. Later this year, the U.S. Coast Guard is expected to release its final report detailing the results of the investigation. But Dawood said nothing can return her loved ones. 'They're never going to come back. Their voices are still in the house, their memories are in the house,' Dawood said in the documentary, which was released on May 28. 'No matter what the investigation is, the rooms are still empty.' In addition to the Dawoods, the disaster also claimed the lives of Oceangate CEO Stockton Rush, British billionaire Hamish Harding, and French diver and Titanic expert Paul-Henri Nargeolet. In late June 2023, investigators recovered Titan wreckage debris from the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean. Dawood told the BBC she was initially supposed to go on the excursion with her husband, but allowed her son to go in her place, 'because he really wanted to go.' She and her daughter Alina, then 17, were on a support vessel when it lost the ability to communicate with the Titan, per the BBC. Reflecting on the fatal excursion, she's struck by the attitude of those responsible for executing the trip. 'This arrogance of the people in charge – when they think they're above everything, that really gets to me,' Dawood said. 'Like why is ego and arrogance more important than safety? The irony is not lost on me that the Titanic sunk for exactly the same reason. History repeats itself.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. In the aftermath, Dawood said she's been reshaped by the loss of her husband and son. 'I think I will never be the same. I don't think that anybody who goes through loss and such a trauma can ever be the same,' she said. Dawood added that one particular message from officials comforted her in the wake of the tragedy. 'One of the most important things that came out for me was when the Coast Guard also assured us as a family that we couldn't have known. For me that was – yeah, I guess the most important reassurance they could have given me,' she said. Now, she's hoping to move on knowing that no results from the investigation will change her new reality. Dawood suggested that the person responsible for the deadly tragedy can no longer be held accountable, seemingly alluding to CEO Stockton Rush without naming him. 'We're not looking for blaming,' Dawood said. 'We all know who the culprit is. [But] it's not changing anything, does it? The culprit died with them, right? So who am I to blame?' Read the original article on People


The Intercept
3 hours ago
- The Intercept
Trump Puts Lives at Risk by Revoking Emergency Abortion Guidelines for Hospitals
The Trump administration rescinded Biden-era guidance that explicitly required emergency rooms to provide abortions to pregnant patients if such care would save their lives. Medical experts expect the policy shift to sow chaos in hospitals and endanger pregnant people throughout the U.S. In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's move to overturn Roe v. Wade, the Biden administration issued guidance related to the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, or EMTALA, a federal law that requires health care providers that take Medicare to provide 'stabilizing' medical treatment to all patients experiencing medical emergencies. In a 2022 letter to health care providers, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Beccerra wrote that if a doctor believes a pregnant patient at an emergency room 'is experiencing an emergency medical condition as defined by EMTALA, and that abortion is the stabilizing treatment necessary to resolve that condition, the physician must provide that treatment.' The memo also clarified that EMTALA preempts state law in cases where abortion is illegal with exceptions narrower than those in EMTALA. In a press release Tuesday, the Trump administration rescinded the older guidance, stating that the previous rules 'do not reflect the policy of this Administration.' The release noted that Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 'will work to rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions.' 'In places where doctors and hospitals are being threatened with both criminal and civil penalties for providing abortion care, it will cause a delay.' Abortion providers and experts in reproductive health argue that the vagueness of the new guidance will create uncertainty in emergency rooms, denying pregnant people equal access to care and putting lives at risk in states that have restricted or banned abortion. 'The Trump Administration would rather women die in emergency rooms than receive life-saving abortions,' said Nancy Northup, President and CEO at the Center for Reproductive Rights. 'In pulling back guidance, this administration is feeding the fear and confusion that already exists at hospitals in every state where abortion is banned. Hospitals need more guidance right now, not less.' The Trump administration told The Intercept that the idea that the new guidance puts lives at risk is 'false.' 'CMS will continue to enforce EMTALA, which protects all individuals who present to a hospital emergency department seeking examination or treatment, including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy,' Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon wrote in a statement to The Intercept. Even before the Trump administration rescinded the Biden-era guidance, dozens of pregnant women reported being turned away for emergency medical care since the fall of Roe. A ProPublica report found that at least five women have died as a result of abortion bans since Roe v. Wade was overturned. Most reproductive health care experts believe the number is far higher than what's been reported. 'We already know that women have died because physicians didn't act because of fear surrounding what they or couldn't do under certain state bans,' said Dana Sussman, senior vice president at Pregnancy Justice, a non-profit reproductive justice organization. 'We know that women have died because they have been scared to get care, because they self managed abortions. We know that more women will die, and we and there are probably women who have died, and we will never know their names.' Sussman said that the new guidance will only make it harder for hospitals to feel comfortable providing lifesaving care to pregnant people. 'I think inevitably it will create many more challenges when it comes to what hospitals are advising their physicians, what physicians feel comfortable doing in different states and and I do think that it's putting more lives,' she said. Last year, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case brought by the Biden Administration challenging Idaho's abortion ban on the grounds that it violated EMTALA by prohibiting abortion care in too many circumstances. The court ultimately punted — refusing to add clarity — but allowing emergency abortions to go forward in the state. The Trump Department of Justice declined to continue prosecuting the Idaho case, an early signal that it planned to rescind the Biden guidance. Jamilla Perritt, an OB-GYN and abortion provider in Washington who is also president of the nonprofit Physicians for Reproductive Health, said it's important to clarify that EMTALA still stands, even if the administration has tried to muddy the waters. 'This does not change [providers] legal obligation to provide life saving care for people when they report to emergency rooms,' Perritt said. 'The other thing is that it does not change their moral and ethical obligation to do so.' The confusion caused by this announcement, however, will carry risks, argued Perritt. 'In places where doctors and hospitals are being threatened with both criminal and civil penalties for providing abortion care,' she said. 'It will cause a delay. It will give them pause.' It's striking, Perrit said, to see such policy come from an administration that has been masquerading as supportive of families. 'The federal government gets to decide who lives and who dies during pregnancy complications, during emergency events,' she said. 'The hypocrisy is really glaring, because this is the exact same government that's claiming to support children and families that want people to have more babies, but instead it is dismantling the system that protects the lives of pregnant people and their families.'