Taiwan's Lai, Rubio vow to 'never forget' Tiananmen victims
Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te vowed Wednesday to preserve the memory of China's Tiananmen Square crackdown 36 years ago, echoing rhetoric by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Chinese troops and tanks forcibly cleared peaceful protesters from Beijing's Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989, after weeks-long demonstrations demanding greater political freedoms.
The exact toll is unknown but hundreds died, with some estimates exceeding 1,000 people.
China's communist rulers have since sought to erase any public mention of the crackdown.
"Authoritarian governments often choose to be silent and forget history; democratic societies choose to preserve the truth and refuse to forget those who have contributed to the ideal of human rights and their dreams," Lai said in a post on Facebook ahead of an annual vigil in Taipei's Liberty Square.
"We remember the sacrifice of our predecessors, and we know the value of freedom, and we cannot ignore the erosion of global democracy and the rule of law by authoritarian expansion."
China claims Taiwan is part of its territory and has threatened to seize the democratic island by force.
In a rare return to human rights rhetoric, Rubio said Tuesday the "world will never forget" what happened on June 4 even as Beijing "actively tries to censor the facts".
"Today we commemorate the bravery of the Chinese people who were killed as they tried to exercise their fundamental freedoms, as well as those who continue to suffer persecution as they seek accountability and justice for the events of June 4, 1989," Rubio said in a statement.
Despite a long Senate career as an outspoken advocate for human rights, Rubio has been more selective as Donald Trump's top diplomat, focusing his rights criticism on US adversaries including China and Cuba.
Rubio's predecessors issued statements each year to mark the anniversary of the bloody crackdown.
But Rubio's statement had subtle differences -- his Democratic predecessor Antony Blinken last year urged China to accept recommendations in a UN-backed rights review and to respect freedoms enshrined in the post-World War II Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Rubio did not reference the United Nations, a frequent target of criticism by the Trump administration.
- 'Reaffirm our commitment' -
In Hong Kong, a jailed activist began a 36-hour hunger strike on Wednesday, a dogged attempt to individually commemorate the anniversary in a city that once hosted huge public remembrances.
Former lawyer Chow Hang-tung used to help organise an annual vigil that drew tens of thousands to the city's Victoria Park.
Hong Kong had been the only place under Chinese rule where commemoration of the crackdown was tolerated.
Slogans at the candlelight vigil sometimes called for democracy in China and an end to one-party rule.
But after huge and sometimes violent protests roiled the city in 2019, Beijing brought in a wide-ranging national security law that has quashed political dissent.
The public memorial has effectively been banned and Chow imprisoned, facing a potential life sentence on subversion charges.
On Wednesday, AFP journalists saw dozens of police patrolling the district around the park.
Over the last few years, activists have been detained for "offences in connection with seditious intention" around the anniversary.
In a social media post, Chow said her hunger strike would "commemorate this day and reaffirm our commitment".
She called the city's national security officers "real 'criminals'" and urged authorities to apologise to her over her "wrongful" imprisonment.
"History tells us that (the apology) will likely take a very long time –- the Tiananmen Mothers have been waiting for 36 years and still have not received an apology," she said, referring to an activist group made up of families of victims of the crackdown.
A video featuring 87-year-old Zhang Xianling, whose 19-year-old son was killed in 1989, circulated online last week.
China's authorities have never addressed the group's plea for dialogue around the issue -- instead, they have used all means to monitor and wiretap members of the Tiananmen Mothers, Zhang said.
"The lights in Victoria Park may have been blown out by the gales, but the sparks of justice will glow in the hearts of every conscientious person," she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
3 hours ago
- SBS Australia
SBS Japanese Weekly News Wrap Friday 6 June
SBS Japanese 06/06/2025 10:54 Listen to SBS Japanese Audio on Tue, Thu and Fri from 1pm on SBS 3. Replays from 10pm on Tue, Thu and Sat on SBS1. Listen to past stories from our podcast. Download the free SBS Audio App and don't forget to visit SBS Japanese Facebook and Instagram page!
West Australian
4 hours ago
- West Australian
Australia in driver's seat but US trade deal some time away, says CBA
The chief economist at the nation's biggest bank has warned an Australian trade deal with the US could be some time away given the complexity involved and America's push for increased market access. Commonwealth Bank's Luke Yeaman also said there was a risk that if Donald Trump does not strike deals with key trading partners before the July 9 deadline — when the pause on the US President's reciprocal tariffs is due to resume — he may 'lose patience and reinstate unilateral tariffs . . . sparking another round of volatility in global markets'. It comes as the Australian sharemarket swung on Friday following turmoil in the US, following an ugly exchange between Mr Trump and Elon Musk that wiped more than $US150 billion ($231b) off the value of Tesla. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also signalled he was prepared to make concessions allowing American beef into the country as deliberations ramp up. Mr Yeaman said Australia remained in a 'relatively strong negotiating position' as the country's tariffs are equal to Mr Trump's global minimum level of 10 per cent. He said the recent move to double steel and aluminium taxes to 50 per cent would be a concern, but the Federal Government won't feel pressured to conclude an agreement quickly. 'Using the UK deal as a template, an Australian trade deal could still be some time away,' Mr Yeaman said. 'There are obvious areas for co-operation (critical minerals), but addressing key US asks around market access for US beef exports, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, regulation of US tech companies and defence spending won't be easy.' Last month, the UK became the first country to agree to a trade deal with the US since Mr Trump imposed the sweeping tariffs in April. Prime Minister Keir Starmer this week said Britain was hoping to ink a pact with the US in the next two weeks to avoid the new tariffs on steel. Mr Yeaman said those talks — alongside America's negotiations with China and the European Union — provided important insights into the Trump administration's thinking. He said last month's US-China trade war pause showed both countries have an economic 'pain threshold' they are unwilling to cross — albeit a high one. 'This takes some severe downside scenarios off the table, but tensions will remain high and further bouts of escalation are likely,' Mr Yeaman said. 'Whenever two superpowers 'play chicken' there is always a risk of a head on crash. With US-China tariffs escalating to over 125 per cent, it appeared that could be the outcome (and a severe global recession). 'Both countries have now shown that they do not want to go down that road — the economic costs are simply too high.' But despite the de-escalation, Mr Yeaman remained doubtful a comprehensive US-China trade agreement would be settled by August 14. AMP deputy chief economist Diana Mousina said financial markets appeared to remain confident Mr Trump would pull back from the brink. 'US sharemarkets have had a massive rally in recent weeks, and are up by 19 per cent since the post-Liberation day lows,' she said. 'It is hard to see this positive momentum continuing when Trump's tariffs are still up in the air.' There were plenty of risks weighing on shares including the trade battles, American debt and tensions in Iran, Ms Mousina said. The Aussie dollar could remain weak in the near-term, she said.
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Visa refusal sparks fresh concerns Solomon Islands may block Taipei from Pacific forum
The Solomon Islands government blocked a group of Taiwanese officials from entering the Pacific country earlier this year, stirring fresh concerns in Taipei that it might be locked out of a key regional meeting in Honiara later this year. Solomon Islands will host the Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting in September, and signalled last year that it might break with a long running precedent and refuse visas to Taiwanese officials who want to meet with their three remaining Pacific diplomatic allies on the sidelines. Both Australian and Pacific officials insist that the Solomon Islands government has given them private assurances this year that it will not take that step. But the ABC has been told that when a small group of officials from Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs applied to enter Solomon Islands in March — largely to begin planning the logistics for its PIF delegation — their visa applications were rejected. Australian government sources have said Solomon Islands has since reassured them again that Taiwan's representatives will not be blocked in September, but that this directive was still "working its way through the system", suggesting the decision was an error. A spokesperson from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) told the ABC it was "working closely" with Solomon Islands on preparations for the leaders meeting, "as we do with every host". "There has been no change to arrangements regarding Taiwan's engagement with the Pacific Islands Forum, which have been in place since agreed by leaders in 1992," they said. "The (meeting) is an opportunity for all Forum members to come together to ensure our region is well placed to pursue our shared interests, deepen regional cooperation and strengthen PIF unity." One Pacific island government source also told the ABC that the Forum Secretariat and Pacific leaders were confident Taiwan would be able to participate in the Honiara meeting without any issues. But the March incident has still stirred anxiety in Taipei, which has been fighting a losing battle with Beijing to maintain diplomatic allies in the Pacific, and which fears China is succeeding in its efforts to marginalise it in the region. Solomon Islands has cut off all official contact with Taiwan in the wake of its decision to switch diplomatic ties to Beijing in 2019, and last year threw its weight behind China's declaration that it will "reunify" the self-ruled island with the mainland. Solomon Islands last year also backed Beijing's push to strip Taiwan of its status as a development partner for the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF). That frustrated leaders from the three Pacific nations which retain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, with Palau's President Surangel Whipps even warning that if Taiwan is locked out it could ignite a dispute like the "PIF split" which plunged the organisation into chaos in 2021. Mr Whipps said earlier this week that he had heard Taiwan was having "some difficulty gaining access" to the meeting, and stressed that it was critical Palau be able to hold meetings with its diplomatic partner in Honiara. Solomon Islands has not yet explained why the Taiwanese officials were refused visas in March. The Director of Immigration in Solomon Islands, Chris Akosawa, pointed out that Solomon Islands has recently tightened entry restrictions on Taiwan passport holders, but referred the ABC to the Solomon Islands Foreign Ministry for comment. The ABC sent questions to the Foreign Ministry, but didn't receive a response. So far, Solomon Islands has not given any public assurances that Taiwan will be able to attend the leaders meeting. In May, Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele issued a forceful statement reaffirming his government's commitment to the One China Policy and ordering officials "not to engage in any official capacity with representatives or entities associated with 'Taiwan', China". "This includes official visits, communications, commitments, or participation in events involving 'Taiwan', China," he said. On Monday Mr Manele also declined to say whether his government had made a final decision on Taiwan's participation, although he said he was "working very closely with the Forum Secretariat in terms of these arrangements". "We are fully aware of that situation. So we are looking into that, it's a regional meeting and of course countries also have their national interest as well," he said. A second Pacific island government source said Mr Manele's acknowledgement that the PIF leaders meeting is a "regional" gathering was a good sign that "commonsense would prevail" and that Solomon Islands wouldn't upset the status quo. Invitations to PIF leaders and dialogue partners are expected to be issued shortly. Analysts warn that if Taiwan is excluded it would undermine the authority of the PIF Secretariat and set a dangerous precedent which could undermine Pacific unity and see further splintering — particularly with Palau due to host the leaders meeting next year. A third Pacific government source said it also was not clear if the United States would attend the meeting as a dialogue partner if Taiwan was excluded. A spokesperson for Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs declined to comment on its officials being denied entry but pointed to a 1992 communique endorsed by all PIF leaders which specifically says Taiwan should be able to hold a meeting with Pacific nations "at the same venue as the Forum". "Taiwan will continue to broaden collaboration with the PIF, diplomatic allies in the Pacific, and other like-minded countries, especially in such areas as climate change, food security, clean energy, and talent cultivation, jointly making contributions to the peace, stability, development, and prosperity of the Pacific region." Blake Johnson from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute said while it wasn't yet clear what Solomon Islands would do, it "may be more willing to upset the status quo than people expect". He also said excluding Taiwan from the meeting "certainly could cause fractures within the PIF". "Without the PIF and other regional institutions functioning properly, some Pacific nations will find it more difficult to access support from and participate in valuable initiatives from policing to climate change adaptation funding."
