U.S. Supreme Court won't hear lawsuit seeking to roll back Michigan voting rights measures
U.S. Supreme Court | Susan J. Demas
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear a lawsuit filed by nearly a dozen Michigan Republican lawmakers seeking to roll back voting rights measures passed by voters in 2018 and 2022.
The suit, filed in 2023 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, argued that because the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution, found in Article I, Section 4, provides for state legislatures to regulate the times, places, and manner of holding federal elections, measures passed by citizen-led petition initiatives are unconstitutional as they infringed on the state Legislature's role within state election law.
The U.S. Supreme Court's refusal to take the case was the third, and now final, rejection after the lawsuit was initially dismissed by U.S. District Court Judge Jane Beckering, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, in April 2024 for a lack of standing, a decision which was then affirmed by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in December 2024.
The lawsuit was sponsored by Michigan Fair Elections and the Great Lakes Justice Center and named Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Michigan Director of Elections Jonathan Brater as defendants.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Benson hailed the decision not to take up the case as a 'victory for the people of Michigan,' saying the U.S. Supreme Court had correctly upheld the right of Michigan voters to amend the state constitution.
'In recent years, voters in Michigan have overwhelmingly supported ballot initiatives to create a citizen-led independent redistricting process, to guarantee at least nine days of early voting for every statewide election, and to make voting more accessible for every eligible citizen. Today's action ensures that the will of the voters will stand on these and other issues important to the people of our state,' Benson said.
Proposal 3 of 2018 and Proposal 2 of 2022 both passed with at least 60% of the vote and guaranteed the rights to same-day voter registration, nine days of early voting, absentee voting, among other rights. After voters approved the constitutional amendments, the Legislature passed legislation implementing the measures.
The suit sought not only to halt the changes brought on by the voter-passed initiatives, but also prohibit the future use altogether of citizen-led petition initiatives when they pertain to state election law.
'We also have procedures in place at the state level to amend election law,' state Sen. Jonathan Lindsey (R-Coldwater), one of the 11 lawmakers who filed the suit, said at the time. 'However, these processes were violated in 2018 and 2022 when an alternative amendment process was used without regard to federal constitutional requirements. This lawsuit challenges recent attempts to subvert our constitutional process and will protect against such actions in the future.'
The legal argument behind the lawsuit, known as the independent state legislature theory, was mostly rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2023 when it ruled in Moore v Harper.
In that case's 6-3 majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that there were limits to state legislative power in such matters, effectively repudiating the claim that only state legislatures had the power to make election rules, thus providing state and federal courts, and by extension, state constitutions, a role in that process.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas public schools are set to get an $8.5 billion funding boost. Here's the plan.
Gov. Greg Abbott on Wednesday is expected to sign into law a bill providing roughly $8.5 billion in new funding for Texas public schools, offering relief to districts for teacher and support staff pay, operational expenses, special education, educator preparation, early childhood learning and campus safety. The new dollars in House Bill 2, which lawmakers have dubbed 'historic' because it marks the largest one-time public education investment in recent memory, will arrive after years of stagnant funding. That includes 2023, when the state gave schools targeted money in areas like school security but left billions more on the table due to the political fallout over private school vouchers. Abbott signed a $1 billion voucher program into law last month. The Legislature granted final approval to the 231-page public school funding bill in the last days of the 2025 legislative session, which concluded on Monday. HB 2 will largely go into effect on Sept. 1. Certain parts of the bill will take effect next year. School officials and public education advocates have praised the new funding while warning that the new dollars are a long way from catching districts up with inflation, which has ballooned their costs since the COVID-19 pandemic. HB 2, they say, also will not cure every hardship staring public education in the face, including multimillion-dollar budget deficits and school closures. While the legislation does not give schools as much spending flexibility as they had hoped for, it makes targeted investments in areas lawmakers believe will leave the Texas' public education system better off. Here's a breakdown of some key provisions. Teachers will receive long-term pay raises based on their years of experience and the size of their school district, using the following criteria: Educators with three to four years of experience in districts with 5,000 or fewer students will get a $4,000 raise, while those with five or more years of teaching on their resume will earn $8,000. For districts with more than 5,000 students, teachers with three to four years of experience will earn a $2,500 raise, while those with five or more years of experience will receive $5,000. First- and second-year teachers are not eligible for raises under the new system, known as the Teacher Retention Allotment. The raises for more experienced teachers are permanent, not one-time bonuses. The new law also gives districts $45 per student that they can only use to increase the salaries of school counselors, librarians, nurses and other non-administrative support staff, as well as the teachers who do not qualify for raises under the new retention allotment. Lawmakers expanded Texas' Teacher Incentive Allotment, a state program that awards raises over a five-year period to classroom instructors who demonstrate that they have improved their students' academic performance. HB 2 will allow more teachers in a district to qualify for raises, which will range from as low as $3,000 annually to as high as $36,000. Higher dollar amounts will go to the program's highest performing teachers working in rural or high-poverty communities. School districts can also decide to open up the incentive pay system to include principals and assistant principals. But doing so would mean the district can only offer salary increases to classroom teachers based on performance — not across the board — except for when adjusting for inflation. Educators who have obtained their national teaching certification will continue to automatically qualify for raises through the Teacher Incentive Allotment under the new law, though the State Board for Educator Certification can now revoke their participation if it concludes that the requirements for the national designation do not comply with state law. The board will conduct an initial review of the national certifications no later than Dec. 31, 2026. School districts will not see a significant increase to their base funding per student, known as the basic allotment, which grants them flexibility to tackle their campuses' particular needs, from building maintenance to fine arts programs. That pot of money will only go up by $55 per student. Instead, districts will get more targeted funding — $106 per student — to pay the costs of transportation, insurance, utilities, employee benefits and hiring retired educators, which has become more common as schools struggle to fill teacher vacancies. Texas is moving away from the long-scrutinized special education funding system that gives money to districts based on the classroom setting where a child with a disability receives instruction. Now, schools will receive dollars based on the individual needs of that student — an approach educators, lawmakers and public education advocates consider more equitable. The new system, which Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath will design, will take effect at the beginning of the 2026-27 school year. The education chief must consider the nature of services provided to students, the technology and equipment required and the professional needs of educators. When HB 2 takes effect later this year, districts will also start receiving $1,000 for each assessment they conduct evaluating kids for disabilities. School districts must finalize plans to ensure that no educators without formal classroom training teach children in reading, math, science and social studies — and they have until the 2029-30 school year to transition the uncertified teachers out of those classrooms. The Texas education commissioner may allow districts to delay implementation of the new requirement until Sept. 1, 2030. None of the certification rules will apply to charter schools, which receive public funds but are privately managed. To incentivize untrained teachers hired in the last three years to earn their certification, the state will provide a one-time payment of $1,000 to educators who get formal training by the end of 2026-27 school year. The law also provides a salary of $10,000 to aspiring educators who participate in teacher residencies — training programs that provide them direct classroom experience under the guidance of seasoned instructors — while those who go through a traditional university or alternative certification route will get $3,000. For districts to qualify for the funding, their programs must meet several state requirements, including ensuring candidates spend time in a classroom for at least a full academic year. The education commissioner will establish a list of brief assessments, known as screeners, that districts will use throughout the school year to evaluate foundational reading and math skills among students in kindergarten through third grade. Superintendents are required to publicly report the results at a school board meeting and make them available to parents, who also have the option to opt their kids out of taking the assessments. Lawmakers hope the screeners will help schools provide targeted support before it becomes too difficult for children to catch up. Students who are falling behind will receive additional tutoring. HB 2 also tries to help districts close Texas' prekindergarten funding gap. The state currently requires that districts provide full-day pre-K to eligible children for free, but it only funds those services at a half-day level. Though the way pre-K is funded remains the same, the new law makes changes to the state's funding system for early learning that could help some schools pay for the other half day. Meanwhile, the bill expands free pre-K eligibility to include the children of teachers. Additional funding will go toward helping districts fulfill safety mandates enacted by the Legislature after the Uvalde mass school shooting in 2022, a list that included hiring one armed security officer at each campus. Districts will receive $20 per student and $33,540 for each campus, up from the current allocation of $10 per student and $15,000 per campus. First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State Department shifts $250 million from refugee aid to 'self-deportations'
By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. State Department has moved $250 million to the Department of Homeland Security for voluntary deportations by migrants without legal status, a spokesperson said, an unprecedented repurposing of funds that have been used to aid refugees uprooted by war and natural disasters. The money has been transferred "to provide a free flight home and an exit bonus to encourage and assist illegal aliens to voluntarily depart the United States," the State Department spokesperson told Reuters. Historically, those funds have been used "to provide protection to vulnerable people" overseas and to resettle refugees in the U.S., said Elizabeth Campbell, a former deputy assistant secretary of state. The re-routing of the money comes as President Donald Trump pushes to reshape U.S. government agencies to serve his 'America First' agenda. The State Department's planned reorganization explicitly states that the agency's refugee bureau now largely will focus on efforts to 'return illegal aliens to their country of origin or legal status.' The funds came from Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA) overseen by the Bureau of Population, Refugee and Migration. Its website says its mission is to "reduce illegal immigration," aid people "fleeing persecution, crisis or violence and seek durable solutions for forcibly displaced people." Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau, citing the law authorizing the funding, said in a May 7 Federal Register notice that underwriting the repatriation of people without legal status will bolster the "foreign policy interests" of the U.S. He did not mention the $250 million transfer to DHS. The DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump's administration is working to speed up deportations in a crackdown that the Republican president vowed during the 2024 campaign would expel millions of people illegally in the U.S. It has encouraged migrants to leave voluntarily by threatening steep fines and deporting migrants to notorious prisons in Guantanamo Bay and El Salvador. But the volume of deportations since he took office in January appears to be less than those overseen by his predecessor Joe Biden in the February-May period of 2024, about 200,000 people versus 257,000. On May 9, Trump announced Project Homecoming, an initiative overseen by DHS that offers $1,000 stipends and travel assistance to migrants who "self-deport." DHS said in a May 19 news release that 64 people had "opted to self deport" to Honduras and Colombia on a charter flight under the program. Some experts said that while legal, sending the money to DHS for deportation operations was an unprecedented use of MRA funds. The main purpose of the funds historically has been "to provide refugee and displacement assistance, refugee processing and resettlement to the U.S., and respond to urgent and emerging humanitarian crises - not to return those very people to the harm or persecution they fled,' said Meredith Owen Edwards, senior director of Policy and Advocacy at the Refugee Council USA.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze
Two top Democrats claimed the Republicans' budget reconciliation bill and its proposal to let enhanced Obamacare credits expire will cause the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans. Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, along with Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., announced findings that an estimated 51,000 Americans could die each year due to Republican-led changes to the federal healthcare system and the broader reconciliation bill. The national debt — which measures what the U.S. owes its creditors — fell to $36,214,400,664,854.53 as of June 3rd, according to the latest numbers published by the Treasury Department. That is down about $1.4 billion from the figure reported the previous day. Wyden called the "stakes" of the 'big, beautiful bill' debate "truly life and death," as a statement from his office read that "a new analysis estimates that more than 51,000 people will die per year as a direct result of the Republican reconciliation bill, and their refusal to extend Affordable Care Act premium tax credits." "Taking away health insurance and benefits like home care and mental healthcare from seniors, people with disabilities, kids, and working families will be deadly," Wyden said. "This analysis shows the dire consequences of moving ahead with this morally bankrupt effort," he said, referring to a study he and Sanders asked the University of Pennsylvania and Yale to conduct. Read On The Fox News App Liberals Blame Big Beautiful Bill's Loss On Dying Dems The Democrats employed the Philadelphia college's Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, as well as the Yale School of Public Health's Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis. "Let's be clear," Sanders said in a statement, "The Republican reconciliation bill which makes massive cuts to Medicaid in order to pay for huge tax breaks for billionaires is not just bad public policy." "It is not just immoral. It is a death sentence for struggling Americans." "[N]ot only will some of the most vulnerable people throughout our country suffer, but tens of thousands will die. We cannot allow that to happen," Sanders added. Winners, Losers And Grab-bags From House Gop's Narrow Passage Of 'Big, Beautiful Bill' In a copy of the study posted on UPenn's website, economics and health-centric academics found 7.7 million people would be estimated to lose Medicaid or Obamacare coverage by 2034, and 1.38 million "dual-eligible beneficiaries" would find themselves "disenroll[ed]." In a statement, Wyden cited figures of 11,300 deaths from the loss of Medicaid or Obamacare coverage, 18,200 deaths from the loss of Medicaid coverage among low-income beneficiaries and 13,000 deaths of Medicaid enrollees in nursing homes due to the rollback of a "nursing home minimum staffing rule" from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Wyden attributed an additional projected 8,811 deaths per year to the "failure to extend the enhanced [Obamacare] premium tax credits," citing the academics' analysis. Fox News Digital reached out to House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., -- who spearheaded the "big, beautiful bill" in the House -- for comment. A representative for UPenn told Fox News Digital the university sent the results of their analysis to Wyden and Sanders in response to a request on the matter. "The estimates of mortality that are contained in the letter were based on peer-review research that was done independently and well before their request," the UPenn representative said. "The senators' request was to take the research results and translate into the estimated number of deaths."Original article source: Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze
