logo
By the numbers: Who benefits most from Medicaid across New England?

By the numbers: Who benefits most from Medicaid across New England?

Boston Globe05-03-2025

Who does Medicaid cover, and how many people does it cover?
Medicaid helps cover medical costs for 21 percent of Americans nationally and 20.5 percent of people in Massachusetts. That includes coverage for
who are low income
.
Advertisement
In New England, four states — Maine, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Vermont — have higher rates of residents enrolled in Medicaid than the national average.
Nearly two-thirds of nursing home residents in New England are also enrolled in Medicaid, which provides benefits like nursing home care and personal care services that Medicare doesn't cover.
In every New England state, Medicaid costs disproportionately go to elderly and disabled people, though those groups make up less than one third of enrollees. In Massachusetts, 29 percent of members are elderly or disabled, while 64 percent of expenditures go that group, according to an analysis by
the health policy organization KFF
.
Medicaid is
also a key source of coverage for children; on average 49 percent of Medicaid enrollees are children. They make up just over 40 percent of enrollees in New England and 43 percent in Massachusetts.
What could cutting Medicaid mean for New England?
The budget proposal, which doesn't specify how much would be slashed from the program, will leave it to the states to make
tough decisions around cuts, experts said.
'In many ways, that's why these cuts are attractive to federal policymakers because they're not explicitly enacting proposals that involve cuts to eligibility or benefits or higher premiums of cost sharing,' said Edwin Park, a research professor at Georgetown University who primarily focuses on Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. 'It's basically passing the buck to the states and forcing the states to make the tough choices, the politically painful choices.'
Advertisement
If federal funding is cut, states could find other ways to finance expanded healthcare coverage — like raising taxes or cutting other parts of their budgets, like education — or, more likely, cutting some Medicaid benefits.
In a statement to the Globe, Governor Maura Healey said the Senate needs to 'reject this shameful attack on the health and wellbeing of children, families and seniors in Massachusetts and across our country.'
'This budget resolution threatens the health care of 2 million Massachusetts residents, including nearly half of the children in our state and 70 percent of nursing home residents. Additionally, cuts to Medicaid would cause further strain on our hospitals, nursing homes, home and community-based providers and community health centers. Providers would be forced to shut their doors or lay off staff,' Healey said.
Sarah Gordon, co-director of the BU Medicaid Policy Lab at Boston University, said she foresees expansions under the
Those covered under the expansion are mainly working-age adults without children.
'Compared to children, pregnant women, the elderly, and people with disabilities, the working age population is seen as least deserving [of health insurance] most often,' Gordon said. 'Of course, everyone deserves health insurance, but I think that could be the target.'
Beyond narrowing eligibility, Medicaid cuts could also mean cuts to benefits, which Park said could disproportionately impact the elderly and those with disabilities.
Advertisement
'[States] are either going to have to cut a large number of children who don't cost that much, or you cut seniors or people with disabilities who have significant health and long-term care needs,' he said.
People in rural areas could be the most vulnerable, as they
'We can see those who live in areas where there's already fewer hospitals in more rural areas being more affected by this because those facilities have a higher risk of closure,' Gordon said.
What is Medicaid?
Medicaid was established in 1965 along with Medicare, which provides health insurance for people 65 and older and some people under 65 with certain health conditions.
The exact share of funding the federal government provides for state
Medicaid programs
But before the ACA was passed in 2010, Massachusetts was already pioneering health care reform. In 2006, Massachusetts passed
Jonathan Gruber, a professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who was a key architect of the 2006 reform and went on to consult the Obama administration in drafting the ACA, called the federal bill a 'less generous version of the Massachusetts plan.'
Advertisement
After the ACA was implemented, Massachusetts kept its expanded benefits, but the cost was offset by federal funding, Gruber said.
The Biden administration
'That once again helped people in the state, because it made it cheaper, but also helped the state because now the feds were giving us money,' Gruber said.
How much does Medicaid cost for New England states and the federal government?
Currently, Massachusetts receives 50 cents back on the dollar from the federal government for Medicaid enrollees and 90 cents on the dollar for those eligible under the ACA expansion. State officials said this amounts to $13.9 billion in federal money that goes toward Medicaid in the state, known as MassHealth. The federal funding is 60 percent of MassHealth's budget, according to officials.
In Fiscal Year 2023, the federal government paid $606 billion toward Medicaid nationally, while states paid $274 billion,
What exactly are the Republicans proposing?
The House's budget resolution proposes to chop
Experts said there are three main ways the government could cut costs, which include
Advertisement
'These proposals all move in the same direction, which is trying to dramatically shrink the Medicaid program and lead to significant cuts affecting millions of beneficiaries, seniors, people with disabilities, kids, [and] pregnant women,' Park said.
Emily Spatz can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rockefeller Foundation Releases New Polling Data: Majority of Americans Want Food is Medicine Programs
Rockefeller Foundation Releases New Polling Data: Majority of Americans Want Food is Medicine Programs

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Rockefeller Foundation Releases New Polling Data: Majority of Americans Want Food is Medicine Programs

Nearly 80% of Americans think food and nutrition should be covered by insurance to address chronic disease NEW YORK, June 12, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- New polling data from The Rockefeller Foundation shows that more than four in five adults in the United States – across demographics, income levels, party affiliations, and geographies – support integrating Food is Medicine (FIM) programs into U.S. healthcare. The survey, conducted by Hattaway Communications, highlights high interest but low public awareness of FIM programs, which aim to treat and manage chronic disease by increasing access to nutritious foods. The research underscores the perceived benefits of Food is Medicine programs, with 79% of respondents reporting that FIM programs would personally help them eat better after they received a definition of the intervention. "Americans want nutrition and food solutions to help them eat better, improve their health, and save money," said Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, President of The Rockefeller Foundation. "We know that these programs are effective in helping patients manage diet-related chronic disease and are cost-effective too. Now, it's even clearer that there is a huge opportunity to improve Americans' health outcomes by investing in low-cost, individualized Food is Medicine solutions that are both proven and popular." Chronic diseases, such as diabetes, obesity, and heart disease, impact an estimated 133 million Americans—more than 38% (or one-third) of the total U.S. population—and cost the United States $1.1 trillion per year (equivalent to what the U.S. spends on food itself). The vast majority of chronic conditions are diet-related: In the United States alone, poor diets contribute to 500,000 deaths annually. Modeling on medically tailored meals shows that investing in FIM programs could save an estimated $32.1 billion a year, significantly reducing Americans' healthcare costs. Even still, only 13% of Americans polled said they knew about FIM programs, which include interventions such as medically tailored meals and prescriptions for accessing fruits and vegetables, coupled with nutrition support. When presented with the definition of what they entail, survey respondents (84%) resoundingly supported the efforts. Some of the key findings include: More than 4 in 5 Americans believe U.S. healthcare should offer more food and nutrition programs to treat and manage illnesses. Nearly 9 in 10 patients would prefer to rely more on healthy eating than on medications to manage their conditions. Nearly 4 in 5 Americans think that Food is Medicine programs should be covered by both public and private insurance, including 85% of self-identified Democrats and 78% of Republicans. 84% of respondents believed FIM could help improve the overall quality of health in the United States. 79% of respondents said FIM programs could help them personally. 49% of the American public and 67% of healthcare workers view high costs of nutritious food as the single largest barrier to eating well. "We are seeing a growing awareness of diet-related diseases and their consequences in the U.S.," said Devon Klatell, Vice President for the Food Initiative at The Rockefeller Foundation. "This polling data shows that Americans want more support to eat well and live well. Food is Medicine programs are one tool that health care practitioners and providers must be considering as they work to address chronic disease in America." The Rockefeller Foundation commissioned Hattaway Communications to conduct the survey, which polled respondents across all 50 states between February 28 and March 11, 2025. The survey sampled 2,271 respondents, including 1,135 patients and 399 healthcare workers. The sample was weighted by gender and education to align with the actual proportions within the population and is representative of racial demographics across the U.S. Since 2019, The Rockefeller Foundation has supported Food is Medicine programs and invested in research to improve their effectiveness and understand the benefits and costs. As part of this effort, The Foundation announced its $100 million investment to expand access to Food is Medicine, including supporting vital research like the American Heart Association's Health Care by Food Initiative. The Foundation also initiated partnerships with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to speed the integration of Food Is Medicine into health systems. In February 2025, The Rockefeller Foundation announced $3.5 million in grant funding to support small and mid-scale U.S. farmers, improve health outcomes for people with chronic disease, mitigate rising health care costs in California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., and advance state-based efforts to include FIM interventions as a medically covered benefit under Medicaid programs. About The Rockefeller FoundationThe Rockefeller Foundation is a pioneering philanthropy built on collaborative partnerships at the frontiers of science, technology, and innovation that enable individuals, families, and communities to flourish. We make big bets to promote the wellbeing of humanity. Today, we are focused on advancing human opportunity and reversing the climate crisis by transforming systems in food, health, energy, and finance. For more information, sign up for our newsletter at and follow us on X @RockefellerFdn and LinkedIn @the-rockefeller-foundation. Media Contact:Ashley Chang, The Rockefeller Foundation: media@ View original content: SOURCE The Rockefeller Foundation Sign in to access your portfolio

Fire Watch program; helping veterans, first responders cope with trauma
Fire Watch program; helping veterans, first responders cope with trauma

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Fire Watch program; helping veterans, first responders cope with trauma

The Brief A new virtual program is helping veterans and first responders cope with trauma. The Fire Watch program is available at Rogers Behavioral Health. FOX6 News spoke with a peer specialist who is, himself, recovering from trauma after military service. WAUKESHA, Wis. - Veterans and emergency responders are often first to run into the line of fire. Now, a new virtual program is giving them support to work through the trauma. What we know When veteran Chris Swift came back from serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, he said he had to learn some lessons the hard way. "Some people are like, 'Oh, tell me some cool stories.' Well, they're not always cool stories. They don't understand all the stuff that goes along with it," Swift said. "I drank a lot when I came back. I ended up getting three DUIs. I went to rehab at the VA for about four months, then I went to jail for about seven months." FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android Swift said he is now six years sober. He is also a peer specialist for the Fire Watch program at Rogers Behavioral Health. The goal of the program is to provide help and mental health support for veterans and first responders. The program first launched in September 2024. What they're saying "We can do a wide variety of things within this program. We focus on moral injury, but moral injury can come in a lot of different forms. And we can see it come across as anxiety or depression," said Jennifer Parra-Nelson, Clinical Director of Trauma Services & Fire Watch program. Moral injury is the guilt and shame that can come from trauma. The VA defines it as "the distressing psychological, behavioral, social, and sometimes spiritual aftermath of exposure to such events. A moral injury can occur in response to acting or witnessing behaviors that go against an individual's values and moral beliefs." Organizers said addressing that is an important part of the eight-week, 100% virtual program. Participants go through therapy, learn practical coping mechanisms, and connect with others going through the same thing. SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News "We've seen a lot seen a lot of patients come in just with a lot of stigma. And with a lot of possibly thinking that maybe this won't work for them. And I think we've seen a lot of people be surprised that we are very accessible to this population," Parra-Nelson said. Swift said his goal is to help others who were in his shoes – for their sake and the sake of their loved ones. What you can do Learn much more about the Fire Watch program and how it might be able to help someone you love. Program organizers said insurance covers the Fire Watch program. Medicaid is also accepted. The Source The information in this post was provided, in part, by Rogers Behavioral Health.

RFK Jr.'s newest CDC vaccine panel includes critics of COVID shots, lockdowns
RFK Jr.'s newest CDC vaccine panel includes critics of COVID shots, lockdowns

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr.'s newest CDC vaccine panel includes critics of COVID shots, lockdowns

The Brief U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has replaced the government's vaccine advisory panel with eight new appointees. The new members include vocal critics of COVID-19 vaccines and pandemic lockdowns, such as Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Martin Kulldorff. Public health groups have raised concerns that Kennedy's changes could undermine long-standing vaccination policies. NEW YORK - U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has named eight new vaccine policy advisers to replace the panel that he abruptly dismissed earlier this week. His selections include a scientist who researched mRNA vaccine technology and transformed into a conservative darling for his criticisms of COVID-19 vaccines, and a leading critic of pandemic-era lockdowns. RELATED: RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine panel Kennedy made the announcement in a social media post on Wednesday. The backstory Kennedy's decision to "retire" the previous 17-member panel was widely decried by doctors' groups and public health organizations, who feared the advisers would be replaced by a group aligned with Kennedy's desire to reassess — and possibly end — longstanding vaccination recommendations. Dig deeper The new appointees to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices include Dr. Robert Malone, the former mRNA researcher who emerged as a close adviser to Kennedy during the measles outbreak. Malone, who runs a wellness institute and a popular blog, rose to popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic as he relayed conspiracy theories around the outbreak and the vaccines that followed. He has appeared on podcasts and other conservative news outlets where he's promoted unproven and alternative treatments for measles and COVID-19. He has claimed that millions of Americans were hypnotized into taking the COVID-19 shots. He's even suggested that those vaccines cause a form of AIDS. He's downplayed deaths related to one of the largest measles outbreaks in the U.S. in years. Other appointees include Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who was a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, an October 2020 letter maintaining that pandemic shutdowns were causing irreparable harm. Dr. Cody Meissner, a former ACIP member, also was named. Big picture view The committee, created in 1964, makes recommendations to the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC directors almost always approve those recommendations on how Food and Drug Administration-cleared vaccines should be used. The CDC's final recommendations are widely heeded by doctors and determine the scope of vaccination programs. The Source The Associated Press contributed to this report. The information in this story comes from a social media announcement made by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday, in which he introduced eight new members to the federal vaccine advisory panel. This story was reported from Los Angeles.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store