US judge allows antitrust lawsuit against Apple to proceed
New Jersey, Jun 30 (AP) A federal judge on Monday rebuffed Apple's request to throw out a US government lawsuit alleging the technology trendsetter has built a maze of illegal barriers to protect the iPhone from competition and fatten its profit margins.
The 33-page opinion from US District Judge Xavier Neals in New Jersey will enable an antitrust lawsuit that the US Justice Department filed against Apple 15 months ago to proceed.
Neals has set a timetable that could see the case come to trial in 2027.
Apple has sought to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing the Justice Department had distorted the contours of the smartphone market and made a series of other misinterpretations that warranted the case be thrown out.
But Neals decided there is enough evidence to support the Justice Department's market definitions and concluded the case's key allegations merited further examination at trial.
The case seeks to pierce the digital fortress that Apple Inc, based in Cupertino, California, has built around the iPhone, iPad and other products to create a so-called 'walled garden' allowing its hardware and software to mesh seamlessly for users.
The Justice Department alleges that walled garden has mostly turned into a shield against competition, creating market conditions that enable it to charge higher prices and stifle innovation.
The lawsuit 'sets forth several allegations of technological barricades that constitute anticompetitive conduct,' Neals wrote in his opinion.
The judge also concluded the Justice Department had pointed toward enough areas of troubling conduct that raised the 'dangerous possibility' that Apple has turned the iPhone into an illegal monopoly.
In a Monday statement, Apple reiterated its position that the Justice Department's case 'is wrong on the facts and the law, and we will continue to vigorously fight it in court".
The antitrust lawsuit isn't the only legal headache threatening to undercut its profits, which totalled USD 94 billion on sales of USD 295 billion in its fiscal year ending last September.
Another federal judge in April issued a civil contempt order banning Apple from collecting any fees from in-app transactions on the iPhone that are funnelled through other options besides its once-exclusive payment processing system that charged commissions ranging from 15 to 30 per cent.
Apple also could lose a more than $20 billion annual payment that it gets for making Google the default search tool on the iPhone and other products as part of another antitrust case brought by the Justice Department.
A federal judge in Washington is considering whether to ban the deals with Apple as part of a shake-up being proposed to address Google's illegal monopoly in search.
Neals' decision to allow the Justice Department's antitrust case to proceed came on the same day that Apple was hit with a lawsuit by app maker Proton amplifying the accusations of wrongful conduct by the company.
The lawsuit, which will seek to be certified as a class action presenting thousands of developers who have made iPhone apps, is asking for punitive damages against Apple, as well as a court order to dismantle its walled garden. (AP) ARI
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why Canada made a u-turn on its contentious Digital Services Tax
In a bid to restart stalled trade negotiations with the United States, Canada scrapped its Digital Services Tax (DST) hours before it was due to take effect on Monday. Calling the DST 'a direct and blatant attack' on the US, President Donald Trump had on Friday announced the termination of all trade discussions with Canada. With the contentious tax out of the way, talks between Washington and Ottawa will likely resume. What was the DST? The DST was a 3% levy on the digital services revenue a firm made from Canadian users above $20 million in a calendar year. Controversially, the tax was set to be retroactively implemented beginning 2022. This would have had a significant impact on American technology giants such as Google, Meta, Apple, and Amazon — American tech companies would have had to pay roughly $2.7 billion to the Canadian government, if the tax were to be implemented, The New York Times had reported. 'The DST was announced in 2020 to address the fact that many large technology companies operating in Canada may not otherwise pay tax on revenues generated from Canadians…,' Canada's finance ministry said in its statement on Sunday. While the law had been passed earlier, payments were due from Monday. What does Canada's U-turn mean? Canada is the United States' second-largest trading partner after Mexico, and the largest buyer of US exports. It bought $349.4 billion of US goods and exported $412.7 billion to the US last year, according to US Census Bureau data. At the same time, it currently faces the steepest of Trump's tariffs: apart from the 10% base tariff imposed on most countries, Canada (and Mexico) face an additional 25% on all exports to the US, apparently meant to curb illegal immigration and stop fentanyl smuggling. Trump has also slapped 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Canada and 25% on auto imports. This makes getting a trade deal with the US a top priority for Canada. Scrapping the DST would help in this regard — Trump had been among its most vehement critics. Early indications are that Washington and Ottawa could meet the previously-set July 21 deadline for a trade agreement. Domestically, the U-turn is unlikely to hurt Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney, despite his election platform revolving around standing up to the US President. This is because the DST was not particularly popular in Canada either since it could have raised the cost of all kinds of digital services — from hailing cab rides to streaming movies. In fact, in recent months, many speculated that the tax's best purpose could be to serve as a bargaining chip in ongoing trade talks with the US.
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Apple iPhone 17 Air launch date: Check out the expected specifications, price, and more
iPhone 17 Air launch date: iPhone 17 Air debut is shaping up to be one of the most intriguing launches this September, as Apple prepares to unveil its thinnest, lightest iPhone yet. Rumors suggest the Air model will feature a sleek 5.5 mm ultra‑slim design, weighing just 145 g, and debut a stunning 6.6‑inch ProMotion OLED display running at 120 Hz, bringing premium visuals without the Pro price tag . The introduction of the A19 chipset and support for eSIM-only functionality hints at cutting-edge performance and forward-thinking connectivity. Yet whispers of a 2,800 mAh battery raise questions about endurance—can Apple balance slimness with staying power? This debut promises to redefine design priorities—let's explore what the iPhone 17 Air brings to the flagship table. iPhone 17 Air launch date (Expected) Apple usually follows a consistent launch schedule, and the iPhone 17 Air is expected to be revealed between September 11-13, 2025. Pre-orders could begin immediately after the official unveiling, and if Apple sticks to its traditional timeline, the iPhone 17 series may go on sale around September 19, 2025. iPhone 17 Air expected specifications Design and display The iPhone 17 Air might be the thinnest smartphone with its svelte design and skinny profile. The tablet is anticipated to have a 6.6-inch OLED display with a 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate for fluid graphics and rapid interaction. Camera According to leaks, the iPhone 17 Air would include a 48-megapixel "Fusion" rear sensor that produces excellent images despite its thin form factor. Customers can anticipate a significant upgrade to a 24-megapixel selfie camera on the front, doubling earlier iPhone models' resolution. Software and performance The new A19 chipset, which is rumored to power the iPhone 17 Air, promises superior performance and efficiency. It will probably come with iOS 26, which brings the new "Liquid Glass" design language and more intelligent AI capabilities to the entire system. Battery, color, and charging Sleek Black, Grey, and White color options may be available for the iPhone 17 Air. It might have a 2800 mAh battery that can be charged wirelessly or via a wire. With clever software optimization, Apple strives to balance mobility and power despite its small size. iPhone 17 Air expected price The iPhone 17 Air is anticipated to ship between September 11 and September 13, 2025, along with the rest of the iPhone 17 series, though Apple has not yet confirmed this. According to preliminary estimates, the beginning price in India is approximately Rs 89,990.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Judge allows antitrust lawsuit against Apple to proceed
By Michael Liedtke A federal judge on Monday rebuffed Apple 's request to throw out a U.S. government lawsuit alleging the technology trendsetter has built a maze of illegal barriers to protect the iPhone from competition and fatten its profit margins. The 33-page opinion from U.S. District Judge Xavier Neals in New Jersey will enable an antitrust lawsuit that the U.S. Justice Department filed against Apple 15 months ago to proceed. Neals has set a timetable that could see the case come to trial in 2027. Apple has sought to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing the Justice Department had distorted the contours of the smartphone market and made a series of other misinterpretations that warranted the case be thrown out. But Neals decided there is enough evidence to support the Justice Department's market definitions and concluded the case's key allegations merited further examination at trial. The case seeks to pierce the digital fortress that Apple Inc., based in Cupertino, California, has built around the iPhone, iPad and other products to create a so-called "walled garden" allowing its hardware and software to mesh seamlessly for users. The Justice Department alleges that walled garden has mostly turned into a shield against competition, creating market conditions that enable it to charge higher prices and stifle innovation. The lawsuit "sets forth several allegations of technological barricades that constitute anticompetitive conduct ," Neals wrote in his opinion. The judge also concluded the Justice Department had pointed toward enough areas of troubling conduct that raised the "dangerous possibility" that Apple has turned the iPhone into an illegal monopoly. In a Monday statement, Apple reiterated its position that the Justice Department's case "is wrong on the facts and the law, and we will continue to vigorously fight it in court." The antitrust lawsuit isn't the only legal headache threatening to undercut its profits, which totaled $94 billion on sales of $295 billion in its fiscal year ending last September. Another federal judge in April issued a civil contempt order banning Apple from collecting any fees from in-app transactions on the iPhone that are funneled through other options besides its once-exclusive payment processing system that charged commissions ranging from 15% to 30%. Apple also could lose a more than $20 billion annual payment that it gets for making Google the default search tool on the iPhone and other products as part of another antitrust case brought by the Justice Department. A federal judge in Washington D.C. is considering whether to ban the deals with Apple as part of a shake-up being proposed to address Google's illegal monopoly in searc h. Neals' decision to allow the Justice Department's antitrust case to proceed came on the same day that Apple was hit with a lawsuit by app maker Proton amplifying the accusations of wrongful conduct by the company. The lawsuit, which will seek to be certified as a class action presenting thousands of developers who have made iPhone apps, is asking for punitive damages against Apple, as well as a court order to dismantle its walled garden.
